<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Males and the Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warspite</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-28013</link>
		<dc:creator>Warspite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-28013</guid>
		<description>Frankly, about the &quot;diversity&quot; thing, well, I DO NOT CARE. I read your blog regularly because you do it so damn well. I makes not one jot of difference to me your gender, race, age or viewpoint. I often disagree with what you have to say but I would defend to the death your right to say it-and say it well. Is that not what the blogosphere is all about? A merit based culture? Well, if your blog is a good example of the triumph of ideas versus the politically correct view of fitting all citizens into little blocs based on things that, in a better, saner world, would go unremarked. I find diversity of viewpoint far, far more to the point than differences based on the accident of birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, about the &#8220;diversity&#8221; thing, well, I DO NOT CARE. I read your blog regularly because you do it so damn well. I makes not one jot of difference to me your gender, race, age or viewpoint. I often disagree with what you have to say but I would defend to the death your right to say it-and say it well. Is that not what the blogosphere is all about? A merit based culture? Well, if your blog is a good example of the triumph of ideas versus the politically correct view of fitting all citizens into little blocs based on things that, in a better, saner world, would go unremarked. I find diversity of viewpoint far, far more to the point than differences based on the accident of birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27635</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27635</guid>
		<description>Lol... yeah, you do sound like a liberal (I am one; I promise we&#039;re not all evil), but I think you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head. Men aggressively seek links and attention for their blogs in ways that (most) women don&#039;t.

As for being invited to conferences and TV shows: You get there in the same way you get links from A-List bloggers:

 * Ask to present at a conference.
 * Email quality stories and posts that may be of interest.
 * Tell them you&#039;re available.

Self-promotion is key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol&#8230; yeah, you do sound like a liberal (I am one; I promise we&#8217;re not all evil), but I think you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head. Men aggressively seek links and attention for their blogs in ways that (most) women don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As for being invited to conferences and TV shows: You get there in the same way you get links from A-List bloggers:</p>
<p> * Ask to present at a conference.<br />
 * Email quality stories and posts that may be of interest.<br />
 * Tell them you&#8217;re available.</p>
<p>Self-promotion is key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandhill Trek</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandhill Trek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27538</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ten New Voices - Number 4, 5, and 6&lt;/strong&gt;
Tara Calishain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ten New Voices &#8211; Number 4, 5, and 6</strong><br />
Tara Calishain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27243</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27243</guid>
		<description>Hey La Shawn,
I can&#039;t believe that YOU have had to email links--that shows exactly what the issue is about!  I&#039;ve never really thought to email a link to a post of my own, but that&#039;s probably more laziness on my part.  I really thought &quot;they&quot; all read you every day anyway and wouldn&#039;t need prompting, although as I&#039;ve said before, I&#039;m not surprised.  

I think a lot of people are missing the point.  I&#039;m certain that the biggies maintain that status because they constantly feed off of one another without much regard to those not closely related in their niche.  And because they&#039;re big and get all the inside tips from not just the MSM, but other bloggers, the rest of us keep an eye on them just to read the pulse.  I&#039;ve thought for quite some time that we female bloggers need to work together a lot more; not ignore the big white guys, but spend more time helping each other out.  Same goes for minority bloggers (specifically, black bloggers--although it seems to me there&#039;s some good support within the group).  

I also honestly think that minority--and to a lesser extent, female--bloggers get overlooked because of the topics covered.  Most whites, because they (we) simply don&#039;t feel minority issues in the same way, tend to not pay attention because of a lack of understanding. This isn&#039;t everyone, to be sure--I enjoy reading race-issue posts and I know a lot of others do, but it&#039;s just my intuition that tells me a lot of others don&#039;t.  

It&#039;s not an Affirmative Action or liberal thing to think any of this, either.  It&#039;s a matter of supporting each other, teamwork, whatever you want to call it.

