You searched for:

"lila rose"

Conceived in Rape

by La Shawn on January 4, 2010

in Child Killing

Unlike some who call themselves pro-life, I believe an unborn baby should live even if conceived in rape or incest. That’s just the kind of extremist I am.

Carrying a baby conceived in a brutal, illegal, immoral, or ill-advised act has got to be tough, whether you want him or not. But this is where sacrifice comes in. The innocent child should not be murdered because of how he was conceived.

The Advocate is a student magazine created by Lila Rose, the pro-lifer who exposed Planned Parenthood covering up statutory rape and lying about an unborn baby’s development. In the Winter 2009-2010 issue is a story about a woman conceived during a rape. The five-page PDF file may or may not open. No idea why, but you can read it at Live Action.

Warning: to read the story, you must scroll past graphic images of fetal parts and an intact dead baby.

Rebecca KiesslingRebecca Kiessling almost didn’t make it. An excerpt:

“In 1968, her mother was brutally attacked at knife-point by a serial rapist in Michigan. The police quickly referred her mother to a rape counselor, who presented abortion as the only option. Abortion was illegal in Michigan at the time, but the counselor recommended a “back-alley” abortionist. Her mother refused the abortion due to the unsanitary conditions of these clinics.

“Rebecca’s mother was then referred to a more expensive abortionist, and she was told to meet someone at night near the Detroit Institute of Arts. The person would approach her, say her name, blindfold her, put her in the back seat of a car, and drive her to the secret abortion clinic for the procedure. Uncomfortable with these requirements, Rebecca’s mother decided to carry the pregnancy to term and put Rebecca up for adoption.”

The pregnant woman’s motives for changing her mind are irrelevant. That she decided to spare her baby is all that matters. It’s easier, I suppose, for a pregnant woman who doesn’t want her baby to kill him, rather than tolerating his presence for nine months and giving him to a family who wants to love him.

Lila Rose does it again.

The video below is part of Live Action’s Rose Acuna Project, which will document Planned Parenthood’s so-called counseling techniques. A Planned Parenthood worker tells an undercover “pregnant” woman her baby has only “heart tones” at seven weeks. “Heart beat is when the fetus is active in the uterus…can survive…which is about 17 to 18 weeks.”

Can you believe it? Where did she get that information? A baby’s heart doesn’t beat until after the first trimester? Abortion counselors are supposed to provide truthful information. As the video I linked to yesterday shows, the baby’s heart is beating at four weeks. Some sources say it starts beating as early as 18 days.

Then the counselor says the life growing inside her isn’t a baby.

“So when does it become a baby?” the woman says.

“At birth,” says the counselor.

I’m sure abortion counselors across America and the “pro-choice” in general play semantics games to downplay the truth. I wonder if the counselor in the video has children. When she was pregnant, would she have thought the life she carried was anything other than a baby?

Next, the woman asks the abortionist himself when “it” becomes a baby, and he says, with a straight face, I presume, “When you’re like seven months pregnant or so. Six, seven months pregnant. Right now you’re just a little more than two months.”

I’ll repeat that. A doctor, who knows he’s lying, tells a pregnant woman that the life growing and developing in her womb is not a baby.

I get it. I really do. The abortionist’s aim is to dehumanize the unborn child as much as possible to lessen the pregnant woman’s guilt and to accomplish (Ka-ching!) the killing.

I’m stunned, I must confess, that people really believe the U.S. Constitution gives women a “right of privacy” to do this, and medical ethics groups, or whatever they have, allow the wholesale slaughter of unborn human beings.

I better go now, before I say something un-Christian.

abortable at 12 weeksThe 22nd SFLA National Conference will be held on January 23, 2010, at the Pryzbyla Center, Catholic University in Washington, DC, my old stomping grounds. (Left the capital a year ago after almost 10 years, and don’t miss it. Much.)

Top 5 Reasons You Need to Attend the 22nd SFLA National Conference:

  • Find potential jobs and internships in the pro-life movement
  • Meet other student pro-life leaders from across the U.S.
  • Learn how to be more effective in saving lives on your campus
  • Participate in March for Life and other pro-life events the same week
  • Hear and meet national pro-life speakers and heroes

Check out the proposed schedule. No Lila Rose of Live Action or Erik Whittington of Rock for Life?

Read about both in my recent off-blog effort.

(Image: an “abortable” 12-week-old unborn baby from BabyCenter)

Lila Rose Is Getting Things Done

by La Shawn on September 22, 2009

in Child Killing

Young, full of energy, and passionate about protecting unborn life. I raise my cup of lemon ginger tea to “Lila Rose” of Live Action Films, Planned Parenthood-butt kicker.

This woman is making things happen. Compared to all the ruckus she’s causing, awareness she’s raising, and great things she’s accomplishing, I’m walking in place, staring at the wall! Sheesh.

