<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mission: Middle-Class vs. Lower-Class Families</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tanner</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-2/#comment-43831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 11:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43831</guid>
		<description># 42 -

Your post is self parody.

Fill in the blanks.

Your (article\show\book\magazine\other) is intended for (list ethnicity) so therefore it is  (select perjorative).

# 37 - Not only can you read others minds to know their intentions you like # 42 can project racism into other peoples thoughts and actions. What an incredible gift. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 42 -</p>
<p>Your post is self parody.</p>
<p>Fill in the blanks.</p>
<p>Your (article\show\book\magazine\other) is intended for (list ethnicity) so therefore it is  (select perjorative).</p>
<p># 37 &#8211; Not only can you read others minds to know their intentions you like # 42 can project racism into other peoples thoughts and actions. What an incredible gift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-2/#comment-43520</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43520</guid>
		<description>LaShawn,
While out of town for a conference last week, I had the TV on to a morning program, I believe that it was &quot;Today&quot;. Anyway, they had the authors of a book about a study done concerning outside influences and their effect on test scores of children. The outside influences included financial background, cultural events, TV watching, video game playing, you get the picture. The single largest outside influence on a child test scores was, no surprise here, parental involvement. Close second was financial background. Children of parents who got involve with the childs education got higher test scores, regardless of financial background, although the study said that children from that higher income bracket tended to have better educated parents who then paid for a better education for the child. But I think that many people know of some &quot;rich kid&quot; who has, or is, truely wasting themselves. These two studies truely go hand in hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn,<br />
While out of town for a conference last week, I had the TV on to a morning program, I believe that it was &#8220;Today&#8221;. Anyway, they had the authors of a book about a study done concerning outside influences and their effect on test scores of children. The outside influences included financial background, cultural events, TV watching, video game playing, you get the picture. The single largest outside influence on a child test scores was, no surprise here, parental involvement. Close second was financial background. Children of parents who got involve with the childs education got higher test scores, regardless of financial background, although the study said that children from that higher income bracket tended to have better educated parents who then paid for a better education for the child. But I think that many people know of some &#8220;rich kid&#8221; who has, or is, truely wasting themselves. These two studies truely go hand in hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dick</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-2/#comment-43436</link>
		<dc:creator>dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 03:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43436</guid>
		<description>I read this and it made me think of my friend Steve up in New Hampshire.  Steve quit school in the 10th grade.  His wife quit in the 11th grade.  They have 9 kids and he is raising them on his job as a journeyman carpenter/laborer.  The last time I saw him he had 5 kids in grades 7-12 and all 5 were on the honor roll with 2 of them in the running for valedictorian.  They were all active in sports and all helped support the family by working odd jobs.  When he came to visit me he always had a couple on the way home from school.  They would sit without being told at my kitchen table and do their home work and then ask if they could take my dogs out to play.  They were all polite and respectful and were also all very hard workers.  

What was his secret?  He took them to church every week and it became a part of their life.  They came to visit me after I moved back to New York and the first thing Sunday the kids asked where the Catholic church was so they could go to mass.  They all had some space for themselves to be themselves.  They all knew that they did their homework first before they went out to play.  They all had chores to do and did them without asking.  It was a real pleasure to visit them because the whole family made you welcome.  The kids all wanted to show you their latest papers or the things they had made.  The part that really sold me on them was that they were a family and they wanted to share what they had as a family.  Even with all the kids Steve still found time to mentor a couple of druggies in the neighborhood and taught them how to use tools and how to fix things and how to track in the woods and how to fish.  No drugs.  It worked.

