<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Idiot Accused of Plotting To Kill President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24547</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24547</guid>
		<description>Ok, then how do you know you&#039;re not jacked into the Matrix?

Ummm, what was that line Jesus gave about having ears but hear not, having eyes, but see not, having brians, but about as wise as a slug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, then how do you know you&#8217;re not jacked into the Matrix?</p>
<p>Ummm, what was that line Jesus gave about having ears but hear not, having eyes, but see not, having brians, but about as wise as a slug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24530</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24530</guid>
		<description>&quot;Actus, quit while you’re ahead. You’re no Clinton 
when it comes to parsing “is&quot;. &quot;

it really isn&#039;t that much parsing. you really going to tell me that &#039;faith&#039; in god is equal to the &#039;faith&#039; that i have that a certain treatment is better than another due to empirical evidence? or due to my study of economics?  please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Actus, quit while you’re ahead. You’re no Clinton<br />
when it comes to parsing “is&#8221;. &#8221;</p>
<p>it really isn&#8217;t that much parsing. you really going to tell me that &#8216;faith&#8217; in god is equal to the &#8216;faith&#8217; that i have that a certain treatment is better than another due to empirical evidence? or due to my study of economics?  please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24498</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24498</guid>
		<description>Actus, quit while you&#039;re ahead.  You&#039;re no Clinton when it comes to parsing &quot;is&quot;.  

You said; &quot;&lt;em&gt;They run on a belief, but I donâ€™t think that belief is formed by faith&lt;/em&gt;&quot;  

Mr. Webster would beg to differ, I refer you back to example #1 in his dictionary.  In fact, I thot of #s 1, 4, 6 &amp; 7 specifically with you in mind.

PS.  You ain&#039;t no Webster either. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actus, quit while you&#8217;re ahead.  You&#8217;re no Clinton when it comes to parsing &#8220;is&#8221;.  </p>
<p>You said; &#8220;<em>They run on a belief, but I donâ€™t think that belief is formed by faith</em>&#8221;  </p>
<p>Mr. Webster would beg to differ, I refer you back to example #1 in his dictionary.  In fact, I thot of #s 1, 4, 6 &#038; 7 specifically with you in mind.</p>
<p>PS.  You ain&#8217;t no Webster either. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24152</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24152</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, there is no guarantees that the government won’t change the rules at some point in the future.&quot;

none other than the fact that retired people vote a lot, and vote for social security, and thus we can expect them to elect politicians who will protect their interests.  This isn&#039;t taken on &#039;faith&#039; however.

&quot;However, there is no guarantees that the government won’t change the rules at some point in the future. Given the demographics, most people, particularly younger people, have no faith that SS will live up to its promises. Hence the growing consensus for reform.&quot;

Most people are aware that there are demographic shocks coming. And that is why the most popular &quot;reform&quot; is to shore up SS by removing the income cap on SS contributions: A flat tax to fund social security.

Whats the expectation of SS? none other than current workers taking care of current retirees with some of hte changes made by reagan to help accomodate the demographic shock of the boomers retiring.

&quot;All programs are run on some type of faith that an expect result will be returned. &quot;

They run on a belief, but I don&#039;t think that belief is formed by faith. I think its formed by other things, such as logic, empiricism, and probality models and forecasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, there is no guarantees that the government won’t change the rules at some point in the future.&#8221;</p>
<p>none other than the fact that retired people vote a lot, and vote for social security, and thus we can expect them to elect politicians who will protect their interests.  This isn&#8217;t taken on &#8216;faith&#8217; however.</p>
<p>&#8220;However, there is no guarantees that the government won’t change the rules at some point in the future. Given the demographics, most people, particularly younger people, have no faith that SS will live up to its promises. Hence the growing consensus for reform.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most people are aware that there are demographic shocks coming. And that is why the most popular &#8220;reform&#8221; is to shore up SS by removing the income cap on SS contributions: A flat tax to fund social security.</p>
<p>Whats the expectation of SS? none other than current workers taking care of current retirees with some of hte changes made by reagan to help accomodate the demographic shock of the boomers retiring.</p>
<p>&#8220;All programs are run on some type of faith that an expect result will be returned. &#8221;</p>
<p>They run on a belief, but I don&#8217;t think that belief is formed by faith. I think its formed by other things, such as logic, empiricism, and probality models and forecasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24149</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24149</guid>
		<description>What are we expending in expectation of with regards to SS?  SS is the faith (smoke &amp; mirrors say some) that we will at least get back what we put in, if not more.  However, there is no guarantees that the government won&#039;t change the rules at some point in the future.  Given the demographics, most people, particularly younger people, have no faith that SS will live up to its promises.  Hence the growing consensus for reform.  The underlying premise of SS was flawed and now we see that the promoters were irrationally exuberant, back when the ratio of workers to retirees was 42:1.  Now that it is 3:1, there is no way a pay as you go system can work.