Sorry for the LONG comment; once again I find myself saying &quot;I shoulda just blogged it.&quot;  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey La Shawn,<br />
I can&#8217;t believe that YOU have had to email links&#8211;that shows exactly what the issue is about!  I&#8217;ve never really thought to email a link to a post of my own, but that&#8217;s probably more laziness on my part.  I really thought &#8220;they&#8221; all read you every day anyway and wouldn&#8217;t need prompting, although as I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;m not surprised.  </p>
<p>I think a lot of people are missing the point.  I&#8217;m certain that the biggies maintain that status because they constantly feed off of one another without much regard to those not closely related in their niche.  And because they&#8217;re big and get all the inside tips from not just the MSM, but other bloggers, the rest of us keep an eye on them just to read the pulse.  I&#8217;ve thought for quite some time that we female bloggers need to work together a lot more; not ignore the big white guys, but spend more time helping each other out.  Same goes for minority bloggers (specifically, black bloggers&#8211;although it seems to me there&#8217;s some good support within the group).  </p>
<p>I also honestly think that minority&#8211;and to a lesser extent, female&#8211;bloggers get overlooked because of the topics covered.  Most whites, because they (we) simply don&#8217;t feel minority issues in the same way, tend to not pay attention because of a lack of understanding. This isn&#8217;t everyone, to be sure&#8211;I enjoy reading race-issue posts and I know a lot of others do, but it&#8217;s just my intuition that tells me a lot of others don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not an Affirmative Action or liberal thing to think any of this, either.  It&#8217;s a matter of supporting each other, teamwork, whatever you want to call it.</p>
<p>Sorry for the LONG comment; once again I find myself saying &#8220;I shoulda just blogged it.&#8221;  <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27236</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27236</guid>
		<description>This topic fascinates me to no end, thanks for your input Ms. Barber!  I&#039;ve posted on this topic as well and will continue to do so until I become a b+/A- blogger, lol. ;) Great Job Woman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic fascinates me to no end, thanks for your input Ms. Barber!  I&#8217;ve posted on this topic as well and will continue to do so until I become a b+/A- blogger, lol. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Great Job Woman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Negrophile</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27194</link>
		<dc:creator>Negrophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27194</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A lot of catching up to do, pt. 1&lt;/strong&gt;
At AfroNetizen, Christopher Rabb spends some time on a panel explaining &quot;[t]he trouble with me being the Ambassador for All Colored Peoples.&quot;Big Mama&#039;s Joint posts &quot;Marketing to children: why they want expensive sneakers&quot; points to Washington Post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A lot of catching up to do, pt. 1</strong><br />
At AfroNetizen, Christopher Rabb spends some time on a panel explaining &#8220;[t]he trouble with me being the Ambassador for All Colored Peoples.&#8221;Big Mama&#8217;s Joint posts &#8220;Marketing to children: why they want expensive sneakers&#8221; points to Washington Post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David L</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27168</link>
		<dc:creator>David L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27168</guid>
		<description>Is there any real lack of female, or any particular demographic, bloggers?   There ar something like eight million blogs.  I am not aware of any census of these some eight million blogs.  

In reality the complaint is not about a lack of females bloggers, but a complaint about a lack of female bloggers on at the top of certain blog lists.

I suggset, that the only blog list that maters to to the individual is the blog list he uses for himself.  As your personal blog list is anything you make it, you are free to put anybody on it you care.

For a strange twist, David Burge, Iowahawk, has a rather good take on this kerfuffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any real lack of female, or any particular demographic, bloggers?   There ar something like eight million blogs.  I am not aware of any census of these some eight million blogs.  </p>
<p>In reality the complaint is not about a lack of females bloggers, but a complaint about a lack of female bloggers on at the top of certain blog lists.</p>
<p>I suggset, that the only blog list that maters to to the individual is the blog list he uses for himself.  As your personal blog list is anything you make it, you are free to put anybody on it you care.</p>
<p>For a strange twist, David Burge, Iowahawk, has a rather good take on this kerfuffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27158</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27158</guid>
		<description>LaShawn, please consider the media near-censorship of Christians in their own news organizations.  I consider the lack of a respectable Christian perspective a much bigger reduction of diversity than a lack of women or blacks.

Respectable meaning with similar assumptions about judging results.  Note that 30% recovery rates of religion based AA is not that great -- but is better than any other major program for helping alcoholics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn, please consider the media near-censorship of Christians in their own news organizations.  I consider the lack of a respectable Christian perspective a much bigger reduction of diversity than a lack of women or blacks.</p>
<p>Respectable meaning with similar assumptions about judging results.  Note that 30% recovery rates of religion based AA is not that great &#8212; but is better than any other major program for helping alcoholics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dummocrats</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27153</link>
		<dc:creator>Dummocrats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 04:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27153</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top Ten Real Reasons Why There Are &#039;No&#039; Female Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;
Once again, bloggers and mainstream media reporters are wringing their hands over the perceived lack of female bloggers. I&#039;ve written about this before, but the issue just won&#039;t seem to go away. Today Chris Nolan of Politics from Left to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top Ten Real Reasons Why There Are &#8216;No&#8217; Female Bloggers</strong><br />
Once again, bloggers and mainstream media reporters are wringing their hands over the perceived lack of female bloggers. I&#8217;ve written about this before, but the issue just won&#8217;t seem to go away. Today Chris Nolan of Politics from Left to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodo David</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodo David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27115</guid>
		<description>Stan wrote, &quot;Maybe white males just have too much time on their hands and too much of a sense of self-importance . . .&quot;

