<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shocker: Government Schools Stink And They Cost A Lot Of Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-16083</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-16083</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Brotherhood of the Hypotenuse&lt;/strong&gt;
Simple questions: How many people do you know who donâ€™t know that Â¾=.75=75%? Or that all of them are fractions and represent a portion of a solid, whole entity of many parts? I wonder about this when I hear it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Brotherhood of the Hypotenuse</strong><br />
Simple questions: How many people do you know who donâ€™t know that Â¾=.75=75%? Or that all of them are fractions and represent a portion of a solid, whole entity of many parts? I wonder about this when I hear it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrissy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-15664</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 02:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15664</guid>
		<description>we as a country put more time into being entertained than being educated and educating our children.  Children spend too much time watching TV instead of playing sports, listening to pop music instead of learning to play an instrument, and reading junk magazines instead of real books and writing on their own.  None of the things that they do really develop any of their analytical skills.  I was listening to a show on the radio the other day, and the story insisted that video games benefit children because it makes them savvy risk takers and helps them focus on mastery.  But they master a VIDEO GAME, not a useful skill that makes them a productive contributor to society.  Children are filling their lack of challenges with things ranging from video games to drugs (prescription and illegal).  Why can&#039;t we get them to focus on mastery of Trig and Calc (which can be learned by every child by the age of 18 if we made it a real goal instead of putting them in counting classes)?  Can we teach them to focus on perfecting a craft in their life, instead of having them go to school to get degree after degree without having anything to show for it???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we as a country put more time into being entertained than being educated and educating our children.  Children spend too much time watching TV instead of playing sports, listening to pop music instead of learning to play an instrument, and reading junk magazines instead of real books and writing on their own.  None of the things that they do really develop any of their analytical skills.  I was listening to a show on the radio the other day, and the story insisted that video games benefit children because it makes them savvy risk takers and helps them focus on mastery.  But they master a VIDEO GAME, not a useful skill that makes them a productive contributor to society.  Children are filling their lack of challenges with things ranging from video games to drugs (prescription and illegal).  Why can&#8217;t we get them to focus on mastery of Trig and Calc (which can be learned by every child by the age of 18 if we made it a real goal instead of putting them in counting classes)?  Can we teach them to focus on perfecting a craft in their life, instead of having them go to school to get degree after degree without having anything to show for it???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-15527</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15527</guid>
		<description>Andy you make an excellent point, but when the President&#039;s education agenda is titled &quot;No Child Left Behind,&quot; that tells you everything you need to know.

Dennis Prager&#039;s book on Hard America, Soft America sheds some great light on this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy you make an excellent point, but when the President&#8217;s education agenda is titled &#8220;No Child Left Behind,&#8221; that tells you everything you need to know.</p>
<p>Dennis Prager&#8217;s book on Hard America, Soft America sheds some great light on this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany in Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-15467</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany in Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15467</guid>
		<description>I always believed that integration was a double edged sword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always believed that integration was a double edged sword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-15439</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 03:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15439</guid>
		<description>Renee, as usual, another excellent link :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee, as usual, another excellent link <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-2/#comment-15437</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15437</guid>
		<description>Tiffany, my view on unreachable/unteachable is that it is unfortunate but if implemented, it can serve as a wake up call.  I&#039;m speaking from a tough love POV.  

Realistically, I&#039;d say that no one is unteachable if held to account.  And yes maybe parents have to be dragged kicking and screaming into participating or risk punitive curtailments of their &#039;rights&#039; &amp; freedoms.  Perhaps, everytime little Johnny gets a D, the parent(s) have to pay a fine equal to 1/10 of their monthly income.  This is but just one option to be tested and explored.

Just as a gardener has to prune a tree to maximize the output, there has to be a way to prune away the factors that marginalizes the education process.  

For starters that means raising standards and enforcing discipline.  Students are not &#039;little people with valid perspectives&#039; or whatever the catch phrase du jour may be.  They are children to be shaped and molded.  In the case of black kids, that means &#039;acting white&#039; or suffer the consequences of not applying themselves to the 3 Rs.

