<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right To Beg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Politburo Diktat</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-2/#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator>The Politburo Diktat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-12720</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Show Trial #25 - Josef Stalin Edition&lt;/strong&gt;
 Josef Stalin Edition Stalin was a Bolshevik revolutionary and the second leader of the Soviet Union. While his economic policies resulted in the Soviet Union&#039;s development into a major industrial world power, his rule was marked by totalitarianism an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Show Trial #25 &#8211; Josef Stalin Edition</strong><br />
 Josef Stalin Edition Stalin was a Bolshevik revolutionary and the second leader of the Soviet Union. While his economic policies resulted in the Soviet Union&#8217;s development into a major industrial world power, his rule was marked by totalitarianism an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-2/#comment-7956</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7956</guid>
		<description>This discussion has gotten off track. Not only am I not imputing motives to a whole group of people, I couldn&#039;t care less what their motives are. It&#039;s not my job, duty or inclination to concern myself with other people&#039;s motives, only their behavior. 

Keep in mind that comments are allowed at the host&#039;s pleasure. Comment-enabled blogs are still regulated and certain rules, whether rational, ridiculous or just plain dumb, still apply. A blog that allows comments doesn&#039;t become a free-for-all discussion board unless the host wants it to. 

There seems to be a good resolution to this thread (sort of), so let&#039;s end it and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion has gotten off track. Not only am I not imputing motives to a whole group of people, I couldn&#8217;t care less what their motives are. It&#8217;s not my job, duty or inclination to concern myself with other people&#8217;s motives, only their behavior. </p>
<p>Keep in mind that comments are allowed at the host&#8217;s pleasure. Comment-enabled blogs are still regulated and certain rules, whether rational, ridiculous or just plain dumb, still apply. A blog that allows comments doesn&#8217;t become a free-for-all discussion board unless the host wants it to. </p>
<p>There seems to be a good resolution to this thread (sort of), so let&#8217;s end it and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-2/#comment-7954</link>
		<dc:creator>Catez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7954</guid>
		<description>Dominic I agree with most of what you just said. However I stand by my view expressed way back in this discussion that we also can&#039;t impute motives to a whole group of people when we don&#039;t actually know their motives. So sure, some are hucksters but some aren&#039;t. I know I&#039;m no better without grace. I like very much how you said we are in the world but not of it - yes! There&#039;s so much we could discuss on that but I think we would be going off topic. I&#039;ll say this though - before I was a Christian I would have abused some-one back. Dying to self means I can&#039;t. I sure feel like doing it sometimes!
On this:
&quot;I suggest that you peruse this blog and others with a different view. Some of it is just ranting a bit. God Bless.&quot;

I think I&#039;ve been fair, and I&#039;m not new to reading blogs. However I agree - sometimes they are ranting a bit. But if some-one puts it out there - meaning us commenters too - then it&#039;s up for being responded too I think.

God bless you too. It is always a marvel to me that we can ask God to give some-one his favor - I ask that he favors you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominic I agree with most of what you just said. However I stand by my view expressed way back in this discussion that we also can&#8217;t impute motives to a whole group of people when we don&#8217;t actually know their motives. So sure, some are hucksters but some aren&#8217;t. I know I&#8217;m no better without grace. I like very much how you said we are in the world but not of it &#8211; yes! There&#8217;s so much we could discuss on that but I think we would be going off topic. I&#8217;ll say this though &#8211; before I was a Christian I would have abused some-one back. Dying to self means I can&#8217;t. I sure feel like doing it sometimes!<br />
On this:<br />
&#8220;I suggest that you peruse this blog and others with a different view. Some of it is just ranting a bit. God Bless.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve been fair, and I&#8217;m not new to reading blogs. However I agree &#8211; sometimes they are ranting a bit. But if some-one puts it out there &#8211; meaning us commenters too &#8211; then it&#8217;s up for being responded too I think.</p>
<p>God bless you too. It is always a marvel to me that we can ask God to give some-one his favor &#8211; I ask that he favors you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shayne</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7952</link>
		<dc:creator>Shayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7952</guid>
		<description>Trader Joe&#039;s is a market that has several locations in California. Since they get a lot of traffic it&#039;s a favorite hot spot for homeless people (although a lot of them look fat and comfortable). The market always tells people not to give these people anything because they&#039;re usually frauds, and if they&#039;re not, there are plenty of organizations willing to help them (if they really need help).

