No Pablo, pro-defense and proud of it. We believe there are things worth fighting for.

There is a covert war brewing in France and the rest of EU in general, such as rapes of infidel/non-devout,and a whole slew of violence and intimidation by islamic gangbangers (mini-me terroists) and condoned by many an evil mullah/imans. This has been recorded again and again by the Euro MSM and duly noted with alarm by government officials.

The anti-headgear law in France was driven not by religious animosity, but by the multitude of rapes committed against girls and women who “offend” islamic sensibilities. The goal of the ban is to strip the so-called devout females of their “don’t-rape-me,-I’m-a-good-girl,-I-am” headscarves, so as to make them indistinguishable from the bad girls.

Denial is futile. The record on dhimmism is strong and irrefuteable. Perhaps you should go to Dhimmi Watch at jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch and spend the rest of your free time TRYING to debunk the record there, instead of trying to bamboozle us. We ain’t buying it.

As for the rest of your screed; sKerry IS an extreme left-wing socialist in the mold of France. Your freetime might be better spent at the DU and partaking of their koolaid fest.

Your rantings about the military only shows that you haven’t a clue about the profession — for your edification, check out belmontclub.blogspot.com.

If Iran doesn’t back off, the war on terror will go nuclear!!! It isn’t necessary for us to use nukes; simply laying bunker-busting MOABs on any or all of their 15+ nuke sites will in effect make them no-go areas for years to come. Better yet, perhaps we should aim our HAARPs at them and play a couple chords and let that be a sonic warning to others.

Although our hands are “full” with Iraq, there is a line of thot that, pending the inevitable failure of diplomacy, taking out Iran’s nuke program could trigger the collaspe of the mullahocracy, allowing the moderates and secularists to take over the reigns of Iran.

Given the US demographics, it is a matter of time before the US becomes “brown”, so what. The issue is whether we’re a brown nation operating still under our original constitution, or we (led by dems) let an unassimilated majority transform the core principles of our nation. Either way, this doesn’t compare to the desire of the jihadiis to retake Europe by any means in order to restablish the great 3rd caliphate.

1.) Kerry is not a Socialist. There is nothing more to say in regards to this assertion than ‘wrong.’

2.) The ‘war on terror’ makes no use of the USA’s gigantic nuclear arsenal, and neither should it do so.

3.) As i said, Kerry is a lot less left wing than Conservative individuals and groups make him out to be. Including the ACU.

4.) There is no ‘battle’ in Europe between Muslims and Non Muslims, so you use of the word ‘triumph’ is flawed. Also, you typically assume every European Muslim is a rabid member of Al Qaeda. You are bigoted in your views against Muslims.

5.) Islam is a RELIGION not a colour. Your reference to ‘white’ Europe is therefore flawed.

6.) Compare the figures of European MUSLIMS to NON MUSLIMS. As hard as it is to believe, the majority of European Muslims DONT want to take over Europe and turn it into an Islamic stronghold.

7.) As for ’simple demographics’ what are your opinion on Hispanic Americans? They are the fastest growing group in America, and already account for a substantial percentage of the population. By 2100, will the USA be a latin American nation? Will the Hispanic’s ‘triumph?’ I hope this shows how ridiculous your assertion is.

ya. gimme that scrappy white house chef any day.

Yes, ACTIONS do speak louder than words.

The actions of the two men BEFORE the debate did do much to strengthen my decision that Kerry would be a poor choice for the White House. The news media reported that George Bush spent the day reviewing the damage four devastating hurricanes inflicted on Florida – a key state, and one that almost cost him the presidency in 2000. John Kerry, it was reported, spent a large portion of the day getting a manicure. There’s no mention of him stomping for votes, surveying the damage, or doing any thing else PRESIDENTIAL before the debates.

Actions speak louder than the shrillest words. President Bush acted presidential; John Kerry acted foppish. John Kerry acted the Boston Brahmin – above it all. George Bush acted the Texas rancher, understanding that helping a neighbor in a time of difficulty was not only morally right, but essential for both their survival. Bush “won” the debate long before the two men entered the television studio.

You ought to put up more of an argument than “Wrong”

You weren’t aware that an aspect of the ‘war on terror’ was anti-nuclear proliferation. You understand that BOTH candidates agreed that it was the most importent.

He’s a lot less left-wing than we would make him out. According to the ACU, TRIM, and others, he was among the MOST left-wing.

It [islamic Europe] will never happen.
Oh, no? As always, you facts are half-right. Europe IS secular, and we may be witnessing the death of Western Man in many ways. Who’s to say that Islam, with their birthrates vis-a-vis White Europe, will not triumph? It’s simple demographics.

“The Republicans should stop accepting the baggy-eyed Bolshevik as the moderator.”

I agree. I think someone like Lou Dobbs would be a much better moderator for the Presidential debates.