<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Empire is Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44358</link>
		<dc:creator>firebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 18:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44358</guid>
		<description>And no doubt that GEORGE SOROS wants to be the emperor he is as bad as they get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And no doubt that GEORGE SOROS wants to be the emperor he is as bad as they get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawWife</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44162</link>
		<dc:creator>LawWife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44162</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to avoid articles on this flick, but just to go on the record: This is one of the worst movies I have &lt;em&gt;ever&lt;/em&gt; seen. Action? Boring. Dialog? Pathetic. Lucas&#039;s politics? Hamfisted. Thankfully, my company paid for my ticket (as a teambuilding thing), so I didn&#039;t waste any money. 

The best thing about the whole deal was seeing the preview for the first (hopefully of seven!) Narnia movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to avoid articles on this flick, but just to go on the record: This is one of the worst movies I have <em>ever</em> seen. Action? Boring. Dialog? Pathetic. Lucas&#8217;s politics? Hamfisted. Thankfully, my company paid for my ticket (as a teambuilding thing), so I didn&#8217;t waste any money. </p>
<p>The best thing about the whole deal was seeing the preview for the first (hopefully of seven!) Narnia movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1melchizedek</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44146</link>
		<dc:creator>1melchizedek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44146</guid>
		<description>I think the Taoist&#039;s were saying that you are what you do. Yoda might put it this way,

&quot;Do good or Do not do good, there is no choice!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Taoist&#8217;s were saying that you are what you do. Yoda might put it this way,</p>
<p>&#8220;Do good or Do not do good, there is no choice!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RepJ</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44143</link>
		<dc:creator>RepJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 04:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44143</guid>
		<description>In Yoda speak...  A fool of itself Newsweek did make...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Yoda speak&#8230;  A fool of itself Newsweek did make&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallo World </title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44106</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallo World </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 21:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44106</guid>
		<description>But as LaShawn Barber points out, Jonathan Last&#8217;s case for the empire (which seems to be recycled before each...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as LaShawn Barber points out, Jonathan Last&#8217;s case for the empire (which seems to be recycled before each&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Opinionated Bastard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44094</link>
		<dc:creator>The Opinionated Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44094</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Taoist Karma&lt;/strong&gt;

The Taoists have an interesting concept of karma.  &#8220;The more good you do, the more good you want to do.  The more evil you do, the more evil you want to do.&#8221; That is, its not that bad things happen to bad people, as much has doing bad thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Taoist Karma</strong></p>
<p>The Taoists have an interesting concept of karma.  &#8220;The more good you do, the more good you want to do.  The more evil you do, the more evil you want to do.&#8221; That is, its not that bad things happen to bad people, as much has doing bad thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWG</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-44060</link>
		<dc:creator>AWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-44060</guid>
		<description>So far the discussion has taken for granted that the events of the films are portrayed objectively.  But what if one views them as pro-Rebellion propaganda pieces, in the same vein as &quot;Farenheit 9-11&quot; or &quot;Triumph Of The Will&quot; (say, I just remembered that the novelization of &quot;A New Hope&quot; opened with a quote from &quot;The Journal of the Whills&quot;.  I know the comparison&#039;s a stretch, but where there&#039;s a Whill there&#039;s a way ;))?  It then becomes much easier to make the case for the Empire&#039;s benevolence.  Given the propensity of some people in our modern world to accuse America of &quot;imperialism&quot; and &quot;theocratic tendencies&quot;, it&#039;s not hard to believe there could be individuals within the Star Wars universe who might have a political axe to grind, and therefore be inclined to take statements out of context and fabricate events whole cloth in the presentation of their version of events (e.g., the films as we&#039;ve seen them).  &quot;Palpatine lied, people died&quot;, anyone? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far the discussion has taken for granted that the events of the films are portrayed objectively.  But what if one views them as pro-Rebellion propaganda pieces, in the same vein as &#8220;Farenheit 9-11&#8243; or &#8220;Triumph Of The Will&#8221; (say, I just remembered that the novelization of &#8220;A New Hope&#8221; opened with a quote from &#8220;The Journal of the Whills&#8221;.  I know the comparison&#8217;s a stretch, but where there&#8217;s a Whill there&#8217;s a way <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )?  It then becomes much easier to make the case for the Empire&#8217;s benevolence.  Given the propensity of some people in our modern world to accuse America of &#8220;imperialism&#8221; and &#8220;theocratic tendencies&#8221;, it&#8217;s not hard to believe there could be individuals within the Star Wars universe who might have a political axe to grind, and therefore be inclined to take statements out of context and fabricate events whole cloth in the presentation of their version of events (e.g., the films as we&#8217;ve seen them).  &#8220;Palpatine lied, people died&#8221;, anyone? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest Brown</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43952</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 03:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43952</guid>
		<description>&quot;New Age Easternisms&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New Age Easternisms&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest Brown</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 03:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43950</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t original with me, but the criticism that the Jedi allowed the Sith to take over due to the Knights&#039; pathetic moral relativism is one that has devastating consequences for Lucas&#039;s anti-Bush bias.

