<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some &#8216;Holy Books&#8217; More Equal Than Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SickAndTired</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-2/#comment-45479</link>
		<dc:creator>SickAndTired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 04:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-45479</guid>
		<description>OK, OK, so I can&#039;t count...it&#039;s a six question test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, OK, so I can&#8217;t count&#8230;it&#8217;s a six question test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SickAndTired</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-45478</link>
		<dc:creator>SickAndTired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-45478</guid>
		<description>A simple five question test to determine your political bent.

If you see someone burning an American flag you should:
  1) Ignore it, he&#039;s a moonbat who will soon die of some dread disease he contracted through using dirty illegal drugs or engaging in weird sex.
  2) Remind him that the flag is held in high esteem by many and tell him that someone might hurt him if he doesn&#039;t stop.
  3) Pour a bucket of water on the burning flag, lecture him about how great America is, and tell him to go home and read some history books.
  4) Pour a bucket of water on the burning flag, clobber him in the head with the empty bucket and before he can get up remove all his clothes and burn them.

If you come across someone passing out leaflets reading &quot;US out of America&quot; you should:
  1) Ignore it, idiot ideas are everywhere and moonbats swoon over them all the time.
  2) Take a leaflet, pretend to read it, then ask him what language it is in and what planet he is from .
  3) Take all his leaflets, tell him he looks tired and you&#039;ll circulate the leaflets for him so he can go home and get high.
  4) Slap his face several times, take all the leaflets and stuff them into his mouth one by one until he passes out.

If you own an object you prize above all else because you believe it has been sanctified by whatever G-d you believe in and someone spits on it you should:
  1) Ignore him, he&#039;s just a misguided kid who has no clue how he even dressed himself this morning.
  2) Lower and shake your head sadly realizing that this benighted individual has not yet learned the truth.
  3) Shake your finger at him and give him a stern reminder that such behavior will make him unpopular.
  4) Poke a finger into his chest while shouting &quot;desecrator, desecrator&quot; and when he raises his arm to protect himself rearrange his facial contours.

If you see a group of protesters calling themselves America Last you should:
  1) Ignore them, cross the street and comfort yourself with the thought that free speech allows even these demented people a voice.
  2) Stop, listen to their chant (they&#039;ll only have one), ask how on earth any thinking person could come up with such pathetic versification.
  3) Stop, start your own chant &quot;Hey, Hey, U S A, Hope you win again today!&quot;
  4) Stop, take out a rubber truncheon and begin methodically moving through the crowd rapping each member of the group solidly behind each knee.

If you read an article disrespectful of American values you should:
  1) Ignore it, everyone is entitled to a stupid opinion now and then even if they never have anything but stupid opinions.
  2) Contact the editor, criticize the article and the writer sprinkling the conversation liberally with terms such as Commie, pinko, leftist, Socialist, and traitor.
  3) Cancel your subscription, write the publisher telling them that you and everyone you can convince will never buy anything published by that company again.
  4) Go to the publisher&#039;s office, find the writer and beat the crap out of him then find the editor and beat the crap out of him then set their desks and files on fire.

