<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Embrace Your Niggerdom!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-26208</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-26208</guid>
		<description>La Shawn:

I often wonder if grown men like Dyson and Jackson have completely lost their sense of irony? The title of your post made me laugh (I&#039;m still smiling, and probably will be for the rest of the morning).

But I&#039;m reminded of something I once read: all humor has an element of pain in it. How far these people have fallen, to comport themselves like this in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn:</p>
<p>I often wonder if grown men like Dyson and Jackson have completely lost their sense of irony? The title of your post made me laugh (I&#8217;m still smiling, and probably will be for the rest of the morning).</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m reminded of something I once read: all humor has an element of pain in it. How far these people have fallen, to comport themselves like this in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25984</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25984</guid>
		<description>I gave up my Saturday, in oder to watch the show twice. I listened as Tavis chided the pastor (in his own church.)
  Rev Farrakhan did say we should separate, but there was more to the story. His point was that we as a people need to find a way to lift ourselves up. We need to recapture our future, and not look for help from the republicans or the democrats. Neither of those political groups care about black people until election day. 
 I am disappointed to hear the sarcasm in some of the notes I have read on your site. 
The facts, as stated in the show, black die in their 60s while whites can live into their 70s or 80s. This means they have an opportunity to use their social security and black do not. (Especially if the age to draw social security is raised to 68.) Our babies have a higher death rate, we have poor health, we are less educated (on average than all other peoples.) How do we change the tide? Do you think GW is going to fix that problem?
 Black people are so concerned about who gonna get what, that they don&#039;t care about what is happening to our race. In Africa, they are killing each other, and you know we are doing the same thing here. Instead of spewing charactor the assassination, do something to help the race.
I didn&#039;t agree with everything those panelist talked about during the show, but I support 100% what they are trying to do. 
 The writers on your site seem like smart people, use the smartness to assure our future (an stop killing each other with thos foul tongues.)I don&#039;t consider myself a nigga, and frankly I hate the term. But you know, I stopped a couple young brothers saying that a few moths ago, and they decided to educate me. They said, hey old school, must respect. We call each other nigga not nigger. I reponded, Martin Luther King fought to change America, so that you wouldn&#039;t be called nigger. And now your calling each other nigga infront of white people, who now feal they can call you nigger too. (note nigger not nigga)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up my Saturday, in oder to watch the show twice. I listened as Tavis chided the pastor (in his own church.)<br />
  Rev Farrakhan did say we should separate, but there was more to the story. His point was that we as a people need to find a way to lift ourselves up. We need to recapture our future, and not look for help from the republicans or the democrats. Neither of those political groups care about black people until election day.<br />
 I am disappointed to hear the sarcasm in some of the notes I have read on your site.<br />
The facts, as stated in the show, black die in their 60s while whites can live into their 70s or 80s. This means they have an opportunity to use their social security and black do not. (Especially if the age to draw social security is raised to 68.) Our babies have a higher death rate, we have poor health, we are less educated (on average than all other peoples.) How do we change the tide? Do you think GW is going to fix that problem?<br />
 Black people are so concerned about who gonna get what, that they don&#8217;t care about what is happening to our race. In Africa, they are killing each other, and you know we are doing the same thing here. Instead of spewing charactor the assassination, do something to help the race.<br />
I didn&#8217;t agree with everything those panelist talked about during the show, but I support 100% what they are trying to do.<br />
 The writers on your site seem like smart people, use the smartness to assure our future (an stop killing each other with thos foul tongues.)I don&#8217;t consider myself a nigga, and frankly I hate the term. But you know, I stopped a couple young brothers saying that a few moths ago, and they decided to educate me. They said, hey old school, must respect. We call each other nigga not nigger. I reponded, Martin Luther King fought to change America, so that you wouldn&#8217;t be called nigger. And now your calling each other nigga infront of white people, who now feal they can call you nigger too. (note nigger not nigga)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25867</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25867</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rafael.  Yes I do agree (I think we are on the same page regarding the fould language and messages).  

You said what I was hoping you would say:

&quot;That doesnâ€™t mean succumbing to what afflicts them and if definitely doesnâ€™t mean compromising the Gospel to make them feel more comfortable. The scriptures were written in the language of the common man; so should the Gospel be spread.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rafael.  Yes I do agree (I think we are on the same page regarding the fould language and messages).  </p>
<p>You said what I was hoping you would say:</p>
<p>&#8220;That doesnâ€™t mean succumbing to what afflicts them and if definitely doesnâ€™t mean compromising the Gospel to make them feel more comfortable. The scriptures were written in the language of the common man; so should the Gospel be spread.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Daniel</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25862</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25862</guid>
		<description>Renee, I am speaking merely of a musical style in regards to hip-hop. I am  a minister of the Gospel of Jesus the Messiah, so that kind of foulness you mention has NO PLACE in that ministry, and I am sure you agree with that. I am just saying there are people, ESPECIALLY young people that need the Lord that don&#039;t look like you think they should look or speak like you think they should. If you were to go to Brasil and try to minister, I would hope you have a working knowledge of Portuguese. My thing is there has to be an understanding of the environment you are dealing with. I have served as a youth minister and am well aware that there is a serious battle being waged for their spirits. So, while I CAN speak to the bourgoisie if need be, it carries no credibility around those that have a different view of life. Be all things to all men that you might win some--hit them where they live in other words. That doesn&#039;t mean succumbing to what afflicts them and if definitely doesn&#039;t mean compromising the Gospel to make them feel more comfortable. The scriptures were written in the language of the common man; so should the Gospel be spread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee, I am speaking merely of a musical style in regards to hip-hop. I am  a minister of the Gospel of Jesus the Messiah, so that kind of foulness you mention has NO PLACE in that ministry, and I am sure you agree with that. I am just saying there are people, ESPECIALLY young people that need the Lord that don&#8217;t look like you think they should look or speak like you think they should. If you were to go to Brasil and try to minister, I would hope you have a working knowledge of Portuguese. My thing is there has to be an understanding of the environment you are dealing with. I have served as a youth minister and am well aware that there is a serious battle being waged for their spirits. So, while I CAN speak to the bourgoisie if need be, it carries no credibility around those that have a different view of life. Be all things to all men that you might win some&#8211;hit them where they live in other words. That doesn&#8217;t mean succumbing to what afflicts them and if definitely doesn&#8217;t mean compromising the Gospel to make them feel more comfortable. The scriptures were written in the language of the common man; so should the Gospel be spread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25677</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25677</guid>
		<description>Rafael,
Are you saying it is ok for some to use foul language, promoting sexual promiscuity, lyrics as a way of bringing someone to Christ as ok?  (Maybe your comment:

 &quot;I donâ€™t dig hip-hop either, but I wonâ€™t diss (sorry, that was slang again) those that use it as a way to get their foot in the door to reach someone that may not hear them and the Gospel otherwise.&quot; Is a bit misleading of what you mean.  I am hoping you meant songs, that happen to have the beat of what is labeled hip-hop, but with a postive message.  Yes??

Please clarify if I missed what you mean on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafael,<br />
Are you saying it is ok for some to use foul language, promoting sexual promiscuity, lyrics as a way of bringing someone to Christ as ok?  (Maybe your comment:</p>
<p> &#8220;I donâ€™t dig hip-hop either, but I wonâ€™t diss (sorry, that was slang again) those that use it as a way to get their foot in the door to reach someone that may not hear them and the Gospel otherwise.&#8221; Is a bit misleading of what you mean.  I am hoping you meant songs, that happen to have the beat of what is labeled hip-hop, but with a postive message.  Yes??</p>
<p>Please clarify if I missed what you mean on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Daniel</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25675</guid>
		<description>Aaron, while I wholeheartedly support you in your new life, I have to remind you that some of us have to be all things to all people that we might get some to make a decision for Jesus. I live in the inner city, so that makes me urban. I drive a slammin&#039; (slang) SUV. I am  a college-educated, gainfully employed, ordained minister. I don&#039;t always wear a suit. I sometimes dress in baggy, comfortable clothes because they are comfortable. If they happen to be stylish, that is a bonus. Oh, I forgot to mention my ear is pierced and I walk with a limp (3 knee surgeries). What does all of this mean? Nothing, if my life isn&#039;t in step with what I say to others. Colloquial speech aka slang has been around in every language for millenia--it isn&#039;t going away. I would encourage you to look at what the world-at-large NEEDS, rather than being a self-styled martyr, turning your nose down at those who you COULD be reaching. You KNOW where they are because you came from them. How can you deem them unworthy of a chance to receive the life-giving revelation that you have received? They need your example, but in LOVE. Remember, Jesus went into Samaria. I don&#039;t dig hip-hop either, but I won&#039;t diss (sorry, that was slang again) those that use it as a way to get their foot in the door to reach someone that may not hear them and the Gospel otherwise. Just because someone doesn&#039;t use your methods or isn&#039;t in your sect/set, doesn&#039;t make them wrong. After Elijah finished running from Jezebel, God asked him why was he there, then proceeded to tell him that he wasn&#039;t alone in the fight. Elijah THOUGHT he was, but there were others in other places, using other methods to glorify God and get His word spread. So I encourage you to LOVE the brethren man. Love is serious business, serious  enough to die for. If I have read you wrong I apologize, but I remember being as virulent once upon a time and accomplishing NOTHING for the Kingdom until I replaced that judgemental streak with a lot of love and compassion. Just remember where you came from Bruh (more slang). PEACE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, while I wholeheartedly support you in your new life, I have to remind you that some of us have to be all things to all people that we might get some to make a decision for Jesus. I live in the inner city, so that makes me urban. I drive a slammin&#8217; (slang) SUV. I am  a college-educated, gainfully employed, ordained minister. I don&#8217;t always wear a suit. I sometimes dress in baggy, comfortable clothes because they are comfortable. If they happen to be stylish, that is a bonus. Oh, I forgot to mention my ear is pierced and I walk with a limp (3 knee surgeries). What does all of this mean? Nothing, if my life isn&#8217;t in step with what I say to others. Colloquial speech aka slang has been around in every language for millenia&#8211;it isn&#8217;t going away. I would encourage you to look at what the world-at-large NEEDS, rather than being a self-styled martyr, turning your nose down at those who you COULD be reaching. You KNOW where they are because you came from them. How can you deem them unworthy of a chance to receive the life-giving revelation that you have received? They need your example, but in LOVE. Remember, Jesus went into Samaria. I don&#8217;t dig hip-hop either, but I won&#8217;t diss (sorry, that was slang again) those that use it as a way to get their foot in the door to reach someone that may not hear them and the Gospel otherwise. Just because someone doesn&#8217;t use your methods or isn&#8217;t in your sect/set, doesn&#8217;t make them wrong. After Elijah finished running from Jezebel, God asked him why was he there, then proceeded to tell him that he wasn&#8217;t alone in the fight. Elijah THOUGHT he was, but there were others in other places, using other methods to glorify God and get His word spread. So I encourage you to LOVE the brethren man. Love is serious business, serious  enough to die for. If I have read you wrong I apologize, but I remember being as virulent once upon a time and accomplishing NOTHING for the Kingdom until I replaced that judgemental streak with a lot of love and compassion. Just remember where you came from Bruh (more slang). PEACE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James M. Barber</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25673</link>
		<dc:creator>James M. Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25673</guid>
		<description>LaShawn,
I saw on the computer Rev Peterson&#039;s forum. I believe it was Mychal Massie who said that some said he was not black because of his views. Gloria
Jackson is the greatgranddaughter of Booker T. Washington so she has personal interest in supporting his views. Over thirty years ago, one fifteen year old said someone was not black because both parents had a college education and the mother was a junior high math teacher. These classifications of being black that depend on education and opinions are still troubling today.
Dr. Condi Rice cannot be black since both her parents have a college education. This is the Rev Jessie that we support! Rev. Peterson said that there is not separate black agenda!

