<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Correctness Kills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Slater</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29286</guid>
		<description>Black, conservative, AND a Charley Reese aficionado!?  La Shawn is truly a gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black, conservative, AND a Charley Reese aficionado!?  La Shawn is truly a gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29128</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29128</guid>
		<description>Doc,
They did not do away with measurable physical standards.  I had to run the same obstacle course, drag the same 180 lb. dummy the same distance, run the same course in the same minimum time, do the same amount of pushups (not girl pushups) and situps as the males did, during the applications tryouts and all through the academy.  As I said, some of the guys that applied washed out, too.  I&#039;ve worked hard to maintain good physical condition for the whole of my career, and although, as I said, I&#039;m female and not as strong as most of my male counterparts, including my husband, who is a 23 year law enforcement veteran, I&#039;m in a lot better shape than a lot of them.  (You know the old cliche of the fat cop in the donut shop, don&#039;t you? Some of those guys exist at the department where I work.)  TCLEOSE sets up guidelines, but minimum standards vary from agency to agency within the state, for instance, I don&#039;t know what sort of tryout our sheriff&#039;s department has, but they hire both patrol officers and corrections officers, so they may have a different standard for each.  I only know from personal experience the standards my department uses, I&#039;ve been with them for my whole career. TCLEOSE also approves mandatory training courses, including defensive tactics courses, that an officer has to take throughout his career and pass in order to keep his license.  They also provide TCLEOSE approved courses that are not mandatory, but that officers can take on a voluntary basis. I&#039;ve taken some non-mandatory courses that were sponsored by other police agencies in Texas, and, just as at the department where I work, they did not have lower standards for females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc,<br />
They did not do away with measurable physical standards.  I had to run the same obstacle course, drag the same 180 lb. dummy the same distance, run the same course in the same minimum time, do the same amount of pushups (not girl pushups) and situps as the males did, during the applications tryouts and all through the academy.  As I said, some of the guys that applied washed out, too.  I&#8217;ve worked hard to maintain good physical condition for the whole of my career, and although, as I said, I&#8217;m female and not as strong as most of my male counterparts, including my husband, who is a 23 year law enforcement veteran, I&#8217;m in a lot better shape than a lot of them.  (You know the old cliche of the fat cop in the donut shop, don&#8217;t you? Some of those guys exist at the department where I work.)  TCLEOSE sets up guidelines, but minimum standards vary from agency to agency within the state, for instance, I don&#8217;t know what sort of tryout our sheriff&#8217;s department has, but they hire both patrol officers and corrections officers, so they may have a different standard for each.  I only know from personal experience the standards my department uses, I&#8217;ve been with them for my whole career. TCLEOSE also approves mandatory training courses, including defensive tactics courses, that an officer has to take throughout his career and pass in order to keep his license.  They also provide TCLEOSE approved courses that are not mandatory, but that officers can take on a voluntary basis. I&#8217;ve taken some non-mandatory courses that were sponsored by other police agencies in Texas, and, just as at the department where I work, they did not have lower standards for females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29019</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29019</guid>
		<description>Political Correctness is a very clever way for liberals to curve the rights of others.  With the popularity of &quot;hate crime laws&quot; anybody can be put in jail for having an un-pc thought. The latest pc abuse is the Dioces in San Diego  not being allowed to enforce Church doctrine. Because of a torrent of bad publicty by gay the Bishop has to perform a mass in honor of a well known unrepentant gay pornographer. PC is destroying religious freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Correctness is a very clever way for liberals to curve the rights of others.  With the popularity of &#8220;hate crime laws&#8221; anybody can be put in jail for having an un-pc thought. The latest pc abuse is the Dioces in San Diego  not being allowed to enforce Church doctrine. Because of a torrent of bad publicty by gay the Bishop has to perform a mass in honor of a well known unrepentant gay pornographer. PC is destroying religious freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Daniel</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29016</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29016</guid>
		<description>Anything that waters down the truth is evil. Political Correctness, more often than not, falls into that category. While I agree that society needs more civility in general, a spade is still a spade. I got my fill of PC in the Marine Corps, when I was &quot;counseled&quot; by a Sergeant Major for offering religious counseling to a Marine who had ASKED me for it, but didn&#039;t agree with the scriptural assessment of his situation. I found out then that even gentle, soothing and encouraging words could be un-PC. Since then, I have had about as much use for PC as I have for the ACLU--little to none. Again, I think society should be more civil in general, but when that &quot;civility&quot; erodes the truth, it morphs into Evil Personified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that waters down the truth is evil. Political Correctness, more often than not, falls into that category. While I agree that society needs more civility in general, a spade is still a spade. I got my fill of PC in the Marine Corps, when I was &#8220;counseled&#8221; by a Sergeant Major for offering religious counseling to a Marine who had ASKED me for it, but didn&#8217;t agree with the scriptural assessment of his situation. I found out then that even gentle, soothing and encouraging words could be un-PC. Since then, I have had about as much use for PC as I have for the ACLU&#8211;little to none. Again, I think society should be more civil in general, but when that &#8220;civility&#8221; erodes the truth, it morphs into Evil Personified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father Branigan</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29013</link>
		<dc:creator>Father Branigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29013</guid>
		<description>You pretty much have Tupac to thank for the PC-ness of the word &quot;Thug&quot;.  Until then, thug had no particular association with black men.

