<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Moderation Is In Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 04:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12472</guid>
		<description>I like the crown! Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the crown! Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12455</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12455</guid>
		<description>Steel, shades of the movie Spawn, eh?  Seeing how Jacob wrestled with an angel and refused to let him go, and that Satan is an ex-angel, it &#039;sounds&#039; plausible.  However, God gave Satan dominion over earth, and since Satan is immortal and operates both in the spirit &amp; physical realm, I just don&#039;t see it.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel, shades of the movie Spawn, eh?  Seeing how Jacob wrestled with an angel and refused to let him go, and that Satan is an ex-angel, it &#8216;sounds&#8217; plausible.  However, God gave Satan dominion over earth, and since Satan is immortal and operates both in the spirit &#038; physical realm, I just don&#8217;t see it.  <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyle</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>But... but... but La Shawn, weren&#039;t you upset when I called you &#039;Queen La Shawn&#039;? Have you grown into the title? It does have a pleasant ring to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230; but&#8230; but La Shawn, weren&#8217;t you upset when I called you &#8216;Queen La Shawn&#8217;? Have you grown into the title? It does have a pleasant ring to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel Turman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel Turman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12204</guid>
		<description>Andy,

 If it comes to a confrontation with Satan ... I will grab
him by the throat and kill him. 

 God willing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p> If it comes to a confrontation with Satan &#8230; I will grab<br />
him by the throat and kill him. </p>
<p> God willing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12196</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12196</guid>
		<description>Steel, well, Scripturally speaking, if you ever get a twinge in your heart about the possiblity of a hereafter, better pay close attention, it might be God speaking to you in a soft voice, as he is wont to do.  

Ignore it long enough and God will leave you alone.  In which case Satan may or may not care about subverting your goodness, since either way you&#039;re his.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel, well, Scripturally speaking, if you ever get a twinge in your heart about the possiblity of a hereafter, better pay close attention, it might be God speaking to you in a soft voice, as he is wont to do.  </p>
<p>Ignore it long enough and God will leave you alone.  In which case Satan may or may not care about subverting your goodness, since either way you&#8217;re his.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel Turman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel Turman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>Andy,

....your goodness is moot in the hereafter....

 Precisely. For me, the hereafter is moot. Goodness
is to be measured in the here and now. That would be
a fine eulogy BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>&#8230;.your goodness is moot in the hereafter&#8230;.</p>
<p> Precisely. For me, the hereafter is moot. Goodness<br />
is to be measured in the here and now. That would be<br />
a fine eulogy BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliette</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12127</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12127</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to be the Queen, no? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to be the Queen, no? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12121</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12121</guid>
		<description>Steel, this is just off the cuff, since I don&#039;t have access to references.  Basically, only Jesus was perfect and that perfection and subsequent sacrifice is what atones us from the curse of eternal damnation.  

Good is as good gets considering that there are none that are righteous, no not one.  Our best are but filthy rags fit to be burned by an absolute God who created us.  

So in this sphere of existence, yes you can be an exceedingly good man but if you&#039;re not saved from God&#039;s wrath, your goodness is moot in the hereafter.  

The sticking point for you is not your goodness, but our raison d&#039;etre.  As long as you cannot reconcile yourself to a ubercreator or God, your goodness only counts for your eulogy - &quot;Here lies Steel Turman, he was a good Mensch.&quot;  If that&#039;s your position and you&#039;re sticking to it, so be it.  

On the other hand, having been a long-time cornerite, when was the last time you tested our claims against our Source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel, this is just off the cuff, since I don&#8217;t have access to references.  Basically, only Jesus was perfect and that perfection and subsequent sacrifice is what atones us from the curse of eternal damnation.  </p>
<p>Good is as good gets considering that there are none that are righteous, no not one.  Our best are but filthy rags fit to be burned by an absolute God who created us.  </p>
<p>So in this sphere of existence, yes you can be an exceedingly good man but if you&#8217;re not saved from God&#8217;s wrath, your goodness is moot in the hereafter.  </p>
<p>The sticking point for you is not your goodness, but our raison d&#8217;etre.  As long as you cannot reconcile yourself to a ubercreator or God, your goodness only counts for your eulogy &#8211; &#8220;Here lies Steel Turman, he was a good Mensch.&#8221;  If that&#8217;s your position and you&#8217;re sticking to it, so be it.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, having been a long-time cornerite, when was the last time you tested our claims against our Source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12103</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12103</guid>
		<description>how good is good enough?
how bad is bad enough?

who draws this line?

