<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Word Was God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Harmon</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>Kendall Harmon is not a Bishop he is a Canon theologian, a parish priest and an editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kendall Harmon is not a Bishop he is a Canon theologian, a parish priest and an editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TxRascal</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-6288</link>
		<dc:creator>TxRascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-6288</guid>
		<description>DJJ...

The comments you hear from your Anglican friends could be viewed as a manifestation of the revival of Gnosticism...

An interesting (and timely)treatment on this very subject can be found at:

http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?p=2813

Incidentally, the blog &quot;titusonenine&quot; is authored by Kendall Harmon, an orthodox Bishop of the Episcopal church...

Additionally, an interesting series of articles on both Christian inclusion and exclusion, particularly as they relate to human sexuality, can be found at:

http://www.markdroberts.com/

Dr. Roberts is the Sr. Pastor of a Southern California Presbyterian church...

LaShawn...

The Gospel of John is my favorite book of The Bible... Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJJ&#8230;</p>
<p>The comments you hear from your Anglican friends could be viewed as a manifestation of the revival of Gnosticism&#8230;</p>
<p>An interesting (and timely)treatment on this very subject can be found at:</p>
<p><a href="http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?p=2813" rel="nofollow">http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?p=2813</a></p>
<p>Incidentally, the blog &#8220;titusonenine&#8221; is authored by Kendall Harmon, an orthodox Bishop of the Episcopal church&#8230;</p>
<p>Additionally, an interesting series of articles on both Christian inclusion and exclusion, particularly as they relate to human sexuality, can be found at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.markdroberts.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.markdroberts.com/</a></p>
<p>Dr. Roberts is the Sr. Pastor of a Southern California Presbyterian church&#8230;</p>
<p>LaShawn&#8230;</p>
<p>The Gospel of John is my favorite book of The Bible&#8230; Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belief Seeking Understanding</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-6170</link>
		<dc:creator>Belief Seeking Understanding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-6170</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christian Carnival XXXVIII, Part 1&lt;/strong&gt;
There has been a wonderful response to the call for participation in this week&#039;s Christian Carnival, with not only an abundance (34 posts), but a wide variety, a veritable smorgasbord of Christian posts. There are some contributors I&#039;ve met before,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christian Carnival XXXVIII, Part 1</strong><br />
There has been a wonderful response to the call for participation in this week&#8217;s Christian Carnival, with not only an abundance (34 posts), but a wide variety, a veritable smorgasbord of Christian posts. There are some contributors I&#8217;ve met before,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-6141</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-6141</guid>
		<description>Jim R, Sorry for the delay in responding, I misread your last post and thot it was an answer to the prior -- onscreen dyslexia.  

Regarding creation, La Shawn has links to &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Answers in Genesis&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; and &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Truth Be Told&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; (TBT archives Jun/Jul &amp; Sep), both sites cover the question in detail.

Regardless of the &quot;24hr&quot; days or &quot;millenia&quot; days theories, the sequence is clear, as laid out by Gen 1.  And yes that includes the dinosaurs which walked the earth in OT times.  Job 40 (behemoth), Job 41, Psa 74 &amp; 104 and Isa 27 (leviathan) covers their attributes, sustenance from God and extinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim R, Sorry for the delay in responding, I misread your last post and thot it was an answer to the prior &#8212; onscreen dyslexia.  </p>
<p>Regarding creation, La Shawn has links to &#8220;<strong>Answers in Genesis</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>Truth Be Told</strong>&#8221; (TBT archives Jun/Jul &#038; Sep), both sites cover the question in detail.</p>
<p>Regardless of the &#8220;24hr&#8221; days or &#8220;millenia&#8221; days theories, the sequence is clear, as laid out by Gen 1.  And yes that includes the dinosaurs which walked the earth in OT times.  Job 40 (behemoth), Job 41, Psa 74 &#038; 104 and Isa 27 (leviathan) covers their attributes, sustenance from God and extinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonH</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-5952</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5952</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,
Please explain why my question to Shannon was either nixed or never made it through.  The post was in dispute of the &quot;sinner&#039;s prayer&quot;.  Was it too far off topic, or did you just not like it?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,<br />
Please explain why my question to Shannon was either nixed or never made it through.  The post was in dispute of the &#8220;sinner&#8217;s prayer&#8221;.  Was it too far off topic, or did you just not like it?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>Let me expand on the intent of my previous post question.
Some believe the creation of the world as explained in Genesis to be literally six 24HR days.

