<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PBS Gets The Message About Liberal Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-52964</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-52964</guid>
		<description>Andy writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;Yup, sending the moonbats to the corner for a permanent timeout. NPR/PBS is but one front in which weâ€™re taking back the control of the signal.&quot;

 Who&#039;s &quot;we&quot;? And what is so &quot;moonbat&quot; about the home of &quot;Firing Line&quot; by William F. Buckley and the &quot;Wall Street Journal Editorial Board&quot;?

--Cobra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy writes:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Yup, sending the moonbats to the corner for a permanent timeout. NPR/PBS is but one front in which weâ€™re taking back the control of the signal.&#8221;</p>
<p> Who&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8221;? And what is so &#8220;moonbat&#8221; about the home of &#8220;Firing Line&#8221; by William F. Buckley and the &#8220;Wall Street Journal Editorial Board&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8211;Cobra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-52087</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 05:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-52087</guid>
		<description>Actus: &quot;&lt;em&gt;Um, thereâ€™s quite a bit more going on here than just the advancement of an agenda.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Yup, sending the moonbats to the corner for a permanent timeout.  NPR/PBS is but one front in which we&#039;re taking back the control of the signal. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actus: &#8220;<em>Um, thereâ€™s quite a bit more going on here than just the advancement of an agenda.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, sending the moonbats to the corner for a permanent timeout.  NPR/PBS is but one front in which we&#8217;re taking back the control of the signal. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-51434</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51434</guid>
		<description>&quot;Theyâ€™re running all over Washington, enlisting the help of whatever sympathetic â€œnewsâ€ organizations they can find, in order to whine about a president having the dastardly nerve to actually advance his own agenda instead of theirs.&quot;

Um, there&#039;s quite a bit more going on here than just the advancement of an agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Theyâ€™re running all over Washington, enlisting the help of whatever sympathetic â€œnewsâ€ organizations they can find, in order to whine about a president having the dastardly nerve to actually advance his own agenda instead of theirs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, there&#8217;s quite a bit more going on here than just the advancement of an agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-51352</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51352</guid>
		<description>That breathless &quot;story&quot; that Cobra posted has been making the rounds on the internet for a long time now, and it never has gained any traction.  The reason is that it&#039;s clearly a case of Mr. Bush&#039;s opponents being in a childish snit because they have lost power.  They&#039;re running all over Washington, enlisting the help of whatever sympathetic &quot;news&quot; organizations they can find, in order to whine about a president having the dastardly nerve to actually advance his own agenda instead of theirs.  Gadzooks!  Who woulda thought it?!  [insert rolling eyes here]    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That breathless &#8220;story&#8221; that Cobra posted has been making the rounds on the internet for a long time now, and it never has gained any traction.  The reason is that it&#8217;s clearly a case of Mr. Bush&#8217;s opponents being in a childish snit because they have lost power.  They&#8217;re running all over Washington, enlisting the help of whatever sympathetic &#8220;news&#8221; organizations they can find, in order to whine about a president having the dastardly nerve to actually advance his own agenda instead of theirs.  Gadzooks!  Who woulda thought it?!  [insert rolling eyes here]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-51292</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51292</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cobra, fact or fiction is in the eye of the beholder. &quot;

I was wondering when postmodernism would make its way onto the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cobra, fact or fiction is in the eye of the beholder. &#8221;</p>
<p>I was wondering when postmodernism would make its way onto the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-2/#comment-51274</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51274</guid>
		<description>Cobra, fact or fiction is in the eye of the beholder. 

As for the &#039;fact&#039; budget being twice as much as that spent by the Clinton administration, that is meaningless without context.  Who is spending how much for what?  We have new agencies, new initiatives which all have to do their PR -- which is part of their job to inform the public.  

So what?  Give us some apples to apples comparison.  All I&#039;ve seen are apples to oranges comparisons including these howlers:

&quot;&lt;em&gt;&quot;We strongly disagree [with] and are very disappointed by the administration&#039;s actions,&quot; Walker says. &quot;This is not just about what&#039;s arguably legal; it&#039;s about what&#039;s right. Taxpayers have the right to know if and when the government is trying to influence them with their own dollars.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

To which I say the public has a right to know if and when the MSM is trying to influence them.  And speaking of tax-funded entities, is Mr Walker also  directing some of his rage at PBS/NPR?  No? Why not?