If you find someone desecratorily touching a Koran you should:
  1) Slay him, he has desecrated the holy Qu&#039;ran and insulted the prophet, may he rest in peace.
  2) Issue a fatwah on the desecrator offering paradise to anyone who finds and kills him.
  3) Start a riot blaming the little Satan Israel and the big Satan America for creating this atmosphere of disrespect for Islam.
  4) Ignore it, you don&#039;t care because the truth is in your heart, the book is a mere reflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple five question test to determine your political bent.</p>
<p>If you see someone burning an American flag you should:<br />
  1) Ignore it, he&#8217;s a moonbat who will soon die of some dread disease he contracted through using dirty illegal drugs or engaging in weird sex.<br />
  2) Remind him that the flag is held in high esteem by many and tell him that someone might hurt him if he doesn&#8217;t stop.<br />
  3) Pour a bucket of water on the burning flag, lecture him about how great America is, and tell him to go home and read some history books.<br />
  4) Pour a bucket of water on the burning flag, clobber him in the head with the empty bucket and before he can get up remove all his clothes and burn them.</p>
<p>If you come across someone passing out leaflets reading &#8220;US out of America&#8221; you should:<br />
  1) Ignore it, idiot ideas are everywhere and moonbats swoon over them all the time.<br />
  2) Take a leaflet, pretend to read it, then ask him what language it is in and what planet he is from .<br />
  3) Take all his leaflets, tell him he looks tired and you&#8217;ll circulate the leaflets for him so he can go home and get high.<br />
  4) Slap his face several times, take all the leaflets and stuff them into his mouth one by one until he passes out.</p>
<p>If you own an object you prize above all else because you believe it has been sanctified by whatever G-d you believe in and someone spits on it you should:<br />
  1) Ignore him, he&#8217;s just a misguided kid who has no clue how he even dressed himself this morning.<br />
  2) Lower and shake your head sadly realizing that this benighted individual has not yet learned the truth.<br />
  3) Shake your finger at him and give him a stern reminder that such behavior will make him unpopular.<br />
  4) Poke a finger into his chest while shouting &#8220;desecrator, desecrator&#8221; and when he raises his arm to protect himself rearrange his facial contours.</p>
<p>If you see a group of protesters calling themselves America Last you should:<br />
  1) Ignore them, cross the street and comfort yourself with the thought that free speech allows even these demented people a voice.<br />
  2) Stop, listen to their chant (they&#8217;ll only have one), ask how on earth any thinking person could come up with such pathetic versification.<br />
  3) Stop, start your own chant &#8220;Hey, Hey, U S A, Hope you win again today!&#8221;<br />
  4) Stop, take out a rubber truncheon and begin methodically moving through the crowd rapping each member of the group solidly behind each knee.</p>
<p>If you read an article disrespectful of American values you should:<br />
  1) Ignore it, everyone is entitled to a stupid opinion now and then even if they never have anything but stupid opinions.<br />
  2) Contact the editor, criticize the article and the writer sprinkling the conversation liberally with terms such as Commie, pinko, leftist, Socialist, and traitor.<br />
  3) Cancel your subscription, write the publisher telling them that you and everyone you can convince will never buy anything published by that company again.<br />
  4) Go to the publisher&#8217;s office, find the writer and beat the crap out of him then find the editor and beat the crap out of him then set their desks and files on fire.</p>
<p>If you find someone desecratorily touching a Koran you should:<br />
  1) Slay him, he has desecrated the holy Qu&#8217;ran and insulted the prophet, may he rest in peace.<br />
  2) Issue a fatwah on the desecrator offering paradise to anyone who finds and kills him.<br />
  3) Start a riot blaming the little Satan Israel and the big Satan America for creating this atmosphere of disrespect for Islam.<br />
  4) Ignore it, you don&#8217;t care because the truth is in your heart, the book is a mere reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44462</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44462</guid>
		<description>Anom #39:&quot;&lt;em&gt;I am not sure what â€œiconsâ€ you find in our charter documents. An â€œiconâ€ is an image. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not illustrated. They were just handwritten texts. One of these documents, the Declaration of Independence, refers to the â€œCreatorâ€ but in a non-denominational way.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Anom #24: &quot;&lt;em&gt;I donâ€™t know about MSM or jihad, but I agree with the ACLU that Ten Commandment iconography does not belong in public buildings â€” especially judicial buildings.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

What was it you didn&#039;t understand about my use of &quot;icons&quot;?  

As for our charter documents, the &quot;plain&quot; text contained within is a verifiable work of art -- often imitated, never duplicated.  

If it were any shorter, it&#039;d be a mini photoalbum, each a picture of what our forefathers intended.  Instead, it&#039;s a rich document with hyperlinks to both history as facts &amp; the future as ideas. 

If the EU constitution was any shorter, it&#039;d still be longer than need be.  (For starters, they chose the language of diplomacy to convey the EU image :) )

As for the mention of &quot;the Creator&quot;, we all know who they were referring to.  By the way, where on God&#039;s green earth did we get the God-Creator meme?  