As you may recall, she goes undercover posing as a girl knocked up by her adult boyfriend, and catches employees on tape advising her to cover up statutory rape. Her undercover videos have resulted in pulled Planned Parenthood funding. By the way, I put her name in quotes because I always assumed it was a pseudonym. Might be first and middle name.

Listen to her 2009 Values Voter Summit speech, given on September 18. To make women feel less guilty killing their babies, abortion mill workers dehumanize the life growing inside. Watch the video for details about “first trimester matter.”

Live Action Film’s “Lila Rose” and Alabama Attorney Troy King discuss Alabama Planned Parenthood’s illegal activities on “The O’Reilly Factor,” guest-hosted by Laura Ingraham. The country needs more AG’s like King:

You may recall my blog post about the Birmingham Planned Parenthood’s failure to report statutory rape. The abortion mill is making this too easy.

Whatever you tell us stays within these walls.

Live Action’s “Lila Rose” went undercover at a Planned Parenthood in Birmingham, Alabama. She told the employee she was 14, and the woman said she needed her parents’ consent to kill her baby. So far, so legal.

When Lila Rose hedges, the employee asks if she has an older sister over the age of 18. The “pregnant” girl says no, but that her half-brother is over 18. Does he have the same last name? He doesn’t. Out of luck. Or is she?

Lila Rose says her baby’s father is 31. Does the “Whatever you tell us stays within these walls” statement still hold? It’s mandatory in Alabama for clinics to report suspected sexual abuse of a minor.

Check out this Reuters story about “Lila Rose,” the college student who poses as a pregnant teen knocked up by her adult boyfriend and captures Planned Parenthood workers failing to report what’s presented to them as statutory rape and in some cases, encouraging her to lie about it.

'abortable' baby at 16 weeksU.S. News and World Report blogger Bonnie Erbe wants to know why the pro-life crusader hasn’t been arrested for trespassing or fraud, and – get this – Planned Parenthood has posted Lila Rose’s picture so its disgraceful workers will be on the alert.

#1: On the alert for what? As long as PP reports statutory rapes and stops encouraging teenagers to lie about it, what difference does it make who comes into the mill? Whether a sting operation or the real deal, as long as PP workers do what they’re required to do by law (and common decency, for crying out loud), what’s the problem? Unless they plan on continuing the “you rape ‘em, we muzzle ‘em” policy.

#2 – Instead of posting Lila Rose’s face on the wall, how about posting pics of the women who failed to report the rapes, alerting girls and women seeking “services” to stay clear of workers who’ll not only allow abuse to continue, but advise them to keep their mouths shut, too?

Lila RoseThe work of “Lila Rose,” the young woman who caught several Planned Parenthood abortion mills red-handed (pun intended) covering up statutory rape, is featured in the Los Angeles Times.

The article is biased in favor of abortion and against Lila Rose’s tactics, but I’m not hating on the Times. I’m surprised and quite pleased the mainstream newspaper wrote about the cover-ups at all. Hey, be grateful for small things. The more people who’re aware of Planned Parenthood’s stupendously hare-brained activity, the better.

The biased term “antiabortion” is used throughout the article. Obviously, the author believes abortion is okay. Otherwise, why not use “pro-life”? Because it shines a bright, revealing light on what abortion is: the death of a fetus. And pro-deathers prefer not to think of a fetus as a living human worthy of life.

Did you catch my bias? I call “pro-choice” people “pro-deathers.” I wear my bias on my sleeve and in my heart. I am neither impressed by sentiments nor persuaded by arguments that women should retain the right to kill their babies on demand. For whatever reason.

I am biased in favor of unborn life, not allowing women to snuff out that life because they don’t want “it.” Most mainstream media types are leftists who support atrocities like abortion, and it shows in how they choose to frame a story. I used to rant and rave about it. But I do the same thing. It’s human nature. Why fight it? I’m willing to give readers credit for being smarter than reporters (and freelance writers) think they are.

Takeaway for today: Embrace your biases!

And follow Live Action on Twitter.

I “tweet” more than I blog these days, so follow me for links and updates throughout the day.

unborn babyEt tu, feminists?

Much like its counterpart in Arizona, Planned Parenthood in Memphis, Tennessee, encourages a girl who says her adult boyfriend knocked her up to lie about it.

Lila Rose, an adult posing as a minor, caught an abortion mill worker on tape saying, “Look, if we keep this conversation I’m gonna have to talk to my manager and yeah, [your boyfriend]’s gonna get in trouble…And please don’t say that I told you this…Don’t mention it. Just say you have a boyfriend 17 years old…whatever.”

Lila Rose goes undercover to expose this atrocity, but there have been real cases of PP workers covering up rape. In 2002, a judge found Planned Parenthood of Arizona negligent for failing to report the rape of 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother, who brought the girl to the clinic twice in a six-month period. Too ridiculous for words.

One would think feminists who work in these mills and their “sisters” who support child killing on demand would be outraged even by the possibility that an adult male could get away with raping a female minor.

The only explanation I can come up with is this: Fetus-hating screws up your brain.