You can apply this to any number of examples.  What are we expending in expectation of with regards to Name Your Program?  

All programs are run on some type of faith that an expect result will be returned.  It is where the underlying principle is flawed that we object to, such as AA and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are we expending in expectation of with regards to SS?  SS is the faith (smoke &#038; mirrors say some) that we will at least get back what we put in, if not more.  However, there is no guarantees that the government won&#8217;t change the rules at some point in the future.  Given the demographics, most people, particularly younger people, have no faith that SS will live up to its promises.  Hence the growing consensus for reform.  The underlying premise of SS was flawed and now we see that the promoters were irrationally exuberant, back when the ratio of workers to retirees was 42:1.  Now that it is 3:1, there is no way a pay as you go system can work.</p>
<p>You can apply this to any number of examples.  What are we expending in expectation of with regards to Name Your Program?  </p>
<p>All programs are run on some type of faith that an expect result will be returned.  It is where the underlying principle is flawed that we object to, such as AA and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24147</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24147</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why don&#039;t you go find out, and report back.&quot;

Doesn&#039;t sound like it. I don&#039;t think we&#039;re asked to, as you say, expend efforts and resources in expectation of certain results due to faith.

Its due to a belief, an expectation, but I don&#039;t think that belief is formed &#039;solely on the authority or veracity of the other&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why don&#8217;t you go find out, and report back.&#8221;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t sound like it. I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re asked to, as you say, expend efforts and resources in expectation of certain results due to faith.</p>
<p>Its due to a belief, an expectation, but I don&#8217;t think that belief is formed &#8216;solely on the authority or veracity of the other&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24143</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24143</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you go find out, and report back.

Here&#039;s a starting point:
&quot;&lt;strong&gt;Webster&#039;s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;
&lt;em&gt;Faith \Faith\, n. [OE. feith, fayth, fay, OF. feid, feit, fei,
   F. foi, fr. L. fides; akin to fidere to trust, Gr. ??????? to
   persuade. The ending th is perhaps due to the influence of
   such words as truth, health, wealth. See Bid, Bide, and
   cf. Confide, Defy, Fealty.]
   
   1. Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is
      declared by another, resting solely and implicitly on his
      authority and veracity; reliance on testimony.

   2. The assent of the mind to the statement or proposition of
      another, on the ground of the manifest truth of what he
      utters; firm and earnest belief, on probable evidence of
      any kind, especially in regard to important moral truth.

            Faith, that is, fidelity, -- the fealty of the
            finite will and understanding to the reason.
                                                  --Coleridge.

   3. (Theol.)
      (a) The belief in the historic truthfulness of the
          Scripture narrative, and the supernatural origin of
          its teachings, sometimes called historical and
          speculative faith.
      (b) The belief in the facts and truth of the Scriptures,
          with a practical love of them; especially, that
          confiding and affectionate belief in the person and
          work of Christ, which affects the character and life,
          and makes a man a true Christian, -- called a
          practical, evangelical, or saving faith.

                Without faith it is impossible to please him
                [God].                            --Heb. xi. 6.

                The faith of the gospel is that emotion of the
                mind which is called ``trust&#039;&#039; or ``confidence&#039;&#039;
                exercised toward the moral character of God, and
                particularly of the Savior.       --Dr. T.
                                                  Dwight.

                Faith is an affectionate, practical confidence
                in the testimony of God.          --J. Hawes.

   4. That which is believed on any subject, whether in science,
      politics, or religion; especially (Theol.), a system of
      religious belief of any kind; as, the Jewish or Mohammedan
      faith; and especially, the system of truth taught by
      Christ; as, the Christian faith; also, the creed or belief
      of a Christian society or church.

            Which to believe of her, Must be a faith that reason
            without miracle Could never plant in me. --Shak.

            Now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.
                                                  --Gal. i. 23.

   5. Fidelity to one&#039;s promises, or allegiance to duty, or to a
      person honored and beloved; loyalty.

            Children in whom is no faith.         --Deut. xxvii.
                                                  20.

            Whose failing, while her faith to me remains, I
            should conceal.                       --Milton.

   6. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity; as, he
      violated his faith.

            For you alone I broke me faith with injured Palamon.
                                                  --Dryden.

