
I’ve heard/seen all sorts of epithets for black conservatives, but porch ni***er is a new one. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review columnist Mike Seate was castigated for committing the crime of publicly criticizing blacks in a column titled, “Brothers, Don’t Go Messing Downtown.” In the column he wrote:
There are few times when I can recall actually being embarrassed to be black. One was when political writer Ward Connerly embarked on a campaign to end affirmative action (ah, the selflessness). Another came a few years later, when XFL running back Rod Smart jogged onto the field in the short-lived football league’s opening game wearing a grammatically challenged shirt reading “He Hate Me.”
Those infractions were relatively easy to recover from. But not shooting people in downtown Pittsburgh. That’s a screw-up this city and I might never fully get over.
If you brothers hadn’t noticed, Downtown isn’t exactly looking like floss city these days. Bums use abandoned storefronts for bedrooms, toilets and everything else. We lose new stores faster than shoplifters lose security guards. If y’all hadn’t noticed, a good bit of the city’s economic decline is your fault.
Yup. We have met the enemy, and he’s wearing corn rows, a Lakers jersey and a 9mm Glock shoved into his waistband. We can’t blame this one on the white man, an unfair economic system, or 400 years of slavery and oppression. This is our mess.
That’s some bold talk, Mike. Embarrassed by your brothers and sisters for their unruly and uncivilized behavior? And in the presence of whites who might be reading your column? And you say the enemies of black America are blacks killing other blacks and not rich, white Republicans from Texas?
How refreshing!
In today’s column, Seate writes:
People, don’t blame the messenger. Neither Bill Cosby nor I ever shot anyone Downtown. While I can’t speak for Mr. Cosby, I have not intentionally influenced black kids to drop out of school, dress like gangsters, carry guns or hang out on street corners instead of educating themselves and seeking jobs.
According to our critics, any crime or anti-social act committed by a black man is not his responsibility: “Africans were a peaceful people until the evil white man came and stole us away and remade our minds in his savage image,” one reader railed. “If we kill or rob, it’s not our fault. We’re only reacting to what the white man has taught us.”
If black people are this uncomfortable about staring our problems in the face or even discussing them, we’re in big trouble.
Excuses and scapegoats will always be easier than painful self-examination. Even Fat Albert could tell you that.
“Self-examination? What about white racists doing a little self-examination,” I can almost hear liberals whine.
Just a few minutes ago, I got an e-mail from a race preferences proponent who shared what he considered evidence of racism. An employer instructed a receptionist to mark job applications by race. Based on this episode, the e-mailer implied that applications filled out by blacks and Hispanics went in the garbage, though he couldn’t say so because he has no proof. For all he knew, the employer was marking applications to make sure he stuck to his race quota so he wouldn’t get sued.
The e-mailer concludes: “I realize affirmative action is not the perfect solution. But until we can wipe out the entrenched racism that is rampant in this country, or until someone can come up with a better solution (I’m all ears) it is a necessary imperfect solution.”
Here’s your answer, so lean in closer. Until people stop blaming others for their failures and accept some good old-fashioned responsibility, we can’t begin to address the problem of “racism.” Dealing with race discrimination, perceived or otherwise, is secondary to individual accountability.
If and when certain people engage in a little self-examination, per Seate’s advice, that’s all the answer you’ll get from me.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 33 comments }
I’ve heard the phrase “porch monkeys” used in both a racist and non-racist context here in Texas, but never that version.
Sigh, at any rate, it looks like the domino effect is picking up speed on this issue. I’ll be glad when the last
dominobarrier, to placing the blame squarely on the perpetrator, has fallen.Great answer La Shawn!!
Oh I can’t wait to read this one so I give my 2 cents. Man, look what that Bill Cosby done started!!
This is better than……forget it. (KIKI!! You better behave yourself, girl.)
Mike Seate, my new hero. Hey hey hey!
I’m glad to see this wave of reason hitting America. This kind of criticism MUST come from within because the majority of black people won’t put up with it coming from anywhere else. And they’re barely putting up with it coming from within. Amen, Mike Seate. Let’s help America by helping ourselves.
About this comment “Africans were a peaceful people until the evil white man came and stole us away and remade our minds in his savage image,” one reader railed. “If we kill or rob, it’s not our fault. We’re only reacting to what the white man has taught us.” . . . umm, said individual who wrote this should probably bone up on African history as to just who were the people who caught his ancestors who were so unfortunate enough to be on the wrong side and ended up on that boat full of white men in charge.
