<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trolls Are Attacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-2/#comment-33863</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33863</guid>
		<description>Evon, once again I was generalizing, even tho I wasn&#039;t particularly thinking of Hebrew.  The term &quot;dead&quot; was overkill when &quot;ancient&quot; should have sufficed.  

My analogy would be that one doesn&#039;t need to know anything beyond the user interface to use or even depend on a computer.  But if one really wants to get under the hood, then learning some of the ancient/dead programming languages could be useful :) 

To quote Omniglot at www.omniglot.com/writing/hebrew.htm
&lt;em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Origin:&lt;/strong&gt;
The earliest Hebrew script was derived from a Phoenician script. The modern Hebrew script was developed from a script known as Proto-Hebrew/Early Aramaic.

&lt;strong&gt;Used to write:&lt;/strong&gt;
Hebrew, a Semitic language and the official language of Israel. Hebrew was the language of the early Jews, but fell out of use as an everyday spoken language and was replaced by Aramaic about 2,500 years ago. Hebrew continued to be used as a liturgical language since then and was revived as a spoken language in the early 20th century. Today about 5 million people in Israel speak Modern Israeli Hebrew. A further 2-3 million people speak the language in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Palestinian West Bank and Gaza, Panama, the UK and USA. &lt;/em&gt;

Another good resource is www.ancient-hebrew.org.

For most people, self included, a modern day translation -- KJV for me -- coupled with a good commentary or two is good enough for everyday discipleship.   Naturally, one would have to be able to trust their sources, as noted by your example of scholars guessing at Aramaic meanings.  That said, the NT Bereans are a good example of why everyone should avoid dogma about their preferred sources, and be prepared to grow in their knowledge and understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evon, once again I was generalizing, even tho I wasn&#8217;t particularly thinking of Hebrew.  The term &#8220;dead&#8221; was overkill when &#8220;ancient&#8221; should have sufficed.  </p>
<p>My analogy would be that one doesn&#8217;t need to know anything beyond the user interface to use or even depend on a computer.  But if one really wants to get under the hood, then learning some of the ancient/dead programming languages could be useful <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>To quote Omniglot at <a href="http://www.omniglot.com/writing/hebrew.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.omniglot.com/writing/hebrew.htm</a><br />
<em><br />
<strong>Origin:</strong><br />
The earliest Hebrew script was derived from a Phoenician script. The modern Hebrew script was developed from a script known as Proto-Hebrew/Early Aramaic.</p>
<p><strong>Used to write:</strong><br />
Hebrew, a Semitic language and the official language of Israel. Hebrew was the language of the early Jews, but fell out of use as an everyday spoken language and was replaced by Aramaic about 2,500 years ago. Hebrew continued to be used as a liturgical language since then and was revived as a spoken language in the early 20th century. Today about 5 million people in Israel speak Modern Israeli Hebrew. A further 2-3 million people speak the language in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Palestinian West Bank and Gaza, Panama, the UK and USA. </em></p>
<p>Another good resource is <a href="http://www.ancient-hebrew.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.ancient-hebrew.org</a>.</p>
<p>For most people, self included, a modern day translation &#8212; KJV for me &#8212; coupled with a good commentary or two is good enough for everyday discipleship.   Naturally, one would have to be able to trust their sources, as noted by your example of scholars guessing at Aramaic meanings.  That said, the NT Bereans are a good example of why everyone should avoid dogma about their preferred sources, and be prepared to grow in their knowledge and understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve matlock</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-2/#comment-33353</link>
		<dc:creator>steve matlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33353</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think La Shawn needs to apologize for the timing - good grief, for all that Karol W. was, he was just the pope. He had lots of good qualities - but he was a created being, not the eternal Godhead. I don&#039;t he would be impressed with the hue and cry about timing. Like Mary, he would reply &quot;do whatever He (Jesus) says.&quot;

If La Shawn was saying something bad about Karol W., then that&#039;s another issue. 