When I see the people who talk about how they were pushed down because of their race or something else, I always think it had to have been the way they were raised.  If you demand respect and deserve respect from your kids, you will get it.  If you don&#039;t bother with them you will get that too.  Your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this and it made me think of my friend Steve up in New Hampshire.  Steve quit school in the 10th grade.  His wife quit in the 11th grade.  They have 9 kids and he is raising them on his job as a journeyman carpenter/laborer.  The last time I saw him he had 5 kids in grades 7-12 and all 5 were on the honor roll with 2 of them in the running for valedictorian.  They were all active in sports and all helped support the family by working odd jobs.  When he came to visit me he always had a couple on the way home from school.  They would sit without being told at my kitchen table and do their home work and then ask if they could take my dogs out to play.  They were all polite and respectful and were also all very hard workers.  </p>
<p>What was his secret?  He took them to church every week and it became a part of their life.  They came to visit me after I moved back to New York and the first thing Sunday the kids asked where the Catholic church was so they could go to mass.  They all had some space for themselves to be themselves.  They all knew that they did their homework first before they went out to play.  They all had chores to do and did them without asking.  It was a real pleasure to visit them because the whole family made you welcome.  The kids all wanted to show you their latest papers or the things they had made.  The part that really sold me on them was that they were a family and they wanted to share what they had as a family.  Even with all the kids Steve still found time to mentor a couple of druggies in the neighborhood and taught them how to use tools and how to fix things and how to track in the woods and how to fish.  No drugs.  It worked.</p>
<p>When I see the people who talk about how they were pushed down because of their race or something else, I always think it had to have been the way they were raised.  If you demand respect and deserve respect from your kids, you will get it.  If you don&#8217;t bother with them you will get that too.  Your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-2/#comment-43433</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 03:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43433</guid>
		<description>Don-
I&#039;ve been teaching for 5 years now, and I see the same thing.  Tell your wife to hang in there, it IS worth the fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don-<br />
I&#8217;ve been teaching for 5 years now, and I see the same thing.  Tell your wife to hang in there, it IS worth the fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-2/#comment-43430</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 03:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43430</guid>
		<description>I stringly suspect the single parent thing is another effect rather than the cause - I am acquainted with a couple of families where the father still lives with the mother, yet both are devoted students of the &quot;I don&#039;t need to teach my kid stuff&quot; school.

My suspicion is that the kind of people who don&#039;t understand that you have to work at teaching your kids things, rather than just giving the cookies and the TV are also the kind of people who don&#039;t realise that you need to work at relationships - they don&#039;t just happen.

It&#039;s all part of the same mindset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stringly suspect the single parent thing is another effect rather than the cause &#8211; I am acquainted with a couple of families where the father still lives with the mother, yet both are devoted students of the &#8220;I don&#8217;t need to teach my kid stuff&#8221; school.</p>
<p>My suspicion is that the kind of people who don&#8217;t understand that you have to work at teaching your kids things, rather than just giving the cookies and the TV are also the kind of people who don&#8217;t realise that you need to work at relationships &#8211; they don&#8217;t just happen.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all part of the same mindset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Giannatti</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43422</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Giannatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 00:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43422</guid>
		<description>My wife has devoted 30 years to teaching in inner cities. This post made her cry. She has seen this every day for thirty years. It transcends race and color... it is a cultural chasm. Kids who had disinterested parents have children they are not interested in. The quote about not talking with the baby... she has heard it hundreds - HUNDREDS - of times. From kids of all color. She is now getting the children of the kids she knew then and they are even worse (as expected). 
I wish i could watch A&amp;E sometimes, but we do not have cable and we limit (hey - there&#039;s a concept) TV and Radio and many other cultural cesspools. We encourage activities (ice skating, photography, writing and sports) and limit mind-numbing video games and such. We are not overbearing, just careful. What my wife and I have sacrificed for our kids is huge compared to some of our acquaintances, but the payoff is even greater. Kind, compassionate and smart kids who have strong critical thinking skills.
Keep it up, LaShawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife has devoted 30 years to teaching in inner cities. This post made her cry. She has seen this every day for thirty years. It transcends race and color&#8230; it is a cultural chasm. Kids who had disinterested parents have children they are not interested in. The quote about not talking with the baby&#8230; she has heard it hundreds &#8211; HUNDREDS &#8211; of times. From kids of all color. She is now getting the children of the kids she knew then and they are even worse (as expected).<br />
I wish i could watch A&amp;E sometimes, but we do not have cable and we limit (hey &#8211; there&#8217;s a concept) TV and Radio and many other cultural cesspools. We encourage activities (ice skating, photography, writing and sports) and limit mind-numbing video games and such. We are not overbearing, just careful. What my wife and I have sacrificed for our kids is huge compared to some of our acquaintances, but the payoff is even greater. Kind, compassionate and smart kids who have strong critical thinking skills.<br />
Keep it up, LaShawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43403</guid>
		<description>If corporate media is so concerned about profit, they sure aren&#039;t doing a very good job of it.  Most media outlets (and I&#039;m talking news sources here) are showing to be less and less profitable as we get our information elsewhere (internet).