It&#039;s ironic that a black man who claimed to have been speaking for the downtrodden has stigmatized his brothers with this word.

He only had a short time on this Earth to contribute, and he did.  Not a positive word to describe his people, but a very negative word, and MTV-Hollywood embraced it.

  &quot;Yes, Tupac, you and your brothers are all thugs.  We want you to be thugs, we expect you to be thugs, and we will promote you as being cool if you continue to be thugs.&quot;

Notice that the downtrodden is not a big theme in the &quot;thug&quot; lifestyle.  Uber-hedonists have no time for such things.

Also notice the lack of concern for society at large while promoting &quot;thug-ness&quot; as cool.  It doesn&#039;t take a brilliant poet to know that the downtrodden are the ones who are going to feel the brunt of the stigma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pretty much have Tupac to thank for the PC-ness of the word &#8220;Thug&#8221;.  Until then, thug had no particular association with black men.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that a black man who claimed to have been speaking for the downtrodden has stigmatized his brothers with this word.</p>
<p>He only had a short time on this Earth to contribute, and he did.  Not a positive word to describe his people, but a very negative word, and MTV-Hollywood embraced it.</p>
<p>  &#8220;Yes, Tupac, you and your brothers are all thugs.  We want you to be thugs, we expect you to be thugs, and we will promote you as being cool if you continue to be thugs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Notice that the downtrodden is not a big theme in the &#8220;thug&#8221; lifestyle.  Uber-hedonists have no time for such things.</p>
<p>Also notice the lack of concern for society at large while promoting &#8220;thug-ness&#8221; as cool.  It doesn&#8217;t take a brilliant poet to know that the downtrodden are the ones who are going to feel the brunt of the stigma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warspite</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29012</link>
		<dc:creator>Warspite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29012</guid>
		<description>I love this site and many gratz to Ms. LSB on her well deserved success. I can&#039;t think of anyone who deserves it more, who makes more sense.

$$$ quote:&quot;But just because you can do something doesnâ€™t mean you should.&quot;

Simple, yet profound, no? Simple fact: by the age of about 14, males are, in just about every case, stronger than females. That this actually needs to be stated as a &quot;fact&quot; shows how far from reality our society has devolved. I had hoped that when the Two Towers went down, a lot of the silliness that had so permeated the American Body Social would vanish. It did but, when we were not atttacked again, the old patterns re-emerged.

I think I am going to rant-Good Lord, please feel free to delete me!