It is, of course, the same problem that always bedevils moral relativism, namely the inability to make non-hypocritical or non-irrelevantly emotive moral criticisms. You know what I&#039;m talking about, &quot;There are no such things as moral absolutes, and only irredeemably evil Bushhitler lovers believe in them.&quot;

OK, -I&#039;m- convinced!

As has been posted elsewhere, the original trilogy succeeded precisely BECAUSE it was a non-nuanced &quot;good vs. evil&quot; struggle which contrasted heavily with the post-Watergate world view. In addition to the too spiffy setup and the cardboard actors, the second trilogy suffers from Lucas&#039;s cod-New Age Easterisms about the impossibilty of making distinctions between good and evil. So, who cares?

The fact is that the Empire is indeed evil, not just because it holds the power to destroy the individual but because it gladly exercises it. BTW, the notion that Fascist, Nazi and Marxist (i.e. all totalitarian collectivist governments) regimes are more &quot;efficient&quot; is idiotic. The only &quot;efficiency&quot; they show is in mass murder. In all important civil and scientific matters, they are parasitic (i.e. they can only progress by allowing to scientists the freedom of inquiry that contradicts their ideology) and inefficient (&quot;divide and conquer&quot; was Hitler and Stalin&#039;s motto) to the Nth degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t original with me, but the criticism that the Jedi allowed the Sith to take over due to the Knights&#8217; pathetic moral relativism is one that has devastating consequences for Lucas&#8217;s anti-Bush bias.</p>
<p>It is, of course, the same problem that always bedevils moral relativism, namely the inability to make non-hypocritical or non-irrelevantly emotive moral criticisms. You know what I&#8217;m talking about, &#8220;There are no such things as moral absolutes, and only irredeemably evil Bushhitler lovers believe in them.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, -I&#8217;m- convinced!</p>
<p>As has been posted elsewhere, the original trilogy succeeded precisely BECAUSE it was a non-nuanced &#8220;good vs. evil&#8221; struggle which contrasted heavily with the post-Watergate world view. In addition to the too spiffy setup and the cardboard actors, the second trilogy suffers from Lucas&#8217;s cod-New Age Easterisms about the impossibilty of making distinctions between good and evil. So, who cares?</p>
<p>The fact is that the Empire is indeed evil, not just because it holds the power to destroy the individual but because it gladly exercises it. BTW, the notion that Fascist, Nazi and Marxist (i.e. all totalitarian collectivist governments) regimes are more &#8220;efficient&#8221; is idiotic. The only &#8220;efficiency&#8221; they show is in mass murder. In all important civil and scientific matters, they are parasitic (i.e. they can only progress by allowing to scientists the freedom of inquiry that contradicts their ideology) and inefficient (&#8220;divide and conquer&#8221; was Hitler and Stalin&#8217;s motto) to the Nth degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brutus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43942</link>
		<dc:creator>brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43942</guid>
		<description>
I disagree with the &quot;Empire&quot; being ruled by nobody.
Clearly the Senior Officer of the Imperial Fleet
would move to bring order to the immediate
region in which he was deployed -- particularly
in a target rich environment of rebel
cruisers located at point blank range from his guns.

After that? Alea iacta est -- oh, and the
rebellion would be as much dust at the Death Star II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the &#8220;Empire&#8221; being ruled by nobody.<br />
Clearly the Senior Officer of the Imperial Fleet<br />
would move to bring order to the immediate<br />
region in which he was deployed &#8212; particularly<br />
in a target rich environment of rebel<br />
cruisers located at point blank range from his guns.</p>
<p>After that? Alea iacta est &#8212; oh, and the<br />
rebellion would be as much dust at the Death Star II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43928</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43928</guid>
		<description>&quot;A synonym for a mind emptied of all thought is thoughtless stupidity. &quot;

Or something akin to enlightenment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A synonym for a mind emptied of all thought is thoughtless stupidity. &#8221;</p>
<p>Or something akin to enlightenment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Minich, PI</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43927</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Minich, PI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 19:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43927</guid>
		<description>There was one advantage to the Empire, in my view.  It toppled the top-heavy Republic and allowed something more efficient to take its place.  This was probably better for all concerned than the Old Republic at the time of its fall.

Not that it justifies the Empire, but I think the Empire woke enough people up to how bad stuff was in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was one advantage to the Empire, in my view.  It toppled the top-heavy Republic and allowed something more efficient to take its place.  This was probably better for all concerned than the Old Republic at the time of its fall.</p>
<p>Not that it justifies the Empire, but I think the Empire woke enough people up to how bad stuff was in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeputyHeadmistress</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43925</link>
		<dc:creator>DeputyHeadmistress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 18:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43925</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more interested in the comparison of the left to the Skywalkers when they are with the REpublic-

Luke always impressed us a whiny and annoying.  Anakin isn&#039;t much better.  Anakin is all about him.  

Most importantly, logic is a bad thing for those guys= &quot;Luke, empty your mind of all thought&quot; is pretty much a leftist mantra.

