Comments on: Other Bloggers http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/ Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: SCSIwuzzy http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47633 SCSIwuzzy Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:55:15 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47633 Yes, all of your questions are rhetorical as well :) I'm sorry LB, I'm just having one of those incorribible 'fish in barrel' days. Yes, all of your questions are rhetorical as well :)
I’m sorry LB, I’m just having one of those incorribible ‘fish in barrel’ days.

]]> By: actus http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47631 actus Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:31:04 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47631 "Any question I ask of actus is rhetorical, since I long ago stopped expecting a direct answer" Are the irrelevant ones rhetorical too? “Any question I ask of actus is rhetorical, since I long ago stopped expecting a direct answer”

Are the irrelevant ones rhetorical too?

]]> By: SCSIwuzzy http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47626 SCSIwuzzy Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:26 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47626 Actually, I think it was Baklava that asked that. Any question I ask of actus is rhetorical, since I long ago stopped expecting a direct answer. :) That, and my teaching experience has left me falling into socratic mode without noticing until after the fact... Actually, I think it was Baklava that asked that. Any question I ask of actus is rhetorical, since I long ago stopped expecting a direct answer. :)
That, and my teaching experience has left me falling into socratic mode without noticing until after the fact…

]]> By: actus http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47623 actus Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:11:04 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47623 "SCSI asked you what was false and for YOU to be on target. True or false?" What's the hangup with whats false? Are all islamofascists muslims? True. Are all muslims islamofascists? false. This is trivial. What is going is the use of the general when you mean the specific. And this is not being "on target." its actually being overbroad. I don't know why he's asking me about false or not, when I'm going on about the overbreadth. “SCSI asked you what was false and for YOU to be on target. True or false?”

What’s the hangup with whats false? Are all islamofascists muslims? True. Are all muslims islamofascists? false. This is trivial. What is going is the use of the general when you mean the specific. And this is not being “on target.” its actually being overbroad.

I don’t know why he’s asking me about false or not, when I’m going on about the overbreadth.

]]> By: Andy http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47618 Andy Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:46:07 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47618 Got me there SCSI. ;) Actus, now you're positively dizzy. SCSI asked you what was false and for YOU to be on target. True or false? Got me there SCSI. ;)

Actus, now you’re positively dizzy. SCSI asked you what was false and for YOU to be on target. True or false?

]]> By: actus http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47588 actus Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:44:01 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47588 "Still not false. Islamofascists are by definition muslim. " I don't care about false or not. I said "not on target." Its not on target to use the general term when you mean the specific, because its overbroad. “Still not false. Islamofascists are by definition muslim. ”

I don’t care about false or not. I said “not on target.” Its not on target to use the general term when you mean the specific, because its overbroad.

]]> By: SCSIwuzzy http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47511 SCSIwuzzy Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:37:13 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47511 Andy, not all moonbats are democrats. What about the green party, socialist party and communist party? They may not amount to enough votes to matter, but that does not take away from their moonbat pedigree. Andy, not all moonbats are democrats. What about the green party, socialist party and communist party? They may not amount to enough votes to matter, but that does not take away from their moonbat pedigree.

]]> By: Andy http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47509 Andy Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:19:16 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47509 Still not false. Islamofascists are by definition muslim. By comparison, 'Republicans are white christians' is false, while 'moonbats are democrats' is true. Quit being so pedantic. Who cares if it's a great white or a whale, you've done jumped your shark. Still not false. Islamofascists are by definition muslim.

By comparison, ‘Republicans are white christians’ is false, while ‘moonbats are democrats’ is true.

Quit being so pedantic. Who cares if it’s a great white or a whale, you’ve done jumped your shark.

]]> By: actus http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47508 actus Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:01:29 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47508 "OK. What was false about what she wrote." 'Although I used “Muslims” as a general term, my focus was and is on Islamofascists' She used the general term (muslim) when she meant the specific (islamofascist). That's not 'on target.' “OK. What was false about what she wrote.”

‘Although I used “Muslims” as a general term, my focus was and is on Islamofascists’

She used the general term (muslim) when she meant the specific (islamofascist). That’s not ‘on target.’

]]> By: Baklava http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47414 Baklava Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:57:03 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47414 OK. What was false about what she wrote. Be on target Actus... OK. What was false about what she wrote.

Be on target Actus…

]]> By: actus http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47393 actus Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:08:35 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47393 "La Shawn simply wrote her opinion which is relevant and on target. " She said she used the general term when her gripe was specific. That's not on target. “La Shawn simply wrote her opinion which is relevant and on target. ”

She said she used the general term when her gripe was specific. That’s not on target.

]]> By: Baklava http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47379 Baklava Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:37:25 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47379 #27 Actus, Was it muslims who rioted and killed after the Newsweek story or not? Must one always label the rioters Islamofacists or be called a bigot by you? Definition of bigot is - a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own. La Shawn simply wrote her opinion which is relevant and on target. You are intolerant of her opinion making you fit the definition. #27 Actus,

Was it muslims who rioted and killed after the Newsweek story or not?

Must one always label the rioters Islamofacists or be called a bigot by you?

Definition of bigot is – a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.

La Shawn simply wrote her opinion which is relevant and on target. You are intolerant of her opinion making you fit the definition.

]]> By: La Shawn http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47371 La Shawn Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:53:47 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47371 Thierrion - You're using HaloScan, which doesn't like my blog. :( Try Simpletracks: http://kalsey.com/tools/trackback/ Thierrion – You’re using HaloScan, which doesn’t like my blog. :(

Try Simpletracks:

http://kalsey.com/tools/trackback/

]]> By: Thierrion Kagan http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47367 Thierrion Kagan Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:42:26 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47367 La Shawn, Tried to send a trackback, but got denied. Am I doing something wrong? --Thierrion La Shawn,

Tried to send a trackback, but got denied. Am I doing something wrong?

–Thierrion

]]> By: Bene Diction http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/other/comment-page-2/#comment-47153 Bene Diction Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:27:21 +0000 http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/07/social-conservatives-and-the-other-kind/#comment-47153 I used Peter Marshall who was Senate chaplain during WWII. I'm sorry if you see that as critical, personal, chastising and offensive. It was not posted to offend you, your other commenters might find use of it on their blogs someday. Marshall contributed the how of faith during a critical time in US history. No win, no win. If you see comments as a personal attack or persecution and exercise a need to self-defend when there is no intent of harm, it is incumbant on one party to unilaterally disengage. Thank you for your time. I'm gone. I used Peter Marshall who was Senate chaplain during WWII.
I’m sorry if you see that as critical, personal, chastising and offensive. It was not posted to offend you, your other commenters might find use of it on their blogs someday. Marshall contributed the how of faith during a critical time in US history.

No win, no win. If you see comments as a personal attack or persecution and exercise a need to self-defend when there is no intent of harm, it is incumbant on one party to unilaterally disengage.
Thank you for your time.
I’m gone.

]]>