Lola, that’s kind of hard to do when one won’t read anything by dead white men, preferring to read the history of the world according to ebonics.
What chance did Kunte’s Mandinkas have against slave traders from Timbuktu?
But that’s OK. Ancient history is alive and well in Sudan and other islamic African countries.
Or how about that boatload of 400 some children stolen during the Sierra Leone conflict just a few years ago going up adn down the W. African coast looking for buyers. Seems like that went down the memory hole, since a quick google check brought up nothing
I actually saw Kweisi Infume tell O’Reily that he liked Bush and the problems with education were not his fault! My, my. It appears Mr. Cosby has started something.
Interestingly enough LaShawn this post could apply to anyone raising children today. We have so many parents that have abdicated their roles as parents. We have a generation of parents failing at being parents because it’s easier to have the school, the church or anyone else for that matter parent our children. It sickens me, I see it daily. We have celebrities dumbing it down for everyone and the world holding them up as the icons to follow.
I want to take a moment to echo cooper just a bit – it is one thing (and a good thing) that responsible black Americans engage in this self-questioning. But to be fair we must say that this is a problem throughout America.
Nobody comes up clean in this issue, and no one is worse or better than another on this score.
Why is it that the things that Blacks ARE doing are rarely mentioned?
For the same reason that the good Iraq stories are rarely mentioned. If there’s no bad news, then there’s no news.
Because the things that Blacks ARE NOT doing hurts us all and need to be addressed.
Beau wrote:
(KIKI!! You better behave yourself, girl.)
*musing* Kiki…behave…same sentence? (scratches head) Behave??!! What’s that? Oh, nevermind! I can’t do that!
Okay, here goes! Why is it that when Cosby stands up and says that black parent’s should teach their children, and that black children should be better educated, and that it’s not “acting white”, he gets booed and cursed and hated? YET…I’ll say it again…YET, when Obama(rhymes with Osama) says the exact same thing at the Democratic National Convention, all the blacks stand up and cheer him on and dance in the aisles. I believe that’s a double standard. It should be cheered no matter what. ALL CHILDREN, regardless of race should be encouraged to do well in school and to achieve. That’s not “acting white”, it’s just plain smart and common sense.
Sorry, Beau, I tried to behave. I lasted for all of 5 seconds. Whew! I almost exploded from the sheer agony of behaving.
What’s odd is that the pro-racial preferences person didn’t assume what was an equally likely reason: the Hispanic and black ones were marked so that they could be given preferences. In this day, that’s far more likely.
The black people who are upset with Mike’s article probably haven’t been to downtown Pittsburgh in long time. I rarely go down there myself because there is absolutetly nothing. Lord & Taylors, Lazarus, Claire’s, and other shops are gone. But there are a lot of jewelry stores, CD shops, Ghetto Gear stores, and people out in the streets selling incense and hair ballies. Parking is high. You have panhandlers on every corner. No one goes downtown for anything except to go to work. Everyone goes out to the suburbs to shop, especially to the new Waterfront in Homestead. The only people you see hanging out downtown are young black folks. The guys ride around in their cars blasting their loud music and the girls walk around half naked in packs. Who wants to be around all of that? If you ever come to Pittsburgh, Lashawn, don’t be suprised by how dead it is.
1) get educated (HS certificate PLUS real ability to read)
2) get a job and keep it at least a year
3) avoid sex until or outside of marriage (less fun) (no children outside of marriage)
3 rules for anybody in any group to get out of poverty within 5 years. Until black culture copies Asian culture (Japanese Americans went to concentration camps in WWII) on these points, black results will be less than the results of those who DO follow them.
The existence of racism has been used to excuse having too much sex, not getting up to go to work, and never doing school homework (too white).
I’m sad racism does exist, but its a lousy, and now 40 year old–too old — excuse for black/ Hispanic responsibility. Notice Asians are not counted as “minorities”, nor are Jews…
All I’ma say is “Thank GOD the state of P-A honors a Florida CWP. Let us lock & load ‘fore we head downtown. And might as well pack an extra clip or 2. Stay alert, stay alive.”
Nuff said.
***
And that Kiki……..I knew She’d launch a Scud.
(I should NOT be eggin her on like that, I know, but I need company. Bad girl!!! Hahahaha. Sweet!!)