   7. Credibility or truth. [R.] &lt;strong&gt;[Or as moonbats like to say
      reality-based]&lt;/strong&gt;

            The faith of the foregoing narrative. --Mitford.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you go find out, and report back.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a starting point:<br />
&#8220;<strong>Webster&#8217;s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)</strong>&#8221;<br />
<em>Faith \Faith\, n. [OE. feith, fayth, fay, OF. feid, feit, fei,<br />
   F. foi, fr. L. fides; akin to fidere to trust, Gr. ??????? to<br />
   persuade. The ending th is perhaps due to the influence of<br />
   such words as truth, health, wealth. See Bid, Bide, and<br />
   cf. Confide, Defy, Fealty.]</p>
<p>   1. Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is<br />
      declared by another, resting solely and implicitly on his<br />
      authority and veracity; reliance on testimony.</p>
<p>   2. The assent of the mind to the statement or proposition of<br />
      another, on the ground of the manifest truth of what he<br />
      utters; firm and earnest belief, on probable evidence of<br />
      any kind, especially in regard to important moral truth.</p>
<p>            Faith, that is, fidelity, &#8212; the fealty of the<br />
            finite will and understanding to the reason.<br />
                                                  &#8211;Coleridge.</p>
<p>   3. (Theol.)<br />
      (a) The belief in the historic truthfulness of the<br />
          Scripture narrative, and the supernatural origin of<br />
          its teachings, sometimes called historical and<br />
          speculative faith.<br />
      (b) The belief in the facts and truth of the Scriptures,<br />
          with a practical love of them; especially, that<br />
          confiding and affectionate belief in the person and<br />
          work of Christ, which affects the character and life,<br />
          and makes a man a true Christian, &#8212; called a<br />
          practical, evangelical, or saving faith.</p>
<p>                Without faith it is impossible to please him<br />
                [God].                            &#8211;Heb. xi. 6.</p>
<p>                The faith of the gospel is that emotion of the<br />
                mind which is called &#8220;trust&#8221; or &#8220;confidence&#8221;<br />
                exercised toward the moral character of God, and<br />
                particularly of the Savior.       &#8211;Dr. T.<br />
                                                  Dwight.</p>
<p>                Faith is an affectionate, practical confidence<br />
                in the testimony of God.          &#8211;J. Hawes.</p>
<p>   4. That which is believed on any subject, whether in science,<br />
      politics, or religion; especially (Theol.), a system of<br />
      religious belief of any kind; as, the Jewish or Mohammedan<br />
      faith; and especially, the system of truth taught by<br />
      Christ; as, the Christian faith; also, the creed or belief<br />
      of a Christian society or church.</p>
<p>            Which to believe of her, Must be a faith that reason<br />
            without miracle Could never plant in me. &#8211;Shak.</p>
<p>            Now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.<br />
                                                  &#8211;Gal. i. 23.</p>
<p>   5. Fidelity to one&#8217;s promises, or allegiance to duty, or to a<br />
      person honored and beloved; loyalty.</p>
<p>            Children in whom is no faith.         &#8211;Deut. xxvii.<br />
                                                  20.</p>
<p>            Whose failing, while her faith to me remains, I<br />
            should conceal.                       &#8211;Milton.</p>
<p>   6. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity; as, he<br />
      violated his faith.</p>
<p>            For you alone I broke me faith with injured Palamon.<br />
                                                  &#8211;Dryden.</p>
<p>   7. Credibility or truth. [R.] <strong>[Or as moonbats like to say<br />
      reality-based]</strong></p>
<p>            The faith of the foregoing narrative. &#8211;Mitford.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24141</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24141</guid>
		<description>&quot;Secularism is faith in man and a government, not in a higher being that transcends earthly wisdom.&quot;

Is it really faith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Secularism is faith in man and a government, not in a higher being that transcends earthly wisdom.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it really faith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24139</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24139</guid>
		<description>Secularism is faith in man and a government, not in a higher being  that transcends earthly wisdom.  That&#039;s the hog slop being fed by socialists.  Why settle for leftovers when there&#039;s better fare to be had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secularism is faith in man and a government, not in a higher being  that transcends earthly wisdom.  That&#8217;s the hog slop being fed by socialists.  Why settle for leftovers when there&#8217;s better fare to be had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24130</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24130</guid>
		<description>&quot;Secularism is also faith based, as well as any other belief system. In that regard, all schools are faith-based.&quot;

So all this talk about &quot;faith based&quot; initiatives and the benefits of &quot;faith&quot; is hogwash?  ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Secularism is also faith based, as well as any other belief system. In that regard, all schools are faith-based.&#8221;</p>
<p>So all this talk about &#8220;faith based&#8221; initiatives and the benefits of &#8220;faith&#8221; is hogwash?  ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-24019</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-24019</guid>
		<description>Actus said: &quot;&lt;em&gt;A faith based program?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  

And your point was?  

Secularism is also faith based, as well as any other belief system.  In that regard, all schools are faith-based.  Effort and resources (economics 101 again) are expended in the faith that the execution of whatever system is deployed will produce intended results.

Terror High was designed to support terrorism and seems to be succeeding rather well.  

