<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic And Republican Platforms Through The Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wood</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-13061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-13061</guid>
		<description>pre-apologies for double-topicing:

WRT the two political parties and race:
The Democratic party 
   1: focuses on group-divisions (race / gender / wealth)
   2: identifies a victim and an opressor in every situation
   3: loudly declares its support for the victim-group.
The Democratic party is group-oriented and its solutions are group (socialist) -oriented. To the Democratic party, both problems and successes are the group&#039;s, and not for any individual&#039;s responsibility or laudation.
(for comfirmatory quotes, reference HRClinton, TKennedy, and ?Stalin? on the &quot;cult of the individual&quot; and related misc.)

The Republicans are not groupist, but are instead expressly individualist in outlook, believing both success and failure are solely belonging to the individual.

The KKK (et al) divide the population by race. Enough said.



Oh, and ......    CONDI &#039;08       :)


(Or for VP in &#039;06 if Cheney&#039;s heart struggles with yet more stress, then for the top slot in &#039;08 :)  )


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

WRT whether paedophilia is a mental illness or &quot;faulty wiring&quot;: 

Certain conditions are &quot;soft-wired&quot; like situation-induced depression or my wife hypochondria (that she got out of). Anything soft-wired is reasonable to describe as a &quot;mental-illness&quot;

Certain neural conditions are hard-wired (my wife and I are both mild Asperger&#039;s neuropaths)
Then there&#039;s what I call &quot;deep-wired&quot; conditions like trauma-induced PTSD/psychosis/MPD/etc.
Hard-wired and deep-wired states aren&#039;t &quot;mental-illnesses&quot; as much as a neurological-condition.

Paedophilia falls into either the hard-wired or deep-wired category and is untreatable given moden non-understanding of neural wiring, and no matter what you try, someone&#039;s brain that is jumper-cabled to react sexually to kids needs to be locked away permanently, killed or cryogenically-suspended until we can do something to rewire them.

As a &quot;different thinker&quot; I believe strongly that you will NEVER fix paedophiles short of star-trek technology, and as many are dangerously intelligent, you cannot trust them. Worse, unlike burglary or Aspergers, paedophilia is partially &quot;contagious&quot; in that the traumatized victims historically have a % chance of becoming victimizers themselves, especially long-term victims.

/\/\
\/\/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pre-apologies for double-topicing:</p>
<p>WRT the two political parties and race:<br />
The Democratic party<br />
   1: focuses on group-divisions (race / gender / wealth)<br />
   2: identifies a victim and an opressor in every situation<br />
   3: loudly declares its support for the victim-group.<br />
The Democratic party is group-oriented and its solutions are group (socialist) -oriented. To the Democratic party, both problems and successes are the group&#8217;s, and not for any individual&#8217;s responsibility or laudation.<br />
(for comfirmatory quotes, reference HRClinton, TKennedy, and ?Stalin? on the &#8220;cult of the individual&#8221; and related misc.)</p>
<p>The Republicans are not groupist, but are instead expressly individualist in outlook, believing both success and failure are solely belonging to the individual.</p>
<p>The KKK (et al) divide the population by race. Enough said.</p>
<p>Oh, and &#8230;&#8230;    CONDI &#8217;08       <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(Or for VP in &#8217;06 if Cheney&#8217;s heart struggles with yet more stress, then for the top slot in &#8217;08 <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   )</p>
<p>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=</p>
<p>WRT whether paedophilia is a mental illness or &#8220;faulty wiring&#8221;: </p>
<p>Certain conditions are &#8220;soft-wired&#8221; like situation-induced depression or my wife hypochondria (that she got out of). Anything soft-wired is reasonable to describe as a &#8220;mental-illness&#8221;</p>
<p>Certain neural conditions are hard-wired (my wife and I are both mild Asperger&#8217;s neuropaths)<br />
Then there&#8217;s what I call &#8220;deep-wired&#8221; conditions like trauma-induced PTSD/psychosis/MPD/etc.<br />
Hard-wired and deep-wired states aren&#8217;t &#8220;mental-illnesses&#8221; as much as a neurological-condition.</p>
<p>Paedophilia falls into either the hard-wired or deep-wired category and is untreatable given moden non-understanding of neural wiring, and no matter what you try, someone&#8217;s brain that is jumper-cabled to react sexually to kids needs to be locked away permanently, killed or cryogenically-suspended until we can do something to rewire them.</p>
<p>As a &#8220;different thinker&#8221; I believe strongly that you will NEVER fix paedophiles short of star-trek technology, and as many are dangerously intelligent, you cannot trust them. Worse, unlike burglary or Aspergers, paedophilia is partially &#8220;contagious&#8221; in that the traumatized victims historically have a % chance of becoming victimizers themselves, especially long-term victims.</p>
<p>/\/\<br />
\/\/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12844</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12844</guid>
		<description>Epitome, if we carry your statement to its logical &amp; secular conclusion, then it&#039;s obvious that Kinsey was mentally ill and here is Hollywood, once again glorifying a mentally ill &#039;scientist&#039; and further promulgating his sex studies as gospel for the human condition.  