Here&#039;s another:
&quot;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Deceiving the American people about government policies and proposals is not the American way,&quot; Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., wrote to President Bush after those revelations. &quot;Propaganda should not be coming out of the White House.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

And deceiving the American people about chappaquiddick, Bush&#039;s policies and proposals is not the American way.  Blah, blah... Propaganda should not be coming out of the MSM/DNC

Yawn!!! Pot meet kettle. Methinks if the MSM can&#039;t be bothered to report the good news, somebody has to do it.  Actually I think the sturm &amp; drang is due to the fact that the MSM shapes its message to the blue State stronghold while ignoring the so-called flyovers and the MSM/DNc is all up in a snit that the govt manages to get its message out to those people.  My, my life is so unfair.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobra, fact or fiction is in the eye of the beholder. </p>
<p>As for the &#8216;fact&#8217; budget being twice as much as that spent by the Clinton administration, that is meaningless without context.  Who is spending how much for what?  We have new agencies, new initiatives which all have to do their PR &#8212; which is part of their job to inform the public.  </p>
<p>So what?  Give us some apples to apples comparison.  All I&#8217;ve seen are apples to oranges comparisons including these howlers:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>&#8220;We strongly disagree [with] and are very disappointed by the administration&#8217;s actions,&#8221; Walker says. &#8220;This is not just about what&#8217;s arguably legal; it&#8217;s about what&#8217;s right. Taxpayers have the right to know if and when the government is trying to influence them with their own dollars.&#8221;</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>To which I say the public has a right to know if and when the MSM is trying to influence them.  And speaking of tax-funded entities, is Mr Walker also  directing some of his rage at PBS/NPR?  No? Why not?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another:<br />
&#8220;<em>&#8220;Deceiving the American people about government policies and proposals is not the American way,&#8221; Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., wrote to President Bush after those revelations. &#8220;Propaganda should not be coming out of the White House.&#8221;</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>And deceiving the American people about chappaquiddick, Bush&#8217;s policies and proposals is not the American way.  Blah, blah&#8230; Propaganda should not be coming out of the MSM/DNC</p>
<p>Yawn!!! Pot meet kettle. Methinks if the MSM can&#8217;t be bothered to report the good news, somebody has to do it.  Actually I think the sturm &amp; drang is due to the fact that the MSM shapes its message to the blue State stronghold while ignoring the so-called flyovers and the MSM/DNc is all up in a snit that the govt manages to get its message out to those people.  My, my life is so unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobra</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51226</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51226</guid>
		<description>Waitiminute...don&#039;t public funds (taxpayer expense) also go to President Bush&#039;s propaganda campaigns involving &quot;fake news?&quot;

&gt;&gt;&gt;The Bush administration has come under a lot of criticism for its attempts to fob off government propaganda as genuine news reports. Whether federal agencies are purchasing the services of supposedly independent columnists or making videos extolling White House initiatives and then disguising them as TV news reports, that&#039;s wrong. But it is time to acknowledge that the nation&#039;s news organizations have played a large and unappetizing role in deceiving the public....
...As documented this week in an article in The Times by David Barstow and Robin Stein, more than 20 federal agencies, including the State Department and the Defense Department, now create fake news clips. The Bush administration spent $254 million in its first four years on contracts with public relations firms, more than double the amount spent by the Clinton administration... 
...Most of these tapes are very skillfully done, including &quot;interviews&quot; that seem genuine and &quot;reporters&quot; who look much like the real thing. Only sophisticated viewers would easily recognize that these videos are actually unpaid commercial announcements for the White House or some other part of the government. Some of the videos clearly cross the line into the proscribed territory of propaganda, and the Government Accountability Office says at least two were illegally distributed.&quot;
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/031605O.shtml 

So this issue is beyond liberal and conservative. It&#039;s about FACT and FICTION.

--Cobra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waitiminute&#8230;don&#8217;t public funds (taxpayer expense) also go to President Bush&#8217;s propaganda campaigns involving &#8220;fake news?&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;The Bush administration has come under a lot of criticism for its attempts to fob off government propaganda as genuine news reports. Whether federal agencies are purchasing the services of supposedly independent columnists or making videos extolling White House initiatives and then disguising them as TV news reports, that&#8217;s wrong. But it is time to acknowledge that the nation&#8217;s news organizations have played a large and unappetizing role in deceiving the public&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;As documented this week in an article in The Times by David Barstow and Robin Stein, more than 20 federal agencies, including the State Department and the Defense Department, now create fake news clips. The Bush administration spent $254 million in its first four years on contracts with public relations firms, more than double the amount spent by the Clinton administration&#8230;<br />
&#8230;Most of these tapes are very skillfully done, including &#8220;interviews&#8221; that seem genuine and &#8220;reporters&#8221; who look much like the real thing. Only sophisticated viewers would easily recognize that these videos are actually unpaid commercial announcements for the White House or some other part of the government. Some of the videos clearly cross the line into the proscribed territory of propaganda, and the Government Accountability Office says at least two were illegally distributed.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/031605O.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/031605O.shtml</a> </p>
<p>So this issue is beyond liberal and conservative. It&#8217;s about FACT and FICTION.</p>
<p>&#8211;Cobra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51198</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51198</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Animal Planet can survive in the commercial arena, then NPR/PBS/CPB and all the rest should be able to exist their own merits, without slurping out of the public trough.&quot;