Can I take 3 stabs at it?  
Isa 40:28 &lt;em&gt;Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of his understanding.&lt;/em&gt;

Rom 1:25  &lt;em&gt;Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.&lt;/em&gt; (for context, ya gotta read that whole chapter)

1Pe 4:19  &lt;em&gt;Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator.&lt;/em&gt;

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anom #39:&#8221;<em>I am not sure what â€œiconsâ€ you find in our charter documents. An â€œiconâ€ is an image. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not illustrated. They were just handwritten texts. One of these documents, the Declaration of Independence, refers to the â€œCreatorâ€ but in a non-denominational way.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Anom #24: &#8220;<em>I donâ€™t know about MSM or jihad, but I agree with the ACLU that Ten Commandment iconography does not belong in public buildings â€” especially judicial buildings.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>What was it you didn&#8217;t understand about my use of &#8220;icons&#8221;?  </p>
<p>As for our charter documents, the &#8220;plain&#8221; text contained within is a verifiable work of art &#8212; often imitated, never duplicated.  </p>
<p>If it were any shorter, it&#8217;d be a mini photoalbum, each a picture of what our forefathers intended.  Instead, it&#8217;s a rich document with hyperlinks to both history as facts &amp; the future as ideas. </p>
<p>If the EU constitution was any shorter, it&#8217;d still be longer than need be.  (For starters, they chose the language of diplomacy to convey the EU image <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>As for the mention of &#8220;the Creator&#8221;, we all know who they were referring to.  By the way, where on God&#8217;s green earth did we get the God-Creator meme?  </p>
<p>Can I take 3 stabs at it?<br />
Isa 40:28 <em>Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of his understanding.</em></p>
<p>Rom 1:25  <em>Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.</em> (for context, ya gotta read that whole chapter)</p>
<p>1Pe 4:19  <em>Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44238</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44238</guid>
		<description>Anom, my point was that it wasn&#039;t as clear cut as you implied it to be.  Rather than take the time to spell it out for you, I chose to speak in generalities and pointing out a couple more common-knowledge incidents of &quot;interference--figuring you&#039;d suss it.  However, it doesn&#039;t make my point moot with regards to the discriminations that the founding fathers had for certain sects and non-judeo-christian religions.  And so it goes, revising the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anom, my point was that it wasn&#8217;t as clear cut as you implied it to be.  Rather than take the time to spell it out for you, I chose to speak in generalities and pointing out a couple more common-knowledge incidents of &#8220;interference&#8211;figuring you&#8217;d suss it.  However, it doesn&#8217;t make my point moot with regards to the discriminations that the founding fathers had for certain sects and non-judeo-christian religions.  And so it goes, revising the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44237</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44237</guid>
		<description>Glamchild, I&#039;ll have to side with SCSI on all points.  Furthermore, like the bloated IMF and World Bank, the Bureau of Indian Afairs caused more damage by economically oppressing the very subjects they were tasked to assist.  

Like Nkrumah was exploited by British colonialists cum business partners, the Indians were exploited and &quot;nickeled &amp; dimed&quot; to death, in order to get them appreciate, and depend, on the hi-fat subsistance powdered milk (no pun intended), in this case coming from Uncle Sam.

Dare I say, more than the so-called reparations due descendants of slaves, we have still yet to do right by many of the duly sworn treaties that we soberly agreed to?  A just start would be full emancipation of the reservations following the complete withdrawal of the Federal Government from Indian Affairs. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glamchild, I&#8217;ll have to side with SCSI on all points.  Furthermore, like the bloated IMF and World Bank, the Bureau of Indian Afairs caused more damage by economically oppressing the very subjects they were tasked to assist.  </p>
<p>Like Nkrumah was exploited by British colonialists cum business partners, the Indians were exploited and &#8220;nickeled &amp; dimed&#8221; to death, in order to get them appreciate, and depend, on the hi-fat subsistance powdered milk (no pun intended), in this case coming from Uncle Sam.</p>
<p>Dare I say, more than the so-called reparations due descendants of slaves, we have still yet to do right by many of the duly sworn treaties that we soberly agreed to?  A just start would be full emancipation of the reservations following the complete withdrawal of the Federal Government from Indian Affairs. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doverspa</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44234</link>
		<dc:creator>doverspa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44234</guid>
		<description>LaShawn, hope I&#039;m not too late to add a pertinent comment.  Please take a moment to read this article on OpinionJournal.com as a good summary of why the Qu&#039;ran is not the &quot;Muslim Bible&quot; and how the religions differ with respect to the Holy Texts.  Direct comparisons are not justified.  Best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaShawn, hope I&#8217;m not too late to add a pertinent comment.  Please take a moment to read this article on OpinionJournal.com as a good summary of why the Qu&#8217;ran is not the &#8220;Muslim Bible&#8221; and how the religions differ with respect to the Holy Texts.  Direct comparisons are not justified.  Best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44195</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44195</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Islam is disrespected&lt;/strong&gt;

