<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedback On New Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-19020</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-19020</guid>
		<description>Given the available space on the right, would you consider expanding the Recent Posts to 10 or even 15?  I wonder if WordPress can also indicate the # of comments (perhaps even use &quot;-&quot; or blank for posts with no comments allowed)?  That should enhace usability in determining whether new comments were added since the last vist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the available space on the right, would you consider expanding the Recent Posts to 10 or even 15?  I wonder if WordPress can also indicate the # of comments (perhaps even use &#8220;-&#8221; or blank for posts with no comments allowed)?  That should enhace usability in determining whether new comments were added since the last vist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18852</guid>
		<description>Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.

If you still don&#039;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#039;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024x768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.

If you still don&#039;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#039;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024x768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.

If you still don&#039;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#039;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024x768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the browser window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,<br />
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.</p>
<p>If you still don&#8217;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#8217;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024&#215;768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,<br />
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.</p>
<p>If you still don&#8217;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#8217;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024&#215;768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the Cindy, If you click on the left side of the scroll bar, instead of the left scroll bar button,<br />
the screen will scroll in one big leap, exposing the full right pane with one click.</p>
<p>If you still don&#8217;t like even a one-click scroll, then read Andy&#8217;s comment about increasing text sizes in the 1024&#215;768 setting for either the whole screen or just in the browser window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Swanson</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18842</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18842</guid>
		<description>Thanks, La Shawn! [grinning happily]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, La Shawn! [grinning happily]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Hart</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18833</guid>
		<description>Ms. Barber,

1) I like the new look especially the three-column look with the main center column justified. My present resolution setting is 1024 x 768, Windows XP, IE 6+.

2) I’m not that particular on the use of categories but I do like them more than the one single list of blog links. I like the use of comments but after reading some of Michelle Malkins “trash” I can certainly understand the need to eliminate them or at least limit them to only a few posts. I like the aesthetic changes and the position of your side containers is immaterial. My main interest is in your writing and communication of thoughts and overall information. Isn’t that the real importance of any of us having and maintaining a blog?

3) Suggestions and changes would have to come from someone other than a non-computer geek like myself. The little codex I know comes strictly from trial and error and the dependence on many friends.  At the present time I can not think of any new features other than I enjoy pictures along with some posts to add variety.

Please keep up the excellent work and I’m sure there are many individuals well qualified out in the Blogosphere to help with the many technical details. As for now, your site looks especially good and easy to read.  Thank you…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Barber,</p>
<p>1) I like the new look especially the three-column look with the main center column justified. My present resolution setting is 1024 x 768, Windows XP, IE 6+.</p>
<p>2) I’m not that particular on the use of categories but I do like them more than the one single list of blog links. I like the use of comments but after reading some of Michelle Malkins “trash” I can certainly understand the need to eliminate them or at least limit them to only a few posts. I like the aesthetic changes and the position of your side containers is immaterial. My main interest is in your writing and communication of thoughts and overall information. Isn’t that the real importance of any of us having and maintaining a blog?</p>
<p>3) Suggestions and changes would have to come from someone other than a non-computer geek like myself. The little codex I know comes strictly from trial and error and the dependence on many friends.  At the present time I can not think of any new features other than I enjoy pictures along with some posts to add variety.</p>
<p>Please keep up the excellent work and I’m sure there are many individuals well qualified out in the Blogosphere to help with the many technical details. As for now, your site looks especially good and easy to read.  Thank you…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18830</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18830</guid>
		<description>800x600 - and I dislike scrolling left and right.  I just can&#039;t get used to 1024 - too small for my aging eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>800&#215;600 &#8211; and I dislike scrolling left and right.  I just can&#8217;t get used to 1024 &#8211; too small for my aging eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18814</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18814</guid>
		<description>8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18812</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18812</guid>
		<description>Thanks, everybody! :D

I think someone made a comment about text size. I&#039;m using Firefox and I can increase the size of text on the page.

Cindy - I thought you were already on my blogroll. You are now. :)

Thanks, Andy. You did mention that. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, everybody! <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think someone made a comment about text size. I&#8217;m using Firefox and I can increase the size of text on the page.</p>
<p>Cindy &#8211; I thought you were already on my blogroll. You are now. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks, Andy. You did mention that. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18811</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18811</guid>
		<description>To add to Jim R&#039;s comment about changing the resolution, 800 x 600 to 1024 x 768 or higher:  

If you like the overall improved resolution, but find the text too small, you can click on the &quot;Advanced&quot; button and under the General tab, change the font to display at a larger %.  Default setting is &quot;normal at 96dpi&quot;.

Experiment and see what works for you.  If other applications look fine as is, i.e. Word, Excel etc, but the browser text is too small to read comfortably, then focus instead on changing the Browser&#039;s view settings.  Go to the menu and click on View &#124; Text Size and change to suit.