I believe and I think what La Shawn and others are saying is that as sinners, we&#039;re all prone to do evil &amp; therefore we are all mentally ill to a degree, in that we live in sin.  However, time and time again, the Bible speaks of those who have been warned, but persist in doing wrong as having been &lt;strong&gt;given&lt;/strong&gt; over to Satan and increased atrocities.  

Clinically speaking, we may call these people &#039;mentally ill&#039;, the Bible would call it demon possession.

The implication here is that ALL humans are born with a conscience -- sense of good &amp; evil -- however, how well we &#039;listen&#039; to our conscience is shaped in part by our environment and in part to our free will.  If we squelch our conscience long enough, we become totally depraved (Demon possessed) and do what we will simply because it suits us and all moral constraints be damned.

To wit, take cannibalism which is expressly forbidden and goes against basic human nature.  We would say Lector Hannibal (Silence of the Lambs) is mentally ill, but we wouldn&#039;t have said the same of a tribe that practices ritual cannibalism.  Even in those tribes, they have restraints around the practice, ie, only eat the enemy etc.  For example, Indians that eat only the heart of slain enemy warriors to take on their strenth &amp; courage.  In either case, the conscience has been ignored and the act justified by Satan for one reason or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epitome, if we carry your statement to its logical &#038; secular conclusion, then it&#8217;s obvious that Kinsey was mentally ill and here is Hollywood, once again glorifying a mentally ill &#8216;scientist&#8217; and further promulgating his sex studies as gospel for the human condition.  </p>
<p>I believe and I think what La Shawn and others are saying is that as sinners, we&#8217;re all prone to do evil &#038; therefore we are all mentally ill to a degree, in that we live in sin.  However, time and time again, the Bible speaks of those who have been warned, but persist in doing wrong as having been <strong>given</strong> over to Satan and increased atrocities.  </p>
<p>Clinically speaking, we may call these people &#8216;mentally ill&#8217;, the Bible would call it demon possession.</p>
<p>The implication here is that ALL humans are born with a conscience &#8212; sense of good &#038; evil &#8212; however, how well we &#8216;listen&#8217; to our conscience is shaped in part by our environment and in part to our free will.  If we squelch our conscience long enough, we become totally depraved (Demon possessed) and do what we will simply because it suits us and all moral constraints be damned.</p>
<p>To wit, take cannibalism which is expressly forbidden and goes against basic human nature.  We would say Lector Hannibal (Silence of the Lambs) is mentally ill, but we wouldn&#8217;t have said the same of a tribe that practices ritual cannibalism.  Even in those tribes, they have restraints around the practice, ie, only eat the enemy etc.  For example, Indians that eat only the heart of slain enemy warriors to take on their strenth &#038; courage.  In either case, the conscience has been ignored and the act justified by Satan for one reason or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epitome</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12613</link>
		<dc:creator>Epitome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12613</guid>
		<description>&quot;First, I have to say that it is a shame to see someone pushing pedophilia as a mental illness. Having spent 6 years working nothing but sex crimes and domestic violence, I can say that Mike M. needs to spend time in the places I have been and see how he feels about whether it should be classified as a “mental illness” for the purposes of the criminal justice system or not. The problem with mental illness defenses is that they often let perpetrators of horrendous crimes get what amounts to a free ride and a walk.&quot;

I think disputing the classification of pedophilia as a &#039;mental illness&#039; on the grounds of unfavorable consequences it can have as a criminal defense is irrelevant.

Let&#039;s be frank here: If pedophilia ISN&#039;T a mental illness, that what is it? The implication of Ms. Barber&#039;s diagnosis, that pedophiles are people who choose not to control their sexual urges, is that sexual attraction to children is natural, and is only an issue of self control. 