And to bring up the &quot;grandmother&quot; analogy - if my grandmother died, and we discussed some of her beliefs and actions at the funeral _at the back of the church where most guests didn&#039;t sit_, then that&#039;s the way it goes. La Shawn didn&#039;t drive over to St. Peter&#039;s Basilica and start shouting from a megaphone that the pope secretly ate cheeseburgers on Friday. (North American joke there.) She made her comments in her own private blog, where if you don&#039;t like what she says, there&#039;s this handy &quot;X&quot; icon in the top right of the window that you can use to avoid unpleasant-to-you topics.

Enough with the victim attitude. It&#039;s very distracting, and doesn&#039;t reflect well upon anyone who uses it as a defense. 

And with regards to Greek to Latin to English, I daresay that this is more inaccurate than Greek to English, because you don&#039;t get any intermediate errors, such as &quot;penance&quot; for &quot;repentance.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think La Shawn needs to apologize for the timing &#8211; good grief, for all that Karol W. was, he was just the pope. He had lots of good qualities &#8211; but he was a created being, not the eternal Godhead. I don&#8217;t he would be impressed with the hue and cry about timing. Like Mary, he would reply &#8220;do whatever He (Jesus) says.&#8221;</p>
<p>If La Shawn was saying something bad about Karol W., then that&#8217;s another issue. </p>
<p>And to bring up the &#8220;grandmother&#8221; analogy &#8211; if my grandmother died, and we discussed some of her beliefs and actions at the funeral _at the back of the church where most guests didn&#8217;t sit_, then that&#8217;s the way it goes. La Shawn didn&#8217;t drive over to St. Peter&#8217;s Basilica and start shouting from a megaphone that the pope secretly ate cheeseburgers on Friday. (North American joke there.) She made her comments in her own private blog, where if you don&#8217;t like what she says, there&#8217;s this handy &#8220;X&#8221; icon in the top right of the window that you can use to avoid unpleasant-to-you topics.</p>
<p>Enough with the victim attitude. It&#8217;s very distracting, and doesn&#8217;t reflect well upon anyone who uses it as a defense. </p>
<p>And with regards to Greek to Latin to English, I daresay that this is more inaccurate than Greek to English, because you don&#8217;t get any intermediate errors, such as &#8220;penance&#8221; for &#8220;repentance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdeberry</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-2/#comment-33349</link>
		<dc:creator>mdeberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33349</guid>
		<description>Evan: You got me again...maybe childish was a little harsh.  And I also reading the comments.  I guess my overall point is: the death of JPII has highlighted the real diffrences in the Protestant and Catholic view of Christ.  Differences that will probably never be resolved this side of heaven...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan: You got me again&#8230;maybe childish was a little harsh.  And I also reading the comments.  I guess my overall point is: the death of JPII has highlighted the real diffrences in the Protestant and Catholic view of Christ.  Differences that will probably never be resolved this side of heaven&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evon Bachaus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33337</link>
		<dc:creator>Evon Bachaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33337</guid>
		<description>Andy,

You consider Hebrew a dead language?