There was one time when some dirty-looking guy held up a sign that said: &quot;Why lie? I need money for booz.&quot; It was sickingly comedic.

There was another time when a guy came up to our car window holding the usual sign (&quot;Hungry, need food...&quot;). The only thing we had handy was a bag of popcorn, which I know isn&#039;t great, but it was something. Then he said: &quot;Oh, well, could I just have some money for a soda?&quot; Yeah, right.

As Trader Joe&#039;s said, there are plenty of organizations (many of them Christian) to help these people who are willing to take them in. They don&#039;t need to be accosting people on the street.

Shayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trader Joe&#8217;s is a market that has several locations in California. Since they get a lot of traffic it&#8217;s a favorite hot spot for homeless people (although a lot of them look fat and comfortable). The market always tells people not to give these people anything because they&#8217;re usually frauds, and if they&#8217;re not, there are plenty of organizations willing to help them (if they really need help).</p>
<p>There was one time when some dirty-looking guy held up a sign that said: &#8220;Why lie? I need money for booz.&#8221; It was sickingly comedic.</p>
<p>There was another time when a guy came up to our car window holding the usual sign (&#8220;Hungry, need food&#8230;&#8221;). The only thing we had handy was a bag of popcorn, which I know isn&#8217;t great, but it was something. Then he said: &#8220;Oh, well, could I just have some money for a soda?&#8221; Yeah, right.</p>
<p>As Trader Joe&#8217;s said, there are plenty of organizations (many of them Christian) to help these people who are willing to take them in. They don&#8217;t need to be accosting people on the street.</p>
<p>Shayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7950</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7950</guid>
		<description>I will say that I can be wrong, but your first post came off as pointing fingers or accusing.  Yes, as a Christian, our prespective is in light of the Scriptures, that we both are in agreement; however, I think that looking at LaShawn&#039;s entire blog and countless posts demonstrates the Gospel. Yet, are we not in this world?  I believe except for the fact that the Almighty is conveying instruction through his Word; imagine other things that the men of God address in their daily lives. She and the others on her blog were addressing everyday events in our lives, one being the manners of beggars. I currently wait tables part time, while I work as a mortgage loan officer, it is my observation, that Scripture and biblical perspective goes out the window come Sunday at the Cheesecake Factory in Raleigh, NC when its time to tip. That&#039;s why I made the &quot;heavenly-minded&quot; statement.  Though we are in this world, we are not of it.  I suggest that you peruse this blog and others with a different view.  Some of it is just ranting a bit. God Bless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say that I can be wrong, but your first post came off as pointing fingers or accusing.  Yes, as a Christian, our prespective is in light of the Scriptures, that we both are in agreement; however, I think that looking at LaShawn&#8217;s entire blog and countless posts demonstrates the Gospel. Yet, are we not in this world?  I believe except for the fact that the Almighty is conveying instruction through his Word; imagine other things that the men of God address in their daily lives. She and the others on her blog were addressing everyday events in our lives, one being the manners of beggars. I currently wait tables part time, while I work as a mortgage loan officer, it is my observation, that Scripture and biblical perspective goes out the window come Sunday at the Cheesecake Factory in Raleigh, NC when its time to tip. That&#8217;s why I made the &#8220;heavenly-minded&#8221; statement.  Though we are in this world, we are not of it.  I suggest that you peruse this blog and others with a different view.  Some of it is just ranting a bit. God Bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7948</link>
		<dc:creator>Catez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7948</guid>
		<description>Hi Dominic,
A few misconceptions in your post. 
1.&quot;Does Paul the Apostle not say, if a man doesn&#8217;t work, he should not eat?&quot;
Yes - and he was writing to Christians who by the grace of God were able to work. However - I never said people should not work. I said it is a gift from God. So I don&#039;t know who you are agruing the point with but it isn&#039;t me.

