<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irony And Kevin Drum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moge</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-24046</link>
		<dc:creator>Moge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-24046</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a woman writing an op-ed/political/satirical blog, but I doubt very much Ms. Estrich really wants to read it: we don&#039;t see the world in quite the same way. There may be an ole&#039; boy network of bloggers, but there&#039;s room for everyone. Blogging is very democratic: it&#039;s the quality of the writing that counts. I believe talent always finds its admirers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a woman writing an op-ed/political/satirical blog, but I doubt very much Ms. Estrich really wants to read it: we don&#8217;t see the world in quite the same way. There may be an ole&#8217; boy network of bloggers, but there&#8217;s room for everyone. Blogging is very democratic: it&#8217;s the quality of the writing that counts. I believe talent always finds its admirers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23808</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23808</guid>
		<description>I miss the purple haze from a freshly run test or hand out back in my school days.
You could also spot the people that really liked it... a telltale bluish-purple smudge on the tip of the nose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the purple haze from a freshly run test or hand out back in my school days.<br />
You could also spot the people that really liked it&#8230; a telltale bluish-purple smudge on the tip of the nose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23803</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23803</guid>
		<description>Julie, that&#039;s the beauty of blogs.  Especially for non-mainstream &quot;journalism&quot; and newsletters. 

Before Xerox commoditized copiers, if one couldn&#039;t afford print shops, one would have to transcribe articles to a mimeograph, with graphics consisting of simple line drawings, and in my experience, hand crank them out page by page.  And if you had a mailing list, crank out a set of envelopes.  Just to target an audience of 100, it could easily consume a day or two to publish.  

Xerox made pictures and schematics possible &amp; less messier, not to mention getting high off the mimeograph ink. 

Blogging is truly revolutionary and an equalizer in allowing anyone do 1 to many publishing plus enabling the speed of light feedback loop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, that&#8217;s the beauty of blogs.  Especially for non-mainstream &#8220;journalism&#8221; and newsletters. </p>
<p>Before Xerox commoditized copiers, if one couldn&#8217;t afford print shops, one would have to transcribe articles to a mimeograph, with graphics consisting of simple line drawings, and in my experience, hand crank them out page by page.  And if you had a mailing list, crank out a set of envelopes.  Just to target an audience of 100, it could easily consume a day or two to publish.  </p>
<p>Xerox made pictures and schematics possible &#038; less messier, not to mention getting high off the mimeograph ink. </p>
<p>Blogging is truly revolutionary and an equalizer in allowing anyone do 1 to many publishing plus enabling the speed of light feedback loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23796</link>
		<dc:creator>julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23796</guid>
		<description>It is a mistake to treat the term &quot;blog&quot; as meaning &quot;political blog.&quot;  Yes, this second type gets lot of attention, but perhaps the most revolutionary element of blogging is that we are getting informed commentary on virtually every topic in the world, these blogs fit into hundreds of niches, then thousands of sub niches, but they remain the revolutionary aspect most consistent with early visions of networks.  

Beyond this you have millions of essentially social blogs, these create tiny &quot;communities&quot; and offer people connections once previously impossible with linking to others of similar types.  They multiply  by significant (not necessarilly huge) numbers the people participants have access to, this means in the strange patterns of word to mouth things can ripple around much, much faster.

The effect of these things is not obviously dramatic, yet it can be nore fundamental than today&#039;s teapot tempests, an idea dropped in a venture capital blog or discussion group and read by a few hundred may be more important than things read by millions because this is the precise audience that matters in development of technology.  Similarly thousands of third world doctors may get access to things not availible or in the less tangible tens of thousands of teenage girls may through loosely interconnected networks be more able to define their &quot;culture&quot; with less influence from mass influences and the ability to find sympathetic companions all over the world, reducing the power of traditional peer pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a mistake to treat the term &#8220;blog&#8221; as meaning &#8220;political blog.&#8221;  Yes, this second type gets lot of attention, but perhaps the most revolutionary element of blogging is that we are getting informed commentary on virtually every topic in the world, these blogs fit into hundreds of niches, then thousands of sub niches, but they remain the revolutionary aspect most consistent with early visions of networks.  </p>
<p>Beyond this you have millions of essentially social blogs, these create tiny &#8220;communities&#8221; and offer people connections once previously impossible with linking to others of similar types.  They multiply  by significant (not necessarilly huge) numbers the people participants have access to, this means in the strange patterns of word to mouth things can ripple around much, much faster.</p>
<p>The effect of these things is not obviously dramatic, yet it can be nore fundamental than today&#8217;s teapot tempests, an idea dropped in a venture capital blog or discussion group and read by a few hundred may be more important than things read by millions because this is the precise audience that matters in development of technology.  Similarly thousands of third world doctors may get access to things not availible or in the less tangible tens of thousands of teenage girls may through loosely interconnected networks be more able to define their &#8220;culture&#8221; with less influence from mass influences and the ability to find sympathetic companions all over the world, reducing the power of traditional peer pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23795</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23795</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Obviously&lt;/em&gt;, more men have more free time than women, given the statistics on women (generally) pulling more than their fair share of the load in home and family responsibilities. 