If someone is sexually attracted to children, or animals, or heaven knows what else, I don&#039;t think it should be such a point of contention that these individuals are mentally ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;First, I have to say that it is a shame to see someone pushing pedophilia as a mental illness. Having spent 6 years working nothing but sex crimes and domestic violence, I can say that Mike M. needs to spend time in the places I have been and see how he feels about whether it should be classified as a “mental illness” for the purposes of the criminal justice system or not. The problem with mental illness defenses is that they often let perpetrators of horrendous crimes get what amounts to a free ride and a walk.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think disputing the classification of pedophilia as a &#8216;mental illness&#8217; on the grounds of unfavorable consequences it can have as a criminal defense is irrelevant.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be frank here: If pedophilia ISN&#8217;T a mental illness, that what is it? The implication of Ms. Barber&#8217;s diagnosis, that pedophiles are people who choose not to control their sexual urges, is that sexual attraction to children is natural, and is only an issue of self control. </p>
<p>If someone is sexually attracted to children, or animals, or heaven knows what else, I don&#8217;t think it should be such a point of contention that these individuals are mentally ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biblegeek.blog-city.com</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12463</link>
		<dc:creator>biblegeek.blog-city.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12463</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#039;Democratic And Republican Platforms Through The Years&#039;  posted at La Shawn Barber&#039;s Corner&lt;/strong&gt;
You might want to do yourself a favor and read La Shawn&#039;s latest post. It&#039;s on fire!!
Democratic And Republican Platforms Through The Years
(Looooook, click the yellow text link.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8216;Democratic And Republican Platforms Through The Years&#8217;  posted at La Shawn Barber&#8217;s Corner</strong><br />
You might want to do yourself a favor and read La Shawn&#8217;s latest post. It&#8217;s on fire!!<br />
Democratic And Republican Platforms Through The Years<br />
(Looooook, click the yellow text link.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12454</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12454</guid>
		<description>Montie, excellent points.  Simply put, sin is rebellion against God&#039;s rules.  Violence and/or murder is actualized hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montie, excellent points.  Simply put, sin is rebellion against God&#8217;s rules.  Violence and/or murder is actualized hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12442</link>
		<dc:creator>Montie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12442</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,

Just got in on this discussion this morning (Sunday Morning) as I&#039;m on call this weekend and had to come into the office. As usual your aprkling wit and unequaled common sense has driven your liberal readers to distraction. I have a couple of comments.

First, I have to say that it is a shame to see someone pushing pedophilia as a mental illness. Having spent 6 years working nothing but sex crimes and domestic violence, I can say that Mike M. needs to spend time in the places I have been  and see how he feels about whether it should be classified as a &quot;mental illness&quot; for the purposes of the criminal justice system or not. The problem with mental illness defenses is that they often let perpetrators of horrendous crimes get what amounts to a free ride and a walk.

Second, La Shawn what you say about &quot;hate crimes&quot; is absolutely correct. Hate crimes legislation is nothing more than PC gone horribly wrong, and shoved down the public&#039;s throat as a means of stamping out racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. when it accomplishes nothing of the sort. It has certainly complicated our crime reporting, as one of the criteria that must be evaluated when it comes to certain crimes was whether the crime envolved &quot;hate crimes&quot;. Does it make the original crime any less of a crime?...no. Adding the catagory of &quot;hate crime&quot; to any other crime is done mostly as a &quot;sentence enhancer&quot; to get a stiffer penalty.