Tom, break down Asians by subgroup and you will find some interesting stats that show the Asian model minority is a myth.
Because the things that Blacks ARE NOT doing hurts us all and need to be addressed.
They need to be addressed and many Black groups ARE addressing them. But if it makes you feel better to ignore that FACT, so be it.
Concerned Black Men.
100 Black Men.
100 Black Women.
Professional Black Men.
Addressing the problems. But conservatives won’t give them their due and highlight their efforts. Why? Because it’s more fun to bash Blacks than to point out whose doing it right?
The Burden of “Acting White”: Are There Race Differences in Attitudes Towards Education?
If you want to see a broad study that looked at the “acting white” stuff, read that link. Instead of what you think happens, you’ll find out the opposite.
But facts don’t matter.
What do you mean “conservatives won’t give them their due”? How, exactly, would conservatives go about doing that without pandering?
Conservatives could support programs such as vouchers, small business administration loans to minorities and women, hiring practices based on merit and achievement, faith based initiatives that have been shown to be much more effective than government programs, and equal (not race biased) opportunity.
Oh, wait. They do that.
Oh no she dih-in!!
Launched 5 missiles (by my count), one time?? First volley, too?? AND a direct target hit?
I can hear the Doom On You call from the forward observer:
Alpha 1-2, this is Bravo 2-3, fire for effect, polar, over….
FFE, POLAR, OUT!
Direction 1234, Distance 3456, over….
DIRECTION 1234, DISTANCE 3456, OUT!
Liberals in the open, basking in ignorance & false glory, 5 rounds, over….
LIBERALS IN THE OPEN, BASKING IN IGNORANCE AND FALSE GLORY, 5 ROUNDS, OUT!
Shot, 5 rounds, over
SHOT, 5 ROUNDS, OUT
Splash, over
SPLASH, OUT
(Boom, B-Boom, Boom-Boom-Boom)
End of Mission, Target Destroyed, Estimate Countless Liberal Casualties and some hurt liberal feelins. Waaaaah!! Waaaah!! Waaaah!!)
EOM, TARGET DESTROYED, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH
(NOTE TO SELF: Ms. du Toit….I LIKE her. Watch & learn from a pro, son, watch & learn.)
Beau, you got me crackin’up here!
Beau, you are in rare form today, but that’s why we love you here!
THANKS Mrs. du Toit (does Kim know you’re here? I’m sure he’d approve!)
DarkStar — do you disagree on any of my points 1, 2, or 3?
I really wish the Rep. Convention would feature more black conservative speakers. I don’t think any from the groups DS mentioned were invited to speak at the NAACP, were they DS? Isn’t it really the Dem Party black toadies that not only refuse to support any Black self-helpers who deny the need for gov’t support, but actively denigrate them?
I’d guess you ARE correct that some Reps like to bash blacks; I’m certain there are at least as many Dems who truly feel that blacks are inferior, merely by being black. They may even feel guilty about feeling superior, but they LIKE: moral superiority, intellectual superiority, and (secretly, unspoken in public) racial superiority.
Before starting to read the link, the facts ARE: that many blacks drop out (as Cos said), and
many that DO graduate are still functionally illiterate.
After starting to read the link, it seems that the theory is to be tested … where’s the executive summary? I’m NOT going waste all evening reading study weasel-jargon. Are they gonna conclude the studies show no “too-white” effect? Or that the studies which do show the effect are not good enough studies?
some 4 or 5 pages in:
“The NELS:88(90) survey includes a number of items concerning the student’s school expectations and work habits, as well as parental involvement. The evidence from these data, reported here, does not support the hypothesis that black youths tend to be more alienated from school than white youths.
Sorry DS — that’s NOT the hypothesis I postulated. I’m thinking fudge is coming, and time wasting.
But wait: “The first is based on simple averages, whereas the second is based on averages that have been adjusted for differences between the two racial groups with respect to several characteristics of respondents’ families: income; mother’s education; and whether or not the respondent lives in the same household with his or her father or other adult male guardian.
So the blame (blacs failing to learn in school — a FACT) is gonna be that so many blacks don’t live with their fathers? Maybe this IS more statistically true — meaning that abstinence and faithfulness are MORE important; but that’s exactly my point #3. AND the point most fought against by the pro-sex, pro-abortion, pro-condom, pro-sex ed (mis-)liberated rad-fems.
So tell me, please DS — why ARE there so many poorly educated blacks?