2. &quot;You come on the blog, void of any understanding of LB, and just tear into everyone about not being spiritual enough in regards to the situation. Who are you? Are you that prophet, or should we look for another?&quot;

This is uneccessary Dominic. I haven&#039;t torn into everyone at all. I am pointing out that without Christ we are all beggars - and with him we have his righteousness not our own. I gave my view on a discussion - and I certainly didn&#039;t take the tone you have or say people were not spiritual enough. I do think something has been missing in the discussion. But what are you so angry about - that some-one is trying to explore how to love these people?

3.&quot;Biblical perspective? Sounds kind of high minded to me? &quot;

Well it&#039;s not high minded at all - it&#039;s a basic approach. Goodness me Dominic - are you saying one can&#039;t seek a biblical perspective on life issues? Too high minded? Hardly.

4.&quot;I believe I possess the same spirit as you, but I am not going to allow game playing hucksters to swindel me or others without making my objections known.&quot;

I agree with you - and if you read what I said you&#039;d see that. But how do we love these people Dominic?  That is my question - how do we respond? For the nth time - I agree 100% that we can protect our physical safety. 

You&#039;ve knee-jerked a response to what you think I&#039;m saying. It isn&#039;t what I said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dominic,<br />
A few misconceptions in your post.<br />
1.&#8221;Does Paul the Apostle not say, if a man doesn&#8217;t work, he should not eat?&#8221;<br />
Yes &#8211; and he was writing to Christians who by the grace of God were able to work. However &#8211; I never said people should not work. I said it is a gift from God. So I don&#8217;t know who you are agruing the point with but it isn&#8217;t me.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;You come on the blog, void of any understanding of LB, and just tear into everyone about not being spiritual enough in regards to the situation. Who are you? Are you that prophet, or should we look for another?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is uneccessary Dominic. I haven&#8217;t torn into everyone at all. I am pointing out that without Christ we are all beggars &#8211; and with him we have his righteousness not our own. I gave my view on a discussion &#8211; and I certainly didn&#8217;t take the tone you have or say people were not spiritual enough. I do think something has been missing in the discussion. But what are you so angry about &#8211; that some-one is trying to explore how to love these people?</p>
<p>3.&#8221;Biblical perspective? Sounds kind of high minded to me? &#8221;</p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s not high minded at all &#8211; it&#8217;s a basic approach. Goodness me Dominic &#8211; are you saying one can&#8217;t seek a biblical perspective on life issues? Too high minded? Hardly.</p>
<p>4.&#8221;I believe I possess the same spirit as you, but I am not going to allow game playing hucksters to swindel me or others without making my objections known.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with you &#8211; and if you read what I said you&#8217;d see that. But how do we love these people Dominic?  That is my question &#8211; how do we respond? For the nth time &#8211; I agree 100% that we can protect our physical safety. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve knee-jerked a response to what you think I&#8217;m saying. It isn&#8217;t what I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratso ferrari</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7947</link>
		<dc:creator>ratso ferrari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7947</guid>
		<description>Some simple common sense words from the Bible:
If a man will not work then he should not eat.
Some words from liberal ungodly PC humanists: 
If a man will not work then what is wrong with our society? We should give him a government stipend, three meals a day and a nice warm apartment with cable tv. Don&#039;t forget the Playboy channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some simple common sense words from the Bible:<br />
If a man will not work then he should not eat.<br />
Some words from liberal ungodly PC humanists:<br />
If a man will not work then what is wrong with our society? We should give him a government stipend, three meals a day and a nice warm apartment with cable tv. Don&#8217;t forget the Playboy channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>OK OK Dominic has read the many posts and I am now entering the fray. From what I can see from reading this thread, Catez, you are expressing the &quot;so heavenly-minded, no earthly good&quot; syndrome. 