I wasn&#039;t disagreeing with your portrayal of minorities by the media, but I don&#039;t believe it is as profit motivated as you suggest.  Many members of the media and the corporate culture they live in truly believe that they know what is best for all of us...that they are so smart that only they can save minorities and everyone else from themselves.  Therefore, they reject good ideas that come from other sources.  

I think it is a shame that many media outlets only portray black and hispanic communities as being the only poor people in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If corporate media is so concerned about profit, they sure aren&#8217;t doing a very good job of it.  Most media outlets (and I&#8217;m talking news sources here) are showing to be less and less profitable as we get our information elsewhere (internet).</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t disagreeing with your portrayal of minorities by the media, but I don&#8217;t believe it is as profit motivated as you suggest.  Many members of the media and the corporate culture they live in truly believe that they know what is best for all of us&#8230;that they are so smart that only they can save minorities and everyone else from themselves.  Therefore, they reject good ideas that come from other sources.  </p>
<p>I think it is a shame that many media outlets only portray black and hispanic communities as being the only poor people in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43398</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 16:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43398</guid>
		<description>Cobra, good comments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobra, good comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43396</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43396</guid>
		<description>Meep writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;Iâ€™ve read excerpts from Thomas Sowellâ€™s book, and this is pretty much his point. City Journal might not talk about them, as white rednecks tend not to live in New York City and those who work at City Journal may not have grown up in â€œwhite trashâ€ surroundings.&quot;

  It took me about 15 seconds to pull up statistics about the racial demographics of poor people in America from the internet. The information is readily available. The City Journal doesn&#039;t &quot;talk about&quot; poor whites because it&#039;s not in their agenda to.

--Cobra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meep writes:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Iâ€™ve read excerpts from Thomas Sowellâ€™s book, and this is pretty much his point. City Journal might not talk about them, as white rednecks tend not to live in New York City and those who work at City Journal may not have grown up in â€œwhite trashâ€ surroundings.&#8221;</p>
<p>  It took me about 15 seconds to pull up statistics about the racial demographics of poor people in America from the internet. The information is readily available. The City Journal doesn&#8217;t &#8220;talk about&#8221; poor whites because it&#8217;s not in their agenda to.</p>
<p>&#8211;Cobra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meep</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43390</link>
		<dc:creator>meep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 11:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43390</guid>
		<description>Being white, and having grown up in the South, yes -- this is just redneck culture, plain and simple. I&#039;ve read excerpts from Thomas Sowell&#039;s book, and this is pretty much his point. City Journal might not talk about them, as white rednecks tend not to live in New York City and those who work at City Journal may not have grown up in &quot;white trash&quot; surroundings.