If this is true, then the earth and all it&#039;s creatures were created at the same time, and evolution of the planet Earth followed by the evolution of life on its surface, would be false. 

What is your understanding of Gods creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me expand on the intent of my previous post question.<br />
Some believe the creation of the world as explained in Genesis to be literally six 24HR days.</p>
<p>If this is true, then the earth and all it&#8217;s creatures were created at the same time, and evolution of the planet Earth followed by the evolution of life on its surface, would be false. </p>
<p>What is your understanding of Gods creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-2/#comment-5914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5914</guid>
		<description>Were all creatures on earth created by God at the same time,
that is, with Adam and Eve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were all creatures on earth created by God at the same time,<br />
that is, with Adam and Eve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5912</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5912</guid>
		<description>La Shawn

Although I am a writer (recently completed a politically inspired quick read on the grass roots of our great country) this blog stuff is new to me.  As a committed Christian, how exciting to know someone like you exists for the rest of us!  Just sitting here listening to a lib talking about how his new book claims that Jesus was a liberal!?  We need folks like you to remind us of the truth!  Thanks loads... Deb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn</p>
<p>Although I am a writer (recently completed a politically inspired quick read on the grass roots of our great country) this blog stuff is new to me.  As a committed Christian, how exciting to know someone like you exists for the rest of us!  Just sitting here listening to a lib talking about how his new book claims that Jesus was a liberal!?  We need folks like you to remind us of the truth!  Thanks loads&#8230; Deb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>Stephen, would you care to explain what you believe to be the origin of sin?  

I&#039;m wondering: if God was once a man, then where did original man come from?  Who was the original man?  Why would Lucifer volunteer to save the children of Adam &amp; Eve?  Was it because of sin?  If so, who sinned first?

In contrast, followers of Christ believe that the trinity of God has always been in existence (I Am), but that angels were created, not born, to serve God, therefore they are not equal to him -- to be blunt, they are inferior to the Godhead.  Furthermore, angels are subservient to the bride of Christ/children of God that is the church, as embodied by the believers.  

At some point in time before creation, Lucifer (the most beautiful of all creation) had a case of God envy that lead him his fall from grace and, in the ensuing clash, was cast out of heaven along with a third of all angels.  Lucifer&#039;s sin was that of vanity leading to jealousy and culminated in open revolution -- in fact, the 7 abominations that God hates the most are the same that Lucifer/Satan relished.

After the fall of Lucifer, God in addition to creating heavens &amp; earth (universe), created Adam &amp; Eve, along with the original life forms in the Garden of Eden, and on the 7th day, God said it was all good and rested.  Every creature that came thereafter that were born of his or her parents in kind, not created.

Herein is what I believe to be the most fundamental dichotomy between the Bible and other theological tomes -- the origin of God, creation and sin.  Judaism and Christianity share a common ground founded on these three points. Beyond this, several Judaic denominations, ie Jehovah&#039;s Witness, Hasidic etc, then branch out according to varying interpretations. 

The next significant fork, which now defines the Christian, concerns the deity and incarnation of Christ and the blood redemption. This is the common ground shared by &quot;Christian&quot; denominations.  For all other religious groups, if Christ is not the raison d&#039;être, then they simply cannot be considered as Christian, however noble or &quot;similar&quot;.  