JMB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn,<br />
I saw on the computer Rev Peterson&#8217;s forum. I believe it was Mychal Massie who said that some said he was not black because of his views. Gloria<br />
Jackson is the greatgranddaughter of Booker T. Washington so she has personal interest in supporting his views. Over thirty years ago, one fifteen year old said someone was not black because both parents had a college education and the mother was a junior high math teacher. These classifications of being black that depend on education and opinions are still troubling today.<br />
Dr. Condi Rice cannot be black since both her parents have a college education. This is the Rev Jessie that we support! Rev. Peterson said that there is not separate black agenda!</p>
<p>JMB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25664</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25664</guid>
		<description>WOW, 
Thanks Aaron.  I couldn&#039;t have said it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW,<br />
Thanks Aaron.  I couldn&#8217;t have said it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron J. Hankins</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25663</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron J. Hankins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25663</guid>
		<description>Leo,

You are exactly right that I did have what you would consider &quot;racist&quot; thoughts about what it meant to be Black in America.  I thought I was Black because of the culture that I grew up in and embraced as my own.  It was a worldly culture of SIN, plain and simple. I got my views from my Black friends, from BET, and later on from all my Black professors and &quot;mentors.&quot;  There was a time, from the end of high school all throughout college, that I would not listen to a white person.  I saw every white person as a racist, bigoted oppressor who was only there to hold me down.  The views I had about Black Americans and myself came only from my Black professors and other Black scholars such as Dyson, West, Gates, DuBois, etc.  I thought you were Black if you listened to rap, spoke slang, walked with a limp, abhorred marriage, was disrespectful, was loud, defiant, etc. If you were Black but you wore a suit and tie, spoke proper english, had a steady job, was married, owned property such as a car or house, was responsible, didn&#039;t rant about racism and the &quot;man&quot; then you were not Black but rather &quot;a puppet of the White oppressor.&quot; This view was supported by all my Black peers, friends and professors.  It was the very people who claimed they were against racism, that was pumping nothing but racist ideology, mentalities and attitudes into my mind. But after being cleansed by the washing of the blood of Jesus Christ and the renewing of my mind (Romans 12:2) I rejected all of my past liberal racist ideologies and began to seek the truth.  Now I am against the very culture that I grew up in and embraced.  I am against hip hop and rap that does nothing but glorify the flesh and the world, which is also a secular humanist religion (check out exministries.com).  I am against the hip hop culture that promotes speaking in slang, walking with a limp, dressing disgracefully, etc. because it is a culture born of SIN and the Devil.  I know, I was of the Devil and went doing his work and spreading his message.  Now I don&#039;t see things in terms of Blacks or White culture but rather in terms of a culture of Jesus Christ.  When people dress a certain way, such as the way I did when I was a sinful pagan, I ask myself, is that glorifying to God and is that a culture born of Christ, or is it worldly, fleshly and of the Devil.  Same with speech, same with music, etc.  Yes, I will be honest.  I may lose some friends or even some allies, but I get extremely mad when others speak to Black youth using slang, wearing urban apparel, rapping, etc. glorifying the same sinful worldly culture that true Christians are trying to snatch youth out of. I get especially mad when it is so-called Christians who are glorifying and promoting this sinful culture to reach those trapped in sin. We need real Christians who are willing to renew their mind, surrender their entire life to Christ, no matter how strong a former sinful, worldly culture had them wrapped up, and conform to the mind and culture of Christ.  We need sensible MALE leaders who speak proper english, who tuck their shirts in and wear clothes that fit them, who walk properly, who value marriage and family, who denounce hip hop and rap and the sinful culture that permeates throughout them. It is not about &quot;what does it mean to be Black?&quot; but rather &quot;what does it mean to look, act, think, like Christ?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo,</p>
<p>You are exactly right that I did have what you would consider &#8220;racist&#8221; thoughts about what it meant to be Black in America.  I thought I was Black because of the culture that I grew up in and embraced as my own.  It was a worldly culture of SIN, plain and simple. I got my views from my Black friends, from BET, and later on from all my Black professors and &#8220;mentors.&#8221;  There was a time, from the end of high school all throughout college, that I would not listen to a white person.  I saw every white person as a racist, bigoted oppressor who was only there to hold me down.  The views I had about Black Americans and myself came only from my Black professors and other Black scholars such as Dyson, West, Gates, DuBois, etc.  I thought you were Black if you listened to rap, spoke slang, walked with a limp, abhorred marriage, was disrespectful, was loud, defiant, etc. If you were Black but you wore a suit and tie, spoke proper english, had a steady job, was married, owned property such as a car or house, was responsible, didn&#8217;t rant about racism and the &#8220;man&#8221; then you were not Black but rather &#8220;a puppet of the White oppressor.&#8221; This view was supported by all my Black peers, friends and professors.  It was the very people who claimed they were against racism, that was pumping nothing but racist ideology, mentalities and attitudes into my mind. But after being cleansed by the washing of the blood of Jesus Christ and the renewing of my mind (Romans 12:2) I rejected all of my past liberal racist ideologies and began to seek the truth.  Now I am against the very culture that I grew up in and embraced.  I am against hip hop and rap that does nothing but glorify the flesh and the world, which is also a secular humanist religion (check out exministries.com).  I am against the hip hop culture that promotes speaking in slang, walking with a limp, dressing disgracefully, etc. because it is a culture born of SIN and the Devil.  I know, I was of the Devil and went doing his work and spreading his message.  