As long as we have the let-it-be culture, there is no imperative for them to exert themselves.  Would you rather a small percentage get hit with this bitter truth or 50% of the student body obliviously drifting along to a life of shortchanged hopes and dreams?  Which is crueler? 

At this late stage we have had at least 2 generations critically damaged by the liberal elites.  Of course any course correction will involve hard decisions and yes even pain.  But to let things drift along for another generation or two is unconscienable, not to mention a drain on society at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiffany, my view on unreachable/unteachable is that it is unfortunate but if implemented, it can serve as a wake up call.  I&#8217;m speaking from a tough love POV.  </p>
<p>Realistically, I&#8217;d say that no one is unteachable if held to account.  And yes maybe parents have to be dragged kicking and screaming into participating or risk punitive curtailments of their &#8216;rights&#8217; &#038; freedoms.  Perhaps, everytime little Johnny gets a D, the parent(s) have to pay a fine equal to 1/10 of their monthly income.  This is but just one option to be tested and explored.</p>
<p>Just as a gardener has to prune a tree to maximize the output, there has to be a way to prune away the factors that marginalizes the education process.  </p>
<p>For starters that means raising standards and enforcing discipline.  Students are not &#8216;little people with valid perspectives&#8217; or whatever the catch phrase du jour may be.  They are children to be shaped and molded.  In the case of black kids, that means &#8216;acting white&#8217; or suffer the consequences of not applying themselves to the 3 Rs.</p>
<p>As long as we have the let-it-be culture, there is no imperative for them to exert themselves.  Would you rather a small percentage get hit with this bitter truth or 50% of the student body obliviously drifting along to a life of shortchanged hopes and dreams?  Which is crueler? </p>
<p>At this late stage we have had at least 2 generations critically damaged by the liberal elites.  Of course any course correction will involve hard decisions and yes even pain.  But to let things drift along for another generation or two is unconscienable, not to mention a drain on society at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15415</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15415</guid>
		<description>I always found this article from a past Issues and Views write up of interest when thinking of education:

http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1000/article/1017</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always found this article from a past Issues and Views write up of interest when thinking of education:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1000/article/1017" rel="nofollow">http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1000/article/1017</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15368</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15368</guid>
		<description>tiffany,
I never said some were unreachable and should be abandoned.  But I still don&#039;t think that the small number who are nearly so, should dictate the policy for those who aren&#039;t.  Any lowest common denominator system will punish the those who excel, just as a system that aims for the median will fail those at the extreme ends of the quality curve.
If the monies collected to teach the children were given back, in part, as vouchers to those who want something different, that leaves more resources for the children who stay behind.  Instead of having 1 or 2 children in a class (and yes, I know some schools have whole rooms of them) that are from the apathetic families or have other things going against them, you could consolidate them and concentrate on them.  Right now, we always hear about how the teachers cannot give the exceptional (again, both ends of the bell curve) the extra attention they need at the expense of the rest of the class.
I want to see the parents and students given the chance to make the decisions that are right for them, not what some beuraucrat thinks.  I want the teachers that are trained and equiped to deal with the exceptional children to be able to.
Now, I&#039;ve seen some bashing of the NEA/unions, but not a bashing of teachers as a whole.  Union = beuraucrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tiffany,<br />
I never said some were unreachable and should be abandoned.  But I still don&#8217;t think that the small number who are nearly so, should dictate the policy for those who aren&#8217;t.  Any lowest common denominator system will punish the those who excel, just as a system that aims for the median will fail those at the extreme ends of the quality curve.<br />
If the monies collected to teach the children were given back, in part, as vouchers to those who want something different, that leaves more resources for the children who stay behind.  Instead of having 1 or 2 children in a class (and yes, I know some schools have whole rooms of them) that are from the apathetic families or have other things going against them, you could consolidate them and concentrate on them.  Right now, we always hear about how the teachers cannot give the exceptional (again, both ends of the bell curve) the extra attention they need at the expense of the rest of the class.<br />
I want to see the parents and students given the chance to make the decisions that are right for them, not what some beuraucrat thinks.  I want the teachers that are trained and equiped to deal with the exceptional children to be able to.<br />
Now, I&#8217;ve seen some bashing of the NEA/unions, but not a bashing of teachers as a whole.  Union = beuraucrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany in Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany in Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>Stephen Johnson:

Thanks for your comments..I am also the daughter of a public school teacher and and am amazed at the vitrolic comments aimed at teachers, who simply are trying to do their best under the circumstances they are dealt with. Does my mom have plentry of complaints about the administration, the union and uninvolved parents? Sure she does, but she still doesn&#039;t write off the CHILDREN, even the ones deemed unreachable (which often translates to POOR AND MINORITY) by some of the folk on this thread. I remain in awe of being with my mom in public settings and how past students will come and tell my mom hello and how much they appreciated her trying. Quite often, after the past student has left my mom will mentioned how that person gave her HELL in the classroom.  

I guess you never know how you will impact someone do you?

And to those who think some children are unreachable/unteachable, thank God you chose another career path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Johnson:</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments..I am also the daughter of a public school teacher and and am amazed at the vitrolic comments aimed at teachers, who simply are trying to do their best under the circumstances they are dealt with. Does my mom have plentry of complaints about the administration, the union and uninvolved parents? Sure she does, but she still doesn&#8217;t write off the CHILDREN, even the ones deemed unreachable (which often translates to POOR AND MINORITY) by some of the folk on this thread. I remain in awe of being with my mom in public settings and how past students will come and tell my mom hello and how much they appreciated her trying. Quite often, after the past student has left my mom will mentioned how that person gave her HELL in the classroom.  </p>
<p>I guess you never know how you will impact someone do you?</p>
<p>And to those who think some children are unreachable/unteachable, thank God you chose another career path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15343</guid>
		<description>LB: &quot;All schools private? Well, the libertarian position is that all schools should compete for students in the open market. I lean that way, myself.&quot;

Competition is the key. It makes us all try harder. What would your response be La Shawn to those who worry about fractionalization of America into say Christian, Muslim, Liberal, Conservative...etc. via voucher funded schools?
How could that be avoided, or do you think it should?

Right now, even though I believe it is changing somewhat, our schools and colleges seem to be fully gov&#039;t funded liberal run schools without competition. The problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB: &#8220;All schools private? Well, the libertarian position is that all schools should compete for students in the open market. I lean that way, myself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Competition is the key. It makes us all try harder. What would your response be La Shawn to those who worry about fractionalization of America into say Christian, Muslim, Liberal, Conservative&#8230;etc. via voucher funded schools?<br />
How could that be avoided, or do you think it should?</p>
<p>Right now, even though I believe it is changing somewhat, our schools and colleges seem to be fully gov&#8217;t funded liberal run schools without competition. The problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15331</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15331</guid>
		<description>Chris R,
Your comment resonates with me.  I got out of the teaching path when I saw all of the BS that has now been heaped on teachers, as well as the teachers that reveled in it.
I still think that someday, when the mortgage is paid off and my own future is secure, then maybe I&#039;ll go back an teach part or full time (aside from the English as a second language classes I did a few years ago).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris R,<br />
Your comment resonates with me.  I got out of the teaching path when I saw all of the BS that has now been heaped on teachers, as well as the teachers that reveled in it.<br />
I still think that someday, when the mortgage is paid off and my own future is secure, then maybe I&#8217;ll go back an teach part or full time (aside from the English as a second language classes I did a few years ago).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen johnson</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15328</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15328</guid>
		<description>Dory- You suspect wrong about me.  (Which goes more to the idea that we tend to catorgorize people by their belief on one issue.  Not a fan of litmus tests).

