<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic Convention Highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Its not so much that i&#039;m offended, just that i&#039;m flabbergasted.  I mean, I know people tend to project their own views on what they hear, but I heard nothing of ths sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not so much that i&#8217;m offended, just that i&#8217;m flabbergasted.  I mean, I know people tend to project their own views on what they hear, but I heard nothing of ths sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Overlord</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>The Overlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 06:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-785</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;what convention were you watching?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aaww, shucks..  Me thinks you&#039;ve offended the poor wittle wibawal..

Hehe, great work Le Shawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>what convention were you watching?</p></blockquote>
<p>Aaww, shucks..  Me thinks you&#8217;ve offended the poor wittle wibawal..</p>
<p>Hehe, great work Le Shawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 04:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>what convention were you watching?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what convention were you watching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWG</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>AWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>[memer]&lt;i&gt;“You are now leaving the town of Reasonable Conversation. Welcome to Polemicland!”&lt;/i&gt;
Welcome to scenic Polemicland!  Population: memer. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[memer]<i>“You are now leaving the town of Reasonable Conversation. Welcome to Polemicland!”</i><br />
Welcome to scenic Polemicland!  Population: memer. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Robertson</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 23:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>LaShawn, great as always.
  
  But, you are very wrong about the Liberals being hostile to religious faith. Just ask any nice Muslim jihadist who he/she wants to take the White House in November...and it darn sure ain&#039;t Bush!!!!

  Isn&#039;t it wonderful to see how accommodating the DNC and their hacks- uh, I mean friends in the media are to people of faith?

  Well, Bin Laden, Al-sadr and Ibrahim Hooper&#039;s faith, anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn, great as always.</p>
<p>  But, you are very wrong about the Liberals being hostile to religious faith. Just ask any nice Muslim jihadist who he/she wants to take the White House in November&#8230;and it darn sure ain&#8217;t Bush!!!!</p>
<p>  Isn&#8217;t it wonderful to see how accommodating the DNC and their hacks- uh, I mean friends in the media are to people of faith?</p>
<p>  Well, Bin Laden, Al-sadr and Ibrahim Hooper&#8217;s faith, anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 22:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Rope-a-dope: in the spirit of bi-partisanship, Bush signs off on all the big-ticket items, in exchange for a coup de grâce later. 

On the conservative front, if dismantling or reforming big government is part of his strategy for 2004 to call the liberals&#039; bluff, I imagine that would rally true conservatives who felt &quot;betrayed&quot;.

On the liberal front, a couple of weeks ago, Steven den Beste wrote &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2004/07/Amasterstroke.shtml&quot; target=&quot;sdb&quot;&gt;A Masterstroke&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;...Even if the Democrats weren&#039;t revealing themselves as incompetent clowns, come October they would still find themselves in deep trouble.

So what I conclude is that the next Bush &quot;masterstroke&quot; is going to be the November election. The Republicans and the Bush administration have been biding their time, and conserving their money. They have been carefully accumulating political ammunition and have resisted the urge to expend any of it too soon. They&#039;ve laid the groundwork for a very effective campaign this autumn, and the Democrats are going to get routed.

Last October I wrote an analysis of the American party system and primary process and tried to show why it meant that the Democrats had no hope of winning the White House next November. In that post, I said:

    &lt;blockquote&gt;Any political position or locus of policies which is viable within the Democratic primary process will be fatal in the general election. Any locus of policies which would be even remotely viable in the general election (such as the one held by Lieberman) is fatal within the primary process. Like Groucho Marx, who said that he wouldn&#039;t want to belong to any club which would have him, the Democrats will refuse to nominate any candidate who actually would have a chance of winning.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I still feel comfortable with the analysis in that article. As a presidential candidate, Kerry is deeply vulnerable. The Republicans are carefully preparing the groundwork for a full-scale assault on his greatest weaknesses. Once they open up active hostilities, it&#039;s actually going to end up being very much like the other Bush masterstrokes, where everything changes permanently and no one can again look at the fundamental issues the same way...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bush posing as a Trojan chimp boy, until he&#039;s well inside the moonbat walls; stuff like this is what keeps my hopes alive. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rope-a-dope: in the spirit of bi-partisanship, Bush signs off on all the big-ticket items, in exchange for a coup de grâce later. </p>
<p>On the conservative front, if dismantling or reforming big government is part of his strategy for 2004 to call the liberals&#8217; bluff, I imagine that would rally true conservatives who felt &#8220;betrayed&#8221;.</p>
<p>On the liberal front, a couple of weeks ago, Steven den Beste wrote &#8220;<a href="http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2004/07/Amasterstroke.shtml" target="sdb">A Masterstroke</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Even if the Democrats weren&#8217;t revealing themselves as incompetent clowns, come October they would still find themselves in deep trouble.</p>
<p>So what I conclude is that the next Bush &#8220;masterstroke&#8221; is going to be the November election. The Republicans and the Bush administration have been biding their time, and conserving their money. They have been carefully accumulating political ammunition and have resisted the urge to expend any of it too soon. They&#8217;ve laid the groundwork for a very effective campaign this autumn, and the Democrats are going to get routed.</p>
<p>Last October I wrote an analysis of the American party system and primary process and tried to show why it meant that the Democrats had no hope of winning the White House next November. In that post, I said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any political position or locus of policies which is viable within the Democratic primary process will be fatal in the general election. Any locus of policies which would be even remotely viable in the general election (such as the one held by Lieberman) is fatal within the primary process. Like Groucho Marx, who said that he wouldn&#8217;t want to belong to any club which would have him, the Democrats will refuse to nominate any candidate who actually would have a chance of winning.</p></blockquote>
<p>I still feel comfortable with the analysis in that article. As a presidential candidate, Kerry is deeply vulnerable. The Republicans are carefully preparing the groundwork for a full-scale assault on his greatest weaknesses. Once they open up active hostilities, it&#8217;s actually going to end up being very much like the other Bush masterstrokes, where everything changes permanently and no one can again look at the fundamental issues the same way&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Bush posing as a Trojan chimp boy, until he&#8217;s well inside the moonbat walls; stuff like this is what keeps my hopes alive. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed the post.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the post.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Slater</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-769</guid>
		<description>I agree with David.  The current RNC looks mighty weak in regards to items 1, 2, and 4; from any kind of conservative perspective, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with David.  The current RNC looks mighty weak in regards to items 1, 2, and 4; from any kind of conservative perspective, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Part of the issue about body armor goes beyond cost.  It is an item controlled by State Department and you know how bad red tape can be.  How much more so when an agency is institutionally hostile to Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the issue about body armor goes beyond cost.  It is an item controlled by State Department and you know how bad red tape can be.  How much more so when an agency is institutionally hostile to Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Frenzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>'Frenzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-763</guid>
		<description>Great post. Looking forward to the next one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Looking forward to the next one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Walker</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Being a liberal means never voting to pay for military appropriations, and then blaming the Republicans when an attack on us succeeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a liberal means never voting to pay for military appropriations, and then blaming the Republicans when an attack on us succeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Education:

