The Oil-For-Food Stuff And Other Thievery

Blogs for Bush has some pretty gloomy comments about this, some even suggesting a coming “rebellion” when Bush wins! It’s a frightening trend that I lay at the feet of MSM & Michael Mooreon, not to mention the willing accomplice of Terry McAwful! Their vitriol has poisoned our country!

Oil for Food is not going to be vigorously investigated until after the election, because of the strong ties between sKerry and the UN. What they know so far is that the dirty hands extend clear up to Kofi Annan’s son!

http://www.acepilots.com/unscam/ is a blog dedicated to UNSCAM. It’s been up and running ever since last Feb/Mar 04. I used to follow it, but the details of avarice and greed is so disgusting that I couldn’t bear to keep tabs on it any more — around the time Kofi appointed Volcker & Co. I figure that the UN, France, Germany, Russia and other players are guilty as charged, the only question is how much so. Saddam got at least $10B. Should Bush win re-election, things should get interesting with regards to what the US & Iraq are going to do about it.

Simple explanation of a complicated scan.

1-Saddam sold oil cheap to friends, who gave him a cash cut of their discount. (Stealing from the register).

2- Saddam paid to much for food, etc. His suppliers gave him cash kickbacks on the overcharges.

3- The U.N. people in charge of preventing these scams didn’t, were they paid off? That’s what the investigation is about.

4- The total amount of cash he stole from this program set up to feed the poor sets a world record, his loot pile may not be surpassed for centuries.

Bush can EASILY handle WMD issue. Don’t believe the hype.

Americans for Bush, calm down and understand that we are 20 something days out and Democrat desperation is setting in. heck, in the VP debate, John Edwards even resorted to invoking the names of MLK Jr. and Nelson Mandela. When the Donks play the race card, you know they are getting whupped.

The media is in full campaign for Kerry mode. HOLD THE LINE!!! The enemy is in final assault mode. HOLD THE LINE!!!!

George W. Bush simply has to use the following in his debate to defuse this non-issue:

Ø 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 changed EVERYTHING

Ø After 9/11/01, the POTUS could no longer assume things, he had to take action when directly threatened by our enemies not matter whether fully vetted or not.

Ø Saddam may not have had the actual weapons stockpiles ready at the fire, but Bush never said he did. He said he could reconstitute and THEN be ready to immediately deploy the weapons. Bush was correct not to take chances with this fool after 9/11. Trusting the UN to find weapons is like trusting Richard Simmons to find his manhood.

Ø Saddam Hussein was paying the families of homicide bombers in Israel and thus had a DIRECT hand in causing death and mayhem outside the borders of Iraq. He was therefore a qualified international threat on that evidence alone.

Ø Saddam Hussein did harbor terrorists whom he could have passed weapons onto. One of the world’s most notorious terrorists, Abu Nidal was living in and recently died in Baghdad. Other were there as well. Al Qaeda was well represented in Iraq.

Ø The latest report did however say that Saddam was simply waiting for the coast to clear before he would reconstitute his WMD programs. President Bush’s “pre-emptive” action not only prevented that, but destroyed the infrastructure necessary to do it.

Ø MANY TRUCKS WITH UNKNOWN CONTENTS HEADED QUICKLY INTO SYRIA PRECEEDING THE BATTLE. Numerous reports from international sources indicate the STRONG possibility that Saddam Hussein hid weapons in the Bekaa Valley in much the same way he flew his fighter jets into Iran in order to keep them away from US bombs and missiles.

Ø America under Democrat leadership had been attacked repeatedly with no response and continuing that cowardice only emboldened the enemy up to and including the 9/11 attacks.

Ø 3000 Americans died on 9/11 and none have died in the US since and when even ONE American is killed, the US is within its God given rights to destroy anything, anyone, any group or any nation even remotely involved.

Ø HINDSIGHT IS 20/20. Monday morning quarterbacking does not make America safe and tough talk doesn’t kill terrorists. Soldiers, bombs, planes, bullets and a President with conviction, honor and the vision and moral grounding to lead this nation is what kills terrorists.

This morning on the Mark Larsen Morning Magazine on radio AM 1040 in Tampa, a caller named “Chris” made a brilliant point that of course bristled (as evidenced by his quick dismissal of the caller) the increasingly anti-Bush commentator Larsen. In fairness to Larsen, he says he is going to hold his nose and vote for Bush in that he “supports” the troops.

The caller Chris said and I am paraphrasing, that US intelligence gathering entities operate under call signs such as CIA, FBI, NSA, ATF and DEA while the terrorists operate and spread their propaganda under the call signs ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and Fox. He said the incessant running of negative footage in Iraq and the blatant campaigning the networks are doing for John Kerry in order to defeat Bush is what is getting our soldiers killed. I thought the comment was on highly on point. I only wish President Bush could use it. Then again, I wish President Bush would take it to Kerry’s grill when he insults this nation and our troops, but……anyway Bush can handle this issue EASILY if he reaches down, grabs ‘em and use the points he has already made and that I reiterated above.