The MSM complained about Christians objecting to the &quot;Piss Christ&quot; saying it was just art. I wonder what they would say if some artist came up with &quot;Piss Mohamed&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Islam is disrespected</strong></p>
<p>The MSM complained about Christians objecting to the &#8220;Piss Christ&#8221; saying it was just art. I wonder what they would say if some artist came up with &#8220;Piss Mohamed&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44175</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 17:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44175</guid>
		<description>Glamchild,
You are litttle off base about the Amerinds.  The religious use of peyote by &lt;em&gt;some tribes&lt;/em&gt; predates peyote being classified as an illegal drug.  And the tribes that use it in religious functions do not us it in a habitual fashion, but as part of specific, and infrequent, ceremonies.
For the religious purposes point you make, think about this: During Prohibition, Alchohol was illegal.  Yet churches, esp the Catholic Church, were still allowed to use wine in ceremonies.
Sovereignty: Most reservations are subject to only federal law, not state laws.  Remember, many of these reservations were created as part of treaties between the US and the individual tribal nations.
There are activists that behave the way you describe, but they are a &lt;em&gt;minority&lt;/em&gt; among the Amerind population.  Actually, I hear that BS more from pinkskin wannabe do-gooders than from tribals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glamchild,<br />
You are litttle off base about the Amerinds.  The religious use of peyote by <em>some tribes</em> predates peyote being classified as an illegal drug.  And the tribes that use it in religious functions do not us it in a habitual fashion, but as part of specific, and infrequent, ceremonies.<br />
For the religious purposes point you make, think about this: During Prohibition, Alchohol was illegal.  Yet churches, esp the Catholic Church, were still allowed to use wine in ceremonies.<br />
Sovereignty: Most reservations are subject to only federal law, not state laws.  Remember, many of these reservations were created as part of treaties between the US and the individual tribal nations.<br />
There are activists that behave the way you describe, but they are a <em>minority</em> among the Amerind population.  Actually, I hear that BS more from pinkskin wannabe do-gooders than from tribals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cox</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44174</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44174</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Gosh, you&#039;re a mean drunk! All that over a typo? Give up the sauce. Believe me when I tell you it&#039;s not worth it. - Admin&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gosh, you&#8217;re a mean drunk! All that over a typo? Give up the sauce. Believe me when I tell you it&#8217;s not worth it. &#8211; Admin</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glamchild</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44172</link>
		<dc:creator>Glamchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44172</guid>
		<description>Regarding the talk about bigamy, above:

Interestingly, the Bigamists have filed lawsuits asserting their freedom to engage in bigamy.  There&#039;s about a dozen federal lawsuits winding their way through Utah and Colorado Federal Courts right now.  And, they are making a freedom of religion argument to support it.

Religion is used to justify all kinds of crazy, and, often, illegal activities.

Back to the Indians:  Native Americans frequently use peyote ----an illegal hallucenagenic---- in their religious services.  Peyote is an illegal drug in the USA, and nobody else would get away with using it for &quot;religious purposes&quot;.  

Actually, forget freedom of religion..... Native Americans, under &quot;sovereignty&quot; feel they aren&#039;t even subject to U.S. Law.  They follow &quot;Tribal Law&quot;, and simply don&#039;t have to obey anything we say.