A brief digression on point. When I found myself alone, unattached and middle-aged, I was, briefly, mismatched with a much younger female. This lady had it all-beauty and brains and, well, what she saw in me I did not understand either then or now. Well, I had let myself go and didn&#039;t look, shall we say, like I ever &quot;juiced&quot;(i.e. abused steroids). But Miss Perfect, she worked out, and a lot, and often, and with the mindset of youth. One day, she challenged me to arm wrestle. Now, to start with, there was 30 years of difference, and she was fit, while I was, to be un-PC about it, fat and saggy and agressively chain smoking and drinking myself into the early grave that I so wholeheartedly yearned for in those days. She thought that because she lifted at the gym and ran and what-not, I was easy pickings. Well, someone forgot to tell her some simple truths about the human condition. And the thing of it was, we were both, if I recall it correctly through a booze infested haze, rather taken aback when I &quot;pinned&quot; her in 1 brief, pitiless moment. 

Women can do some really important, vital things that men can&#039;t. Essential, in fact, to the survival of our species. All men have is some extra muscle-mass. But to ignore that or make pretend that this basic inequality does not exist is worse than foolhardy-it is very dangerous, especially for bright, strong young women. They actually believe the propaganda and put themselves in harm&#039;s way. It happens every day, and the results can be plain devestating.

I consider myself a feminist-but I will tell you flat out that a society that settles for mere &quot;equality&quot; for women will not long survive. Any idiot can run a Fortune 500 corporation. If you don&#039;t believe me, check out the list of CEO&#039;s. But only a female of a certain age and in special circumstances can reproduce the species. Everything has been, up until very recent times, designed around that simple truth. I am NOT consigning women to be nothing but child making machines. Fact is, without the active involvement of both sexes in economic productivity we can&#039;t begin to compete and why waste all that human material and brainpower? Just do not lose sight of the essentials of the human condition: no babies, no future. I don&#039;t know if having children is a choice or a responsibility or both-but I know a awful lot of women my own age who went the career track, were very successful and hit 50 in pure misery. Maybe my boomer generation had it worst-the breakthrough generation or whatever, but reaching a &quot;certain age&quot;, alone and childless, has made a lot of real flesh and blood people I know very unhappy. 

Almost as bad are those-and I seem to know a lot in this group too-who waited too long, &quot;choosing&quot; to have a kid for the first time when past 40. Surprising how many 50ish women I know, single mothers, with youngsters under 10. These kids are worked to death-constant classes and activities, stressed and competitive to the max. I guess the parent(s) need to prove something, but it sure makes for some unhappy mini-adults. I think everyone deserves a childhood. When they are ready for the Senior Prom, these moms will be cashing in their 401(k)s and looking over retirement communities. It seems unfair to say the least, to all involved. 

