Its not a matter of moral relativism…its a matter of pure, cold, hard economics that’s been the history of our country. When my Germans from Russia ancestors came here, they worked so hard in the cotton fields of OK and the sugar beet fields of NE and CO. But they moved on and didn’t stay there because the work was too demanding and not economically rewarding. Mine moved to Lincoln, NE. One got a job as a janitor and the other worked for the Burlington. This is the course of history. You’ll never get them or their grandkids or great-grandkids to go back and do that work. The U.S. got away with 250 years of slave labor in order to keep agricultural costs down. There followed share-cropping, etc. The Okies left OK for CA during the depression in a desperate attempt to find work in our fields. For a time, CA authorities stopped them at the border and turned them back because there were so many of them and not enough work. They were viewed as inferiors who would fill my state with tons of unemployed, ignorant, diseased, backward people and their undesirable children. But I will guarantee you that the Okies that got here don’t work the fields anymore and neither do their descendants. They may own some of the farms in our Great Valley, but they don’t do the work in the fields. CA produces half of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the U.S. and exports huge amounts around the world. The permanent peasantry of Mexican workers, legal and illegal, does all this work.
Our textile industry is gone because U.S. garment mfgs and retailers want to pay people in Cambodia, where I do work, 15 cents an hour and the Chinese perhaps even less. I’m convinced that some of them would go back to slave labor if they could get away with it. I know that some of the Chinese and Korean contractors would. In fact, considering that the slave masters had to take care of the slave children and old folks who couldn’t work any more, 15 cents an hour might even be cheaper than our former slave system. Capitalism ALWAYS seeks the lowest cost of labor and the highest profit. We are seeing it work in its purest sense.

We have a Republican Establishment that holds differing definitions of National Sovereignty, Cultural Integrity, and Secure Borders — That The Democrat Establishment does so we’ve known long ago. Even Eisenhower, a weak conservative at the time, implemented “Operation Wetback”. We can listen to Rep. Tancredo, or we can be in trouble. That Mr. Tancredo is ‘persona non grata’ at the White House speaks volumes.

This is what Bush said about illegal aliens: “Hell, if they’ll walk across Big Bend, we want ‘em.”

That quote comes from the book “The Right Nation.”

How do I harbor her?

“That makes you just as much a part of the problem.”

Certainly not the security problem. She’s not a muslim terrorist.

Of course, this is totally self serving for Mexico’s government elite to profilgate their elitism while doing nothing to solve the problems their country faces. Disgusting.

*vomit*`

Just saw the President speak at his conference with Fox, etc. Unbelievable double-speak. Says that his plan will help control the borders and keep smugglers, drug runners and terrorists out. How for Heaven’s sake if he won’t put troops at the border?