I totally understood the manner in which LaShawn addressed this issue.  Does Paul the Apostle not say, if a man doesn&#039;t work, he should not eat?  Does the Scripture not address laziness (slothful in the KJV)?  What of the verse, a man is worse than an infidel who does not feed his family? Come on, give us a break!  You come on the blog, void of any understanding of LB, and just tear into everyone about not being spiritual enough in regards to the situation. Who are you? Are you that prophet, or should we look for another?  

Biblical perspective?  Sounds kind of high minded to me?  Yes, the love and compassion of Christ rules above all things, however, the wise as a serpent exists in me also.  I can remember being a newborn Christian watching how the saints around me conducted themselves.  Bums, derelicts and hucksters would come to our services on Sunday or weekly Bible study and hit people up for money. When I would offer to give them a ride to the store and buy them something to eat,&quot;naw, I&#039;ll buy it&quot; was the response. If they can be that independent, why not go to the local grocery store and offer to bag food for money?  I hate sounding like a teacher&#039;s pet, but LaShawn is absolutely right, along with everyone else on this board. Healthy, well-dressed adult men in America are not your typical homeless person.  I believe I possess the same spirit as you, but I am not going to allow game playing hucksters to swindel me or others without making my objections known. 

Brings me to a story, day before yesterday, walking across the parking lot and a girl of about twenty-two approaches me, says her boyfriend and her are up from Charlotte because his grandmother dies, blah, blah, blah...car broke down, can you give me some money to fix car (she mentions needing $300 bucks), observing the situation, I say no thanks and move on. One, I could spare it, second, would not if I did, other avenues she could have taken to get help, and three, don&#039;t fall for these tales anymore.  Is it wrong as a Christian to use a little wisdom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK OK Dominic has read the many posts and I am now entering the fray. From what I can see from reading this thread, Catez, you are expressing the &#8220;so heavenly-minded, no earthly good&#8221; syndrome. </p>
<p>I totally understood the manner in which LaShawn addressed this issue.  Does Paul the Apostle not say, if a man doesn&#8217;t work, he should not eat?  Does the Scripture not address laziness (slothful in the KJV)?  What of the verse, a man is worse than an infidel who does not feed his family? Come on, give us a break!  You come on the blog, void of any understanding of LB, and just tear into everyone about not being spiritual enough in regards to the situation. Who are you? Are you that prophet, or should we look for another?  </p>
<p>Biblical perspective?  Sounds kind of high minded to me?  Yes, the love and compassion of Christ rules above all things, however, the wise as a serpent exists in me also.  I can remember being a newborn Christian watching how the saints around me conducted themselves.  Bums, derelicts and hucksters would come to our services on Sunday or weekly Bible study and hit people up for money. When I would offer to give them a ride to the store and buy them something to eat,&#8221;naw, I&#8217;ll buy it&#8221; was the response. If they can be that independent, why not go to the local grocery store and offer to bag food for money?  I hate sounding like a teacher&#8217;s pet, but LaShawn is absolutely right, along with everyone else on this board. Healthy, well-dressed adult men in America are not your typical homeless person.  I believe I possess the same spirit as you, but I am not going to allow game playing hucksters to swindel me or others without making my objections known. </p>
<p>Brings me to a story, day before yesterday, walking across the parking lot and a girl of about twenty-two approaches me, says her boyfriend and her are up from Charlotte because his grandmother dies, blah, blah, blah&#8230;car broke down, can you give me some money to fix car (she mentions needing $300 bucks), observing the situation, I say no thanks and move on. One, I could spare it, second, would not if I did, other avenues she could have taken to get help, and three, don&#8217;t fall for these tales anymore.  Is it wrong as a Christian to use a little wisdom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Politburo Diktat</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7944</link>
		<dc:creator>The Politburo Diktat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7944</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Show Trial #15&lt;/strong&gt;
 Leon Trotsky Edition An early leader of the Bolshevik Revolution and Commissar of the Red Army in the Civil War, Trotsky lost out to Stalin in the power struggle after Lenin&#039;s death. Exiled from the Soviet Union, Stalin&#039;s agents killed Trotsky in Me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Show Trial #15</strong><br />
 Leon Trotsky Edition An early leader of the Bolshevik Revolution and Commissar of the Red Army in the Civil War, Trotsky lost out to Stalin in the power struggle after Lenin&#8217;s death. Exiled from the Soviet Union, Stalin&#8217;s agents killed Trotsky in Me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RepJ</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7942</link>
		<dc:creator>RepJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7942</guid>
		<description>I just have one more thing to say.  lol