Mdeberry,

Your original post says that &quot;God doesn&#039;t care how smart we are.&quot;  Now, you call the posters &quot;childish?&quot;  Do you mean petulant? I don&#039;t find them childish.  One of the reasons I like to read this blog is because I enjoy the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>You consider Hebrew a dead language?</p>
<p>Mdeberry,</p>
<p>Your original post says that &#8220;God doesn&#8217;t care how smart we are.&#8221;  Now, you call the posters &#8220;childish?&#8221;  Do you mean petulant? I don&#8217;t find them childish.  One of the reasons I like to read this blog is because I enjoy the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNCoRRELATED</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33320</link>
		<dc:creator>UNCoRRELATED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anonymous Blogging&lt;/strong&gt;
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has an interesting article about anonymous blogging; specifically directed at those who would like to blog about their employment but don&#039;t want to get caught. I think there are good reasons to blog anonymously or ps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anonymous Blogging</strong><br />
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has an interesting article about anonymous blogging; specifically directed at those who would like to blog about their employment but don&#8217;t want to get caught. I think there are good reasons to blog anonymously or ps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdeberry</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33318</link>
		<dc:creator>mdeberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33318</guid>
		<description>Evan: Point taken. It seems to me, however, the posts on this issue from others seem pretty childish and condescending.  And by the way, how come so many of the theological and intellectual types have bought into the &#039;cult&#039; of secularism, or the &#039;cult&#039; of materialism, or the &#039;cult&#039; of pragmatism???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan: Point taken. It seems to me, however, the posts on this issue from others seem pretty childish and condescending.  And by the way, how come so many of the theological and intellectual types have bought into the &#8216;cult&#8217; of secularism, or the &#8216;cult&#8217; of materialism, or the &#8216;cult&#8217; of pragmatism???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33273</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33273</guid>
		<description>Ditto Evon,

As for the various languages, I&#039;d say the ancients are useful for personal edification and in ministry, but NOT necessary in the sense of divining the &quot;truth&quot;.  I passed up learning any of those &quot;dead&quot; languages, nevertheless, I frequently come up with a renewed appreciation or perspective when I read the Bible in German.  More often than not, the relevation is found just in the nuance. 

But as noted by others before, the various translations have been worked and reworked to the point that there ain&#039;t no secret code waiting to be revealed.

John 3:16 is true whether read/recited in Greek, English, Hymong, Swahili or even, dare I say it, Ebonics? ;)

As for the Pope, all I can say is if he&#039;s gone to be with our Lord and Savior, why is anyone mourning?  This is a time for celebration, not weeping.  We ought to be weeping for lost souls, not for those who went on to glory!  

OTOH, the world hasn&#039;t stopped because JP2 died, so let the discussions continue, afterall thousands are dying daily only to wake up in hell.

As for his replacement, I think it would be cool if the next was Chinese, that&#039;ll really upset the Peking cart, barring that, perhaps one from the Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto Evon,</p>
<p>As for the various languages, I&#8217;d say the ancients are useful for personal edification and in ministry, but NOT necessary in the sense of divining the &#8220;truth&#8221;.  I passed up learning any of those &#8220;dead&#8221; languages, nevertheless, I frequently come up with a renewed appreciation or perspective when I read the Bible in German.  More often than not, the relevation is found just in the nuance. </p>
<p>But as noted by others before, the various translations have been worked and reworked to the point that there ain&#8217;t no secret code waiting to be revealed.</p>
<p>John 3:16 is true whether read/recited in Greek, English, Hymong, Swahili or even, dare I say it, Ebonics? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for the Pope, all I can say is if he&#8217;s gone to be with our Lord and Savior, why is anyone mourning?  This is a time for celebration, not weeping.  We ought to be weeping for lost souls, not for those who went on to glory!  </p>
<p>OTOH, the world hasn&#8217;t stopped because JP2 died, so let the discussions continue, afterall thousands are dying daily only to wake up in hell.</p>
<p>As for his replacement, I think it would be cool if the next was Chinese, that&#8217;ll really upset the Peking cart, barring that, perhaps one from the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evon Bachaus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33232</link>
		<dc:creator>Evon Bachaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33232</guid>
		<description>Scott: 
 I&#039;m not sure what you are disturbed about or why. On EWTN, I notice many of the people are aware of evangelicals and people of reformed theological positions and often speak to them as well as to people of other theological positions.  That makes sense to me, since I suspect people of all theological persuasions watch EWTN from time to time. 

mdeberry:

Paul exhorts us in I Cor 14:20 &quot;in understanding be men.&quot;  That was the title of the first book on theology that I checked out of my church library. Elsewhere Paul scolds believers who have not grown in their faith.  The theologically naive are prime targets for cults.  We all know that we are to accept Christ with the simplicity of a child.  We are not to stay children, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott:<br />
 I&#8217;m not sure what you are disturbed about or why. On EWTN, I notice many of the people are aware of evangelicals and people of reformed theological positions and often speak to them as well as to people of other theological positions.  That makes sense to me, since I suspect people of all theological persuasions watch EWTN from time to time. </p>
<p>mdeberry:</p>
<p>Paul exhorts us in I Cor 14:20 &#8220;in understanding be men.&#8221;  That was the title of the first book on theology that I checked out of my church library. Elsewhere Paul scolds believers who have not grown in their faith.  The theologically naive are prime targets for cults.  We all know that we are to accept Christ with the simplicity of a child.  We are not to stay children, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdeberry</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33228</link>
		<dc:creator>mdeberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33228</guid>
		<description>People, people, people!  The thing is God doesn&#039;t care how smart we are, He doesn&#039;t care how theologically gifted we think we are. Whether Protestant or Catholic, Jew or Gentile the fundamental question we have to face is: What will you do with Jesus? How we respond to this question day by day, hour by hour determines if we are in right relationship with God... This is not rocket science! Ultimately the only thing that matters at the end of life is what we have done with Jesus and what we allow Him to do through and with us... peace!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, people, people!  The thing is God doesn&#8217;t care how smart we are, He doesn&#8217;t care how theologically gifted we think we are. Whether Protestant or Catholic, Jew or Gentile the fundamental question we have to face is: What will you do with Jesus? How we respond to this question day by day, hour by hour determines if we are in right relationship with God&#8230; This is not rocket science! Ultimately the only thing that matters at the end of life is what we have done with Jesus and what we allow Him to do through and with us&#8230; peace!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Konecky</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33225</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Konecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33225</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve spent years looking at both sides of the Protestant/Catholic issue, as a believer who has personally struggled with the deep issues of faith in Christ, and one thing really strikes me.  I repeatedly see angst traveling in the direction from Reformers to Catholics, but seldom the other way around.  I&#039;m talking on a public discourse, pulpit level.  The challenge most often flows from Reformer to Catholic, while Catholics seem to be much more at peace on the topic.

That disturbs me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent years looking at both sides of the Protestant/Catholic issue, as a believer who has personally struggled with the deep issues of faith in Christ, and one thing really strikes me.  I repeatedly see angst traveling in the direction from Reformers to Catholics, but seldom the other way around.  I&#8217;m talking on a public discourse, pulpit level.  The challenge most often flows from Reformer to Catholic, while Catholics seem to be much more at peace on the topic.</p>
<p>That disturbs me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reformed Politics</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33185</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformed Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La Shawn Barber&lt;/strong&gt;
I was just over at La Shawn&#039;s Corner and I read this very moving piece about what happened when she commented on The Pope&#039;s passing. I guess it&#039;s a sign that the blogosphere is growing that we start attacking each other! Too bad! 

She has comment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La Shawn Barber</strong><br />
I was just over at La Shawn&#8217;s Corner and I read this very moving piece about what happened when she commented on The Pope&#8217;s passing. I guess it&#8217;s a sign that the blogosphere is growing that we start attacking each other! Too bad! </p>
<p>She has comment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evon Bachaus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33163</link>
		<dc:creator>Evon Bachaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33163</guid>
		<description>Learning any new language is good for your mind. Learning Greek and Hebrew would help you understand and feel at ease with how the writers of Scripture thought.  If you only learn Greek you would be able to read the OT in the Septuagint, which according to one of my profs was the worst translation of Scripture ever until the Living Bible came out. You might not become an expert but I&#039;m sure you would enjoy it.  Hebrew Scripture is full of puns. Knowing the original languages would add zest to your personal Bible study if nothing else. 