This is not to simply dismiss any other as positively wrong or evil on the basis of faith.  By comparison, Islam splits off at Abraham via Ishmael and only acknowledges Jesus as a prophet, even tho they claim that Jews and Christians are also people of the Book. The notion of any Messiah is also rejected; instead the koran demands that all others be subjugated to their belief system.  This is a concept that is neither found in the OT nor NT.  

However, as pointed out by La Shawn, since most belief systems claim to be the ONE &amp; ONLY truth, it is only logical that; either only one can be the truth or none at all, in which case atheists would be right.  Sincerely misplaced faith still misses the meaning of life, and there can be no 2nd place.  That said; there is no reason that civil people of differing beliefs can&#039;t meet on some common ground to reason out the truth as they see it, to perhaps persuade one another of the validity of their faith, or agree to disagree. 

I don&#039;t say this to be sanctimonious.  My beloved grandmother was a devout Tibetan Buddhist who could teach some preachers a few things about the Bible.  Yet after considering all things, she decided that life is endless misery until one finally reaches nirvana.  If her way IS the truth, then she has since been reincarnated into who knows what or who, while I&#039;m doomed to reincarnation as probably a gnat.  

Either that or Osama is now enjoying his 72 virgins.  Or Madeline O&#039;Hara is nothingness, or that UFO suicide cult is surfin&#039; with the alien on some galactic starship.  

In any case, it is simply not logical that all belief systems are equally true, or that all paths lead to heaven.  It then becomes the responsibility of the individual to seek out the truth for himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, would you care to explain what you believe to be the origin of sin?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering: if God was once a man, then where did original man come from?  Who was the original man?  Why would Lucifer volunteer to save the children of Adam &#038; Eve?  Was it because of sin?  If so, who sinned first?</p>
<p>In contrast, followers of Christ believe that the trinity of God has always been in existence (I Am), but that angels were created, not born, to serve God, therefore they are not equal to him &#8212; to be blunt, they are inferior to the Godhead.  Furthermore, angels are subservient to the bride of Christ/children of God that is the church, as embodied by the believers.  </p>
<p>At some point in time before creation, Lucifer (the most beautiful of all creation) had a case of God envy that lead him his fall from grace and, in the ensuing clash, was cast out of heaven along with a third of all angels.  Lucifer&#8217;s sin was that of vanity leading to jealousy and culminated in open revolution &#8212; in fact, the 7 abominations that God hates the most are the same that Lucifer/Satan relished.</p>
<p>After the fall of Lucifer, God in addition to creating heavens &#038; earth (universe), created Adam &#038; Eve, along with the original life forms in the Garden of Eden, and on the 7th day, God said it was all good and rested.  Every creature that came thereafter that were born of his or her parents in kind, not created.</p>
<p>Herein is what I believe to be the most fundamental dichotomy between the Bible and other theological tomes &#8212; the origin of God, creation and sin.  Judaism and Christianity share a common ground founded on these three points. Beyond this, several Judaic denominations, ie Jehovah&#8217;s Witness, Hasidic etc, then branch out according to varying interpretations. </p>
<p>The next significant fork, which now defines the Christian, concerns the deity and incarnation of Christ and the blood redemption. This is the common ground shared by &#8220;Christian&#8221; denominations.  For all other religious groups, if Christ is not the raison d&#8217;être, then they simply cannot be considered as Christian, however noble or &#8220;similar&#8221;.  </p>
<p>This is not to simply dismiss any other as positively wrong or evil on the basis of faith.  By comparison, Islam splits off at Abraham via Ishmael and only acknowledges Jesus as a prophet, even tho they claim that Jews and Christians are also people of the Book. The notion of any Messiah is also rejected; instead the koran demands that all others be subjugated to their belief system.  This is a concept that is neither found in the OT nor NT.  </p>
<p>However, as pointed out by La Shawn, since most belief systems claim to be the ONE &#038; ONLY truth, it is only logical that; either only one can be the truth or none at all, in which case atheists would be right.  Sincerely misplaced faith still misses the meaning of life, and there can be no 2nd place.  That said; there is no reason that civil people of differing beliefs can&#8217;t meet on some common ground to reason out the truth as they see it, to perhaps persuade one another of the validity of their faith, or agree to disagree. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t say this to be sanctimonious.  My beloved grandmother was a devout Tibetan Buddhist who could teach some preachers a few things about the Bible.  Yet after considering all things, she decided that life is endless misery until one finally reaches nirvana.  If her way IS the truth, then she has since been reincarnated into who knows what or who, while I&#8217;m doomed to reincarnation as probably a gnat.  </p>
<p>Either that or Osama is now enjoying his 72 virgins.  Or Madeline O&#8217;Hara is nothingness, or that UFO suicide cult is surfin&#8217; with the alien on some galactic starship.  </p>
<p>In any case, it is simply not logical that all belief systems are equally true, or that all paths lead to heaven.  It then becomes the responsibility of the individual to seek out the truth for himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>To those who directed questions to me; I hope you were satisfied with the answers given by the others.