Stan, I resemble that remark!  I might be another white, male blogger, but at least I offer a Crabby Patty to anyone who might actually read my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan wrote, &#8220;Maybe white males just have too much time on their hands and too much of a sense of self-importance . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Stan, I resemble that remark!  I might be another white, male blogger, but at least I offer a Crabby Patty to anyone who might actually read my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobb</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-27012</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-27012</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blog Patronage: A Token of Affection&lt;/strong&gt;
The very persistence of the question of black blogs amidst &#039;white male hegemony&#039; demands that the real black bloggers please stand up, and it&#039;s about time. But you and I both know that the A-List Bloggers or the MSM have to say it&#039;s an issue before...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog Patronage: A Token of Affection</strong><br />
The very persistence of the question of black blogs amidst &#8216;white male hegemony&#8217; demands that the real black bloggers please stand up, and it&#8217;s about time. But you and I both know that the A-List Bloggers or the MSM have to say it&#8217;s an issue before&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mean dean</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-2/#comment-26968</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-26968</guid>
		<description>Ahem ... you&#039;ve had some of us pudgie white guys at hello!-)

Then again, up until last week, I was one of your neighbors. Promise to take my good habits w/me!-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem &#8230; you&#8217;ve had some of us pudgie white guys at hello!-)</p>
<p>Then again, up until last week, I was one of your neighbors. Promise to take my good habits w/me!-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig henry</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26917</link>
		<dc:creator>craig henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-26917</guid>
		<description>With regard to your point about conferences and MSM spots-- isn&#039;t it interesting that when the legacy media looks at blogs, they can&#039;t help but to find people like themselves (wonkette, Jarvis, Sullivan, Kaus.)  Media bloggers seem to be even less diverse than the blogosphere as a whole.

Question:  Is Ann Althouse overlooked because she is female or is she overlinked because she is a law professor?  I know that there is no answer to that, but i think it does show the danger of looking at this question through a single filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to your point about conferences and MSM spots&#8211; isn&#8217;t it interesting that when the legacy media looks at blogs, they can&#8217;t help but to find people like themselves (wonkette, Jarvis, Sullivan, Kaus.)  Media bloggers seem to be even less diverse than the blogosphere as a whole.</p>
<p>Question:  Is Ann Althouse overlooked because she is female or is she overlinked because she is a law professor?  I know that there is no answer to that, but i think it does show the danger of looking at this question through a single filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Beltway</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26905</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Beltway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-26905</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why No Female Pundits, Part MXVII&lt;/strong&gt;
A Newsweek piece by Steve Levy  and Maureen Dowd&#039;s weekend pitty party have reignited the never dormant &quot;Why is it so hard for women to break through as opinion writers?&quot; discussion.

While a man writing a column taking on the powerful may be seen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why No Female Pundits, Part MXVII</strong><br />
A Newsweek piece by Steve Levy  and Maureen Dowd&#8217;s weekend pitty party have reignited the never dormant &#8220;Why is it so hard for women to break through as opinion writers?&#8221; discussion.</p>
<p>While a man writing a column taking on the powerful may be seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26901</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/13/white/#comment-26901</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t blog, I read.  I do research, specifically to fact-check and supplement articles I read in my local newspaper.  The way I found your blog was through a cite by another blogger in an article about Eason Jordan.  

In retrospect, I found nearly all the blogs on my favorites list by recommendation rather than original search.    The original recommendations came via MSM, and then from links in various blogs.  The reason is that topical searches are inefficient.  A search on any given topic will yield too many hits to wade through.

So, I would encourage you to follow your linking strategy, because it works.  

As for the preponderance of bogs by white guys, all that means is that more blogs by white guys get ignored.  I think people voluntarily disclose personal details because those details help them explain where they are coming from.  But those details have little influence on the question of whether a blog will be added to a given &quot;favorites&quot; list and develop lasting traffic.  You write well.  Your positions are thoughtful, and have texture and nuance.  You know how to track down useful and interesting information.  That makes you a keeper, regardless of the personal details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t blog, I read.  I do research, specifically to fact-check and supplement articles I read in my local newspaper.  The way I found your blog was through a cite by another blogger in an article about Eason Jordan.  </p>
<p>In retrospect, I found nearly all the blogs on my favorites list by recommendation rather than original search.    The original recommendations came via MSM, and then from links in various blogs.  The reason is that topical searches are inefficient.  A search on any given topic will yield too many hits to wade through.</p>
<p>So, I would encourage you to follow your linking strategy, because it works.  </p>
<p>As for the preponderance of bogs by white guys, all that means is that more blogs by white guys get ignored.  I think people voluntarily disclose personal details because those details help them explain where they are coming from.  But those details have little influence on the question of whether a blog will be added to a given &#8220;favorites&#8221; list and develop lasting traffic.  You write well.  Your positions are thoughtful, and have texture and nuance.  You know how to track down useful and interesting information.  That makes you a keeper, regardless of the personal details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