I’d loved to hear/read a feminist’s response to this question: Why no outrage over the exploitation of your younger, vulnerable “sisters”?

Fetus-Hating Screws Up Your Brain

by La Shawn on March 18, 2009

in Child Killing

unborn babyOkay, I see why some people would want to kill a fetus. Some believe he/she has no rights until he/she is viable. Others believe the mother’s right to do with her body as she pleases trumps everything. Reasons for wanting to kill a fetus vary from the most well-meaning (fetal deformity or life of the mother at stake) to the most evil (Just get rid of the thing!).

But I’ll never understand why grown “feminist” women overtly cover up the rape of young girls. Yes, that is more puzzling to me than condoning the slaughter of an unborn child.

I don’t care how developed their bodies may be. What does a 15-year-old understand about the consequences of opening herself up to an exploitive adult male whose only intent is to get as much as he can from a still-forming, naïve young girl who thinks she’s a woman? Feminists, more than anybody, should be all over Planned Parenthood for not only allowing the exploitation to continue, but for encouraging girls to lie about it. Aren’t feminists against the exploitation of women??? Good grief.

Perhaps the pathological disregard for unborn babies causes some “pro-choice” people to also disregard long-term consequences to a young girl of being taken advantage of by a grown man. The fetus if the focus. Everything and everyone else can go to hell.

In 2002, Planned Parenthood of Arizona failed to report the rape of 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother, who brought the girl to the clinic twice in a six-month period!

Lila Rose, a college student and pro-life crusader, poses as a minor to catch Planned Parenthood employees covering up statutory rapes. In the latest episode, Jackie Stollar of Live Action Films posed as a 15-year-old impregnated by her 27-year-old boyfriend, and Planned Parenthood did not report the rape. In fact, an employer told her that “everything is confidential” and that she wouldn’t say a word:

Related posts:

Abortion mills sure love the “choice” afforded women and girls in this country. In fact, they’re so eager to suck out that fetus, they forget to do things like call the police after minors tell them adult males impregnated them. They’re so hot for death, they fail to protect vulnerable young girls. Obeying the law is a pain in the butt sometimes. Or in this case, a pain in the gut.

UCLA student and pro-life activist Lila Rose of Live Action Films has caught on tape an abortion mill worker encouraging who she believes is a 15-year-old girl not to bring her 27-year-old “boyfriend” to a hearing required to waive parental consent to kill her baby. Does the nurse report the rape? No.

The abortion mill supposedly is investigating the situation. It’s investigating itself. Very useful! “We are conducting an internal, fact-based review to ensure that all our high standards of care and legal obligations have been met,” wrote Rachel Chánes, vice president of community services for Planned Parenthood Arizona.

Yeah, whatever.

Terry GoddardIn 2002, a judge found Planned Parenthood of Arizona negligent for failing to report the rape of a 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother. You won’t believe this, but he brought her to the clinic to have the baby killed. Planned Parenthood’s silence led to continued abuse and a second abortion six months later.

Most ironically, Arizona’s top cop, Attorney General Terry Goddard, is scheduled to deliver the keynote speech at an event sponsored by Planned Parenthood. The highest prosecuting official in the state is speaking at an event financed by an organization that breaks state law covering up the rape of young girls. Nice. His mother must be proud.

Front Row Seat for the Wrath

by La Shawn on December 17, 2008

in Child Killing

Finally, some legal action!

This is “old” news, but in case you missed it – Lila Rose, an adult posing as a 13-year-old girl, told Planned Parenthood abortion mill workers that she was carrying a 31-year-old man’s child. Did the woman call child protective services? Encourage the girl to tell her parents about the rape? This is what she said:

“I didn’t hear the age.”

As you should know, sex between an adult and a 13-year-old is called statutory rape. A felony. The “nurse” was obligated to report the rape, but her primary concern, obviously, was making sure the “child” exercised her right to have her baby murdered. Crime? What crime?

“I don’t want to know how old he is. Okay. Okay…I didn’t hear the age.”

Lila Rose went undercover at another abortion mill, told the same story, and got this response:

“I don’t care how old he is.”

The women acknowledged their duty to report the rape, but they both buried their heads in the sand and even encouraged the “child” to lie. Why? As far as they knew, the girl was 13, a child, for crying out loud! (Also see Lies and Regrets)

It’s senseless, and someone’s finally doing something about it. Indiana’s Attorney General says his office is investigating Planned Parenthood of Indiana. (Source)

Color me a cool shade of jaded, but I don’t think justice will be served. And I won’t hold my breath waiting for feminists to speak out against this flagrant lawbreaking and appalling disregard for the welfare of a child violated and taken advantage of by an adult male. Destroying the fetus is the focus of the pro-child killing movement. Think about it: a cause dedicated to snuffing out precious life growing inside a woman…how twisted is that?

I hope I get a front row seat to watch God’s wrath rain down on unrepentant child murderers.

(Hat tip: Dawn Eden)