What it can also do is give a defense attorney an opening to argue whether the defendant was being racist, sexist, or homophobic at the time of the commission of the crime. If it can be shown that the defendent was not acting or thinking in a manner that would constitute grounds for filing the charge as a &quot;hate crime&quot; then often the whole case is lost when the original case would have stood on its own without having to prove what the defendant was thinking, or motivated by, only that he did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,</p>
<p>Just got in on this discussion this morning (Sunday Morning) as I&#8217;m on call this weekend and had to come into the office. As usual your aprkling wit and unequaled common sense has driven your liberal readers to distraction. I have a couple of comments.</p>
<p>First, I have to say that it is a shame to see someone pushing pedophilia as a mental illness. Having spent 6 years working nothing but sex crimes and domestic violence, I can say that Mike M. needs to spend time in the places I have been  and see how he feels about whether it should be classified as a &#8220;mental illness&#8221; for the purposes of the criminal justice system or not. The problem with mental illness defenses is that they often let perpetrators of horrendous crimes get what amounts to a free ride and a walk.</p>
<p>Second, La Shawn what you say about &#8220;hate crimes&#8221; is absolutely correct. Hate crimes legislation is nothing more than PC gone horribly wrong, and shoved down the public&#8217;s throat as a means of stamping out racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. when it accomplishes nothing of the sort. It has certainly complicated our crime reporting, as one of the criteria that must be evaluated when it comes to certain crimes was whether the crime envolved &#8220;hate crimes&#8221;. Does it make the original crime any less of a crime?&#8230;no. Adding the catagory of &#8220;hate crime&#8221; to any other crime is done mostly as a &#8220;sentence enhancer&#8221; to get a stiffer penalty.</p>
<p>What it can also do is give a defense attorney an opening to argue whether the defendant was being racist, sexist, or homophobic at the time of the commission of the crime. If it can be shown that the defendent was not acting or thinking in a manner that would constitute grounds for filing the charge as a &#8220;hate crime&#8221; then often the whole case is lost when the original case would have stood on its own without having to prove what the defendant was thinking, or motivated by, only that he did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12427</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Josh.  Murder is a crime.  We don&#039;t need special laws saying that because you kill someone because of their color or sexual orientation is MORE of a crime...

If you intentionally kill someone,  I think it is safe to say... YOU HATE THEM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Josh.  Murder is a crime.  We don&#8217;t need special laws saying that because you kill someone because of their color or sexual orientation is MORE of a crime&#8230;</p>
<p>If you intentionally kill someone,  I think it is safe to say&#8230; YOU HATE THEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12421</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12421</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bush’s callousness. He only signed into law the hate crimes bill when his state Congress overrode his veto. This is only one example.&quot;

Thats because in Texas they actually prosecute the current law on the books. The perp was KILLED for his crime.

I&#039;m not against hate crime legislation, but I am against hate crime legislation stacked on top of other laws that aren&#039;t enforced, in the name of appeasing a minority constituency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bush’s callousness. He only signed into law the hate crimes bill when his state Congress overrode his veto. This is only one example.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats because in Texas they actually prosecute the current law on the books. The perp was KILLED for his crime.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against hate crime legislation, but I am against hate crime legislation stacked on top of other laws that aren&#8217;t enforced, in the name of appeasing a minority constituency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12417</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12417</guid>
		<description>&#039;You conveniently forget about the ability to do voting by absentee ballot. NOBODY has to wait an hour. My friends home bound mother was able to vote. She simply picked up the phone and requested an absentee ballot be mailed to her.&#039;

Not everywhere, no.  Some places don&#039;t give absentee ballots to people who just say they won&#039;t be going down to the voting place.

Take care of own?  what are you talking about? I live across the country from Cruz, and many hours from byrd.  I have nothing to do with those guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;You conveniently forget about the ability to do voting by absentee ballot. NOBODY has to wait an hour. My friends home bound mother was able to vote. She simply picked up the phone and requested an absentee ballot be mailed to her.&#8217;</p>
<p>Not everywhere, no.  Some places don&#8217;t give absentee ballots to people who just say they won&#8217;t be going down to the voting place.</p>
<p>Take care of own?  what are you talking about? I live across the country from Cruz, and many hours from byrd.  I have nothing to do with those guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12408</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12408</guid>
		<description>Renee,
Agreed.  I have travelled extensively, and lived in true blue Philly and Frisco, as well as Penssylbamma.  The south and rural America tend to wear their racism on their sleeves.  And when I saw/heard someone make a racist comment South of the Mason/Dixxon, more often than not another local would take the speaker to task for it.  Or if it was a &#039;drive by&#039; situation, come over and tell the recipient that what they saw was out of line and unacceptable.
As for KKK members never voting democrat... plenty still do.  And plenty who think the dems are the party of black appeasement (toss in the jews, them yeller people, catholics and whomever else is on their list today) don&#039;t vote at all.  They aren&#039;t fans of the republican party, from the history, and the party&#039;s policies around free trade and unions.  Insular protectionist isolationists, who want union hours and contracts protected, aren&#039;t fans of the republican party as it has stood since... oh, at least as far back as Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee,<br />
Agreed.  I have travelled extensively, and lived in true blue Philly and Frisco, as well as Penssylbamma.  The south and rural America tend to wear their racism on their sleeves.  And when I saw/heard someone make a racist comment South of the Mason/Dixxon, more often than not another local would take the speaker to task for it.  Or if it was a &#8216;drive by&#8217; situation, come over and tell the recipient that what they saw was out of line and unacceptable.<br />
As for KKK members never voting democrat&#8230; plenty still do.  And plenty who think the dems are the party of black appeasement (toss in the jews, them yeller people, catholics and whomever else is on their list today) don&#8217;t vote at all.  They aren&#8217;t fans of the republican party, from the history, and the party&#8217;s policies around free trade and unions.  Insular protectionist isolationists, who want union hours and contracts protected, aren&#8217;t fans of the republican party as it has stood since&#8230; oh, at least as far back as Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12384</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12384</guid>
		<description>&quot;And, I’d venture to say that there are still more white racists in the South than in the North.&quot;