I am not bashing Chrisian education.  My original post was about &#039;private schools&#039; which should not be ( and I did not intend to mean) exclusivly Christian.  

But as a Christian (which I proudly am), I do not see any child (we are talking about children) as un-reach/teach-able.  And a weird thing popped up as we took this rhetorical journey...the idea that some were/are doomed to fail.

This is the main divergence of the Public/Private school mandate.  The public school-woeful as SOME are, has a mandate to teach ALL children, without regard to what their home or personal situation may be.  WHEREAS the Private school benefits from being free from that burden.

In pointing out that one gets to choose its students, AND has the benefit of parents who get to choose the school (thus showing a level of involvement,) I was not demeaning the success of CHRISTIAN schools.  I was pointing out that the two differ in operation as well as mandate.

You got a little defensive because you read private to mean Christian; and while all Christian Schools may be private, ALL private schools are NOT Christian.  There was nothing in my original comment to suggest such a thing; beyond your determination that I am a liberal (a wrong determination, I must add).

My point about you taking the &quot;higher paying public school job&quot; was intended to show the irony of the words higher.paying.Public.School.Job- which seems almost oxymoronic.

The truth in this lies in the middle.  Many Private schools do a fine job educating their students (on average) and perhaps the worst private school is better than the worst public school; but one must acknowledge that the two are very different.  I never said &#039;you have it easy because you teach in private school&#039;, though that is exactly what you inferred from my comment.  I stated that to SOME degree the two differ.  A point that I think you acknowledge, because of the level of defenses that went up.  

Renee- You are right, my &#039;welfare&#039; statement created a negetive connotation and gross generalization that is wrong and was unintended.  You took me to task on that matter, and I apologize.

All my other points, though, are right on the money.  As economically conservative as I may be, and believe you me I am, I do not think that the market is equiped to handle some social situations.  At least not in a developed nation.  

What some have suggested on this blog harkens back to before the founding of this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dory- You suspect wrong about me.  (Which goes more to the idea that we tend to catorgorize people by their belief on one issue.  Not a fan of litmus tests).</p>
<p>I am not bashing Chrisian education.  My original post was about &#8216;private schools&#8217; which should not be ( and I did not intend to mean) exclusivly Christian.  </p>
<p>But as a Christian (which I proudly am), I do not see any child (we are talking about children) as un-reach/teach-able.  And a weird thing popped up as we took this rhetorical journey&#8230;the idea that some were/are doomed to fail.</p>
<p>This is the main divergence of the Public/Private school mandate.  The public school-woeful as SOME are, has a mandate to teach ALL children, without regard to what their home or personal situation may be.  WHEREAS the Private school benefits from being free from that burden.</p>
<p>In pointing out that one gets to choose its students, AND has the benefit of parents who get to choose the school (thus showing a level of involvement,) I was not demeaning the success of CHRISTIAN schools.  I was pointing out that the two differ in operation as well as mandate.</p>
<p>You got a little defensive because you read private to mean Christian; and while all Christian Schools may be private, ALL private schools are NOT Christian.  There was nothing in my original comment to suggest such a thing; beyond your determination that I am a liberal (a wrong determination, I must add).</p>
<p>My point about you taking the &#8220;higher paying public school job&#8221; was intended to show the irony of the words higher.paying.Public.School.Job- which seems almost oxymoronic.</p>
<p>The truth in this lies in the middle.  Many Private schools do a fine job educating their students (on average) and perhaps the worst private school is better than the worst public school; but one must acknowledge that the two are very different.  I never said &#8216;you have it easy because you teach in private school&#8217;, though that is exactly what you inferred from my comment.  I stated that to SOME degree the two differ.  A point that I think you acknowledge, because of the level of defenses that went up.  </p>
<p>Renee- You are right, my &#8216;welfare&#8217; statement created a negetive connotation and gross generalization that is wrong and was unintended.  You took me to task on that matter, and I apologize.</p>
<p>All my other points, though, are right on the money.  As economically conservative as I may be, and believe you me I am, I do not think that the market is equiped to handle some social situations.  At least not in a developed nation.  </p>
<p>What some have suggested on this blog harkens back to before the founding of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15324</link>
		<dc:creator>firebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15324</guid>
		<description>Its been proven time and time again that kids educated at home do better then the one educated at these goverment run schools and frankly its time to eliminate the dept of education and return to home schooling its time to end the brainwashing thier going through at the hands of the leftists and the NEA(National Education Association)and get them away from the eco-freaks revolutionists and terrorists and radicals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its been proven time and time again that kids educated at home do better then the one educated at these goverment run schools and frankly its time to eliminate the dept of education and return to home schooling its time to end the brainwashing thier going through at the hands of the leftists and the NEA(National Education Association)and get them away from the eco-freaks revolutionists and terrorists and radicals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15307</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;EG&lt;/strong&gt; - Sorry for jumping the gun. I guess the word &quot;forced&quot; threw me off. It sounds like the language of a voucher opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EG</strong> &#8211; Sorry for jumping the gun. I guess the word &#8220;forced&#8221; threw me off. It sounds like the language of a voucher opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-15257</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2004/12/07/shocker/#comment-15257</guid>
		<description>Another issue in education is the quality of the individual being hired to teach and the difficulty in retaining quality teachers in &quot;inner-city&quot; or &quot;tough&quot; schools.  It is very difficult (and I learned from experience) to teach and continually reach out to students who show little regard for simple values and who are entitled to behave as they wish with little or no consequences.  Why are the consequences weakened?  I was asked in my previous teaching job to submit a list of &quot;tolerances&quot; for inappropriate behaviors that would be handled with classroom &quot;consequences.&quot;  