Now I don&#8217;t see things in terms of Blacks or White culture but rather in terms of a culture of Jesus Christ.  When people dress a certain way, such as the way I did when I was a sinful pagan, I ask myself, is that glorifying to God and is that a culture born of Christ, or is it worldly, fleshly and of the Devil.  Same with speech, same with music, etc.  Yes, I will be honest.  I may lose some friends or even some allies, but I get extremely mad when others speak to Black youth using slang, wearing urban apparel, rapping, etc. glorifying the same sinful worldly culture that true Christians are trying to snatch youth out of. I get especially mad when it is so-called Christians who are glorifying and promoting this sinful culture to reach those trapped in sin. We need real Christians who are willing to renew their mind, surrender their entire life to Christ, no matter how strong a former sinful, worldly culture had them wrapped up, and conform to the mind and culture of Christ.  We need sensible MALE leaders who speak proper english, who tuck their shirts in and wear clothes that fit them, who walk properly, who value marriage and family, who denounce hip hop and rap and the sinful culture that permeates throughout them. It is not about &#8220;what does it mean to be Black?&#8221; but rather &#8220;what does it mean to look, act, think, like Christ?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25642</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25642</guid>
		<description>Self restraint is reinforced in a stronger manner when there is a father present.  I see this on a daily basis in my classroom.  On an average, students with both parents at home display more self restraint in the classroom and are more apt to succeed.  A majority of my male students who live without a father show contempt towards their mother, contempt towards their female classmates, and particularly contempt towards female teachers.  These same male students will likely grow up to be absentee fathers, wife-beaters and show an utter lack of respect towards authority.  I do not have the same discipline problems because I am a man.  That respect for mothers, female classmates and teachers comes from the discipline inherently instilled by a father.  There are always exceptions, and I know plenty of single mothers who run a well disciplined home.  However, the truth is that these behaviors flourish in a setting that is absent of the man showing young boys how to be a man.  This is true no matter if they are black, white, hispanic or any other ethnic/racial group.  It has been applied more to blacks because of the fact that the majority of babies born to unwed mothers with no participation of the father takes place in the black community.  An example is in Galveston, TX, where I taught for 2 years.  Among blacks, over 40% of the family units where without a father.  The schools there face an alarming problem in student discipline and achievement among black students, especially black males.  This translates to an overabundance of black family units (without 2 parents) living in public housing with young black males becoming involved in gangs and crime.  While not having a father is not the sole reason for these problems, it is a major contributor.  You do find the same problem in the white and hispanic communities where the situation is the same, but it is predominantly in the black community.  For whites to point out these facts, that makes them &quot;racist.&quot;  Many of us &quot;whiteys&quot; have grown tired of this defense mechanism being used by politicians who refuse to confront the truth or are too polarized to speak out for fear of being called an &quot;Uncle Tom&quot; or house N.  Facts are facts. Until the facts are confronted and accepted, we will find ourselves in this same sad discussion.  Progress will only come when more adopt the rule for Academy freshmen when they must confront their wrong doing: &quot;NO EXCUSE SIR.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self restraint is reinforced in a stronger manner when there is a father present.  I see this on a daily basis in my classroom.  On an average, students with both parents at home display more self restraint in the classroom and are more apt to succeed.  A majority of my male students who live without a father show contempt towards their mother, contempt towards their female classmates, and particularly contempt towards female teachers.  These same male students will likely grow up to be absentee fathers, wife-beaters and show an utter lack of respect towards authority.  I do not have the same discipline problems because I am a man.  That respect for mothers, female classmates and teachers comes from the discipline inherently instilled by a father.  There are always exceptions, and I know plenty of single mothers who run a well disciplined home.  However, the truth is that these behaviors flourish in a setting that is absent of the man showing young boys how to be a man.  This is true no matter if they are black, white, hispanic or any other ethnic/racial group.  It has been applied more to blacks because of the fact that the majority of babies born to unwed mothers with no participation of the father takes place in the black community.  An example is in Galveston, TX, where I taught for 2 years.  Among blacks, over 40% of the family units where without a father.  The schools there face an alarming problem in student discipline and achievement among black students, especially black males.  This translates to an overabundance of black family units (without 2 parents) living in public housing with young black males becoming involved in gangs and crime.  While not having a father is not the sole reason for these problems, it is a major contributor.  You do find the same problem in the white and hispanic communities where the situation is the same, but it is predominantly in the black community.  For whites to point out these facts, that makes them &#8220;racist.&#8221;  Many of us &#8220;whiteys&#8221; have grown tired of this defense mechanism being used by politicians who refuse to confront the truth or are too polarized to speak out for fear of being called an &#8220;Uncle Tom&#8221; or house N.  Facts are facts. Until the facts are confronted and accepted, we will find ourselves in this same sad discussion.  Progress will only come when more adopt the rule for Academy freshmen when they must confront their wrong doing: &#8220;NO EXCUSE SIR.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25608</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25608</guid>
		<description>Politicians are fair game, including the President, but I still have to object to the overuse of the racist accusation.  Seldom is it directed at someone deserving of the tag.  It&#039;s a cheap slur, misused and misdirected so badly as to be useless in any rational discussion.  