Contary to No Child Left Behind ain&#039;t funded rhetoric, Federal funds are over budgeted.

NCLB isn&#039;t giving out money for lack of funding; it isn&#039;t giving it out b/c no one has yet to meet the qualifications, let alone submit their mandated plan of action.  How is this Bush&#039;s fault when congress voted for it.  Is Kerry implying that he voted for the NCLB, before he voted against it by setting the release mechanism too high?

With regards to other sources of federal education funding, every State in the Union and DC is returning unused monies to the treasury.

Gotta love union leader Andy Stern for blurting out the truth about education, the need for charter schools, vouchers, etc and about disparities in labor classism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Education:</p>
<p>Contary to No Child Left Behind ain&#8217;t funded rhetoric, Federal funds are over budgeted.</p>
<p>NCLB isn&#8217;t giving out money for lack of funding; it isn&#8217;t giving it out b/c no one has yet to meet the qualifications, let alone submit their mandated plan of action.  How is this Bush&#8217;s fault when congress voted for it.  Is Kerry implying that he voted for the NCLB, before he voted against it by setting the release mechanism too high?</p>
<p>With regards to other sources of federal education funding, every State in the Union and DC is returning unused monies to the treasury.</p>
<p>Gotta love union leader Andy Stern for blurting out the truth about education, the need for charter schools, vouchers, etc and about disparities in labor classism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rae</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>You know, I read a youth biography of Booker T. Washington the other night.  While informative, it wasn&#039;t without bias.  It was subtly obvious that the authors disagreed with Mr. Washington&#039;s views.  It made me wonder,as we home educate and so know exactly what world view is being taught our children, what kids are being taught in government schools about affirmative action and those who dare to dissent with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I read a youth biography of Booker T. Washington the other night.  While informative, it wasn&#8217;t without bias.  It was subtly obvious that the authors disagreed with Mr. Washington&#8217;s views.  It made me wonder,as we home educate and so know exactly what world view is being taught our children, what kids are being taught in government schools about affirmative action and those who dare to dissent with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RepJ</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>RepJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Loved it, La Shawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved it, La Shawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/08/05/democratic-convention-summary/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Defense:

All things remaing the same in terms of actual battles, the death toll in 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and beyond will have been much higher.  Because everything that Kerry voted against, would have meant our soldiers would have to fight with older equipment.  

Where a typical RPG would have bounced off a M1 Abrahms, the M60 crew would be dead.  

Instead of the F-15/16, aircrews would be getting shot down in A-7s and F-4s.

And on it goes. Watch for Bush to come out with head to head stats on every weapon system that Kerry tried to kill.

Remember the heroic rescue by Jesse Jackson of the 3 soldiers captured by Serbia back in 99? The only thing that keep those boys alive was that they were in an armored M1114 Humvee. Had it been up to Kerry, they would have been in a Vietnam era Jeep and you know Jesse wouldn&#039;t even bother trying to bring back their bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense:</p>
<p>All things remaing the same in terms of actual battles, the death toll in 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and beyond will have been much higher.  Because everything that Kerry voted against, would have meant our soldiers would have to fight with older equipment.  </p>
<p>Where a typical RPG would have bounced off a M1 Abrahms, the M60 crew would be dead.  </p>
<p>Instead of the F-15/16, aircrews would be getting shot down in A-7s and F-4s.</p>
<p>And on it goes. Watch for Bush to come out with head to head stats on every weapon system that Kerry tried to kill.</p>
<p>Remember the heroic rescue by Jesse Jackson of the 3 soldiers captured by Serbia back in 99? The only thing that keep those boys alive was that they were in an armored M1114 Humvee. Had it been up to Kerry, they would have been in a Vietnam era Jeep and you know Jesse wouldn&#8217;t even bother trying to bring back their bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

