Academic Freedom, Hate Mail And David Horowitz

by La Shawn on December 28, 2004

in Conservatives, Education

Where there’s David Horowitz, there’s fire. On the controversial former liberal-turned-conservative’s web site, FrontPage magazine, you’ll find articles with names like Reparations Buffoons On the Washington Mall and Black Crime (In Your Face). Now he’s forcing leftist academics to explain why they suppress the viewpoints of conservatives students.

Horowitz is backing a group called Students for Academic Freedom, which exposes and publicizes leftist professors who allow their anti-American bias to creep into their lectures and assignments.

What a good time to be a conservative student! That they’re shedding a complacent image and using liberal tactics against liberals is refreshing. We all have our biases, but sometimes they must be controlled and subdued. If liberal professors refuse, they’ll have to explain why. Either way, their anti-Americanism will no longer remain unchallenged.

I’ll confess. I wouldn’t mind if more journalists exhibited strong pro-American sentiments in their writing. A conservative professor allowing aspects of his faith to intermingle with various teaching methods wouldn’t bother me. But I understand why it would bother the anti-American and the faithless. Academic freedom is necessary to protect students with different viewpoints. Because academia is dominated by the left, it’s the viewpoint of the “minority” that needs the most protection at present. From the Associated Press:

[A]cademic freedom guidelines have traditionally been cited to protect left-leaning students from punishment for disagreeing with teachers about such issues as American neutrality before World War II and U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Now, conservative students who support the liberation of Iraq are invoking those same guidelines.

To many professors, there’s a new and deeply troubling aspect to this latest chapter in the debate over academic freedom: students trying to dictate what they don’t want to be taught.

I don’t want to be “taught” that the greatest country in the world, where people are sneaking in by the millions and no one is trying to get out (except maybe a few deranged Bush-haters), is a racist, imperialist, warmongering cesspool of dead white men whose ideas have oppressed the rest of the world.

But that’s just me.

Some also fear teachers will shy away from sensitive topics, or fend off criticism by “balancing” their syllabuses with opposing viewpoints, even if they represent inferior scholarship.

“Faculty retrench. They are less willing to discuss contemporary problems and I think everyone loses out,” said Joe Losco, a professor of political science at Ball State University in Indiana who has supported two colleagues targeted for alleged bias. “It puts a chill in the air.”

Conservatives say a chill is in order.

That last line is a great one. And did you catch the part about presenting opposing viewpoints even when they represent inferior scholarship? They admit it! I’d venture to say that most politically correct junk theories represent inferior scholarship, Afrocentrism and “gay studies” (get real!) being examples.

College professors who claim leftist bias doesn’t affect their teaching are either liars or in need of rigorous remedial training. In one instance, a student objected to the Koran as required reading. Why was it mandatory? The Bible, the foundation of Western thought (individual liberty, equal justice, etc.) is not required reading. Why not? There’s no bias at work here?

Anti-American, anti-Western attitudes among academia will not change until more conservatives become professors. Conservative students must continue exposing and embarrassing college administrators and professors. For your edification, see Academia: The Last Liberal Refuge?

And liberal professors will just have to deal with it. Protected in his ivy-covered world of make-believe, one professor whined about receiving hate mail from people critical of his “peace studies” class. Horowitz said, “These people are such sissies. I get hate mail every single day. What can I do about it? It’s called the Internet.”

It’s called reigning in your biases, defending your arguments and taking it like a man, professor. Welcome to the real world.

{ 13 trackbacks }

The Daily Brief
12.30.04 at 2:55 am
The Sundries Shack
12.31.04 at 1:19 pm
Watcher of Weasels
12.29.04 at 2:33 am
Watcher of Weasels
12.31.04 at 1:43 am
King of Fools
12.31.04 at 8:59 am
The Sundries Shack
12.31.04 at 1:30 pm
Little Miss Attila
12.31.04 at 8:01 pm
The Education Wonks
12.31.04 at 8:22 pm
Watcher of Weasels
01.02.05 at 1:49 am
Belief Seeking Understanding
01.02.05 at 7:24 am
The Glittering Eye
01.02.05 at 4:54 pm
The SmarterCop
01.03.05 at 9:26 am
The Moderate Voice
01.07.05 at 1:23 pm

{ 22 comments }

Michael E. Cummins 12.28.04 at 8:54 am

Touche! I would add something useful to the topic, but I think LaShawn said it all. What a great start to a Monday!

LB 12.28.04 at 8:56 am

It’s a “Monday” for me, too.

firebird 12.28.04 at 9:39 am

Hit the nail right on the head as they would say these students should challenge these intellectual eggheads spreading their antiamerican crap at these collages

texasfarmboy 12.28.04 at 12:01 pm

You are fast becoming my favorite blogger. Great post, great observations, and a truly right on topic that needs to be addressed, put out in front and be made a topic of discussion for every parent sending their kid off to college.

miguel 12.28.04 at 12:30 pm

Q: Why are most professors liberal?