Being a Christian does not mean that you&#039;ve given up your human right to be angry about things from time to time.

La Shawn,  About &#039;turning the other cheek&#039;.  I remember from a few years ago that that term could have meant something other than what it is generally believed to mean today.  That &#039;turning the other cheek&#039; in Jesus&#039; time could have been a real insult to the other person.  Any insight on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have one more thing to say.  lol</p>
<p>Being a Christian does not mean that you&#8217;ve given up your human right to be angry about things from time to time.</p>
<p>La Shawn,  About &#8216;turning the other cheek&#8217;.  I remember from a few years ago that that term could have meant something other than what it is generally believed to mean today.  That &#8216;turning the other cheek&#8217; in Jesus&#8217; time could have been a real insult to the other person.  Any insight on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7941</link>
		<dc:creator>Catez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7941</guid>
		<description>Ok - it was a long response to me so it did seem to me that those were comments directed to me. I can accept they were general - although not sure why you made them to me as they don&#039;t apply to me. 
I hope it&#039;s done too La Shawn - I thought it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok &#8211; it was a long response to me so it did seem to me that those were comments directed to me. I can accept they were general &#8211; although not sure why you made them to me as they don&#8217;t apply to me.<br />
I hope it&#8217;s done too La Shawn &#8211; I thought it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>I never wrote nor implied that you blogged only about me (false argument), and I never called you a liberal. This is going around in circles, and I&#039;m bored with it. I&#039;ve had my say, and I&#039;ve allowed you yours. I hope it&#039;s done. And I didn&#039;t call you a troll. I was giving an example of the level of dissent I allow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never wrote nor implied that you blogged only about me (false argument), and I never called you a liberal. This is going around in circles, and I&#8217;m bored with it. I&#8217;ve had my say, and I&#8217;ve allowed you yours. I hope it&#8217;s done. And I didn&#8217;t call you a troll. I was giving an example of the level of dissent I allow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7936</link>
		<dc:creator>Catez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7936</guid>
		<description>Hi, I do need to add that you made some comments in reply to me about liberal bloggers. I am not liberal - so those comments don&#039;t apply to me. I have thought some things were missing from the discussion - meaning the whole discussion. But your comments about liberals trying to stop your freedom of speech doesn&#039;t apply to me. That needs to be clear. I&#039;m not disagreeing with you - but it is erroneous if you are applying it to me.
Chilling out has it&#039;s benefits - it&#039;s going to be a beautiful day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I do need to add that you made some comments in reply to me about liberal bloggers. I am not liberal &#8211; so those comments don&#8217;t apply to me. I have thought some things were missing from the discussion &#8211; meaning the whole discussion. But your comments about liberals trying to stop your freedom of speech doesn&#8217;t apply to me. That needs to be clear. I&#8217;m not disagreeing with you &#8211; but it is erroneous if you are applying it to me.<br />
Chilling out has it&#8217;s benefits &#8211; it&#8217;s going to be a beautiful day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>Catez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,