As for interest in politics, some of the most engaged people I know are my women friends; we talk about political issues all of the time... but as I said, &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; don&#039;t have &lt;em&gt;time&lt;/em&gt; to blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Obviously</em>, more men have more free time than women, given the statistics on women (generally) pulling more than their fair share of the load in home and family responsibilities. </p>
<p>As for interest in politics, some of the most engaged people I know are my women friends; we talk about political issues all of the time&#8230; but as I said, <em>they</em> don&#8217;t have <em>time</em> to blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23640</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23640</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Whither The Female Bloggers?&lt;/strong&gt;
In the course of reading blogs, it becomes readily apparent that blogging is perhaps the most male-dominated &quot;industry&quot; in America right now. Is there a gender gap in blogging? The Pew Research Center recently studied the demographics of blogging, fi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Whither The Female Bloggers?</strong><br />
In the course of reading blogs, it becomes readily apparent that blogging is perhaps the most male-dominated &#8220;industry&#8221; in America right now. Is there a gender gap in blogging? The Pew Research Center recently studied the demographics of blogging, fi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNCoRRELATED</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23557</link>
		<dc:creator>UNCoRRELATED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23557</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Where the girls aren&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt;
La Shawn Barber puts in her two bits about the absence of women from the Op Ed pages and the blogosphere--no links. Well, I&#039;m doing my part today. It seems a lot of the commentary on the Kinsley-Estrich brouhaha has...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Where the girls aren&#8217;t</strong><br />
La Shawn Barber puts in her two bits about the absence of women from the Op Ed pages and the blogosphere&#8211;no links. Well, I&#8217;m doing my part today. It seems a lot of the commentary on the Kinsley-Estrich brouhaha has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Lotzgesell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23529</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Lotzgesell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23529</guid>
		<description>Dear La Shawn,

     I enjoy reading your blog very much.  You are doing conservative women a great deed.  I have a fairly new blog up and running.  I write essays on politics, culture, and society.  Please take a moment and check me out.  I am looking, of course, for link exchanges.

Best wishes, Dana Lotzgesell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear La Shawn,</p>
<p>     I enjoy reading your blog very much.  You are doing conservative women a great deed.  I have a fairly new blog up and running.  I write essays on politics, culture, and society.  Please take a moment and check me out.  I am looking, of course, for link exchanges.</p>
<p>Best wishes, Dana Lotzgesell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fen</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23526</link>
		<dc:creator>Fen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23526</guid>
		<description>I would MUCH rather see you on than that Wonkette tramp with her Kitty Kelly gossip.  If it wasn&#039;t for her looks they wouldn&#039;t give her a second glance.

As for the disparity, its a combination of many things, but mostly environment - I think men are more inclined to be adversarial and challenging, and drawn to the political realm.

Hat tip to Malkin for luring me to your site. Its now part of my daily AM read :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would MUCH rather see you on than that Wonkette tramp with her Kitty Kelly gossip.  If it wasn&#8217;t for her looks they wouldn&#8217;t give her a second glance.</p>
<p>As for the disparity, its a combination of many things, but mostly environment &#8211; I think men are more inclined to be adversarial and challenging, and drawn to the political realm.</p>
<p>Hat tip to Malkin for luring me to your site. Its now part of my daily AM read <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth B</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23523</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23523</guid>
		<description>Estherdelia-

Sorry for misspelling your name.  I was typing too quickly, too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estherdelia-</p>
<p>Sorry for misspelling your name.  I was typing too quickly, too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23522</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23522</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why There&#039;s A Dearth Of A-List Female Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;
The whole &quot;feminism in the blogosphere&quot; meme is cropping up again as it does every few months. After gaining experience...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why There&#8217;s A Dearth Of A-List Female Bloggers</strong><br />
The whole &#8220;feminism in the blogosphere&#8221; meme is cropping up again as it does every few months. After gaining experience&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth B</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23521</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23521</guid>
		<description>Esterdelia- I&#039;m an INTP, too.  No wonder we had the same sort of thought!  I&#039;ll have to go read your comments.  

I talk a little bit about MBTI type on my phonics page (linked below), mostly how it relates to learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esterdelia- I&#8217;m an INTP, too.  No wonder we had the same sort of thought!  I&#8217;ll have to go read your comments.  </p>
<p>I talk a little bit about MBTI type on my phonics page (linked below), mostly how it relates to learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23520</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23520</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around The &#039;Sphere&lt;/strong&gt;
Our occasional collection of links from all  over Blogtopia. Links reprent varying points of view and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around The &#8216;Sphere</strong><br />
Our occasional collection of links from all  over Blogtopia. Links reprent varying points of view and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drive by poster</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23491</link>
		<dc:creator>Drive by poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23491</guid>
		<description>&quot;Although its geeky Usenet roots were (and are) testosterone laden affairs&quot;

Testosterone? Geeky? How can you use those two words in a sentence like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Although its geeky Usenet roots were (and are) testosterone laden affairs&#8221;</p>
<p>Testosterone? Geeky? How can you use those two words in a sentence like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mollo</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-23488</link>
		<dc:creator>mollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/20/irony/#comment-23488</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s silly to look at just one blog topic, politics, and analyze the female/male ratio.  Do they think I just read political blogs?  On my favorites menu, there are MORE female bloggers than male bloggers.  I like the political, medical, and educational blogs too.  I wonder if anybody will complain that there are too many female educational bloggers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s silly to look at just one blog topic, politics, and analyze the female/male ratio.  Do they think I just read political blogs?  On my favorites menu, there are MORE female bloggers than male bloggers.  I like the political, medical, and educational blogs too.  I wonder if anybody will complain that there are too many female educational bloggers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