Is that relativism?

Christ was perfect, we are not. Jesus died that all may live eternally. 

For that I thank Him, I accept Him, I honor Him with my life, and I thank Him for all that He has done and continues to do in my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how good is good enough?<br />
how bad is bad enough?</p>
<p>who draws this line?</p>
<p>Is that relativism?</p>
<p>Christ was perfect, we are not. Jesus died that all may live eternally. </p>
<p>For that I thank Him, I accept Him, I honor Him with my life, and I thank Him for all that He has done and continues to do in my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12099</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12099</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting, Rikki. Since I don&#039;t frequent the boards, I don&#039;t know a lot about them or how to implement. I&#039;d welcome your guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting, Rikki. Since I don&#8217;t frequent the boards, I don&#8217;t know a lot about them or how to implement. I&#8217;d welcome your guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rikki</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12098</link>
		<dc:creator>Rikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12098</guid>
		<description>Lashawn, have you ever thought of having a message board?  Just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lashawn, have you ever thought of having a message board?  Just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12078</link>
		<dc:creator>Montie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12078</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,

As one of your faithful followers, I would be sorely disappointed to lose the ability to interact with you and your other readers, that the comments feature provides. There are only three blogs of the many I try to check out each day that I regularly comment on  (yours, Dean Esmay&#039;s, and Rosemary Esmay&#039;s).

In addition, without comments, where would I get my daily dose of Beau?  No matter how much some of the things your liberal commenters makes my blood boil, Beau can usually make me laugh about it.

Of course I could always resort to email, but then that leaves everyone else out of the discussion (at least during those times when I WANT everyone else in on the discussion) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,</p>
<p>As one of your faithful followers, I would be sorely disappointed to lose the ability to interact with you and your other readers, that the comments feature provides. There are only three blogs of the many I try to check out each day that I regularly comment on  (yours, Dean Esmay&#8217;s, and Rosemary Esmay&#8217;s).</p>
<p>In addition, without comments, where would I get my daily dose of Beau?  No matter how much some of the things your liberal commenters makes my blood boil, Beau can usually make me laugh about it.</p>
<p>Of course I could always resort to email, but then that leaves everyone else out of the discussion (at least during those times when I WANT everyone else in on the discussion) <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary M. Volin</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12076</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary M. Volin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12076</guid>
		<description>Hello Steel Turman,

Well said! You appear to be a good person to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Steel Turman,</p>
<p>Well said! You appear to be a good person to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel Turman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12072</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel Turman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12072</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking a few days about how I can&#039;t be good
because I haven&#039;t accepted your religion. 

 I may be damned for not accepting your religion but that
does not make my &#039;good&#039; less than yours. 

 Good is really just being GOOD and doing GOOD. 

 That you can differentiate between my goodness and yours is a bit troublesome. But not so much that I would negate
your good in favor of mine. Nope, I would say good is a 
thing all should strive for without consideration to ...
personal creed, color, religion or point of origin. In that,
I would ask you to look for something Jesus might have said
about good men. Maybe that there are good men but they may not be saved but for me and all that. THAT does not make those good men less good ... only not saved. 

 There is always an inclination to try and brand something
in black and white, never more than in something as ...
a religion. Right or wrong. Good or evil. Okay. But if I
were living the life of a &#039;good man&#039; and did not espouse
your religion ... how would you know I was not a believer?

 How?

 Is it incumbent upon my goodness to allay it to the feet
of your Christ at every turn, or to just be good? 

 Do I have to go to a place and share my goodness with
like thinking humans and praise to be ... good? 

 Would that not take a very large piece of goodness out
of the world?

 And what would be the result? More evil? And what purpose
does THAT serve in your realm? That I &#039;believe&#039; and quote
scripture make my good more good? C&#039;mon, surely, you can&#039;t
hold that.