Did I say the new look looks great?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to Jim R&#8217;s comment about changing the resolution, 800 x 600 to 1024 x 768 or higher:  </p>
<p>If you like the overall improved resolution, but find the text too small, you can click on the &#8220;Advanced&#8221; button and under the General tab, change the font to display at a larger %.  Default setting is &#8220;normal at 96dpi&#8221;.</p>
<p>Experiment and see what works for you.  If other applications look fine as is, i.e. Word, Excel etc, but the browser text is too small to read comfortably, then focus instead on changing the Browser&#8217;s view settings.  Go to the menu and click on View | Text Size and change to suit.</p>
<p>Did I say the new look looks great?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Swanson</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18810</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18810</guid>
		<description>Looks great, La Shawn, except that I still haven&#039;t made YOUR blogroll.  Now, that&#039;ll be a happy day! :)  (Obviously I&#039;m not too proud to plug...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great, La Shawn, except that I still haven&#8217;t made YOUR blogroll.  Now, that&#8217;ll be a happy day! <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Obviously I&#8217;m not too proud to plug&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Stanton</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18805</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18805</guid>
		<description>Looks good to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18796</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18796</guid>
		<description>I like it.  Esp the boxes around different &#039;features&#039; in the left and right columns.  Much easier to process.
Dividing up your blogroll into category, and in the case of Right, also into letter groupings, also much easier to read and know what you&#039;re getting into when you click on a link.  You have so many now, that I thought I missed one or two, only to find that they were in another box (although I&#039;m pretty sure one or two or missing [can&#039;t put my finger on which], and it looks like some are new).  I knew I should have screen scraped your old page when you announced changes, for when this question was asked :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.  Esp the boxes around different &#8216;features&#8217; in the left and right columns.  Much easier to process.<br />
Dividing up your blogroll into category, and in the case of Right, also into letter groupings, also much easier to read and know what you&#8217;re getting into when you click on a link.  You have so many now, that I thought I missed one or two, only to find that they were in another box (although I&#8217;m pretty sure one or two or missing [can't put my finger on which], and it looks like some are new).  I knew I should have screen scraped your old page when you announced changes, for when this question was asked <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Mikey</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18780</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18780</guid>
		<description>The new design looks great except that you could have a BIG FONT link to my site....;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new design looks great except that you could have a BIG FONT link to my site&#8230;.;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartiniPundit</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18775</link>
		<dc:creator>MartiniPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18775</guid>
		<description>LaShawn -

I like the new design. Everything looks pretty good on my 12&quot; Powerbook screen.  I&#039;m using Safari 1.2.4 and 1024 x 768 and don&#039;t seem to have any trouble with your blogroll etc.

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn -</p>
<p>I like the new design. Everything looks pretty good on my 12&#8243; Powerbook screen.  I&#8217;m using Safari 1.2.4 and 1024 x 768 and don&#8217;t seem to have any trouble with your blogroll etc.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin S.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18763</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18763</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using 1280x1024, and it looks a little lopsided.  (I use 1600x1200 on my main computer at home, and haven&#039;t checked it there yet.)  Still, it&#039;s completely readable, and looks nice.  

I don&#039;t care much one way or the other for the categories -- I don&#039;t have a lot of problems with just skimming through the full list.  I do (half-jokingly) support the No-Talent Hack category idea, though.

Please, please, PLEASE don&#039;t make links automatically open in a new window.  It annoys me to no end when sites do that. (Small popups for comment links are okay.  Regular links, no.)  For those who want a new window, I&#039;m almost certain that there should be an easy way to force a link into a new window.  On the other hand, for those of us who like having a minimal number of windows open under most circumstances, clicking a link becomes a chore when they auto open in a new window:  Click link.  Close old window.  Lose history.  Sigh when you realize you can&#039;t get back to where you were half an hour ago by clicking the &quot;back&quot; button.   I realize how petty that complaint really is, but it&#039;s one of my pet peeves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using 1280&#215;1024, and it looks a little lopsided.  (I use 1600&#215;1200 on my main computer at home, and haven&#8217;t checked it there yet.)  Still, it&#8217;s completely readable, and looks nice.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care much one way or the other for the categories &#8212; I don&#8217;t have a lot of problems with just skimming through the full list.  I do (half-jokingly) support the No-Talent Hack category idea, though.</p>
<p>Please, please, PLEASE don&#8217;t make links automatically open in a new window.  It annoys me to no end when sites do that. (Small popups for comment links are okay.  Regular links, no.)  For those who want a new window, I&#8217;m almost certain that there should be an easy way to force a link into a new window.  On the other hand, for those of us who like having a minimal number of windows open under most circumstances, clicking a link becomes a chore when they auto open in a new window:  Click link.  Close old window.  Lose history.  Sigh when you realize you can&#8217;t get back to where you were half an hour ago by clicking the &#8220;back&#8221; button.   I realize how petty that complaint really is, but it&#8217;s one of my pet peeves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-18758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/18/feedback/#comment-18758</guid>
		<description>Commenters with right pane problems. If right pane is missing, you are probably set to an 800x600 display resolution.

To see the right pane, scroll right using the scroll bar at the bottom of the sreen.

-or- change your display resolution to 1024x768. To do this, right click on a blank area of your desktop screen. Left click &#039;properties&#039; then left click &#039;settings&#039;tab. Move &#039;screen area&#039; bar to the right to increase resolution to 1024x768. Left click OK. Your display will temp go blank and recover showing new resolution. If it looks ok, left click YES or ACCEPT on query window showing to save and use this new resolution.

Repeat above to switch back to 800x600 if you don&#039;t like the smaller size text and icons at any time in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenters with right pane problems. If right pane is missing, you are probably set to an 800&#215;600 display resolution.</p>
<p>To see the right pane, scroll right using the scroll bar at the bottom of the sreen.</p>
<p>-or- change your display resolution to 1024&#215;768. To do this, right click on a blank area of your desktop screen. Left click &#8216;properties&#8217; then left click &#8217;settings&#8217;tab. Move &#8217;screen area&#8217; bar to the right to increase resolution to 1024&#215;768. Left click OK. Your display will temp go blank and recover showing new resolution. If it looks ok, left click YES or ACCEPT on query window showing to save and use this new resolution.</p>
<p>Repeat above to switch back to 800&#215;600 if you don&#8217;t like the smaller size text and icons at any time in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
