Wealthy, liberal elites like John Kerry know what’s good for the rest of us. While they preach “tolerance” and “diversity”, they live as far away from black people as they can get.
Yet, they want to force their Marxist ideals on everybody else. Their vision of a classless society doesn’t apply to themselves, only to us ordinary folks.
A man living off the hard work of his wife’s first husband wants it to stay that way, make no mistake about that. But career politicians like Kerry study human weakness. Fanning the flames of class envy and playing on black people’s fears of “racist” conservatives are the quickest ways to get a sound bite (besides having sex with an intern in the Oval Office). Given man’s fallen nature, I wouldn’t expect anything more.
On the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, this is what the man of the people had to say:
“We have certainly not met the promise of Brown when, in too many parts of our country, our school systems are not separate but equal, they are separate and unequal.”
So why did this hypocrite, like so many of his elitist friends, send his kids to private schools instead of “integrated” government-run schools so he could help fulfill “the promise of Brown“?
“Today, more than ever, we need to renew our commitment to one America.”
Does he mean one race? One class? I won’t touch the “one race” thing, but does “one America” mean he’s ready to give up his wife’s first husband’s fortune so he can be “middle-class” like you and me?
“You cannot promise no child left behind and then pursue policies that leave millions of children behind. Because that promise is a promissory note to all of America’s families that must be paid in full.”
“Promissory note” is code for “your tax dollars will continue to finance bloated, failed social programs that make rich liberals like me feel good about ourselves.”
“We should not delude ourselves into thinking that the work of Brown is done when there are those who still seek, in different ways, to see it undone. To roll back affirmative action to restrict equal rights to undermine the promise of our Constitution.”
Equal justice before the law is more precise than “equal rights”, but liberals talk out of both sides of their mouths whenever they utter “equal rights” in the same context as “affirmative action.” There is nothing affirming about lowered standards, and the only action going on is discrimination, which, under our Constitution, is actionable.
When I ask liberals why they’re voting for John Kerry, the answers usually range from anger over “Bush’s war” in Iraq to those “tax cuts for the rich” to “He is not-Bush.” Nothing, and I mean nothing, positive about John Kerry or his agenda.
I have yet to hear or read a coherent argument why anyone who is not white and rich (and living in California, Massachusetts or Manhattan) would vote for an elitist, aloof, race-pandering opportunist like John Kerry.
But I’m a patient woman. I’ll wait until I’m 80 if I have to. But that’s it!