I once had a political argument with an Irish socialist, and in a final flurry of desperate energy he accused me of being a racist.  My crime?  I had stated that France had become irrelevant in the setting of world priorities.  Ok, that&#039;s a fair point to debate.  But to call me a racist is beyond any rational comprehension.  All I can assume is that he had the bizarre notion that the French are a different race than Americans (as if each country were homogeneous in the first place), or more likely that he simply ran out of legitimate arguments and resorted to typical left-wing hyperbole.

I don&#039;t mind being called a grouch, or a hard-nosed conservative, because I am.  I don&#039;t mind being called wrong when I&#039;m wrong (I hear that at home a lot).  I don&#039;t even mind being called wrong when I think I&#039;m right; that&#039;s open for discussion, as is my degree of sanity when it comes to Cubs baseball.  But I surely do mind being crudely and cheaply tagged as a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians are fair game, including the President, but I still have to object to the overuse of the racist accusation.  Seldom is it directed at someone deserving of the tag.  It&#8217;s a cheap slur, misused and misdirected so badly as to be useless in any rational discussion.  </p>
<p>I once had a political argument with an Irish socialist, and in a final flurry of desperate energy he accused me of being a racist.  My crime?  I had stated that France had become irrelevant in the setting of world priorities.  Ok, that&#8217;s a fair point to debate.  But to call me a racist is beyond any rational comprehension.  All I can assume is that he had the bizarre notion that the French are a different race than Americans (as if each country were homogeneous in the first place), or more likely that he simply ran out of legitimate arguments and resorted to typical left-wing hyperbole.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind being called a grouch, or a hard-nosed conservative, because I am.  I don&#8217;t mind being called wrong when I&#8217;m wrong (I hear that at home a lot).  I don&#8217;t even mind being called wrong when I think I&#8217;m right; that&#8217;s open for discussion, as is my degree of sanity when it comes to Cubs baseball.  But I surely do mind being crudely and cheaply tagged as a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25606</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25606</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not trying to run you off, Leo. You are welcome to continue participating. I just thought you should be aware that this is not a forum for the &quot;You&#039;re a racist&quot; camp. While I want to provide free discussion back and forth, I don&#039;t want name-calling going on between the commenters. In fairness to you, I don&#039;t think you called Aaron a racist; you were referring to his conclusions. Because you&#039;re new to the blog, however, I thought it was a good opportunity to explain one of my unwritten rules.

You can call George Bush a racist, for example. But when commenters say that to each other, the whole thread gets off-topic and the original points are lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to run you off, Leo. You are welcome to continue participating. I just thought you should be aware that this is not a forum for the &#8220;You&#8217;re a racist&#8221; camp. While I want to provide free discussion back and forth, I don&#8217;t want name-calling going on between the commenters. In fairness to you, I don&#8217;t think you called Aaron a racist; you were referring to his conclusions. Because you&#8217;re new to the blog, however, I thought it was a good opportunity to explain one of my unwritten rules.</p>
<p>You can call George Bush a racist, for example. But when commenters say that to each other, the whole thread gets off-topic and the original points are lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25603</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25603</guid>
		<description>Ms. Barber, 
I found Aaron depiction of his specific sub-group troubling, because he attributed his and other blacks in his sub groups criminal, disruptive, and unfortunate behavior, to the fact that they did not have a father at home, and that they grew up poor. His assumptions are precisely the type of disruptive thought that identifies, and renders  criminal behavior by our people today understandable because of the music they listen to, or because they are from the &quot;Hood&quot;. It is my contention that this kind of behavior has everything to do with lack of moral restrained, even self restrained. I don&#039;t deny these underclass exist, I do deny that people can legitimately hide behind these subgroups to explain why they steal, or rape, or murder. This is the type of rhetoric I am criticizing. 

Mam, I agree that &quot;Illegitimacy, crime, drug use, underemployment, low academic achievement, delinquency, etc. are factors affecting all segments of society to a certain degree&quot;. I did in-fact grow up in such an atmosphere, having grown up in Brooklyn, in Crown Heights. My father was in fact home, but many of my friends did not have their fathers at home. some of my cousins did not know their fathers, and were poor, somehow their lives did not follow the path of Aaron&#039;s.  I am not sure how he would explain that. I have a cousin who did end up in jail, but his father was there for him his whole life. He ended in jail because he was stupid enough to steal car. They were not poor, they were not rich, but certainly they were not poor. How does Aaron account for that. I do paint Aaron conclusions as racist, because this is more of the same thought that has fueled the kind of disruptive, and disingenuous, and frankly false assertions by white America that this is just they those people are because they have no father, and they are poor. With regard to checking out rap videos, I am in few. I am on a ton a rap records, I have toured with many of them, as I am a musician. This can easily be verified by looking up my discography. I have travelled in and out of this music industry, and irresponsible behavior comes from the same place in rap artist, as they do from rock and roll artist who throw televisions out of hotel windows, and routinely travel with cocaine in their possession, and treat women like badly use meat. Some of these rock stars even commit crimes, but they is never a discussion to suggest that we could understand why they may have rape a women, by looking at his music collection. This kind of thinking was even use and well illustrated during 911. One man out of the 20 men who were plotting the 911 event(the darkest man) was arrested before it happen. We all listened as our Attorney General described him as pure evil. But when asked what drove a white man from California to join Al-Qeuda, become muslim, and fight against American troops, it was said well he would listened to KRS-1, and read Alex Haley&#039;s Auto Biography of Malcom X. Ms. Barber they white criminal was said to be a victim of black culture, and therefor not responsible for his actions. Somehow, many of these assertions were from his own father. Our music is not the problem. Our clothes don&#039;t make us do the wrong that we do. Mr. Hawkins does have right to his opinion, but I sincerely disagree with his opinion. 