My Spinning with the Pundits post was a review of a number of pundit sites - and if you did read it you&#039;ll see it was not all about you. I didn&#039;t even go into some of what you had said, and kept it light and in keeping with the other sites I was reviewing. Yes, you emailed me an apology - and I told you I accepted it. For me that is over and forgiven. I wrote my review before that and it was written for people from different countries who don&#039;t know about pundits.  None of my comments here are telling you what to say - they are comments on a topic and I&#039;ve tried to give a biblical perspective. That&#039;s inextricably linked for me. I am not a &quot;troll&quot; - I&#039;ve been involved in a lot of work with homeless people. Can&#039;t blame me for taking an interest in the topic.
I have been civil on your blog. Of course some-one can say what they like on their blog - but what has offended you? You&#039;ve inferred some things about me that aren&#039;t true and lumped me in with other Christians who have disagreed with you in the past. 
I just read Solo&#039;s comment and I agree wholeheartedly - and in saying that I am contributing to a discussion.
RepJ thinks I have called him/her indecent and am upset. I&#039;m not upset. I was saying none of us has any decency of our own to point to. Without Christ we are indecent. La Shawn - I don&#039;t understand what is wrong with saying that. If you look at my comments they are about the whole discussion which I was following and giving my own perspective on. I haven&#039;t said anything about not being safe or having to tolerate violence. We haven&#039;t actually disagreed on that point. 
Let&#039;s chill out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,<br />
My Spinning with the Pundits post was a review of a number of pundit sites &#8211; and if you did read it you&#8217;ll see it was not all about you. I didn&#8217;t even go into some of what you had said, and kept it light and in keeping with the other sites I was reviewing. Yes, you emailed me an apology &#8211; and I told you I accepted it. For me that is over and forgiven. I wrote my review before that and it was written for people from different countries who don&#8217;t know about pundits.  None of my comments here are telling you what to say &#8211; they are comments on a topic and I&#8217;ve tried to give a biblical perspective. That&#8217;s inextricably linked for me. I am not a &#8220;troll&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;ve been involved in a lot of work with homeless people. Can&#8217;t blame me for taking an interest in the topic.<br />
I have been civil on your blog. Of course some-one can say what they like on their blog &#8211; but what has offended you? You&#8217;ve inferred some things about me that aren&#8217;t true and lumped me in with other Christians who have disagreed with you in the past.<br />
I just read Solo&#8217;s comment and I agree wholeheartedly &#8211; and in saying that I am contributing to a discussion.<br />
RepJ thinks I have called him/her indecent and am upset. I&#8217;m not upset. I was saying none of us has any decency of our own to point to. Without Christ we are indecent. La Shawn &#8211; I don&#8217;t understand what is wrong with saying that. If you look at my comments they are about the whole discussion which I was following and giving my own perspective on. I haven&#8217;t said anything about not being safe or having to tolerate violence. We haven&#8217;t actually disagreed on that point.<br />
Let&#8217;s chill out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/comment-page-1/#comment-7934</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/10/15/right/#comment-7934</guid>
		<description>Catez, 

I read your &quot;Spinning the Pundit&quot; post and the less-than-flattering things you said about me. While I consider myself a very patient person (I&#039;ve tolerated a few trolls although they should have been asked to leave long ago.) and don&#039;t really like pulling the &quot;this is my blog&quot; routine if I don&#039;t have to, I&#039;m as human as anyone else, and I don&#039;t like to see certain things said about me, especially written by someone I allow to comment on my blog. 

I&#039;m certain you wouldn&#039;t like it if I wrote a &quot;Spinning the fill-in-the-blank&quot; post and did the same to you. Nevertheless, I&#039;m a grown woman, outspoken and unafraid to say what I need to say, so I can handle it.

