Today is Tuesday, isn’t it? Now that I’m not going out to work every day, the days seem to blend together. Here’s a list of blogs and announcements:
- Blogger Michael “Bunker Mulligan” Reed died earlier this month (see this post), and his family has posted pictures on his blog.
- I’ll be on Pundit Review radio this Sunday around 9:00 p.m. EDT. Listen live online at WRKO. The toll-free call in number is 877-469-4322. If trolls are looking for an opportunity to tell me off, here it is.
- The Search for Righteousness
- DarjeelinGirl
- Podcast mania is sweeping the blogosphere. Frank J.’s latest is up.
I met author Matthew Paul Turner at BlogNashville (he attended my faith-based blogging session), and I encouraged him to start a blog to help promote his books. The coffeehouse Gospel book (pictured on the right) sounds really interesting. I’m glad to see he’s joined the blogosphere.- Who is screwing up America?
- Despite failure, liberals keep trying to make it in talk radio. You have to admire their persistence.
- Ankle Biting Pundits has the latest on John Kerry’s Form 180.
- Kyle French is starting a web design business and he’s offering his services for free to build his portfolio. Contact him: kyle@puretext.us
- Pose with Howard Dean. Funny.
- The Black Informant sports a new look.
- Have you been to RosalindGash.com lately? Check it out.
- Decision ‘08? I guess it’s never too
lateearly. - A reader e-mailed to say part of my anti-lynching post was quoted in the Dallas Morning News last Saturday, but I couldn’t find it online.
Update: Be sure to check the Daou Report for the latest posts from the left and right sides of the blogosphere.
- Liberal blogger Axinar dug up one of my old photos (with part of my nephew’s head in the shot) and says that I can save PBS!
- Also visit the Homeschool Mom Blog.
- Dems demonize Christians? Do tell!
- J.D. Wetterling ponders Great Britian’s history and sees something prophetic as America approaches another birthday.
- Julie Neidlinger is trying to plant a Google bomb for Governor John Hoeven.
Do you have announcements or provocative posts? Trackback if you’re a blogger, and I’ll put the link in the post when I get a chance. Others can leave comments.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 10 comments }
The Sweetheart of the Blogosphere strikes again.
Thanks LaShawn. And as always … send me the trolls, they are tasty.
La Shawn,
I listen to Pundit Review every Sunday nite since they’ve been on the air. My biggest complaint is that they are on for only 1 hour. Maybe you could stress that point to them. I’ll be listening.
As always, thanks for the linkage!!!
)
From: http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2005/06/gettin_racial_u.html
“I mean [Republicans] assume blacks don’t vote their interests but only vote for people that look like them [and so appoint tokens, e.g., Congressman J.C. Watts]. Is there anything more patronizing?”
Yes. A white liberal telling me what my interests are. Or worse, assuming what my interests are simply because of what I look like to him or her. Or worse, a white liberal attempting to pander to me or advocate on my behalf because he or she identifies with ‘my interests’. Or worse, a black liberal who is presumed to represent the interests of all black people simply because white liberals agree with him or her. Or worse, a white liberal who points to a black liberal and says, “But Mr. Black Liberal says XYZ. Why don’t you agree?” Or worse, a white liberal who thinks that white liberals who act in the manner I have described above are not racist. Or worse, a white liberal who refuses to accept my analysis by questioning the authenticity of my “blackness” — whatever that means — or suggesting that every other black person in the country disagrees with me. Even worse than that, white liberals who ask me to “freestyle, dog” at liberal rallies, or who ask me at upscale parties “where the weed at” in a bizarre approximation of the pidgin that is supposed to be my native tongue, despite the fact that, like most “black” people (as opposed to African immigrants or Caribbean island-dwellers), my family has been in this country since the Founding and I speak Standard English. Oh, wait, worse than that is a white liberal politician pandering to sexagenarian congregationalists in a black church around election time, rhyming his words and singing hymns, as if all contemporary Negroes do is harmonize spirituals on the plantation. See, e.g., Al Gore, John Kerry, and Howard Dean.
As for George W. Bush hugging black people, at least we know he’s not afraid to touch them in public. Bush treats them like human beings instead of a voting bloc. Somehow I don’t think it’d be a problem in the Bush family if one of Bush’s daughters married a black dude. Kerry I can imagine fuming and sputtering out racist epithets. Believe it or not, that matters. The most significant part of the phrase “black people” is “people”. Democrats usually don’t act as if that is the case, and that’s exactly how it registers.
The only reason black people vote for Democrats, according to political scientists, is they don’t see any other viable alternative. It doesn’t mean they actually like Democrats, or think they’re exemplars of perfection. Let me give you an example.
There seems to be a big push in the Democratic Party not for decriminalization of sodomy (which was already achieved by Lawrence v. Texas), but for active public blessing of gay marriage: i.e., gay marriage is good, there should be more gay marriage, gay relationships are wonderful, great, fantastic. I don’t remember any push for interracial marriages as wonderful alternatives to ‘conventional’ marriage, just the mere, bare, austere, silent tacit recognition that it shouldn’t be criminal. In case you’re wondering, the reason Republicans pushed the gay marriage issue as a wedge during 2004 was to point out Democratic hypocrisy — pro-gay love, but seemingly not pro-interracial love. It was not to stoke antigay sentiment amongst blacks, as is popularly reported. Blacks were not swayed by hatred for gays; they were shocked to realize that the civil rights movement as it is traditionally defined is on the back-burner in the Democratic Party. Apparently, white liberals think a man and a man getting it on is a better idea than one of their daughters and a black dude.
But what do I know? I’m not omniscient like white liberals are.
Johnny, well said.
Provocative post? Me?
http://marklaroi.blogspot.com/2005/06/peta-employees-charged-with-animal.html
http://marklaroi.blogspot.com/2005/06/al-sharpton-sold-out-completely.html
http://marklaroi.blogspot.com/2005/06/breastfeeding-isnt-man-woman-issue.html
(Thanks La Shawn!)
Thanks for listening Ripama. The station is happy with the show (so far) and we may be expanding the time slot very soon. Keep your fingers crossed. Give us a call sometime.
Well, my trackbacks don’t seem to be working, LaShawn. I wouldn’t mind a little linkage over to Point Five — http://pointfivestep.blogspot.com/
Conservative satire and lies all!
Dinosaurs don’t do trackbacks, La Shawn.
But I did link the anti-lynching post. It was a good read and altho I found it a few days late, it was my pleasure to share it with my few readers.
What a treat, La Shawn! Thank you! You’re a spunky sparkle in the blogosphere – keep up the good work.
Comments on this entry are closed.