A: Because professors study facts. Facts are liberal. Conservatism is a dream world that only allows the facts that you agree with. Conservatives believe a priori in their black and white conclusions; any facts that challenge that worldview are labeled ‘moral-relativism’ or ‘anti-Americanism’. Liberals carefully study all shades of grey issues and let the conclusions fall where they may, even if the conclusion doesn’t make you feel good about yourself.

Conservatism is the simple worldview that you were taught in grade school, liberalism is the tough lessons taught in universities.

SCSIwuzzy 12.28.04 at 1:25 pm

LOL
I’m going to be chuckling about that all day. “Facts are liberal” indeed.
And tough lessons at university? Try the real world… that is the real crucible.

Christopher Cross 12.28.04 at 1:26 pm

Eh, Horowitz is not much more than a publicity whore. Unless there’s a hefty speaking fee being offered, no go.

It’s a good time to be a conservative student if you’re actually serious about getting your ideas our there and convincing people…

…but if that’s your goal, Horowitz ain’t the way to go.

LB 12.28.04 at 1:29 pm

publicity whore

Harsh! True? Maybe…

actus 12.28.04 at 3:30 pm

‘“gay studies” (get real!) being examples.’

What do you know about gay studies scholarship?

Christopher Taylor 12.28.04 at 3:46 pm

Its actually worse than you noted. They weren’t admitting that leftist leaning is inferior scholarship… they were calling using anything BUT leftist crap inferior scholarship.

feaster 12.28.04 at 4:06 pm

I find the phrase “liberal orthodoxy” to be the most telling of all.

gcotharn 12.28.04 at 4:52 pm

I think “media whore” is unfair sniping– or at least misleading. Horowitz is creating changes in the culture as best he can. He is using any media celebrity he has to fuel accomplishment. That’s exactly what a committed person OUGHT to be doing with their media celebrity. Its not a perfect analogy, but who would’ve stooped to call MLK or Ghandi media whores? They also used their media celebrity to advance their causes– and properly so.

I am proud to be a citizen with David Horowitz.

Christopher Cross 12.28.04 at 5:56 pm

Eh, I’d argue he tends to eschew opportunities to spread his message where there is not a chance for publicity or speaking fee involved.

Is he good at what he does? Sure. Is that the best he can do? Hope not.

Renee 12.28.04 at 7:27 pm

I am still laughing from reading the “Reparation Buffoons” piece. I don’t even remember it being advertised or I would have went so I could laugh for real… :-)

Harris 12.28.04 at 9:03 pm

Oh, me. Of course, the Koran should be required in some contexts. Your complaint only makes sense if you believe one of two things:

either that reading the Koran is not necessary in any circumstance, or that you believe all colleges make this a requirement. My own guess would be that you’ll find the Bible as required reading in far more colleges than that of required reading in the Koran.

That raises the more fundamental issue: criticism to be authentic must rise to more than hearsay or gossip. That is why we ask for citations. E.g. Who required the mandatory reading of the Koran? In what context?

You may also ask whether a student deserves merely to be taughht what he or she already believes, or what is in fact true. Ideologies of the left and the right are alike enemies of the Truth. The challenge and opportunity in a good college is to transform our lives by the diligent application of ourselves. (think Rom 12)

Our country and our politics is little served by those with unchallenged minds, or who are left in the slough of their own political prejudice.

La Shawn 12.28.04 at 9:24 pm

Our country and our politics is little served by those with unchallenged minds, or who are left in the slough of their own political prejudice.

I couldn’t agree more. In fact, it might be illegal if I did. You speak like an angel. Too bad we’re living on the earth.

(Bonus points for whoever can tell what movie those last two lines came from.)

Christopher Cross 12.28.04 at 9:36 pm

Ernest goes to Olympus?

SCSIwuzzy 12.29.04 at 12:47 pm

Harris,
Reading the Koran for a course on religion, mid-east history, mid-east literature etc would make perfect sense. But what is the point of making it required reading of all incoming freshman, regardless of major? Had it been the Bible, you could put money on it that the ACLU would be in a tizzy that a state Univ. was violating the 1st Amendment.

Neo 12.31.04 at 1:55 am

I especially like the “even if they represent inferior scholarship”. It is comforting to know that these professors are acting as the “gatekeeepers of ignorance” to to save each and everyone of us from “inferior scholarship,” the newest watchword for academic censorship.

It riles them to believe that you see the web that they weave .. and keep on thinking free.

Attila Girl 12.31.04 at 3:01 am

In some contexts, “inferior scholarship” = “dangerous ideas I don’t agree with.”

EdWonk 12.31.04 at 7:04 pm

Congratulations on winning The Watcher’s Council competition. I tried to send a trackback, but I think Haloscan is having problems. The URL is here: http://educationwonk.blogspot.com/2004/12/council-has-spoken_31.html

Rod Stanton 01.02.05 at 4:13 pm

A truely great post.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Bloggers I Will Meet/See Again On New Year’s Eve Eve

Next post: My Blogosphere Wish List For 2005