However, I can&#039;t stress enough that there is no such thing as a stupid question as pertains to the Bible. After all Nicodemus asked Jesus if being born again was meant to be literal.  We Siblings-In-Christ who hang out at La Shawn&#039;s corner will do our best to reason with you from the Scriptures.  

Have no fear, we won&#039;t bite and rest assured, we only save our sarcasm for inane politics :)

&lt;strong&gt;Act 17:11&lt;/strong&gt;  These (Bereans) were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word (from Paul &amp; Silas) with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so. 
(IOW, the Bereans put Paul &amp; Silas on the spot to ensure that their testimony was true to the Scriptures -- if you&#039;re not familiar with the verse, you should read the whole chapter)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who directed questions to me; I hope you were satisfied with the answers given by the others.</p>
<p>However, I can&#8217;t stress enough that there is no such thing as a stupid question as pertains to the Bible. After all Nicodemus asked Jesus if being born again was meant to be literal.  We Siblings-In-Christ who hang out at La Shawn&#8217;s corner will do our best to reason with you from the Scriptures.  </p>
<p>Have no fear, we won&#8217;t bite and rest assured, we only save our sarcasm for inane politics <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Act 17:11</strong>  These (Bereans) were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word (from Paul &#038; Silas) with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.<br />
(IOW, the Bereans put Paul &#038; Silas on the spot to ensure that their testimony was true to the Scriptures &#8212; if you&#8217;re not familiar with the verse, you should read the whole chapter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>&quot;Srephen&quot; is &quot;Stephen&quot;, everybody. Misspelling. 

Hi, Shannon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Srephen&#8221; is &#8220;Stephen&#8221;, everybody. Misspelling. </p>
<p>Hi, Shannon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>HOW YOU MAY RECEIVE CHRIST AS SAVIOR

To begin your relationship with God and to establish your place in heaven, you must begin by praying (talking to God). Below is an example of a simple prayer that will help you know what to say when you talk to God.

&quot;God, I realize I need a Savior. I confess that I have sinned and I know that my sin will keep me out of heaven. I realize there is not one single thing I can do to earn my way into Your heaven.  Right now I am placing all, 100 percent of my trust, in Christ&#039;s death on the cross and resurrection from the dead as payment for my sin. I now accept you as my Lord and Savior, and I commit my life to you. Thank you for forgiving me and giving me your Holy Spirit.&quot;

This is from Charles Stanley&#039;s website, Intouch.org. If you prayed this prayer or want more information please visit intouch.org.