2 days ago, I was coming out of a mid-town elevator and a very attractive young women stopped me. She told me that I was the first man she had ever seen who actually removed his hat in the elevator when she entered. I was too shocked to do anything but mumble like an idiot and she was gone. My mother, may God bless her sweet soul, would have been very proud, and flabbergasted. Maybe the realites of the new century really will make a difference and a better normality will set in, but I will not bet the rent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this site and many gratz to Ms. LSB on her well deserved success. I can&#8217;t think of anyone who deserves it more, who makes more sense.</p>
<p>$$$ quote:&#8221;But just because you can do something doesnâ€™t mean you should.&#8221;</p>
<p>Simple, yet profound, no? Simple fact: by the age of about 14, males are, in just about every case, stronger than females. That this actually needs to be stated as a &#8220;fact&#8221; shows how far from reality our society has devolved. I had hoped that when the Two Towers went down, a lot of the silliness that had so permeated the American Body Social would vanish. It did but, when we were not atttacked again, the old patterns re-emerged.</p>
<p>I think I am going to rant-Good Lord, please feel free to delete me!</p>
<p>A brief digression on point. When I found myself alone, unattached and middle-aged, I was, briefly, mismatched with a much younger female. This lady had it all-beauty and brains and, well, what she saw in me I did not understand either then or now. Well, I had let myself go and didn&#8217;t look, shall we say, like I ever &#8220;juiced&#8221;(i.e. abused steroids). But Miss Perfect, she worked out, and a lot, and often, and with the mindset of youth. One day, she challenged me to arm wrestle. Now, to start with, there was 30 years of difference, and she was fit, while I was, to be un-PC about it, fat and saggy and agressively chain smoking and drinking myself into the early grave that I so wholeheartedly yearned for in those days. She thought that because she lifted at the gym and ran and what-not, I was easy pickings. Well, someone forgot to tell her some simple truths about the human condition. And the thing of it was, we were both, if I recall it correctly through a booze infested haze, rather taken aback when I &#8220;pinned&#8221; her in 1 brief, pitiless moment. </p>
<p>Women can do some really important, vital things that men can&#8217;t. Essential, in fact, to the survival of our species. All men have is some extra muscle-mass. But to ignore that or make pretend that this basic inequality does not exist is worse than foolhardy-it is very dangerous, especially for bright, strong young women. They actually believe the propaganda and put themselves in harm&#8217;s way. It happens every day, and the results can be plain devestating.</p>
<p>I consider myself a feminist-but I will tell you flat out that a society that settles for mere &#8220;equality&#8221; for women will not long survive. Any idiot can run a Fortune 500 corporation. If you don&#8217;t believe me, check out the list of CEO&#8217;s. But only a female of a certain age and in special circumstances can reproduce the species. Everything has been, up until very recent times, designed around that simple truth. I am NOT consigning women to be nothing but child making machines. Fact is, without the active involvement of both sexes in economic productivity we can&#8217;t begin to compete and why waste all that human material and brainpower? Just do not lose sight of the essentials of the human condition: no babies, no future. I don&#8217;t know if having children is a choice or a responsibility or both-but I know a awful lot of women my own age who went the career track, were very successful and hit 50 in pure misery. Maybe my boomer generation had it worst-the breakthrough generation or whatever, but reaching a &#8220;certain age&#8221;, alone and childless, has made a lot of real flesh and blood people I know very unhappy. </p>
<p>Almost as bad are those-and I seem to know a lot in this group too-who waited too long, &#8220;choosing&#8221; to have a kid for the first time when past 40. Surprising how many 50ish women I know, single mothers, with youngsters under 10. These kids are worked to death-constant classes and activities, stressed and competitive to the max. I guess the parent(s) need to prove something, but it sure makes for some unhappy mini-adults. I think everyone deserves a childhood. When they are ready for the Senior Prom, these moms will be cashing in their 401(k)s and looking over retirement communities. It seems unfair to say the least, to all involved. </p>
<p>2 days ago, I was coming out of a mid-town elevator and a very attractive young women stopped me. She told me that I was the first man she had ever seen who actually removed his hat in the elevator when she entered. I was too shocked to do anything but mumble like an idiot and she was gone. My mother, may God bless her sweet soul, would have been very proud, and flabbergasted. Maybe the realites of the new century really will make a difference and a better normality will set in, but I will not bet the rent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29009</guid>
		<description>Re: the dress of criminals at trial...before the law they enter the courtroom under the presumption of innocence, not guilt. To dress them as average citizens is simply dressing them as innocents, which before the law they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the dress of criminals at trial&#8230;before the law they enter the courtroom under the presumption of innocence, not guilt. To dress them as average citizens is simply dressing them as innocents, which before the law they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-29004</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-29004</guid>
		<description>&quot;Weâ€™re careful not to make people feel ashamed of what they do. Thatâ€™s why prisoners on trial are unshackled and wearing street clothes.&quot;

Isn&#039;t the whole issue at the trial just what they&#039;ve done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Weâ€™re careful not to make people feel ashamed of what they do. Thatâ€™s why prisoners on trial are unshackled and wearing street clothes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the whole issue at the trial just what they&#8217;ve done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna V.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28977</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28977</guid>
		<description>hirez, I mainly lurk at this blog, but I do visit LaShawn&#039;s place fairly regularly and I was startled to see the objections to the use of the word &quot;thug.&quot;  I&#039;m a white female and when I think of thugs, I think of Mafia hitmen, Nazis, Hamas members, drug dealers, gang members, serial killers,..., in short I think of violent men with no respect for human life.  (And yes, Nichols certainly fits the bill.)

It never occurred to me to apply the word to one race and it never occurred to me that others might apply it to the members of one race.  