Raymond C. Coleman

Tampa, FL

My car was keyed in a Wal-mart parking lot and the only reason I can think of was the Bush/Cheney bumper sticker. I guess the punishment for people who do those things is that they have to be themselves for life.

legalxxx.blogspot.com links to a Washington Times article detailing French complicity in Oil-for-Food. Hammers the Kerry idea of global test.

I agree 100% Stephen and I think the American people see his steely will as well and perfer it to jelly-like or at best, semi-cartilaginous spined show horse in these periolous times. Better to blow up a mosque and be wrong, than not blow it up and it turn out to be the operations center of the next attack on a US city.

Excellent point Stephen, courage thru restraint. It may cost us in the short run, but pays off in the long.

Last night, I was listening to Mike Gallagher on the radio, and 2 calls in a row were people calling in to say that their cars had been vandalized because they had Bush/Cheney stickers on them. One man had his car hit and the air let out of his tires, and the other woman had the back end of her Suburban crushed in. Ahhh…these are the “peaceful” people doing this. These are the Dems. who are sooooooooo against violence.

I was also on Instapundit, and he linked to a Liberal site where they were discussing the shooting of the Republican Headquarters in Tennessee, I believe. One poster couldn’t understand what the big deal was since no one was hurt or killed. Nice sentiment.(Sarcasm) However, I did like the one poster on there that said to all the previous foul-mouthed, hateful posters, “You do realize that those people (Republicans) probably pack more heat than you do, and can use it better?”. Very astute observation.

Hey, Ray there is something called the Law of Armed Conflict, we as Americans will follow this law if fighting for the military, no one wants to be found breaking any of these laws and be subject to the UCMJ. It’s not worth it. I believe the Iraqis will have to step it up! Bush will win the election in November.

UCMJ does not apply to the Commander-in-Chief. AND more importantly, the so called “Laws” of armed conflict were written before the diaperheads started their jihad again.

islam-facsist terrors has de facto re-written ALL rules of engagement. The Geneva Convention doesn’t even apply anymore and since we are the ONLY country that really ever adhered to its tenets, to hell with rules when your people are being killed by these devils via some of the most vile and underhanded tactics ever.

To beat the enemy, you become more mean, viscious, evil, wicked and nasty than the enemy.

SCSI; Agreed. Emotionally it would feel most gratifying, however, cold logic must prevail. It makes no sense to vent our emotional rage unchecked only to suffer longterm damages later.

What if there were no My Lai and other atrocities committed? That should be the lesson of Nam. Fight hard, but fair, even if it means we take on collateral damage as a result of restraint.

We hold to certain laws of war, even if it’s unilateral, to spare the women & children whenever possible, not destroy hospitals and houses of worship. It’s one thing to inadvertantly destroy such with dumb bombs, but we’re technologically at the point where such acts are but an artifact of history.

And yes the UCMJ will bust ANYONE from JCS down to the private for such violations. This does not mean that we will never ever deliberately bomb a church or hospital, but that decision can only be made at a higher pay scale than SecDef.

It is exactly because Afghanistan DIDN’T have oil that Russia, Germany, and France (and liberal Democrats) didn’t mind American soldiers spilling blood there.

When oil was present and an issue (Iraq) they squeeled like the fattened-on-oil-kickback pigs they are.

Also read:

‘Inside the Asylum: Why the United Nations and Old Europe Are Worse Than You Think’
by Jed Babbin (Former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense)

I am about halfway through it. Very good book.

Agreed Joshua. Agreed indeed.

Raymond, what about women

Don’t worry, I’ve been responsible for other’s safety & security for a good couple decades. For all we know, you might have even been under my responsibilty a time or two, although not battle-tested. Just my luck to have missed out on various engagements. I might have been at the wrong place, at the wrong time, but I doubt the wrong man.

Peace!

Agreed SCSI

Bush is not killing enough people and breaking enough hardware and buildings for this to be considered a war. We need someone who is totally offensive minded to prosecute this war. Someone like me, Gen. George S. Patton or Coach Steve Spurrier. LOL!!

OH, that is what I thought you were implying.

And your “ifs” would never be confirmed on a workable level. The fact of the matter is that a woman even at her best is probably only as strong as a below to average man. At least with that below to average man, I can still work on him to make him stronger, faster,and better. The girl is maxed out and useless.

The standard was what it was to insure a qualified soldier. It was never created to keep girls out. Now it is lower and we see the results. Lawsuits, rapes, false claims of rape, pregancies, STD, etc. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

I agree with most of what you posted Scuzzy!

Let qualified women in but KEEP THEM SEPARATE from the men. Form the “Pink Berets” or something. Just keep them out of the way of the REAL soldiers.

Idler, that is just common sense!