That&#039;s the sham of &quot;sovereignty&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the talk about bigamy, above:</p>
<p>Interestingly, the Bigamists have filed lawsuits asserting their freedom to engage in bigamy.  There&#8217;s about a dozen federal lawsuits winding their way through Utah and Colorado Federal Courts right now.  And, they are making a freedom of religion argument to support it.</p>
<p>Religion is used to justify all kinds of crazy, and, often, illegal activities.</p>
<p>Back to the Indians:  Native Americans frequently use peyote &#8212;-an illegal hallucenagenic&#8212;- in their religious services.  Peyote is an illegal drug in the USA, and nobody else would get away with using it for &#8220;religious purposes&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Actually, forget freedom of religion&#8230;.. Native Americans, under &#8220;sovereignty&#8221; feel they aren&#8217;t even subject to U.S. Law.  They follow &#8220;Tribal Law&#8221;, and simply don&#8217;t have to obey anything we say.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the sham of &#8220;sovereignty&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44158</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 13:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44158</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Commentaries&lt;/strong&gt;

Miscellaneous David Limbaugh A seminar in Old Media bias Jack Cashill Enron movie misses Hillary&#039;s role in scandal Jerry Falwell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Commentaries</strong></p>
<p>Miscellaneous David Limbaugh A seminar in Old Media bias Jack Cashill Enron movie misses Hillary&#8217;s role in scandal Jerry Falwell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Daniel</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44139</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 02:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44139</guid>
		<description>La Shawn hit the nail on the head when she stated &quot;My Godâ€™s words live in my heart, and no one and no thing can remove or â€œdefileâ€ them.&quot; Those that claim a relationship with God through Jesus the Messiah SHOULD take time to study and meditate on God&#039;s revealed word, just as the Jews were commanded to. Once you know something, it becomes a part of you. While I&#039;d not want any of my bibles damaged by anyone in any way, I wouldn&#039;t kill anyone over it. After all of these years if I don&#039;t have enough of it in my heart/spirit to go a day or three without physically reading it, then I couldn&#039;t have been very serious about the study of it to begin with. 

As for the Muslims that did riot, killing their own countrymen, I can&#039;t fathom what REALLY drove them to that. In the US, those of us that love the Lord and His Christ (and His word) are assaulted DAILY, yet with no comparable response. 

Christianity is NOT a philosophy/religion of victimization. The heirs of God are MORE than conquerors, so the sniping we have to deal with is small stuff. I will say this to my brothers and sisters: stop whining about every perceived (or actual) slight. EXPECT to be vilified. We have work to do that MUST be done. I mean, it isn&#039;t like we haven&#039;t been forewarned that the world we live in would hate us. We can take comfort in the fact that Jesus has already overcome the world and we share in that victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn hit the nail on the head when she stated &#8220;My Godâ€™s words live in my heart, and no one and no thing can remove or â€œdefileâ€ them.&#8221; Those that claim a relationship with God through Jesus the Messiah SHOULD take time to study and meditate on God&#8217;s revealed word, just as the Jews were commanded to. Once you know something, it becomes a part of you. While I&#8217;d not want any of my bibles damaged by anyone in any way, I wouldn&#8217;t kill anyone over it. After all of these years if I don&#8217;t have enough of it in my heart/spirit to go a day or three without physically reading it, then I couldn&#8217;t have been very serious about the study of it to begin with. </p>
<p>As for the Muslims that did riot, killing their own countrymen, I can&#8217;t fathom what REALLY drove them to that. In the US, those of us that love the Lord and His Christ (and His word) are assaulted DAILY, yet with no comparable response. </p>
<p>Christianity is NOT a philosophy/religion of victimization. The heirs of God are MORE than conquerors, so the sniping we have to deal with is small stuff. I will say this to my brothers and sisters: stop whining about every perceived (or actual) slight. EXPECT to be vilified. We have work to do that MUST be done. I mean, it isn&#8217;t like we haven&#8217;t been forewarned that the world we live in would hate us. We can take comfort in the fact that Jesus has already overcome the world and we share in that victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anomalocaris</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44135</link>
		<dc:creator>Anomalocaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 02:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44135</guid>
		<description>Dear Andy, 

Yes, I am clear that there is no state religion in the United States. I am not sure what you mean by &quot;Wiccans, Mormons and quote a few others were NOT free to practice as they pleased.&quot; If you mean &quot;at the time the country was founded&quot; then my response is &quot;There were no Mormons at the time the country was founded.&quot; If you mean &quot;at times in the past&quot; I agree that in the early days of Mormonism, the religion said that men could have multiple wives. Mainstream Mormonism has repudiated this doctrine, but a few splinter sects still adhere to it. Bigamy is not legal in any state of the United States, so any member of a religion or sect that permits multiple spouses at the same time has to give up that aspect of their religion in the United States. But they can practice their religion up to the limits of the law. Most of the time, law and religion don&#039;t collide.

