<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSNBC &#8211; Thursday Blog Round-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-34044</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-34044</guid>
		<description>How about a No-Filibuster-On-Appointments rule?  &#039;Twould benefit (or hurt) both sides equally in the long run whereas discontinuing it altogether deprives the minority side of a powerful, but rarely used, weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a No-Filibuster-On-Appointments rule?  &#8216;Twould benefit (or hurt) both sides equally in the long run whereas discontinuing it altogether deprives the minority side of a powerful, but rarely used, weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReSoT4eM</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33736</link>
		<dc:creator>ReSoT4eM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33736</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed your MSNBC appearance.  I think it&#039;s a mistake for the Senate to change the filibuster rules for this case.  Republicans will need to use it when they are in the minority, and you must be in the majority to set the rules.  Since you asked for shameless blog promotion, click the link to see my blog post on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I missed your MSNBC appearance.  I think it&#8217;s a mistake for the Senate to change the filibuster rules for this case.  Republicans will need to use it when they are in the minority, and you must be in the majority to set the rules.  Since you asked for shameless blog promotion, click the link to see my blog post on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hektor</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33236</link>
		<dc:creator>Hektor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33236</guid>
		<description>Ms. Barber:

I managed to catch your segment on MSNBC and greatly enjoyed it...was concerned it&#039;d been cut, or run early, since it didn&#039;t start at the scheduled time.  Great job, and don&#039;t be so hard on yourself.  There&#039;s a saying...&quot;The camera doesn&#039;t blink!&quot;  It&#039;s disconcerting to look directly into that glass lens and be completely at ease. We&#039;re hardwired to respond to nonverbal feedback, and you don&#039;t get it flying solo in front of the camera. Those who haven&#039;t tried should do so...it&#039;s a hairy experience the first couple of times.  I, noticed you reading from the screen, but I see that all the time from the pros on cable news; I suggest that rather than not reading at all, you just glance at the screen. Forcing yourself to stare straight at the lens throughout the segment will feel unnatural and you&#039;ll look uncomfortable. The screen gives you an acceptable reason to break eye contact with the lens (which helps you), without losing the collegial, conversational structure you&#039;re seeking. 

Looking forward to the next one...again, a very good job.