By the way, it&#039;s not just a matter of being poor (as one can see from poor immigrants who have worked their way up to success). It&#039;s just that many of these attitudes are going to be more devastating to your life if you&#039;re poor. Paris Hilton is white trash, but very very rich white trash. She can afford, in a material sense, poor morals. She doesn&#039;t have to work, she doesn&#039;t have to take care of kids. But if you&#039;re poor, being an ignorant, coked-up whore is going to keep you poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being white, and having grown up in the South, yes &#8212; this is just redneck culture, plain and simple. I&#8217;ve read excerpts from Thomas Sowell&#8217;s book, and this is pretty much his point. City Journal might not talk about them, as white rednecks tend not to live in New York City and those who work at City Journal may not have grown up in &#8220;white trash&#8221; surroundings.</p>
<p>By the way, it&#8217;s not just a matter of being poor (as one can see from poor immigrants who have worked their way up to success). It&#8217;s just that many of these attitudes are going to be more devastating to your life if you&#8217;re poor. Paris Hilton is white trash, but very very rich white trash. She can afford, in a material sense, poor morals. She doesn&#8217;t have to work, she doesn&#8217;t have to take care of kids. But if you&#8217;re poor, being an ignorant, coked-up whore is going to keep you poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mj</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43376</link>
		<dc:creator>mj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 04:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43376</guid>
		<description>This is where God, Jesus, the church (a good one), and the Holy Spirit can make a difference. My husband grew up poor, his father left, an undereducated latino mother who was working all the time to make ends meet, and they even lived in public housing at one point. Despite all that, my husband and his brothers have their act together, and they&#039;re all productive citizens with stable lives. That&#039;s a miracle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where God, Jesus, the church (a good one), and the Holy Spirit can make a difference. My husband grew up poor, his father left, an undereducated latino mother who was working all the time to make ends meet, and they even lived in public housing at one point. Despite all that, my husband and his brothers have their act together, and they&#8217;re all productive citizens with stable lives. That&#8217;s a miracle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43351</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 22:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43351</guid>
		<description>Chris Roberts writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;You point this out, but let us ask which side of the aisle the MSM claims itself to be. They say objective, but their self professed voting habits say otherwise.&quot;


COSBY SHOW
http://www.thecobraslair.com/National%20Issues21.html

 I believe that corporate media is concerned about PROFIT. If the formula for making the most profit reads &quot;playing on the fears, stereotypes and anxieties of the largest population segment,&quot; then that&#039;s what the end result is going to be. When news is NOT considered a profit making entity, then all sides and facets of a particular story can be examined with no fear of losing attention spans. As long as the bottom line is increasing ratings/revenues/viewership/subscriptions, etc. the product will reflect an interest in such, not neccessarily an interest in truth or clarity.
Voting records of individual journalists wouldn&#039;t be applicable to making money for the journal.

--Cobra

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Roberts writes:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;You point this out, but let us ask which side of the aisle the MSM claims itself to be. They say objective, but their self professed voting habits say otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p>COSBY SHOW<br />
<a href="http://www.thecobraslair.com/National%20Issues21.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecobraslair.com/National%20Issues21.html</a></p>
<p> I believe that corporate media is concerned about PROFIT. If the formula for making the most profit reads &#8220;playing on the fears, stereotypes and anxieties of the largest population segment,&#8221; then that&#8217;s what the end result is going to be. When news is NOT considered a profit making entity, then all sides and facets of a particular story can be examined with no fear of losing attention spans. As long as the bottom line is increasing ratings/revenues/viewership/subscriptions, etc. the product will reflect an interest in such, not neccessarily an interest in truth or clarity.<br />
Voting records of individual journalists wouldn&#8217;t be applicable to making money for the journal.</p>
<p>&#8211;Cobra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43350</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 22:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43350</guid>
		<description>Cobra-
You point this out, but let us ask which side of the aisle the MSM claims itself to be.  They say objective, but their self professed voting habits say otherwise.