Here&#039;s the problem I&#039;ve had with a few Christian commenters. They LOVE to tell me where I&#039;m wrong. Fine. But when they tell me what I should be thinking and writing and what words I should or should not use to express myself, I &lt;em&gt;usually&lt;/em&gt; flip out. I won&#039;t today. When unbelievers do it, I don&#039;t like it. But when a fellow believer does it, it&#039;s much, much worse. You and I have been in contact privately about this, and I meant what I wrote in my e-mail. Although I didn&#039;t see your &quot;Spinning&quot; post beforehand, I still would have sent you that e-mail. I am responsible for my own behavior, not anyone else&#039;s.

Having said that, I think your comments misrepresent my intentions in the post. You say that if you were assaulted by a strange man, biblical truth won&#039;t change. As you know, I agree and never contended otherwise. But biblical truth of the existence of evil also doesn&#039;t change. There are evil people everywhere seeking to do us harm, and there is nothing unbiblical about the way I&#039;ve expressed my frustration. But I never wrote nor implied that I was &quot;better&quot; than anyone.

Sharing the Gospel can happen anywhere, anytime. There are also times when a Christian may not share it. I don&#039;t know of any people who start sharing the Gospel whenever they make eye contact with someone on the street or accosted by a drunk stranger. I choose instead to get away from him. If that&#039;s wrong, God will deal with me.

Before a Christian judges another, they should examine their own eyes for planks.  You imply I shouldn&#039;t judge bums, but you&#039;re doing the same thing to me. This is the problem I have with Christians who don&#039;t like the way I read the Bible, don&#039;t like the way I express myself and don&#039;t like that I call certain street people &quot;bums.&quot; I would never even presume to go on someone&#039;s blog, never, and do that. First of all, I don&#039;t have the time. Secondly, it&#039;s just not my style. Thirdly, it is their blog and if that is their style, who am I to judge? If I don&#039;t like a blogger&#039;s style or method of expression, I don&#039;t return to the site.

Again, I must pull rank. &quot;Bum&quot; is the the way I categorize able-bodied men sleeping on the street and it&#039;s the way I&#039;ll continue categorizing able-bodied men on the street. I assure you that your comments on my blog or your own will not change my mind, but as long as you&#039;re civil, you may contribute to the discussion.

No Christian should ever say we &lt;em&gt;shouldn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; take the Gospel to people in the streets, including myself, but my post contains anecdotes about my dealings with strange men, and I express my outrage accordingly, whether you think it&#039;s appropriate or not. There are people with serious mental problems &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; people up to no good or both. What I &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; need to blog about are hard statistics on the number &quot;homeless&quot; who commit crimes. The &quot;homeless&quot; are not a special lot excused of decent behavior, though one would get the impression reading this thread.

I live on the fallen earth, not Disneyland. A society has every right to do what it can to make its streets safe. No one has a right or should be allowed to loiter and sleep on the streets or urinate in public. That&#039;s what I believe and it is not subject to change.

If that&#039;s wrong, then God will deal with me. As you may have noticed, I loathe political correctness and call a thing what it is. Plenty of people don&#039;t like it, including other Christians. If that offends, there is nothing I am &lt;em&gt;willing&lt;/em&gt; to do about it. If &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is wrong, then God will deal with me. 