The reason why you would believe this is the same as I stated from expereince...

In the south, if they are racist, they are in your face...
up north, they smile hide, and wait to you are out of earshot.

Just my personal experiences as a black women who was born and raised up north and has lived in the south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And, I’d venture to say that there are still more white racists in the South than in the North.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason why you would believe this is the same as I stated from expereince&#8230;</p>
<p>In the south, if they are racist, they are in your face&#8230;<br />
up north, they smile hide, and wait to you are out of earshot.</p>
<p>Just my personal experiences as a black women who was born and raised up north and has lived in the south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lottajota</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottajota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12379</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike M.: your association argument cuts both ways.  If you want to associate the KKK with Bush voters (I voted for Bush and HATE the KKK) then I&#039;ll stick you with this (unfair in my opinion) association: Who would Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Ladin have voted for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike M.: your association argument cuts both ways.  If you want to associate the KKK with Bush voters (I voted for Bush and HATE the KKK) then I&#8217;ll stick you with this (unfair in my opinion) association: Who would Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Ladin have voted for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12378</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>Ummmm ok...
again no one said you did.

Have fun:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmm ok&#8230;<br />
again no one said you did.</p>
<p>Have fun:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12376</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12376</guid>
		<description>Renee,

You had the quote of Lyndon Johnson in your post.  I was saying that I never said either party has a hold on being &quot;more&quot; racist.  I may be a liberal, but I&#039;ve never said that one ideology is more racist then another, hence my comment.  I think it was clear in your post that you were making a point about how Democrats assume they have some &quot;divine right&quot; to minority voters in this country.  Sorry if I assumed incorrectly your intent.

My Southern Democrat comment was just that.  Southern Democrats are conservatives, by and large.  LBJ was a souther democrat, hence his racism is easily explained.

I don&#039;t care what party anyone was in during the Civil Rights Era; I still say a sure majority of whites WERE racists in the South at the time.  And, I&#039;d venture to say that there are still more white racists in the South than in the North.

Perhaps I&#039;m going too far into another area.

Well, it&#039;s Friday night.  I think I&#039;m going to go out and have some fun!!

You all have a good night.  La Shawn, I look forward to more great discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee,</p>
<p>You had the quote of Lyndon Johnson in your post.  I was saying that I never said either party has a hold on being &#8220;more&#8221; racist.  I may be a liberal, but I&#8217;ve never said that one ideology is more racist then another, hence my comment.  I think it was clear in your post that you were making a point about how Democrats assume they have some &#8220;divine right&#8221; to minority voters in this country.  Sorry if I assumed incorrectly your intent.</p>
<p>My Southern Democrat comment was just that.  Southern Democrats are conservatives, by and large.  LBJ was a souther democrat, hence his racism is easily explained.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what party anyone was in during the Civil Rights Era; I still say a sure majority of whites WERE racists in the South at the time.  And, I&#8217;d venture to say that there are still more white racists in the South than in the North.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m going too far into another area.</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s Friday night.  I think I&#8217;m going to go out and have some fun!!</p>
<p>You all have a good night.  La Shawn, I look forward to more great discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/comment-page-2/#comment-12373</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/11/19/platforms/#comment-12373</guid>
		<description>Ummm Mike...
Who said you did?  My comment to you was about pedophilia being a disease...
I said they labeled obesity one also but I don&#039;t buy it.

Lighten Up

And yes I do know LBJ was a democrat (hence why I posted it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm Mike&#8230;<br />
Who said you did?  My comment to you was about pedophilia being a disease&#8230;<br />
I said they labeled obesity one also but I don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p>Lighten Up</p>
<p>And yes I do know LBJ was a democrat (hence why I posted it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