My personal experiences and reading of history have taught me that there is (unfortunately), more than enough stupidity and inhumanity to go around and that no ethnic group has a monopoly on vice, just as no group or nationality has the corner on virtue,...,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hirez, I mainly lurk at this blog, but I do visit LaShawn&#8217;s place fairly regularly and I was startled to see the objections to the use of the word &#8220;thug.&#8221;  I&#8217;m a white female and when I think of thugs, I think of Mafia hitmen, Nazis, Hamas members, drug dealers, gang members, serial killers,&#8230;, in short I think of violent men with no respect for human life.  (And yes, Nichols certainly fits the bill.)</p>
<p>It never occurred to me to apply the word to one race and it never occurred to me that others might apply it to the members of one race.  </p>
<p>My personal experiences and reading of history have taught me that there is (unfortunately), more than enough stupidity and inhumanity to go around and that no ethnic group has a monopoly on vice, just as no group or nationality has the corner on virtue,&#8230;,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rampage</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28966</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rampage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28966</guid>
		<description>re gypsy&#039;s comment: &quot;in the state of Texas, female officers do NOT train under different standards than men.&quot;

I tried to look this up on the web and as near as I can tell, the reason is that in 1988 they essentially dropped all measurable physical standards related to strength and endurance. So now women can be cops and so can 5&#039; 3&quot; men who have no more business in that profession than most women do.

I&#039;d like to know if anyone can name a job that has exacting physical standards (I mean measured standards like height and number of pushups and pullups you can do) where women don&#039;t have a different and much lower standard. I&#039;d be surprised to find one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re gypsy&#8217;s comment: &#8220;in the state of Texas, female officers do NOT train under different standards than men.&#8221;</p>
<p>I tried to look this up on the web and as near as I can tell, the reason is that in 1988 they essentially dropped all measurable physical standards related to strength and endurance. So now women can be cops and so can 5&#8242; 3&#8243; men who have no more business in that profession than most women do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know if anyone can name a job that has exacting physical standards (I mean measured standards like height and number of pushups and pullups you can do) where women don&#8217;t have a different and much lower standard. I&#8217;d be surprised to find one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28956</guid>
		<description>Nope,

I called Robert Blake a murderous loon. even worse than thug, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope,</p>
<p>I called Robert Blake a murderous loon. even worse than thug, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hirez</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28944</link>
		<dc:creator>hirez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28944</guid>
		<description>Maybe you need to start using the term for other folks than blacks then...make it race neutral...I am sure you and Lashawn called Robert Blake a thug...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you need to start using the term for other folks than blacks then&#8230;make it race neutral&#8230;I am sure you and Lashawn called Robert Blake a thug&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28941</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28941</guid>
		<description>La Shawn,

As a white liberal I&#039;ve often been given the heave-ho by people offended by my use of the word &quot;thug&quot; to defend anyone. Why do those who get angry at me automatically think I&#039;m speaking of a black man when I use the term? I have to be pretty ticked off to whip out that word, so I don&#039;t use it too lightly. Nichols is a thug. Plain and simple. Not because he&#039;s black, but because he&#039;s a THUG. I agree with you on that one.

And I also appreciate your not politicizing the whole &quot;PC&quot; issue. I&#039;ve read may conservative and liberal bloggers who assign the &quot;PC&quot; blame to the other party. As a watcher of both, I can say a fair amount of un-PC language eminates from both tribes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn,</p>
<p>As a white liberal I&#8217;ve often been given the heave-ho by people offended by my use of the word &#8220;thug&#8221; to defend anyone. Why do those who get angry at me automatically think I&#8217;m speaking of a black man when I use the term? I have to be pretty ticked off to whip out that word, so I don&#8217;t use it too lightly. Nichols is a thug. Plain and simple. Not because he&#8217;s black, but because he&#8217;s a THUG. I agree with you on that one.</p>
<p>And I also appreciate your not politicizing the whole &#8220;PC&#8221; issue. I&#8217;ve read may conservative and liberal bloggers who assign the &#8220;PC&#8221; blame to the other party. As a watcher of both, I can say a fair amount of un-PC language eminates from both tribes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seal-lover</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28940</link>
		<dc:creator>seal-lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28940</guid>
		<description>gypsy pretty much said most of what I would say. I went through the Chgo. police academy and the only difference I recall was women had an extra minute for the run. That was 18 years ago, so I don&#039;t know how it is now. As for prisoners we also put men w/men and women w/women as a rule except when there&#039;s a manpower issue.

