By now I’m sure you know about the Connecticut Supreme Court’s Friday ruling. Four of seven judges said homosexuals have a “right” to marry. After being outlawed and stigmatized for thousands of years throughout most cultures and every major religion, sodomy has gone mainstream. An attempt to make respectable that which perverts God’s order of things…it’s a pity. But we are without excuse.
It’s like this: I tell you what God says about it. I pray for you. But I don’t care what consenting adults, homosexual or otherwise, do in private. I really don’t. I don’t want to know or have anything to do with your business. But I’m forced to know and to care, because certain people are pushing to redefine marriage in order to normalize what is abnormal and make acceptable what is abhorrent.
Did you know that in California, homosexuals can register as domestic partners and receive rights, protections, and benefits? But they want much more than mere rights, protections, and benefits. Homosexuals who want to “marry” in the traditional meaning of the word seek a societal stamp of approval. They want us to accept them as normal. They want “dignity” and “respect” for their unions.
At the same time, they want to shake up the foundation and build a new one. They want to strip us of our prerogative to make judgments. Anything we have to say contrary to what they desire is “bigoted” and “intolerant.” They are the only ones allowed to judge.
Not on my watch.
California’s a weird place. It’s a got a raging-liberal reputation, yet 61.4 percent of voters chose to ban homosexual “marriage” in 2000. In June, the California Supreme Court overturned that law 4-3. Four judges said the people’s will was nil. Consequently, over a million Californians signed a petition for Proposition 8, which defines marriage as between only a man and a woman. The measure will appear on the November 4 ballot.
I arrived in California too late to sign the petition, but I will be voting YES on Proposition 8.
Later…As expected, the ballot language presupposes that “same-sex” couples have a right to marry, which they do not:
ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAME–SEX COUPLES TO MARRY.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
No matter how hard you try, you can’t eliminate all instances of bias. 
By the way, if you can’t afford a parochial school, homeschool your kids.
Listen to this guy, a John McCain-supporting conservative living in California. Sounds like a male me. Parental warning: he says a couple of risque things, but overall, good speech.
Personal note: In California, adjusting. I like it. What I like even more is yet another publishing house editor interested in receiving a book proposal from me. Very nice. Working on it!
Last week I blogged about a study released by Planned Parenthood’s research arm, the Guttmacher Institute. Abortion rates have dropped to their lowest point in 30 years, but black women are still overrepresented among the statistics. In 2004, black women aborted at five times the rate of white women.
Matt Jones, a student at Biola University, GodBlogCon sponsor, wrote and directed a short film called “Choices.” (Click on link or image to watch trailer on YouTube)
Matt’s goal is to get his film, released last year, into high school classrooms.
Along with films like “Choices,” there needs to be an emphasis on abstinence in so-called sex education programs in government schools. The first “it’s my body” choice a woman (or girl) has on the road to “unplanned” pregnancy is keeping her legs closed. If, after she chooses to open her legs and have sex, she ends up pregnant, she has more choices of the non-fatal variety. She can marry the father and create a stable, intact family, and raise the child. If she doesn’t want the baby, she can carry him to term and give him to a family who wants him and will love and take care of him.
Killing the child should never be an option.
Totally unrelated note: This week, I’m preparing to leave my temporary home in SC and move permanently to Southern California. I’m taking a brief break from updating this blog. Thanks again for all the well wishes and kind words about my decision to leave DC after 10 years (more backstory).
See you later.
In his Sermon on the Mount, Jesus talked about the difficulty of following him. “Enter by the narrow gate,” he said, “for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.”
I’ve been a Christian for about 10 years, and last week I witnessed to a stranger, unsolicited, for the first time. The first time. I’ve explained to people what I believe and why I believe it when they’ve asked, but I’ve never initiated such a conversation.
I was talking to a man (an agnostic) at the Blog World Expo, and the conversation turned to religious beliefs. We talked about sin and judgment and forgiveness and salvation. To understand what he believed about these things, I asked a series of questions, listened to his answers, and explained what the Bible teaches. What bothered him about Christianity is its exclusivity.
“I am the way, the truth, and the life,” Jesus said. “No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6)
“I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.” (John 10:9)
We live in a country where it’s considered bad form to make statements about good and evil, and to declare a such thing as absolute truth. To make a judgment about what’s right or wrong is becoming taboo. Some are offended when we say Christ is the only way. “There are many roads to God. How can you say people of other religions are going to hell if they don’t follow your God?”
Actually, people are “going to hell” because they murdered or raped or lied, but the point is that Christ made these claims, and you can either believe him or not. There is no in-between. All this nonsense about Jesus being a great man or a good teacher is just that. Christ was exceedingly clear, and his statements were very simple. He spoke of two gates: wide and narrow. There’s no middle gate through which to walk. You can refuse his offer of forgiveness and face God’s wrath, or accept Christ, turn away from your sins, submit to him, and avoid his wrath.
Back in this blog’s early days, I used to “live-blog” events like speeches and debates. Haven’t live-blogged in a long time. Why break the streak tonight?
I invite you to “live-comment” tonight’s presidential debate. Discuss the candidate’s answers, appearance, and anything else of relevance. Topics of interest to me: immigration (McCain voted for amnesty, so I don’t know what else I’m expecting from him - very disappointing selection), the war in Iraq and how to deal with global terrorism, and the developing Cold War, Part II.
TV-less? Watch it live at CNN.com beginning at 9 p.m. ET. Live-blogging at MM, and trackbackers probably will do the same. Live-blogging and chatting at Hot Air.
As always, thanks for reading and participating on my blog. 
Rest easy, everybody.
Filed under: Conservatives, Liberals - Obama
Update II (9/27): Unlike Kathleen Parker, whose article I quoted below, I don’t believe Sarah Palin should drop out of the race, as I’ve been falsely accused.
Thread closed. Discuss the presidential debate (and Sarah Palin, if you must) in this thread.
When this election is over, I think I’ll return to digital music tech blogging. Smaller readership, less interest, and fewer commenters (understatement), but less tense and much more fun. Politics makes people…
So implied Congressman Alcee Hastings, an impeached former federal judge, to an audience of Jewish liberals yesterday.
According to CNN (also see this link), his exact words were (bad grammar included) “anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks…If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention.”
I’m no Sarah Palin apologist, but what Hastings’s said was race-baitingly foul, obviously. I wonder if anyone called him on it or at the very least, asked what the heck he meant. If I’d been there…It’s a strange thing to say. People who exercise their right to carry a gun and who hunt animals are racist?
Imagine a white Republican saying something similar about a black liberal candidate. Mainstream media would cover it morning, noon, and night. There’d be widespread calls for an apology and/or resignation. But they’ll treat what Hastings said as a curious news item, forgotten by day’s end.
Filed under: Comedy, Liberals, Lunacy
I’m a BIG fan of homeschooling, especially for Christians. Parents homeschool their kids for various reasons, but religion seems to be high on the list.
I think it’s a waste of time and resources to push for changes in the way government schools educate children. Don’t fight corruption and indoctrination. Get your kids out of there.
If you’re a homeschooling parent or considering homeschooling, check out This Old Schoolhouse magazine (see right sidebar and click on the ad). I recommend the magazine not only because it’s one of my advertisers; it’s a wonderful resource I’ve mentioned on the blog before. Other homeschooling resources:
- Classical Homeschooling
- HomeschoolBlogger.com
- The Well-Trained Mind
- Home Education Magazine
- Trivium Pursuit
Related posts:
If you’re a homeschool blogger or read homeschool blogs and other web sites, leave a comment with the name of the site and/or URL. Support homeschooling!