I am not sure what you meant by Wiccans not being free to practice. As far as I know, Wiccans do not have any practices or rituals that break laws. It may be that at times in the past, Christian-influenced legislatures passed laws banning one religion or another. Well, we had the Salem witch trials too. But we wouldn&#039;t tolerate witch trials today -- they are unconstitutional. And we don&#039;t tolerate banning religions per se. All we do is ban a few practices that we wouldn&#039;t allow anybody to do for any reason.

I am not sure what &quot;icons&quot; you find in our charter documents. An &quot;icon&quot; is an image. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not illustrated. They were just handwritten texts. One of these documents, the Declaration of Independence, refers to the &quot;Creator&quot; but in a non-denominational way. 

My points are neither tired nor revisionist. If they tire you, get more sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andy, </p>
<p>Yes, I am clear that there is no state religion in the United States. I am not sure what you mean by &#8220;Wiccans, Mormons and quote a few others were NOT free to practice as they pleased.&#8221; If you mean &#8220;at the time the country was founded&#8221; then my response is &#8220;There were no Mormons at the time the country was founded.&#8221; If you mean &#8220;at times in the past&#8221; I agree that in the early days of Mormonism, the religion said that men could have multiple wives. Mainstream Mormonism has repudiated this doctrine, but a few splinter sects still adhere to it. Bigamy is not legal in any state of the United States, so any member of a religion or sect that permits multiple spouses at the same time has to give up that aspect of their religion in the United States. But they can practice their religion up to the limits of the law. Most of the time, law and religion don&#8217;t collide.</p>
<p>I am not sure what you meant by Wiccans not being free to practice. As far as I know, Wiccans do not have any practices or rituals that break laws. It may be that at times in the past, Christian-influenced legislatures passed laws banning one religion or another. Well, we had the Salem witch trials too. But we wouldn&#8217;t tolerate witch trials today &#8212; they are unconstitutional. And we don&#8217;t tolerate banning religions per se. All we do is ban a few practices that we wouldn&#8217;t allow anybody to do for any reason.</p>
<p>I am not sure what &#8220;icons&#8221; you find in our charter documents. An &#8220;icon&#8221; is an image. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not illustrated. They were just handwritten texts. One of these documents, the Declaration of Independence, refers to the &#8220;Creator&#8221; but in a non-denominational way. </p>
<p>My points are neither tired nor revisionist. If they tire you, get more sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 01:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44128</guid>
		<description>Anom, just as long as you&#039;re clear on the fact that while there is no state religion, all religons were NOT welcome.  To wit, Wiccans, Mormons and quite a few others were NOT free to practice as they pleased.  

As for iconography, who do you think put up the first icons and Christian ideology into our charter documents?  Why do you even bring up tired revisionist arguments about what the founding fathers were voting for before they voted against it?  

Tell us something we didn&#039;t know, such as what the founding fathers thot of the resultant mass of fish OD&#039;ing on tea in the Boston Harbor during the first recorded anti-globalisation riot. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anom, just as long as you&#8217;re clear on the fact that while there is no state religion, all religons were NOT welcome.  To wit, Wiccans, Mormons and quite a few others were NOT free to practice as they pleased.  </p>
<p>As for iconography, who do you think put up the first icons and Christian ideology into our charter documents?  Why do you even bring up tired revisionist arguments about what the founding fathers were voting for before they voted against it?  </p>
<p>Tell us something we didn&#8217;t know, such as what the founding fathers thot of the resultant mass of fish OD&#8217;ing on tea in the Boston Harbor during the first recorded anti-globalisation riot. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44119</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 23:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/05/19/some/#comment-44119</guid>
		<description>Wup. My response to your second part was cut off. 

My response was: That would be like someone justifying their killing of people because they were offended that people in their family was sequestored for jury duty. How&#039;s that for an analogy. Works for me because it has killing for being detained in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wup. My response to your second part was cut off. </p>
<p>My response was: That would be like someone justifying their killing of people because they were offended that people in their family was sequestored for jury duty. How&#8217;s that for an analogy. Works for me because it has killing for being detained in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