You are right Ms Barber, I am black, and you are also right to assume that these things (urban ?black? neighborhood, read crime statistics, talk to some of the young people) are not knew to me. I am these young people, I am only 38 years old, and would be the first to admit I don&#039;t know it all. But this I can say, I do not &quot;feign shock&quot; at Mr Hawkins conclusions, I recognize them. 
If this disqualifies me from this discourse, then I sadly will submit to you decision, what ever that will be. You are right, I have not been reading your posting long, but I have really enjoyed your insight, and also the response of the comments posted to your blog. I do really enjoy coming here and reading your opinions, but I certainly do not want to be a spoiler to your forum. If I have then I do apologize for my ignorance. 

Sincerely

Leo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Barber,<br />
I found Aaron depiction of his specific sub-group troubling, because he attributed his and other blacks in his sub groups criminal, disruptive, and unfortunate behavior, to the fact that they did not have a father at home, and that they grew up poor. His assumptions are precisely the type of disruptive thought that identifies, and renders  criminal behavior by our people today understandable because of the music they listen to, or because they are from the &#8220;Hood&#8221;. It is my contention that this kind of behavior has everything to do with lack of moral restrained, even self restrained. I don&#8217;t deny these underclass exist, I do deny that people can legitimately hide behind these subgroups to explain why they steal, or rape, or murder. This is the type of rhetoric I am criticizing. </p>
<p>Mam, I agree that &#8220;Illegitimacy, crime, drug use, underemployment, low academic achievement, delinquency, etc. are factors affecting all segments of society to a certain degree&#8221;. I did in-fact grow up in such an atmosphere, having grown up in Brooklyn, in Crown Heights. My father was in fact home, but many of my friends did not have their fathers at home. some of my cousins did not know their fathers, and were poor, somehow their lives did not follow the path of Aaron&#8217;s.  I am not sure how he would explain that. I have a cousin who did end up in jail, but his father was there for him his whole life. He ended in jail because he was stupid enough to steal car. They were not poor, they were not rich, but certainly they were not poor. How does Aaron account for that. I do paint Aaron conclusions as racist, because this is more of the same thought that has fueled the kind of disruptive, and disingenuous, and frankly false assertions by white America that this is just they those people are because they have no father, and they are poor. With regard to checking out rap videos, I am in few. I am on a ton a rap records, I have toured with many of them, as I am a musician. This can easily be verified by looking up my discography. I have travelled in and out of this music industry, and irresponsible behavior comes from the same place in rap artist, as they do from rock and roll artist who throw televisions out of hotel windows, and routinely travel with cocaine in their possession, and treat women like badly use meat. Some of these rock stars even commit crimes, but they is never a discussion to suggest that we could understand why they may have rape a women, by looking at his music collection. This kind of thinking was even use and well illustrated during 911. One man out of the 20 men who were plotting the 911 event(the darkest man) was arrested before it happen. We all listened as our Attorney General described him as pure evil. But when asked what drove a white man from California to join Al-Qeuda, become muslim, and fight against American troops, it was said well he would listened to KRS-1, and read Alex Haley&#8217;s Auto Biography of Malcom X. Ms. Barber they white criminal was said to be a victim of black culture, and therefor not responsible for his actions. Somehow, many of these assertions were from his own father. Our music is not the problem. Our clothes don&#8217;t make us do the wrong that we do. Mr. Hawkins does have right to his opinion, but I sincerely disagree with his opinion. </p>
<p>You are right Ms Barber, I am black, and you are also right to assume that these things (urban ?black? neighborhood, read crime statistics, talk to some of the young people) are not knew to me. I am these young people, I am only 38 years old, and would be the first to admit I don&#8217;t know it all. But this I can say, I do not &#8220;feign shock&#8221; at Mr Hawkins conclusions, I recognize them.<br />
If this disqualifies me from this discourse, then I sadly will submit to you decision, what ever that will be. You are right, I have not been reading your posting long, but I have really enjoyed your insight, and also the response of the comments posted to your blog. I do really enjoy coming here and reading your opinions, but I certainly do not want to be a spoiler to your forum. If I have then I do apologize for my ignorance. </p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>Leo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25601</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25601</guid>
		<description>Ummm Lisa,  &quot;&lt;em&gt;Also for some of the blacks who keep talking about the Dems being the founders and members of the KKK, who put us in the hands of these folks after Reconstruction Huh? Whoâ€™s administration did separate but equal come about in 1896?! William McKinley! Also Blacks werenâ€™t even on the radar during this time. So to my Black conservative brothers the GOP wasnâ€™t all it was cracked up to be for sometime.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Question: when did the Reconstruction(s) take place?