Another question is parental invovlement.  Much as WW alluded to in his piece that LB highlighted, there are many things that were taught in the home by most everyone in the past.  Parents have a duty to educate their children at home and not leave all the education to the &quot;professionals.&quot;  Too many children are showing up to school without that education from home that is so needed.  Therefore they start way behind, have a desire to fit in and not have attention drawn to their shortcomings and presto.....behavior problems.  But of course, as long as parents have a bailout program (fed govt.), then many will have little or no interest in taking education seriously at home.

Note that I am talking about some parents, not all!!!

BTW, private schools are less agenda driven (not any less political), and I will for sure take a job at a private school in the future than return to public education.  My experiences have taken whatever naivete I held about being a difference maker in public schools and turned it on my head.

I hope we can ALL work together to solve our education problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another issue in education is the quality of the individual being hired to teach and the difficulty in retaining quality teachers in &#8220;inner-city&#8221; or &#8220;tough&#8221; schools.  It is very difficult (and I learned from experience) to teach and continually reach out to students who show little regard for simple values and who are entitled to behave as they wish with little or no consequences.  Why are the consequences weakened?  I was asked in my previous teaching job to submit a list of &#8220;tolerances&#8221; for inappropriate behaviors that would be handled with classroom &#8220;consequences.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Another question is parental invovlement.  Much as WW alluded to in his piece that LB highlighted, there are many things that were taught in the home by most everyone in the past.  Parents have a duty to educate their children at home and not leave all the education to the &#8220;professionals.&#8221;  Too many children are showing up to school without that education from home that is so needed.  Therefore they start way behind, have a desire to fit in and not have attention drawn to their shortcomings and presto&#8230;..behavior problems.  But of course, as long as parents have a bailout program (fed govt.), then many will have little or no interest in taking education seriously at home.</p>
<p>Note that I am talking about some parents, not all!!!</p>
<p>BTW, private schools are less agenda driven (not any less political), and I will for sure take a job at a private school in the future than return to public education.  My experiences have taken whatever naivete I held about being a difference maker in public schools and turned it on my head.</p>
<p>I hope we can ALL work together to solve our education problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