It is my contention that most of the intellectual elite (who vote Dem/Lib) in our nation has your described stereotype about minorities. Therefore, they believe that  they are the only ones capable of enlightening the masses and saving minorities from their plight.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobra-<br />
You point this out, but let us ask which side of the aisle the MSM claims itself to be.  They say objective, but their self professed voting habits say otherwise.</p>
<p>It is my contention that most of the intellectual elite (who vote Dem/Lib) in our nation has your described stereotype about minorities. Therefore, they believe that  they are the only ones capable of enlightening the masses and saving minorities from their plight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43344</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 21:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43344</guid>
		<description>Jack Tanner writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;The Manhattan Institute is a 501(C)(3) non-profit organization. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law. As Sponsor, you will receive selected publications and invitations to Manhattan Instituteâ€™s special events.&quot;

 The article comes from the City Journal, described here as:

 &quot;City Journal is the nationâ€™s premier urban-policy magazine, â€œthe Bible of the new urbanism,â€ as Londonâ€™s Daily Telegraph puts it. During the Giuliani Administration, the magazine served as an idea factory as the then-mayor revivified New York City, quickly becoming, in the words of the New York Post, â€œthe place where Rudy gets his ideas.â€ The Public Interest goes further, calling City Journal â€œthe magazine that saved the city.â€

But City Journal is a national, not just a local, force, with a readership that spans the U.S.â€”and an especially enthusiastic audience in the nationâ€™s capital. The countryâ€™s most thoughtful journalists are among the quarterly magazineâ€™s subscribers, as are top businessmen and financiers. City officials from coast to coast are loyal fans, and mayors from Milwaukeeâ€™s John Norquist to Oaklandâ€™s Jerry Brown happily acknowledge City Journalâ€™s influence on their own thinking and policy. Newspapers across the land, from the Wall Street Journal to the San Diego Union-Tribune, regularly print adaptations of City Journal articles, disseminating the magazineâ€™s influence to millions of readers.&quot;
Subscription Rates

US $23.00 (1 yr) $42.00 (2 yrs)  $60.00 (3 yrs) 
Canada $27.00 (1 yr)     
Foreign $31.00 (1 yr)     

Copyright The Manhattan Institute.
http://city-journal.org/html/about_cj.html

There is no debate here. The City Journal is a product of the Manhattan Institute that is for sale via subscription, or reprint rights in various publications. 

 It also has NOTHING to do with my point, which was...
&quot; Look at who the media is controlled by. You can NEVER rely on accuracy and truth from an institution which has a primary goal of attracting and retaining a 25-54 year old white audience demographic.&quot;
 My commentary on the Manhattan Institute stands alone in this context, since &quot;media&quot; is the &quot;institution&quot; referenced in the preceding sentence. It is certainly not an implication that the Manhattan Institute conrols all media.  

Stephen writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;Put simply, this WAS a hatchet job. It served no valuable purpose. Bill Cosby told black peopleâ€“â€Dr. heal thyselfâ€, this author simply told white people, â€œnegroes are poor.â€

There is a difference&quot;

 Amen, brother. The TRUTH is, according to a study of the Media at Yale:

&gt;&gt;&gt;POOR PEOPLE
Shown in News Magazines 62% Black 
Shown in Television News 65% Black 
In Reality 29% Black 


In a land where poverty is often taken as a sign of personal failure, the media&#039;s exaggerated association of blacks and the poor cannot help but reinforce old stereotypes of African Americans as inadequate, unmotivated, and mired in poverty. The news media offers the public a portrait of poverty where blacks far outnumber nonblacks, while in reality fewer than three out of ten poor Americans are black.&quot;
http://www.yale.edu/isps/journal/volume2/gilens.html

 I highly doubt new subscriptions for the City Journal would rise significantly among the desired 25-54 white demographic if they wrote articles that reflected REALITY, and not stereotyping, scapegoating, minority-bashing propaganda.