A synonym for a mind emptied of all thought is thoughtless stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more interested in the comparison of the left to the Skywalkers when they are with the REpublic-</p>
<p>Luke always impressed us a whiny and annoying.  Anakin isn&#8217;t much better.  Anakin is all about him.  </p>
<p>Most importantly, logic is a bad thing for those guys= &#8220;Luke, empty your mind of all thought&#8221; is pretty much a leftist mantra.</p>
<p>A synonym for a mind emptied of all thought is thoughtless stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Free</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43923</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 18:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43923</guid>
		<description>
Regarding the Rebels as American Revolutionaries, I think what truly separates &quot;Rebels&quot; from &quot;Revolutionaires&quot; is that rebels tend to fight against something, while revolutionaries are fighting for something.

The American Revolutionaries were fighting _for_ a a new and truly revolutionary form of government, and for principles expounded upon at great length by political writers like Madison, Hamilton etc.

The Star Wars Rebels seem to be fighting _against_ the Empire because, well, Empires are bad.  They are strong, they wear black and their leaders are scary looking.  In the early films (iv-vi) they seem to be fighting to restore the Republic, but they never really articulate any political principles.  At any rate, the prequels expose the Republic as a dysfunctional UN-like body rife with corruption and incapable of protecting its own members from agression (one of the principal duties of any government).

The results of defeating an Empire depend greatly upon the political nature of the opposition.  In in U.S., revolutionaries defeated the British Empire and established a nation that rose to be one of the strongest and most liberal in history.  In much of Africa by contrast, the British Empire was driven out by rebels and you ended up with places like Zimbabwe, which would probably be in much better shape had it remained a colony for at least a few more decades.


&quot;Iâ€™m afraid I only got as far as â€œPalpatine is a dictatorâ€“but a relatively benign one, like Pinochet.â€ Iâ€™m afraid it rather left the humour zone for me at that point. More than 1000 people â€œdisappearedâ€ under Pinochetâ€™s regime.&quot;

Richard, the key word is &quot;relatively&quot;.  Considering the records of communists despots of the time he was a piker (and at the time, Pinochet was considered the only alternative to communist despotism).  1,000 deaths is about 2 and a half days work for Pol Pot and his gang, for example.

And I don&#039;t see Palpatine as being quite that benign; Pinochet, after all, not only left his country in very good economic shape, he also relenquished power and re-established democracy in time.  I don&#039;t think Palpatine was headed down that path.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Rebels as American Revolutionaries, I think what truly separates &#8220;Rebels&#8221; from &#8220;Revolutionaires&#8221; is that rebels tend to fight against something, while revolutionaries are fighting for something.</p>
<p>The American Revolutionaries were fighting _for_ a a new and truly revolutionary form of government, and for principles expounded upon at great length by political writers like Madison, Hamilton etc.</p>
<p>The Star Wars Rebels seem to be fighting _against_ the Empire because, well, Empires are bad.  They are strong, they wear black and their leaders are scary looking.  In the early films (iv-vi) they seem to be fighting to restore the Republic, but they never really articulate any political principles.  At any rate, the prequels expose the Republic as a dysfunctional UN-like body rife with corruption and incapable of protecting its own members from agression (one of the principal duties of any government).</p>
<p>The results of defeating an Empire depend greatly upon the political nature of the opposition.  In in U.S., revolutionaries defeated the British Empire and established a nation that rose to be one of the strongest and most liberal in history.  In much of Africa by contrast, the British Empire was driven out by rebels and you ended up with places like Zimbabwe, which would probably be in much better shape had it remained a colony for at least a few more decades.</p>
<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m afraid I only got as far as â€œPalpatine is a dictatorâ€“but a relatively benign one, like Pinochet.â€ Iâ€™m afraid it rather left the humour zone for me at that point. More than 1000 people â€œdisappearedâ€ under Pinochetâ€™s regime.&#8221;</p>
<p>Richard, the key word is &#8220;relatively&#8221;.  Considering the records of communists despots of the time he was a piker (and at the time, Pinochet was considered the only alternative to communist despotism).  1,000 deaths is about 2 and a half days work for Pol Pot and his gang, for example.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t see Palpatine as being quite that benign; Pinochet, after all, not only left his country in very good economic shape, he also relenquished power and re-established democracy in time.  I don&#8217;t think Palpatine was headed down that path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth B</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/comment-page-1/#comment-43922</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/17/empire/#comment-43922</guid>
		<description>There is a good book about why Empire is good and why we are an Empire.  It&#039;s called Colossus, the Price of America&#039;s Empire by Niall Ferguson.  I&#039;ve just started it, and I like it already.  My husband&#039;s read a lot of it as part of his current military school.  They just discussed it yesterday---interesting timing with your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a good book about why Empire is good and why we are an Empire.  It&#8217;s called Colossus, the Price of America&#8217;s Empire by Niall Ferguson.  I&#8217;ve just started it, and I like it already.  My husband&#8217;s read a lot of it as part of his current military school.  They just discussed it yesterday&#8212;interesting timing with your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