OTOH, contrary to your liberal delusions, it was conservatives that established the notion that everyone should be educated.  The founding of the 1st public school can be traced byac to:
&lt;strong&gt;1647&lt;/strong&gt;  	&lt;em&gt;The General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony decrees that every town of fifty families should have an elementary school and that every town of 100 families should have a Latin school. The goal is to ensure that Puritan children learn to read the Bible and receive basic information about their Calvinist religion.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;
Source: http://www.arc.org/erase/j_timeline.html
(&lt;strong&gt;Caution, history revisionist alert&lt;/strong&gt;, this website is so heavily biased,  they should drop &quot;History&quot; from the title)

Public schools have always had a &quot;religious&quot; element in education bidness until hundreds of years later when socialist liberals hi-jack the system and systematically expels God from the classroom in support of their &quot;God is dead&quot; belief system to bring it more in line with the Soviet model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actus said: &#8220;<em>A faith based program?&#8221;</em>  </p>
<p>And your point was?  </p>
<p>Secularism is also faith based, as well as any other belief system.  In that regard, all schools are faith-based.  Effort and resources (economics 101 again) are expended in the faith that the execution of whatever system is deployed will produce intended results.</p>
<p>Terror High was designed to support terrorism and seems to be succeeding rather well.  </p>
<p>OTOH, contrary to your liberal delusions, it was conservatives that established the notion that everyone should be educated.  The founding of the 1st public school can be traced byac to:<br />
<strong>1647</strong>  	<em>The General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony decrees that every town of fifty families should have an elementary school and that every town of 100 families should have a Latin school. The goal is to ensure that Puritan children learn to read the Bible and receive basic information about their Calvinist religion.</em>&#8221;<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.arc.org/erase/j_timeline.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.arc.org/erase/j_timeline.html</a><br />
(<strong>Caution, history revisionist alert</strong>, this website is so heavily biased,  they should drop &#8220;History&#8221; from the title)</p>
<p>Public schools have always had a &#8220;religious&#8221; element in education bidness until hundreds of years later when socialist liberals hi-jack the system and systematically expels God from the classroom in support of their &#8220;God is dead&#8221; belief system to bring it more in line with the Soviet model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-23945</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-23945</guid>
		<description>&quot;Innocent until proven guilty&quot;

The U.S. gov&#039;t has had a couple of cases were those initially charged had cases drastically cut back or dropped. But the U.S. has had some successes as well.

It&#039;s best to go with &quot;innocent until proven guilty&quot; before anyone starts crowing.

It&#039;s a well known fact that those who are tortured, if done long enough, will admit to anything to end the torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Innocent until proven guilty&#8221;</p>
<p>The U.S. gov&#8217;t has had a couple of cases were those initially charged had cases drastically cut back or dropped. But the U.S. has had some successes as well.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s best to go with &#8220;innocent until proven guilty&#8221; before anyone starts crowing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a well known fact that those who are tortured, if done long enough, will admit to anything to end the torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pajamazon</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-23743</link>
		<dc:creator>pajamazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-23743</guid>
		<description>On the question of &quot;Should people ever be tortured?&quot;  Big YES!  When our enemies use video-taped beheadings and homicide bombers against us, we shall let him know that we are capable of worse!   These animals and criminals respect the threat of torture!  They laugh at the weenies among us who want us to apply &quot;Standards&quot; in a fight to the death.  Use a band-saw to cross-section the &quot;detainees&quot; in front of their terrorist brethren!
Then ask away..............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the question of &#8220;Should people ever be tortured?&#8221;  Big YES!  When our enemies use video-taped beheadings and homicide bombers against us, we shall let him know that we are capable of worse!   These animals and criminals respect the threat of torture!  They laugh at the weenies among us who want us to apply &#8220;Standards&#8221; in a fight to the death.  Use a band-saw to cross-section the &#8220;detainees&#8221; in front of their terrorist brethren!<br />
Then ask away&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-23738</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-23738</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyone wanna guess what kind of school he was valedictorian of?&quot;

A faith based program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone wanna guess what kind of school he was valedictorian of?&#8221;</p>
<p>A faith based program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Phelps</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/comment-page-1/#comment-23736</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/22/local/#comment-23736</guid>
		<description>An interesting &#039;insignificant&#039; peice of info that hasn&#039;t been mentioned by the press is what kind of school he was valedictorian of.  I wouldn&#039;t have known except John Gibson spilled the beans on FOX news yesterday.  Anyone wanna guess what kind of school he was valedictorian of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting &#8216;insignificant&#8217; peice of info that hasn&#8217;t been mentioned by the press is what kind of school he was valedictorian of.  I wouldn&#8217;t have known except John Gibson spilled the beans on FOX news yesterday.  Anyone wanna guess what kind of school he was valedictorian of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