[maybe this was a good paper, but a pdf file would be better than Prev Next junk]
DS, I’ll echo Tom Grey. Abide by the 3 rules and one’ll go far.
For every one group that you point out doing right, there’s probably 99 more that aren’t being pointed out. Shall I throw in the groups I’m aware of and accuse everyone else of ignoring my faves?
There’s only so much mental bandwidth. I’m happy if I can just keep up with 0.99% of the do-righters. Even if I can’t keep up with the new introductions, I don’t mind at least getting the skinny on their angle.
For every Jesse we rag on, there’s probably 899 wanna-bees hoping to get their chance at representing victims. Are we equally discriminatory against them because we don’t “acknowledge” the 89.9%?
Instead of implying a conspiracy of omisson, how about something to the effect of “hey, heads up, here’s an interesting group you might want to check out and here’s why”.
Your comments are usually pithy–like O’Reilly likes them to be;). I
admireenvy those who can keep it pithy.However, pithiness don’t mean squash, if it isn’t brief and precisely meaningful. I, for one, usually end up feeling like I’m trying to digest the soft, spongelike, central cylinder of the stems of most flowering plants, composed mainly of parenchyma (non-supporting/-structural tissues). If I had some honey to go with it, I’ll probably get a better idea of where you’re coming from.
DarkStar – do you disagree on any of my points 1, 2, or 3?
No I don’t. Here’s something for you. I’ve heard “Black leaders” say the same thing.
I don’t think any from the groups DS mentioned were invited to speak at the NAACP, were they DS?
No. None have been invited to speak at a conservative event, either.
Isn’t it really the Dem Party black toadies that not only refuse to support any Black self-helpers who deny the need for gov’t support, but actively denigrate them?
That’s pretty funny. In Baltimore, Professional Black Men has been recognized, and supported, by Black Democrats. Go figure.
Before starting to read the link, the facts ARE: that many blacks drop out (as Cos said), and
many that DO graduate are still functionally illiterate.
And many graduate, go on to college, and graduate from college. In fact, the numbers and percentage of Black who do so, is rising.
So tell me, please DS – why ARE there so many poorly educated blacks?
I live in a majority white county. Blacks make up about 15% of the county. The county school report just came out for the county. Only one school in the county had a score where 80%+ are considered at level or above. Most were at 50-60%. No school in the county has a majority Black population.
Why do those students seem to be poorly educated?
[maybe this was a good paper, but a pdf file would be better than Prev Next junk]
instead of implying a conspiracy of omisson, how about something to the effect of ?hey, heads up, here?s an interesting group you might want to check out and here?s why”.
Why don’t conservatives, especially “Black conservatives,” do that for Black self help groups?
That’s my point.
It’s easy to attack the NAACP, but all that does is provide red meat to fellow travelers. It does nothing to show what is being done and what can be done.
I appreciate your concern (dare I say passion?) about all this, DarkStar. We need to hear a different perpective on these things. I’m so jaded with the way black groups normally do “self-help” that when I hear about one, I presume they’re encouraging blacks, subtly or blatantly, to rely on and expect government help. I just believe that in 2004, that is the wrong message to give blacks, especially young blacks. If these groups are truly trying to help people through some other means than government programs, I’m willing to check them out and write about them.
I’m glad you followed me over to the new site. I hope you know you’re welcome.
You’re in the D.C. area.
Check out Concerned Black Men and 100 Black Women in D.C.
Give them some press.
I am not too sure about (Tom Grey-Liberty Dad’s) comment re: blacks needing to emulate Asians to succeed. Blacks already have a long record of success on their own terms long before Asians arrived in any significant numbers. The problem today is that this past success is not being sustained and is in fact being disparaged by a dysfunctional liberal black culture both on the lower class “streets” and in the toney “suites” filled with “civil rights leaders,” whose main trust seems to be to beg for yet another round of dependency inducing government “programs.”
Let me break it down just as Thomas Sowell has broken it down. When Sowell hears whites speak about blacks “not pulling themselves up” he points out that this is a false impression. Sowell lays it out in his Economics and Politics of Race: “A far higher proportion of blacks in poverty rose out of poverty in the 20 years between 1940 and 1960 — that is, before any major federal civil rights legislation — than in the more than 40 years since then. This trend continued in the 1960s, at a slower pace. The decade of the 1970s — the first affirmative action decade — saw virtually no change in the poverty rate among blacks. In other words, most blacks lifted themselves out of poverty but liberal politicians and black “leaders” have claimed credit. One side effect is that many whites wonder why blacks cannot lift themselves out of poverty like other groups, when that is in fact what most blacks have done…..”