 The good that I do, is the good that you do. We have ...
different reasons or justifications for doing so. Simple.

 I have been up against this argument before. I have always
found that religionists always go to some &#039;faith and you
MUST believe as I&#039; thing. Sorry, I ain&#039;t buying it. I may
be damned by your beliefs but I can still live a good life.

 Goodness is a state of mind and heart. I&#039;ll leave the ...
soul searching aspects of it to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking a few days about how I can&#8217;t be good<br />
because I haven&#8217;t accepted your religion. </p>
<p> I may be damned for not accepting your religion but that<br />
does not make my &#8216;good&#8217; less than yours. </p>
<p> Good is really just being GOOD and doing GOOD. </p>
<p> That you can differentiate between my goodness and yours is a bit troublesome. But not so much that I would negate<br />
your good in favor of mine. Nope, I would say good is a<br />
thing all should strive for without consideration to &#8230;<br />
personal creed, color, religion or point of origin. In that,<br />
I would ask you to look for something Jesus might have said<br />
about good men. Maybe that there are good men but they may not be saved but for me and all that. THAT does not make those good men less good &#8230; only not saved. </p>
<p> There is always an inclination to try and brand something<br />
in black and white, never more than in something as &#8230;<br />
a religion. Right or wrong. Good or evil. Okay. But if I<br />
were living the life of a &#8216;good man&#8217; and did not espouse<br />
your religion &#8230; how would you know I was not a believer?</p>
<p> How?</p>
<p> Is it incumbent upon my goodness to allay it to the feet<br />
of your Christ at every turn, or to just be good? </p>
<p> Do I have to go to a place and share my goodness with<br />
like thinking humans and praise to be &#8230; good? </p>
<p> Would that not take a very large piece of goodness out<br />
of the world?</p>
<p> And what would be the result? More evil? And what purpose<br />
does THAT serve in your realm? That I &#8216;believe&#8217; and quote<br />
scripture make my good more good? C&#8217;mon, surely, you can&#8217;t<br />
hold that.</p>
<p> The good that I do, is the good that you do. We have &#8230;<br />
different reasons or justifications for doing so. Simple.</p>
<p> I have been up against this argument before. I have always<br />
found that religionists always go to some &#8216;faith and you<br />
MUST believe as I&#8217; thing. Sorry, I ain&#8217;t buying it. I may<br />
be damned by your beliefs but I can still live a good life.</p>
<p> Goodness is a state of mind and heart. I&#8217;ll leave the &#8230;<br />
soul searching aspects of it to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Bird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/17/moderation/#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,

I happened on your site last week, and I greatly enjoy your blog, your writings, your opinions, and I share your faith.  And I too am an independent conservative.  I was registered as a Republican for the very first election that I could vote in, the 1972 contest between Nixon and McGovern, but in 1974 I re-registered as an independent with a small &quot;i.&quot;  

One thing I&#039;d like to read is your recounting of your journey from a political liberal to a conservative.  Have you written about that before?  If you have, can you point me to it?  if you haven&#039;t written about it before, how about you dashing off a few paragraphs to tell how it happened, when it happened, and what the experience has been like in making that journey?  I&#039;m assuming that it&#039;s connected to your walk with Christ, and you have written about that, but I&#039;d be interested in your telling it from a political point of view.  Thanks, and keep up the good work,

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,</p>
<p>I happened on your site last week, and I greatly enjoy your blog, your writings, your opinions, and I share your faith.  And I too am an independent conservative.  I was registered as a Republican for the very first election that I could vote in, the 1972 contest between Nixon and McGovern, but in 1974 I re-registered as an independent with a small &#8220;i.&#8221;  </p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d like to read is your recounting of your journey from a political liberal to a conservative.  Have you written about that before?  If you have, can you point me to it?  if you haven&#8217;t written about it before, how about you dashing off a few paragraphs to tell how it happened, when it happened, and what the experience has been like in making that journey?  I&#8217;m assuming that it&#8217;s connected to your walk with Christ, and you have written about that, but I&#8217;d be interested in your telling it from a political point of view.  Thanks, and keep up the good work,</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