In communications law and policy broadcasting -- which is free -- is usually treated differently than cable TV -- which costs money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Animal Planet can survive in the commercial arena, then NPR/PBS/CPB and all the rest should be able to exist their own merits, without slurping out of the public trough.&#8221;</p>
<p>In communications law and policy broadcasting &#8212; which is free &#8212; is usually treated differently than cable TV &#8212; which costs money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51183</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51183</guid>
		<description>Public broadcasting, at taxpayer expense, might have had a small justification back in the day when there were only 3 or 4 channels to watch.  It would have been impossible to run a viable commercial station for the arts and education in direct competition to the other giants.  But today, with hundreds of special interest channels floating around, there&#039;s ample opportunity for specialized programming of all types.  If Animal Planet can survive in the commercial arena, then NPR/PBS/CPB and all the rest should be able to exist their own merits, without slurping out of the public trough.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public broadcasting, at taxpayer expense, might have had a small justification back in the day when there were only 3 or 4 channels to watch.  It would have been impossible to run a viable commercial station for the arts and education in direct competition to the other giants.  But today, with hundreds of special interest channels floating around, there&#8217;s ample opportunity for specialized programming of all types.  If Animal Planet can survive in the commercial arena, then NPR/PBS/CPB and all the rest should be able to exist their own merits, without slurping out of the public trough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51176</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51176</guid>
		<description>Hey Jimbo, 

Just goes to show, people on the public dole just hate the thot of actually cutting loose and making their own way in the world.

Rocky ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jimbo, </p>
<p>Just goes to show, people on the public dole just hate the thot of actually cutting loose and making their own way in the world.</p>
<p>Rocky <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51147</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51147</guid>
		<description>Jim Rockford,
The more pathetic of Philly&#039;s PBS stations is doing the same thing.  THis is the station that advertises itself as the voice of gay Philadelphia, and gives us the great programs like In Bed With Butch, and helped foster Tim and Eric onto the wider world (Tom Goes to the Mayor)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Rockford,<br />
The more pathetic of Philly&#8217;s PBS stations is doing the same thing.  THis is the station that advertises itself as the voice of gay Philadelphia, and gives us the great programs like In Bed With Butch, and helped foster Tim and Eric onto the wider world (Tom Goes to the Mayor)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rockford</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rockford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51094</guid>
		<description>Here in Tampa, one of the two &quot;public&quot; broadcasting station (WUSF, Channel 16) is actually running spots in which they implore viewers to contact Congress to insist that funding be restored.  You have to admire the arrogance of using a tax supported medium to agitate for continued tax support.  (BTW - the other station - WEDU - runs a spot giving contact info and asks that viewers let their representatives know whether they think support should be cut or restored.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Tampa, one of the two &#8220;public&#8221; broadcasting station (WUSF, Channel 16) is actually running spots in which they implore viewers to contact Congress to insist that funding be restored.  You have to admire the arrogance of using a tax supported medium to agitate for continued tax support.  (BTW &#8211; the other station &#8211; WEDU &#8211; runs a spot giving contact info and asks that viewers let their representatives know whether they think support should be cut or restored.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51056</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51056</guid>
		<description>Saying it&#039;s safe to dance on PBS&#039; immiment demise? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying it&#8217;s safe to dance on PBS&#8217; immiment demise? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCSIwuzzy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51009</link>
		<dc:creator>SCSIwuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51009</guid>
		<description>(8) Say, we can act if we want to, if we don&#039;t nobody will 
And you can act real rude or totally removed 
And I can act like an imbecile
Say we can dance, we can dance 
Everything&#039;s out of control
We can dance, we can dance 
They&#039;re doing it from pole to pole 
We can dance, we can dance 
Everybody look at your hands 
We can dance, we can dance 
Everybody taken the chance 
The safety dance (8)
OK LB, I&#039;m done with the dancing jokes for now. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(8) Say, we can act if we want to, if we don&#8217;t nobody will<br />
And you can act real rude or totally removed<br />
And I can act like an imbecile<br />
Say we can dance, we can dance<br />
Everything&#8217;s out of control<br />
We can dance, we can dance<br />
They&#8217;re doing it from pole to pole<br />
We can dance, we can dance<br />
Everybody look at your hands<br />
We can dance, we can dance<br />
Everybody taken the chance<br />
The safety dance (8)<br />
OK LB, I&#8217;m done with the dancing jokes for now. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/17/pbs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51008</link>
		<dc:creator>firebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/06/15/pbs/#comment-51008</guid>
		<description>Lets just cut this PBS out i mean its a rip off its all liberal propeganda i mean those damn predge breaks have become so damn bad they go around and accuse viewers of stealing the programs for not paying for it what a crock and then on NATURE they were touting this GAIA nonsenses what a lot of malarkey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just cut this PBS out i mean its a rip off its all liberal propeganda i mean those damn predge breaks have become so damn bad they go around and accuse viewers of stealing the programs for not paying for it what a crock and then on NATURE they were touting this GAIA nonsenses what a lot of malarkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

