<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5thSister</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>5thSister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>Jeannie,
But a Pro-Kerry campaign would be like a compass at the north pole: pointing an all directions at once.  At least with an anti Bush campaign, they have a consistant message... something John and John cannot manage themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeannie,<br />
But a Pro-Kerry campaign would be like a compass at the north pole: pointing an all directions at once.  At least with an anti Bush campaign, they have a consistant message&#8230; something John and John cannot manage themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3259</guid>
		<description>Gosh, didn&#039;t the Democrats bring up Bush&#039;s NG service? And didn&#039;t the Dems also bring up this letter? Republicans would love to talk about the issues, but the Democrats keep bringing up stupid stuff to distract the American people. 

Here&#039;s an idea: instead of running an anti-Bush campaign, try running a pro-Kerry campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, didn&#8217;t the Democrats bring up Bush&#8217;s NG service? And didn&#8217;t the Dems also bring up this letter? Republicans would love to talk about the issues, but the Democrats keep bringing up stupid stuff to distract the American people. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an idea: instead of running an anti-Bush campaign, try running a pro-Kerry campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desparate dem</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>desparate dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t you Republicans talk about the issues?!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t you Republicans talk about the issues?!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanyogan</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>vanyogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Nothing about this memo scandal surprises me. I worked as consultant for a Russian energy firm in the past decade. My field is supply management and what I saw Russians do with invoices and import documents to get around their cumbersome import regulations was impressive. They basically recreated any documents they need after a reasonable attempt to obtain the documents legitimately or please the corrupt regulators inhibiting them. It&#039;s much too tedious and dull to go into but suffice it to say there is no document that can&#039;t be reproduced if the situation warrants.

Apparently Senator(Don&#039;t you have to show up to be a senator?) Kerry&#039;s campaign is in such tatters that they decided Bush needed to have a scandal on 60 Minutes so they created one for old Danny boy Rather...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about this memo scandal surprises me. I worked as consultant for a Russian energy firm in the past decade. My field is supply management and what I saw Russians do with invoices and import documents to get around their cumbersome import regulations was impressive. They basically recreated any documents they need after a reasonable attempt to obtain the documents legitimately or please the corrupt regulators inhibiting them. It&#8217;s much too tedious and dull to go into but suffice it to say there is no document that can&#8217;t be reproduced if the situation warrants.</p>
<p>Apparently Senator(Don&#8217;t you have to show up to be a senator?) Kerry&#8217;s campaign is in such tatters that they decided Bush needed to have a scandal on 60 Minutes so they created one for old Danny boy Rather&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: it comes in pints?</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>it comes in pints?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Satire Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;
[UPDATE: CBS gets in on the comedy by channeling Baghdad Bob: &quot;The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake&quot;. Guys, that ship sailed when Murrow died] Many other people are doing a fine job rounding up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Satire Roundup</strong><br />
[UPDATE: CBS gets in on the comedy by channeling Baghdad Bob: "The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake". Guys, that ship sailed when Murrow died] Many other people are doing a fine job rounding up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>If they are faked, and it looks like they are, then somebody created bogus military documents and forged a dead man&#039;s signature on them, to discredit a sitting president who&#039;s up for reelection, in time of war.  Somebody&#039;s head needs to roll.  America doesn&#039;t need its electoral process manipulated in this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are faked, and it looks like they are, then somebody created bogus military documents and forged a dead man&#8217;s signature on them, to discredit a sitting president who&#8217;s up for reelection, in time of war.  Somebody&#8217;s head needs to roll.  America doesn&#8217;t need its electoral process manipulated in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellbur</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>What I find interesting about this is that most people doubted the validity of the memo all along. It was really a rather minor component of the whole debate over Bush&#039;s military service.

I think that it will continue to be a minor component. Considering that there are hardly any other records to ascertain precicely what happened in 1972 (and all that we do have  might  be fake), I doubt that this will ever be a closed debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find interesting about this is that most people doubted the validity of the memo all along. It was really a rather minor component of the whole debate over Bush&#8217;s military service.</p>
<p>I think that it will continue to be a minor component. Considering that there are hardly any other records to ascertain precicely what happened in 1972 (and all that we do have  might  be fake), I doubt that this will ever be a closed debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avery</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/09/12/buzz/#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>ummm....Eagles, baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230;.Eagles, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