My mission on this blog is multifaceted, and the way I express myself will probably become even more direct and offend even more people, especially the liberal bloggers who &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; hate me. I thank God everyday I live in a free country. What a hardship it would be to live in a society where my thoughts and speech were regulated by people who disagreed with my views. But God placed me right here, and I don&#039;t intend to squander my freedom of speech for anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catez, </p>
<p>I read your &#8220;Spinning the Pundit&#8221; post and the less-than-flattering things you said about me. While I consider myself a very patient person (I&#8217;ve tolerated a few trolls although they should have been asked to leave long ago.) and don&#8217;t really like pulling the &#8220;this is my blog&#8221; routine if I don&#8217;t have to, I&#8217;m as human as anyone else, and I don&#8217;t like to see certain things said about me, especially written by someone I allow to comment on my blog. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m certain you wouldn&#8217;t like it if I wrote a &#8220;Spinning the fill-in-the-blank&#8221; post and did the same to you. Nevertheless, I&#8217;m a grown woman, outspoken and unafraid to say what I need to say, so I can handle it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the problem I&#8217;ve had with a few Christian commenters. They LOVE to tell me where I&#8217;m wrong. Fine. But when they tell me what I should be thinking and writing and what words I should or should not use to express myself, I <em>usually</em> flip out. I won&#8217;t today. When unbelievers do it, I don&#8217;t like it. But when a fellow believer does it, it&#8217;s much, much worse. You and I have been in contact privately about this, and I meant what I wrote in my e-mail. Although I didn&#8217;t see your &#8220;Spinning&#8221; post beforehand, I still would have sent you that e-mail. I am responsible for my own behavior, not anyone else&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think your comments misrepresent my intentions in the post. You say that if you were assaulted by a strange man, biblical truth won&#8217;t change. As you know, I agree and never contended otherwise. But biblical truth of the existence of evil also doesn&#8217;t change. There are evil people everywhere seeking to do us harm, and there is nothing unbiblical about the way I&#8217;ve expressed my frustration. But I never wrote nor implied that I was &#8220;better&#8221; than anyone.</p>
<p>Sharing the Gospel can happen anywhere, anytime. There are also times when a Christian may not share it. I don&#8217;t know of any people who start sharing the Gospel whenever they make eye contact with someone on the street or accosted by a drunk stranger. I choose instead to get away from him. If that&#8217;s wrong, God will deal with me.</p>
<p>Before a Christian judges another, they should examine their own eyes for planks.  You imply I shouldn&#8217;t judge bums, but you&#8217;re doing the same thing to me. This is the problem I have with Christians who don&#8217;t like the way I read the Bible, don&#8217;t like the way I express myself and don&#8217;t like that I call certain street people &#8220;bums.&#8221; I would never even presume to go on someone&#8217;s blog, never, and do that. First of all, I don&#8217;t have the time. Secondly, it&#8217;s just not my style. Thirdly, it is their blog and if that is their style, who am I to judge? If I don&#8217;t like a blogger&#8217;s style or method of expression, I don&#8217;t return to the site.</p>
<p>Again, I must pull rank. &#8220;Bum&#8221; is the the way I categorize able-bodied men sleeping on the street and it&#8217;s the way I&#8217;ll continue categorizing able-bodied men on the street. I assure you that your comments on my blog or your own will not change my mind, but as long as you&#8217;re civil, you may contribute to the discussion.</p>
<p>No Christian should ever say we <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> take the Gospel to people in the streets, including myself, but my post contains anecdotes about my dealings with strange men, and I express my outrage accordingly, whether you think it&#8217;s appropriate or not. There are people with serious mental problems <em>and</em> people up to no good or both. What I <em>really</em> need to blog about are hard statistics on the number &#8220;homeless&#8221; who commit crimes. The &#8220;homeless&#8221; are not a special lot excused of decent behavior, though one would get the impression reading this thread.</p>
<p>I live on the fallen earth, not Disneyland. A society has every right to do what it can to make its streets safe. No one has a right or should be allowed to loiter and sleep on the streets or urinate in public. That&#8217;s what I believe and it is not subject to change.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s wrong, then God will deal with me. As you may have noticed, I loathe political correctness and call a thing what it is. Plenty of people don&#8217;t like it, including other Christians. If that offends, there is nothing I am <em>willing</em> to do about it. If <em>that</em> is wrong, then God will deal with me. </p>
<p>My mission on this blog is multifaceted, and the way I express myself will probably become even more direct and offend even more people, especially the liberal bloggers who <em>already</em> hate me. I thank God everyday I live in a free country. What a hardship it would be to live in a society where my thoughts and speech were regulated by people who disagreed with my views. But God placed me right here, and I don&#8217;t intend to squander my freedom of speech for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