So both white liberals and conservatives are wrong when they shake their heads either to condemn blacks or to patronize them. The data is there. In fact the deeper you dig, the more you see. Check out what Sowell says in “Inside American Education” and “Race and Intelligence” as regards black education. These days the story is of dismal failure despite billions and billions spent in government “assistance”. But way back in the Jim Crow era, the brothas showed that they could kick a** on this front. In the 1940s for example in New York’s lower east side, working class black students held their own against white students of similar description for years. Sometimes the black test scores were a little higher, and sometimes a little lower, but never miles behind the way they are today. All black PUBLIC schools like Dunbar High in Washington DC prior to the “ghettoization” of the 1960s and 1970s, consistently produced test scores for decades equal to or above the white average.
As far as intelligence tests which some whites and others use to claim “declining” black intelligence, the data shows that the intelligence scores of blacks (along with other initially low IQ whites) have been rising for decades. As Sowell points out, it is the “norming” of IQ tests from their earlier baselines so that increases are reshuffled to yield a “normal average” of 100, that has concealed black progress. When progress is measured from the original baselines, in fact, whole nations have experienced rising IQs. There’s even more as you dig into the data. As far back as the First World War for example, black soldiers from northern states, places like New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Ohio scored higher on mental tests than white soldiers from southern regions like Georgia, Arkansas, Kentucky, and Mississippi. Want more? How about those racist theories of “white blood” being responsible for black intelligence? The data shows that the highest IQ blacks – the geniuses, the “brainacs” – consist of people of predominantly black African and Caribbean ancestry, that is, from populations that typically have LESS white genes than the general black American population.
So while Asian effort is admirable, and indeed worthy of emulation (by WHITES too, who score lower than Asians on things like math tests), black folk need no such “role models” to get the job done. The cold fact is that they have been doing the job for decades, long before any “help” by Great White Liberal Fathers and their black lackeys. That progress started to reverse itself in the 1970s and 1980s as many black communities descended into a chaotic mix of drugs, crime, out of wedlock births and other “progressive” things. You want more proof? look at black immigrants from the West Indies. Not only do they have higher average levels of income and education that Black Americans but in some cases, like the second generation, they surpass the white average. Again, black folk need no lectures from other groups about what it takes. The fact that they are despised by others on this score shows how far they have fallen from that earlier record of hard-nosed striving. Today we hear many excuses as to how “institutional racism” is to blame” and how “mo money” is “urgently needed” to “help” blacks. The historical record shows otherwise.
Get the irony? It is the “insensitive” conservative side of the house that has proven its case. They are not ashamed to talk about black performance, and indeed demonstrate that HONEST discussion shows a remarkable record of black achievement against all odds, while liberals try to hush up and hide any “bad news” regarding black performance with charges of “racism” and calls for yet another round of government “programs”. Kudos to LaShawn for her consistent, uncompromising stand on those who would excuse failure. The historical record, as proved by Sowell’s data, backs up everything she has been saying over the years.
DS, since you’re so passionate about the “uncovered” groups, my point was why don’t YOU add a little something to the thread, besides group-name dropping?
Speaking for myself, I’ve only got so much time in a given day, to check out new stuff. So what about Concerned Black Men, and why should I check it out?
If you said CBM is a group of business men that sponsor after-school activities, that would attract interest by some people, whereas describing the group as political, would draw others. That’s the honey I’m talking about.
I usually follow your links, but they usually lead me to a would-be political messiah. My own viewpoint is that without Christ as the focal point, it’s all for naught. But follow your links, I do, if nothing else just to see where you’re coming from.
Trevorwest, how about everyone needs lectures from every group?
We’re all one race, from Noah and Adam. The color of the skin is about as important as the tribal mark or artificial national border. in other words, stop worrying about “acting white” and hit the books.
Any success story needs to be told and retold as a role model. As you implied, “mo money” isn’t the anser, rather “mo personal accountability”. And only an honest appraisal can bring that about.
If you are piqued about my group name dropping, do a Google search for yourself to find out.
I think that’s fair.
“Concerned Black Men”
“100 Black Women”
“100 Black Men”
Comments on this entry are closed.