Love in Christ,
Shannon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW YOU MAY RECEIVE CHRIST AS SAVIOR</p>
<p>To begin your relationship with God and to establish your place in heaven, you must begin by praying (talking to God). Below is an example of a simple prayer that will help you know what to say when you talk to God.</p>
<p>&#8220;God, I realize I need a Savior. I confess that I have sinned and I know that my sin will keep me out of heaven. I realize there is not one single thing I can do to earn my way into Your heaven.  Right now I am placing all, 100 percent of my trust, in Christ&#8217;s death on the cross and resurrection from the dead as payment for my sin. I now accept you as my Lord and Savior, and I commit my life to you. Thank you for forgiving me and giving me your Holy Spirit.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is from Charles Stanley&#8217;s website, Intouch.org. If you prayed this prayer or want more information please visit intouch.org.</p>
<p>Love in Christ,<br />
Shannon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5883</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5883</guid>
		<description>Let me weigh in and add a point.  Mormons, Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses, Muslims et al violate one clear point referenced at least twice in the Bible:  Proberbs 30:5,6 reads- &quot;Every word of God is tested.  He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.  Do not add to His words lest He reprove you, and you be proved a liar.&quot;  There is another reference in Revleations.  You cannot add, nor take away from the Bible.  It is the RESOLUTE word of God.  Period.  All non-Christian religions do this, and are therefore by their own doctrine NOT Christian.  There are many other points to argue relevance on, but I&#039;m sure those will be argued on this blog soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me weigh in and add a point.  Mormons, Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses, Muslims et al violate one clear point referenced at least twice in the Bible:  Proberbs 30:5,6 reads- &#8220;Every word of God is tested.  He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.  Do not add to His words lest He reprove you, and you be proved a liar.&#8221;  There is another reference in Revleations.  You cannot add, nor take away from the Bible.  It is the RESOLUTE word of God.  Period.  All non-Christian religions do this, and are therefore by their own doctrine NOT Christian.  There are many other points to argue relevance on, but I&#8217;m sure those will be argued on this blog soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJJ</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5881</link>
		<dc:creator>DJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5881</guid>
		<description>LaShawn I hear this all the time- most recently from some Anglican friends who lament all the turmoil over gay marriage. Surely they argue, love would withhold judgemental thinking in such cases. Don&#039;t take my word for it, even the top guy, the Anglican Archbishop wonders about the &quot;tide of intolerance&quot; in various speeches. It is interesting to see the difference of views between the Anglican or Episcopalian white Western church leaders and the black Anglican/Episcopalian church leaders of Africa on these matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn I hear this all the time- most recently from some Anglican friends who lament all the turmoil over gay marriage. Surely they argue, love would withhold judgemental thinking in such cases. Don&#8217;t take my word for it, even the top guy, the Anglican Archbishop wonders about the &#8220;tide of intolerance&#8221; in various speeches. It is interesting to see the difference of views between the Anglican or Episcopalian white Western church leaders and the black Anglican/Episcopalian church leaders of Africa on these matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/comment-page-1/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/03/word/#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,
This reminds me of the most common fallacy I hear from others about Catholicism: that you could confess on your death bed to being worse than Bundy, Gacey and Dahmer combined, say you&#039;re sorry, and all will be well...
Why people think you can take one verse or snippet of the Bible and extend it to interperet an entire faith(s) is beyond me... it seems like saying &quot;I heard that penicillin can cure infections.  Cancer is like an infection, therefore I can use penicillin to cure cancer&quot;.
It just doesn&#039;t work that way. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,<br />
This reminds me of the most common fallacy I hear from others about Catholicism: that you could confess on your death bed to being worse than Bundy, Gacey and Dahmer combined, say you&#8217;re sorry, and all will be well&#8230;<br />
Why people think you can take one verse or snippet of the Bible and extend it to interperet an entire faith(s) is beyond me&#8230; it seems like saying &#8220;I heard that penicillin can cure infections.  Cancer is like an infection, therefore I can use penicillin to cure cancer&#8221;.<br />
It just doesn&#8217;t work that way. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