History refresher timeline and distribution of political power

1857: Supreme Court declared Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in the Dred Scott decision
[Buchanan (D), Sen:41&#124;20 (D 62%), House:132&#124;90 (D 56%)]

1866: 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.  Ku Klux Klan established in Pulaski, Tennessee. 
[Lincoln (R)/Johnson (D), Sen:11&#124;39 (R 72%), House:38&#124;136 (R 70%)]

1867: General Nathan Bedford Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Empire, converted the Klan into a paramilitary arm of the Democratic party to oppose Republican governments set up by Congressional Reconstruction acts.  
[Johnson (D), Sen:9&#124;57 (R 84%), House:47&#124;173 (R 77%)]

1869: The Colored National Labor Union, the 1st national Negro labor group is established (No blacks on radar?)
[Grant (R), Sen:12&#124;62 (R 84%), House:67&#124;171 (R 70%)]

1870: Joseph Rainey and the Reverand Hiram R. Revels, both black, take seats in Congress and Civil Rights Act (Enforcement Act) is passed 
[Grant (R), Sen:12&#124;62 (R 84%), House:67&#124;171 (R 70%)]

1871 â€“ 1872: Tho not all southern whites were KKK, many did sympathize and did not attempt to prevent the atrocities against blacks. Law enforcement was weak so to federal intervention was necessary to stop the reconstruction era Klan. Congressional legislation was enacted to enable law enforcement by the federal government.  1st era KKK is snuffed out
[Grant (R), Sen:17&#124;56 (R 76%), House:104&#124;136 (R 56%)]

1876: In the United States v. Cruikshank, the Supreme Court restricts 14th Amendment to Civil Rights violations committed by states instead of individuals
[Grant (R), Sen:28&#124;46 (R 61%), House:182&#124;103 (D 62%)]

1877: Rutherford B hayes is sworn in as President.  Appoints John Harlan to SCOTUS.  &lt;strong&gt;Note the balance of power&lt;/strong&gt;
[Hayes (R), Sen:35&#124;40 (R 53%), House:155&#124;136 (D 53%)]

1888: Negro banks founded in Washington D. C. and Richmond, VA.  Cleveland did the following; spoke out against injustices on the Chinese in the West, sympathized with the South&#039;s balking at treating blacks as social or political equals, thought Indians should be assimilated into white society and took care not to speak out against female suffrage but never supported women&#039;s right to vote.
[Cleveland (D), Sen:37&#124;39 (R 51%) House:167&#124;152 (D 51%)]

1895: Frederick Douglass spoke at a meeting of the National Council of Women in Washington, D.C then passes away that evening.
[Cleveland (D), Sen:44&#124;40 (D 50%), House:218&#124;124 (D 61%)]

&lt;strong&gt;1896: Supreme Court declared &quot;separate but equal&quot; is constitutional in Plessy v Ferguson.  The lone dissenter, Justice John Harlan, was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1877 by President Rutherford B. Hayes, wrote&lt;/strong&gt;
    &quot;&lt;em&gt;Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law...In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott case...The present decision, it may well be apprehended, will not only stimulate aggressions, more or less brutal and irritating, upon the admitted rights of colored citizens, but will encourage the belief that it is possible, by means of state enactments, to defeat the beneficient purposes which the people of the United States had in view when they adopted the recent amendments of the Constitution.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;  

Lisa, do you understand why Bush mentioned Dred Scott in his debate w/ sKerry?
[Cleveland (D), Sen:40&#124;44 (R 49%), House:93&#124;254 (R 71%)]

&lt;strong&gt;1897: William McKinley is sworn in as president.&lt;/strong&gt;  Lisa, you owe McKinley an apology.
[McKinley (R), Sen:34&#124;44 (R 49%), House:124&#124;206	(R 58%)

1900: G. H. White, a representative from North Carolina, introduced a bill to make lynching a federal crime, but the bill is defeated.
[McKinley (R), Sen:26&#124;53 (R 59%), House:161&#124;187 (R 52%)]

1905: Publication of Thomas Dixonâ€™s novel, The Clansman.  KKK spreads thruout the South, North and Midwest w/ over 3 million members by the 1920s.  In addition to their violence against blacks (cross burning became popular), they were also opposed to the modern music and culture of the Jazz Era, and viewed alcohol, smoking, and gambling as morally decadent.
[Roosevelt (R), Sen:33&#124;57 (R 63%), House:176&#124;207 (R 54%)]

1910: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People established.
[Taft (R), Sen:32&#124;60 (R 65%), House:172&#124;219 (R 56%)]


1929: An all negro union receives a charter from the American Federation of Labor.  2nd era KKK is irrelevant.  Oh yeah, Stock Market Crash.
[Hoover (R), Sen:39&#124;56 (R 58%), House:164&#124;270 (R 62%)]