P.S. A small portion of Daniel is in Aramaic and Jesus spoke Aramaic although the NT is written in Greek. Bible commentaries whose author knows Aramaic can be annoying because they keep guessing about the Aramaic word Jesus used and what he &quot;really&quot; said.  Sort of a Conservative version of the Jesus Seminar. An intermediate Greek course I took used a text by a Roman Catholic scholar.  Our professor used it because it was a very good text and because he could point out how a different interpretation of the use of a preposition by the writer could yield a different theological position.

Or you could take the position of an acquaintance of one of my cousins on the King James Version: &quot;If it was good enough for the Apostle Paul, it&#039;s good enough for me.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learning any new language is good for your mind. Learning Greek and Hebrew would help you understand and feel at ease with how the writers of Scripture thought.  If you only learn Greek you would be able to read the OT in the Septuagint, which according to one of my profs was the worst translation of Scripture ever until the Living Bible came out. You might not become an expert but I&#8217;m sure you would enjoy it.  Hebrew Scripture is full of puns. Knowing the original languages would add zest to your personal Bible study if nothing else. </p>
<p>P.S. A small portion of Daniel is in Aramaic and Jesus spoke Aramaic although the NT is written in Greek. Bible commentaries whose author knows Aramaic can be annoying because they keep guessing about the Aramaic word Jesus used and what he &#8220;really&#8221; said.  Sort of a Conservative version of the Jesus Seminar. An intermediate Greek course I took used a text by a Roman Catholic scholar.  Our professor used it because it was a very good text and because he could point out how a different interpretation of the use of a preposition by the writer could yield a different theological position.</p>
<p>Or you could take the position of an acquaintance of one of my cousins on the King James Version: &#8220;If it was good enough for the Apostle Paul, it&#8217;s good enough for me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom B.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33122</guid>
		<description>Amen La Shawn!

You have nothing whatsoever to apologize for.  Sometimes the truth hurts, but what hurts more is not knowing the truth especially when the stakes are so high.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen La Shawn!</p>
<p>You have nothing whatsoever to apologize for.  Sometimes the truth hurts, but what hurts more is not knowing the truth especially when the stakes are so high.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-33076</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-33076</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;More evidence that people don’t often read entire posts.&lt;/i&gt;

Au contraire, I did read the post. And I was responding to it. My, ahem, apologies for not doing a better job of linking the two. 

But I&#039;m really sorry that you don&#039;t believe you&#039;ve done anything to apologize for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>More evidence that people don’t often read entire posts.</i></p>
<p>Au contraire, I did read the post. And I was responding to it. My, ahem, apologies for not doing a better job of linking the two. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m really sorry that you don&#8217;t believe you&#8217;ve done anything to apologize for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catocb</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/comment-page-1/#comment-32933</link>
		<dc:creator>catocb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/06/trolls/#comment-32933</guid>
		<description>L to the B et al.

I think you missed my point.  I did not claim that learning Latin is useful to studying the scriptures (although it is terribly useful in studying the works of the early Christian leaders and believers...and as an added bonus for you Prods, Latin will allow you to read Milton in the original!)

No, I believe that LaShawn et al may find Greek a very, very difficult language to learn--especially if you have a day job!

To go from English to Greek is quite difficult.

To go from English to Latin to Greek is a much smoother road.

I realize that most would not have the time to learn Latin and Greek, but turn off the tv and you&#039;ll be amazed at how much time you save.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L to the B et al.</p>
<p>I think you missed my point.  I did not claim that learning Latin is useful to studying the scriptures (although it is terribly useful in studying the works of the early Christian leaders and believers&#8230;and as an added bonus for you Prods, Latin will allow you to read Milton in the original!)</p>
<p>No, I believe that LaShawn et al may find Greek a very, very difficult language to learn&#8211;especially if you have a day job!</p>
<p>To go from English to Greek is quite difficult.</p>
<p>To go from English to Latin to Greek is a much smoother road.</p>
<p>I realize that most would not have the time to learn Latin and Greek, but turn off the tv and you&#8217;ll be amazed at how much time you save.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
