<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Blacks On Jackson Jury?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Two Dogs</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-24501</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-24501</guid>
		<description>We have been having a debate pretty much all month long on my blog about race.  I refuse to be called &quot;Native American&quot; and have gotten shouted down for it.  I really prefer Indian.  That said, person of color reeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been having a debate pretty much all month long on my blog about race.  I refuse to be called &#8220;Native American&#8221; and have gotten shouted down for it.  I really prefer Indian.  That said, person of color reeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23994</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23994</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s even worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s even worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hube</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23993</link>
		<dc:creator>Hube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23993</guid>
		<description>La Shawn: You mean you don&#039;t like the moniker &quot;Person of Color&quot;?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn: You mean you don&#8217;t like the moniker &#8220;Person of Color&#8221;?  <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23943</link>
		<dc:creator>firebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23943</guid>
		<description>Just wait for JESSIE JACKSON and AL SHARPTON to start whinning of the unfair biased racsis jedicial systemcourt of the UN and complain why dont they just get a life and stop being such pains in the butt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait for JESSIE JACKSON and AL SHARPTON to start whinning of the unfair biased racsis jedicial systemcourt of the UN and complain why dont they just get a life and stop being such pains in the butt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23934</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23934</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but Stevie could have been an earwitness -- sharpened senses and all.  But seeing how he&#039;s a witness for the defense, never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but Stevie could have been an earwitness &#8212; sharpened senses and all.  But seeing how he&#8217;s a witness for the defense, never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23933</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23933</guid>
		<description>Thanks Funk Phd, I have heard the phrase &#039;Jury of Peers&#039; for a long time, and recently on the news but leave it to the British to corrupt our system.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Funk Phd, I have heard the phrase &#8216;Jury of Peers&#8217; for a long time, and recently on the news but leave it to the British to corrupt our system.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23931</guid>
		<description>Harsh, Juliette, harsh!!!  LOLOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harsh, Juliette, harsh!!!  LOLOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23929</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23929</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: There is now 1 black man on the jury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: There is now 1 black man on the jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliette</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23925</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23925</guid>
		<description>At least we know that Stevie Wonder wasn&#039;t an eyewitness to anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least we know that Stevie Wonder wasn&#8217;t an eyewitness to anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23919</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23919</guid>
		<description>Well, they just announced that MJ got a black alternate juror</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they just announced that MJ got a black alternate juror</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23918</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23918</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine why such admired celebrities as Smokey Robinson, Eddie Murphy, Elizabeth Taylor and Stevie Wonder would risk sullying their own images by appearing for MJ.  They must really love the old pervert. Warts and all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine why such admired celebrities as Smokey Robinson, Eddie Murphy, Elizabeth Taylor and Stevie Wonder would risk sullying their own images by appearing for MJ.  They must really love the old pervert. Warts and all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Peden</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23915</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Peden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23915</guid>
		<description>&quot;African American&quot; is perhaps the most pernicious term I&#039;ve ever heard. I&#039;ve been bitching about it for many moons. I&#039;m white, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;African American&#8221; is perhaps the most pernicious term I&#8217;ve ever heard. I&#8217;ve been bitching about it for many moons. I&#8217;m white, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23910</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23910</guid>
		<description>Mike

 Tax cuts for the rich now there&#039;s a classic, typical class envy with no substance...   all dressed up and no place to go eh Mikey ?

I got a rebate from the Presidents tax cut, didn&#039;t You ? I was hoping he would cut taxes again maybe and really drive the liberals nutz.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p> Tax cuts for the rich now there&#8217;s a classic, typical class envy with no substance&#8230;   all dressed up and no place to go eh Mikey ?</p>
<p>I got a rebate from the Presidents tax cut, didn&#8217;t You ? I was hoping he would cut taxes again maybe and really drive the liberals nutz.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23909</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23909</guid>
		<description>To Mark:

Nowhere in the American judicial system is the word &quot;peer&quot; used to describe the makeup of a jury.  The eighth amendment to the U.S. Constitution secures the right of those accused in criminal prosecutions &quot;to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed&quot; (http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=13&amp;page=transcript)  Trial by a &quot;jury of peers&quot; actually stems from a misinterpretation of the Magna Carta, which stated &quot;No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.&quot; The Magna Carta dates from 1215; the idea this document guaranteed a jury of peers arose in the 17th century.  In the United States, we don&#039;t have an officially recognized system of social castes in which people have peers.  The statutory presumption is that we are all peers, and therefore it is unnecessary to add that word to the description of the jury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mark:</p>
<p>Nowhere in the American judicial system is the word &#8220;peer&#8221; used to describe the makeup of a jury.  The eighth amendment to the U.S. Constitution secures the right of those accused in criminal prosecutions &#8220;to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed&#8221; (<a href="http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=13&#038;page=transcript" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=13&#038;page=transcript</a>)  Trial by a &#8220;jury of peers&#8221; actually stems from a misinterpretation of the Magna Carta, which stated &#8220;No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.&#8221; The Magna Carta dates from 1215; the idea this document guaranteed a jury of peers arose in the 17th century.  In the United States, we don&#8217;t have an officially recognized system of social castes in which people have peers.  The statutory presumption is that we are all peers, and therefore it is unnecessary to add that word to the description of the jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Curley</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/comment-page-1/#comment-23906</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/02/23/no/#comment-23906</guid>
		<description>As delightful as the image of OJ pushing up daisies is, even if he&#039;d been convicted, he would have been unlikely to face execution until sometime around 2015.  California has some prisoners who are still on Death Row for killings that took place in the 1970s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As delightful as the image of OJ pushing up daisies is, even if he&#8217;d been convicted, he would have been unlikely to face execution until sometime around 2015.  California has some prisoners who are still on Death Row for killings that took place in the 1970s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