Late 1940s:  3rd era KKK surfaces w/ Samuel Green behind it. However, they faced obstacles as states began banning its formation. Justice Hugo Black was an anti-catholic &amp; Klansman who introduced the phrase &quot;separation of Church and State&quot; into law in Everson vs. the Board of Education.
[Truman (D), Sen:45&#124;51 (R 53%), House:188&#124;246 (R 57%)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm Lisa,  &#8220;<em>Also for some of the blacks who keep talking about the Dems being the founders and members of the KKK, who put us in the hands of these folks after Reconstruction Huh? Whoâ€™s administration did separate but equal come about in 1896?! William McKinley! Also Blacks werenâ€™t even on the radar during this time. So to my Black conservative brothers the GOP wasnâ€™t all it was cracked up to be for sometime.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Question: when did the Reconstruction(s) take place?</p>
<p>History refresher timeline and distribution of political power</p>
<p>1857: Supreme Court declared Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in the Dred Scott decision<br />
[Buchanan (D), Sen:41|20 (D 62%), House:132|90 (D 56%)]</p>
<p>1866: 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.  Ku Klux Klan established in Pulaski, Tennessee.<br />
[Lincoln (R)/Johnson (D), Sen:11|39 (R 72%), House:38|136 (R 70%)]</p>
<p>1867: General Nathan Bedford Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Empire, converted the Klan into a paramilitary arm of the Democratic party to oppose Republican governments set up by Congressional Reconstruction acts.<br />
[Johnson (D), Sen:9|57 (R 84%), House:47|173 (R 77%)]</p>
<p>1869: The Colored National Labor Union, the 1st national Negro labor group is established (No blacks on radar?)<br />
[Grant (R), Sen:12|62 (R 84%), House:67|171 (R 70%)]</p>
<p>1870: Joseph Rainey and the Reverand Hiram R. Revels, both black, take seats in Congress and Civil Rights Act (Enforcement Act) is passed<br />
[Grant (R), Sen:12|62 (R 84%), House:67|171 (R 70%)]</p>
<p>1871 â€“ 1872: Tho not all southern whites were KKK, many did sympathize and did not attempt to prevent the atrocities against blacks. Law enforcement was weak so to federal intervention was necessary to stop the reconstruction era Klan. Congressional legislation was enacted to enable law enforcement by the federal government.  1st era KKK is snuffed out<br />
[Grant (R), Sen:17|56 (R 76%), House:104|136 (R 56%)]</p>
<p>1876: In the United States v. Cruikshank, the Supreme Court restricts 14th Amendment to Civil Rights violations committed by states instead of individuals<br />
[Grant (R), Sen:28|46 (R 61%), House:182|103 (D 62%)]</p>
<p>1877: Rutherford B hayes is sworn in as President.  Appoints John Harlan to SCOTUS.  <strong>Note the balance of power</strong><br />
[Hayes (R), Sen:35|40 (R 53%), House:155|136 (D 53%)]</p>
<p>1888: Negro banks founded in Washington D. C. and Richmond, VA.  Cleveland did the following; spoke out against injustices on the Chinese in the West, sympathized with the South&#8217;s balking at treating blacks as social or political equals, thought Indians should be assimilated into white society and took care not to speak out against female suffrage but never supported women&#8217;s right to vote.<br />
[Cleveland (D), Sen:37|39 (R 51%) House:167|152 (D 51%)]</p>
<p>1895: Frederick Douglass spoke at a meeting of the National Council of Women in Washington, D.C then passes away that evening.<br />
[Cleveland (D), Sen:44|40 (D 50%), House:218|124 (D 61%)]</p>
<p><strong>1896: Supreme Court declared &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; is constitutional in Plessy v Ferguson.  The lone dissenter, Justice John Harlan, was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1877 by President Rutherford B. Hayes, wrote</strong><br />
    &#8220;<em>Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law&#8230;In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott case&#8230;The present decision, it may well be apprehended, will not only stimulate aggressions, more or less brutal and irritating, upon the admitted rights of colored citizens, but will encourage the belief that it is possible, by means of state enactments, to defeat the beneficient purposes which the people of the United States had in view when they adopted the recent amendments of the Constitution.</em>&#8221;  </p>
<p>Lisa, do you understand why Bush mentioned Dred Scott in his debate w/ sKerry?<br />
[Cleveland (D), Sen:40|44 (R 49%), House:93|254 (R 71%)]</p>
<p><strong>1897: William McKinley is sworn in as president.</strong>  Lisa, you owe McKinley an apology.<br />
[McKinley (R), Sen:34|44 (R 49%), House:124|206	(R 58%)</p>
<p>1900: G. H. White, a representative from North Carolina, introduced a bill to make lynching a federal crime, but the bill is defeated.<br />
[McKinley (R), Sen:26|53 (R 59%), House:161|187 (R 52%)]</p>
<p>1905: Publication of Thomas Dixonâ€™s novel, The Clansman.  KKK spreads thruout the South, North and Midwest w/ over 3 million members by the 1920s.  In addition to their violence against blacks (cross burning became popular), they were also opposed to the modern music and culture of the Jazz Era, and viewed alcohol, smoking, and gambling as morally decadent.<br />
[Roosevelt (R), Sen:33|57 (R 63%), House:176|207 (R 54%)]</p>
<p>1910: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People established.<br />
[Taft (R), Sen:32|60 (R 65%), House:172|219 (R 56%)]</p>
<p>1929: An all negro union receives a charter from the American Federation of Labor.  2nd era KKK is irrelevant.  Oh yeah, Stock Market Crash.<br />
[Hoover (R), Sen:39|56 (R 58%), House:164|270 (R 62%)]</p>
<p>Late 1940s:  3rd era KKK surfaces w/ Samuel Green behind it. However, they faced obstacles as states began banning its formation. Justice Hugo Black was an anti-catholic &#038; Klansman who introduced the phrase &#8220;separation of Church and State&#8221; into law in Everson vs. the Board of Education.<br />
[Truman (D), Sen:45|51 (R 53%), House:188|246 (R 57%)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D in SC</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/comment-page-2/#comment-25417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D in SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/03/embrace/#comment-25417</guid>
		<description>Lisa, I don&#039;t mean to nitpick, but William McKinley wasn&#039;t inaugurated until March 4, 1897. In 1896, the President was Grover Cleveland, a Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, I don&#8217;t mean to nitpick, but William McKinley wasn&#8217;t inaugurated until March 4, 1897. In 1896, the President was Grover Cleveland, a Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