HEKTOR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Barber:</p>
<p>I managed to catch your segment on MSNBC and greatly enjoyed it&#8230;was concerned it&#8217;d been cut, or run early, since it didn&#8217;t start at the scheduled time.  Great job, and don&#8217;t be so hard on yourself.  There&#8217;s a saying&#8230;&#8221;The camera doesn&#8217;t blink!&#8221;  It&#8217;s disconcerting to look directly into that glass lens and be completely at ease. We&#8217;re hardwired to respond to nonverbal feedback, and you don&#8217;t get it flying solo in front of the camera. Those who haven&#8217;t tried should do so&#8230;it&#8217;s a hairy experience the first couple of times.  I, noticed you reading from the screen, but I see that all the time from the pros on cable news; I suggest that rather than not reading at all, you just glance at the screen. Forcing yourself to stare straight at the lens throughout the segment will feel unnatural and you&#8217;ll look uncomfortable. The screen gives you an acceptable reason to break eye contact with the lens (which helps you), without losing the collegial, conversational structure you&#8217;re seeking. </p>
<p>Looking forward to the next one&#8230;again, a very good job.</p>
<p>HEKTOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Wallis</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33233</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33233</guid>
		<description>since the original meaning of filibuster was to invade a foreign country with a private army, I propose we change the name to &quot;DogintheMangering&quot; to more accurately describe it. Anyway, Jimmy Stewart was probably Gay like all Boy&#039;s Club folk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since the original meaning of filibuster was to invade a foreign country with a private army, I propose we change the name to &#8220;DogintheMangering&#8221; to more accurately describe it. Anyway, Jimmy Stewart was probably Gay like all Boy&#8217;s Club folk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33230</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33230</guid>
		<description>I like the format of your segment La Shawn (3 topics...a comment on a right and a left blog... I think that works pretty good).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the format of your segment La Shawn (3 topics&#8230;a comment on a right and a left blog&#8230; I think that works pretty good).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33229</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33229</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OF HORN TOOTING AND CHEST THUMPING&lt;/strong&gt;
The most satisfying thing about writing is enjoying the appreciation of of your readers. I know, I know...I watch Charlie Rose too. And all those New York writers who toiled in obscurity for years when asked &quot;what&#039;s the most satisfying thing about wr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OF HORN TOOTING AND CHEST THUMPING</strong><br />
The most satisfying thing about writing is enjoying the appreciation of of your readers. I know, I know&#8230;I watch Charlie Rose too. And all those New York writers who toiled in obscurity for years when asked &#8220;what&#8217;s the most satisfying thing about wr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33218</link>
		<dc:creator>DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33218</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Misplaced Enthusiasm&lt;/strong&gt;
UPDATE: LaShawn plans to mention these folks on MSNBC this evening! ...It&#039;s hard to know what&#039;s more misguided: Waiting on a sidewalk for a couple of months for a film to open; waiting for this particular film, when the last two in the series have be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Misplaced Enthusiasm</strong><br />
UPDATE: LaShawn plans to mention these folks on MSNBC this evening! &#8230;It&#8217;s hard to know what&#8217;s more misguided: Waiting on a sidewalk for a couple of months for a film to open; waiting for this particular film, when the last two in the series have be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33216</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33216</guid>
		<description>For any newbies out there to the filibuster debate, I have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://freshpolitics.us/?p=234&quot;&gt;primer on the nuclear option&lt;/a&gt; on my site. It might help put the clear back into nuclear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any newbies out there to the filibuster debate, I have a <a href="http://freshpolitics.us/?p=234">primer on the nuclear option</a> on my site. It might help put the clear back into nuclear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33213</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33213</guid>
		<description>the fake schiavo memo that you pushed last time? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fake schiavo memo that you pushed last time? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political Teen</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33212</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political Teen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33212</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Commercial Against Removing the Filibuster (VIDEO)&lt;/strong&gt;
This is a good commercial, if you haven&#039;t seen it - watch it now.

I don&#039;t think it is a smart move that the Republicans want to remove it. Face it, the right will probably be in power of the House and Senate for atleast the next 10 years. But when...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Commercial Against Removing the Filibuster (VIDEO)</strong><br />
This is a good commercial, if you haven&#8217;t seen it &#8211; watch it now.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it is a smart move that the Republicans want to remove it. Face it, the right will probably be in power of the House and Senate for atleast the next 10 years. But when&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33203</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33203</guid>
		<description>Yes, today at 5:20 p.m. EST. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, today at 5:20 p.m. EST. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hektor</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33201</link>
		<dc:creator>Hektor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33201</guid>
		<description>Ms. Barber:

Is that 5:20 ET today (i.e., Thursday)? Sorry to be so dense.

HEKTOR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Barber:</p>
<p>Is that 5:20 ET today (i.e., Thursday)? Sorry to be so dense.</p>
<p>HEKTOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jawa Report</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33194</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jawa Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33194</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jawalanche&lt;/strong&gt;
Here are some things I&#039;m reading right now. It&#039;s like The Puppy Blender, only we do in one post what it takes him to do in 20! More. Dead. Terrorists. Tiny little spy planes. No word from Islamic Army in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jawalanche</strong><br />
Here are some things I&#8217;m reading right now. It&#8217;s like The Puppy Blender, only we do in one post what it takes him to do in 20! More. Dead. Terrorists. Tiny little spy planes. No word from Islamic Army in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33193</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33193</guid>
		<description>The plague isn&#039;t so bad :)

Just joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plague isn&#8217;t so bad <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alli</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33192</link>
		<dc:creator>Alli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/04/07/msnbc/#comment-33192</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have MSNBC but I&#039;ll be with you in spirit. :) good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have MSNBC but I&#8217;ll be with you in spirit. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