No, Brian Nichols had no business being guarded by one small female, but most men would have had trouble with him as well. He was a  big, athletic, martial arts expert, and most of all he was desperate. Desperation gives people strength like you would not believe. Chances are, he would have gotten by whomever was guarding him. There should have been a minimum of two men escorting him. Period. Especially in light of the shanks that were discovered in his shoes just a couple of days earlier. As gypsy mentioned, the guard probably was somewhat complacent, and complacency is what causes more injuries and deaths on this job than anything else. 

As far as the cops not searching the entire garage--well we know now that was a mistake. Since I don&#039;t know what else they were doing at that time, I won&#039;t Monday morning quarterback that one. It&#039;s easy to analyze and criticize every mistake after the fact. If there were 2 0r more men guarding him initially, we wouldn&#039;t have anything else to critcize in my opinion.

I don&#039;t know of too many, if any, jobs where people take IQ tests, if you were serious.  Police dept&#039;s are just like any other job. There are geniuses, morons, and everything in between, unfortunately. There have been plenty of people I&#039;ve had to work with that made me think, &quot;How in the world did you get on this job?&quot; to myself while they were sitting next to me for 8 hours with a gun.

I work inside now due to a back injury, but for the most part I did as good a job as most of the men I worked with when I was on the street. Even so, I would never take this job now. My co-workers would kill me for saying this, but it is just not a job for women. That&#039;s not to say women can&#039;t do a good job, because some of the female officers I know are better police than some of the men. But just because you can do something doesn&#039;t mean you should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gypsy pretty much said most of what I would say. I went through the Chgo. police academy and the only difference I recall was women had an extra minute for the run. That was 18 years ago, so I don&#8217;t know how it is now. As for prisoners we also put men w/men and women w/women as a rule except when there&#8217;s a manpower issue.</p>
<p>No, Brian Nichols had no business being guarded by one small female, but most men would have had trouble with him as well. He was a  big, athletic, martial arts expert, and most of all he was desperate. Desperation gives people strength like you would not believe. Chances are, he would have gotten by whomever was guarding him. There should have been a minimum of two men escorting him. Period. Especially in light of the shanks that were discovered in his shoes just a couple of days earlier. As gypsy mentioned, the guard probably was somewhat complacent, and complacency is what causes more injuries and deaths on this job than anything else. </p>
<p>As far as the cops not searching the entire garage&#8211;well we know now that was a mistake. Since I don&#8217;t know what else they were doing at that time, I won&#8217;t Monday morning quarterback that one. It&#8217;s easy to analyze and criticize every mistake after the fact. If there were 2 0r more men guarding him initially, we wouldn&#8217;t have anything else to critcize in my opinion.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of too many, if any, jobs where people take IQ tests, if you were serious.  Police dept&#8217;s are just like any other job. There are geniuses, morons, and everything in between, unfortunately. There have been plenty of people I&#8217;ve had to work with that made me think, &#8220;How in the world did you get on this job?&#8221; to myself while they were sitting next to me for 8 hours with a gun.</p>
<p>I work inside now due to a back injury, but for the most part I did as good a job as most of the men I worked with when I was on the street. Even so, I would never take this job now. My co-workers would kill me for saying this, but it is just not a job for women. That&#8217;s not to say women can&#8217;t do a good job, because some of the female officers I know are better police than some of the men. But just because you can do something doesn&#8217;t mean you should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig henry</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/comment-page-1/#comment-28933</link>
		<dc:creator>craig henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/03/21/political/#comment-28933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a wing-nut, but i&#039;m not prepared to toss away the presumption of innocence because of Brian Nichols.  Four people are dead because the Atlanta PD and Fulton County SD failed miserably.  I see no reason to punish those who have not been convicted of a crime for those failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a wing-nut, but i&#8217;m not prepared to toss away the presumption of innocence because of Brian Nichols.  Four people are dead because the Atlanta PD and Fulton County SD failed miserably.  I see no reason to punish those who have not been convicted of a crime for those failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