--Cobra
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Tanner writes:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;The Manhattan Institute is a 501(C)(3) non-profit organization. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law. As Sponsor, you will receive selected publications and invitations to Manhattan Instituteâ€™s special events.&#8221;</p>
<p> The article comes from the City Journal, described here as:</p>
<p> &#8220;City Journal is the nationâ€™s premier urban-policy magazine, â€œthe Bible of the new urbanism,â€ as Londonâ€™s Daily Telegraph puts it. During the Giuliani Administration, the magazine served as an idea factory as the then-mayor revivified New York City, quickly becoming, in the words of the New York Post, â€œthe place where Rudy gets his ideas.â€ The Public Interest goes further, calling City Journal â€œthe magazine that saved the city.â€</p>
<p>But City Journal is a national, not just a local, force, with a readership that spans the U.S.â€”and an especially enthusiastic audience in the nationâ€™s capital. The countryâ€™s most thoughtful journalists are among the quarterly magazineâ€™s subscribers, as are top businessmen and financiers. City officials from coast to coast are loyal fans, and mayors from Milwaukeeâ€™s John Norquist to Oaklandâ€™s Jerry Brown happily acknowledge City Journalâ€™s influence on their own thinking and policy. Newspapers across the land, from the Wall Street Journal to the San Diego Union-Tribune, regularly print adaptations of City Journal articles, disseminating the magazineâ€™s influence to millions of readers.&#8221;<br />
Subscription Rates</p>
<p>US $23.00 (1 yr) $42.00 (2 yrs)  $60.00 (3 yrs)<br />
Canada $27.00 (1 yr)<br />
Foreign $31.00 (1 yr)     </p>
<p>Copyright The Manhattan Institute.<br />
<a href="http://city-journal.org/html/about_cj.html" rel="nofollow">http://city-journal.org/html/about_cj.html</a></p>
<p>There is no debate here. The City Journal is a product of the Manhattan Institute that is for sale via subscription, or reprint rights in various publications. </p>
<p> It also has NOTHING to do with my point, which was&#8230;<br />
&#8221; Look at who the media is controlled by. You can NEVER rely on accuracy and truth from an institution which has a primary goal of attracting and retaining a 25-54 year old white audience demographic.&#8221;<br />
 My commentary on the Manhattan Institute stands alone in this context, since &#8220;media&#8221; is the &#8220;institution&#8221; referenced in the preceding sentence. It is certainly not an implication that the Manhattan Institute conrols all media.  </p>
<p>Stephen writes:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Put simply, this WAS a hatchet job. It served no valuable purpose. Bill Cosby told black peopleâ€“â€Dr. heal thyselfâ€, this author simply told white people, â€œnegroes are poor.â€</p>
<p>There is a difference&#8221;</p>
<p> Amen, brother. The TRUTH is, according to a study of the Media at Yale:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;POOR PEOPLE<br />
Shown in News Magazines 62% Black<br />
Shown in Television News 65% Black<br />
In Reality 29% Black </p>
<p>In a land where poverty is often taken as a sign of personal failure, the media&#8217;s exaggerated association of blacks and the poor cannot help but reinforce old stereotypes of African Americans as inadequate, unmotivated, and mired in poverty. The news media offers the public a portrait of poverty where blacks far outnumber nonblacks, while in reality fewer than three out of ten poor Americans are black.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.yale.edu/isps/journal/volume2/gilens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.yale.edu/isps/journal/volume2/gilens.html</a></p>
<p> I highly doubt new subscriptions for the City Journal would rise significantly among the desired 25-54 white demographic if they wrote articles that reflected REALITY, and not stereotyping, scapegoating, minority-bashing propaganda.</p>
<p>&#8211;Cobra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/comment-page-1/#comment-43329</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/12/mission/#comment-43329</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Middle-Class v. Lower-Class success&lt;/strong&gt;

First go read La Shawn Barber&#039;s post on The Mission: Middle-Class vs. Lower-Class Families. Then go read James Taranto on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Middle-Class v. Lower-Class success</strong></p>
<p>First go read La Shawn Barber&#8217;s post on The Mission: Middle-Class vs. Lower-Class Families. Then go read James Taranto on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
