<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54412</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54412</guid>
		<description>LB, thanks for allowing me to play. I appreciate it.

Continue here if anyone wants to do so:
http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004232.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB, thanks for allowing me to play. I appreciate it.</p>
<p>Continue here if anyone wants to do so:<br />
<a href="http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004232.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004232.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54411</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54411</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I answered them anyway to give you the clue that 2 things:
1) NAACP is irrelevant&lt;/em&gt;

I never said otherwise. I&#039;ve asked LB on this site why she bashes the NAACP since they are irrelevant.

&lt;em&gt;2) Main stream media is not on Black americaâ€™s side and reporting things that you want them to&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve been saying that for awhile now.

But, again, just because I don&#039;t drink Republican or conservative Kool-aide, I must not be able to think such thoughts, by your definition.

&lt;em&gt;You have two choices in America. Vote Democrat or Republican. Figure out which message is better and vote.&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve voted independent, Democrat, Republican, and Tax Payer Reform. That&#039;s 4 choices.

&lt;em&gt;Basic information? Thatâ€™s your opinion. NAACP membership numbers is not basic information and they are IRRELEVANT.&lt;/em&gt;

Not really, especially when conservatives use the membership count, which they have, to say the NAACP doesn&#039;t speak for all Blacks.

&lt;em&gt;And it really gets into my skin when someone asks irrelevant meaningless questions and I take the time to give my perspective and instead of learning from it he bashes me.&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s the problem. The questions weren&#039;t designed to get input so that I can understand you. They were designed to get you to think to question yourself.

It&#039;s called the Socratic Method. ;-)

http://www.str.org/free/studies/socratic.htm

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I answered them anyway to give you the clue that 2 things:<br />
1) NAACP is irrelevant</em></p>
<p>I never said otherwise. I&#8217;ve asked LB on this site why she bashes the NAACP since they are irrelevant.</p>
<p><em>2) Main stream media is not on Black americaâ€™s side and reporting things that you want them to</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that for awhile now.</p>
<p>But, again, just because I don&#8217;t drink Republican or conservative Kool-aide, I must not be able to think such thoughts, by your definition.</p>
<p><em>You have two choices in America. Vote Democrat or Republican. Figure out which message is better and vote.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve voted independent, Democrat, Republican, and Tax Payer Reform. That&#8217;s 4 choices.</p>
<p><em>Basic information? Thatâ€™s your opinion. NAACP membership numbers is not basic information and they are IRRELEVANT.</em></p>
<p>Not really, especially when conservatives use the membership count, which they have, to say the NAACP doesn&#8217;t speak for all Blacks.</p>
<p><em>And it really gets into my skin when someone asks irrelevant meaningless questions and I take the time to give my perspective and instead of learning from it he bashes me.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem. The questions weren&#8217;t designed to get input so that I can understand you. They were designed to get you to think to question yourself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called the Socratic Method. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.str.org/free/studies/socratic.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.str.org/free/studies/socratic.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54409</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54409</guid>
		<description>My mistake. 

You keep referring to the Tony Snow article as if it PROVED that SS was happening to the year 2000. And Tony was REFERRING to the policy that existed with Nixon decades earlier.

Reading Comprehension. I admitted my failure in being exact now please for once admit that it didn&#039;t go on till 2000 just because Tony Snow wrote and article about it in 2000. Read his words again and pinpoint exactly where Tony referred to it still going on. You can&#039;t. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake. </p>
<p>You keep referring to the Tony Snow article as if it PROVED that SS was happening to the year 2000. And Tony was REFERRING to the policy that existed with Nixon decades earlier.</p>
<p>Reading Comprehension. I admitted my failure in being exact now please for once admit that it didn&#8217;t go on till 2000 just because Tony Snow wrote and article about it in 2000. Read his words again and pinpoint exactly where Tony referred to it still going on. You can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54406</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54406</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Go back and look at your posts where you insisted it was going on up to the year 2000. Repeatedly.&lt;/em&gt;

Ahhh... NOW you have it right!
This is 2005, last year was 2004, so for you to write that I was saying TODAY, is wrong, now isn&#039;t it?

&lt;em&gt;Thanks for setting the record straight finally. Now you are admitting that you are talking about some limited policy that existed with a few Republicans decades ago and thatâ€™s what I was saying all along. Thank you.&lt;/em&gt;

You&#039;re willfully distorting what I&#039;ve written, and it&#039;s clear with your one post.

Since when is today the same as &quot;up to&quot; 2000?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Go back and look at your posts where you insisted it was going on up to the year 2000. Repeatedly.</em></p>
<p>Ahhh&#8230; NOW you have it right!<br />
This is 2005, last year was 2004, so for you to write that I was saying TODAY, is wrong, now isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p><em>Thanks for setting the record straight finally. Now you are admitting that you are talking about some limited policy that existed with a few Republicans decades ago and thatâ€™s what I was saying all along. Thank you.</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;re willfully distorting what I&#8217;ve written, and it&#8217;s clear with your one post.</p>
<p>Since when is today the same as &#8220;up to&#8221; 2000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54405</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54405</guid>
		<description>Well. I&#039;m a little bit ornery tonight. And it really gets into my skin when someone asks irrelevant meaningless questions and I take the time to give my perspective and instead of learning from it he bashes me. 

My perspective again was that the NAACP is irrelevant and the main stream media isn&#039;t someone to listen to. I should&#039;ve just written that 10 times instead of answering the questions because he&#039;s clueless about what I&#039;m trying to say. 

I&#039;ll quit now. I have to pick up my twin sister. She&#039;s flying in from VA (to CA) and I have to clean and put new sheets on the bed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I&#8217;m a little bit ornery tonight. And it really gets into my skin when someone asks irrelevant meaningless questions and I take the time to give my perspective and instead of learning from it he bashes me. </p>
<p>My perspective again was that the NAACP is irrelevant and the main stream media isn&#8217;t someone to listen to. I should&#8217;ve just written that 10 times instead of answering the questions because he&#8217;s clueless about what I&#8217;m trying to say. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll quit now. I have to pick up my twin sister. She&#8217;s flying in from VA (to CA) and I have to clean and put new sheets on the bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54403</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54403</guid>
		<description>You guys (DS and Bak) should get together over a cup of coffee and have a face-to-face conversation. You agree about a lot more than you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys (DS and Bak) should get together over a cup of coffee and have a face-to-face conversation. You agree about a lot more than you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54402</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54402</guid>
		<description>Darkstar wrote, &quot;Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some basic information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.&quot;

You challenged a conservative to answer. See if I ever answer your IRRELEVANT meaningless questions again. They don&#039;t matter. Nobody ever asked questions like you do. I answered them anyway to give you the clue that 2 things: 
1) NAACP is irrelevant
2) Main stream media is not on Black america&#039;s side and reporting things that you want them to

Yet you RAIL against conservatives.

How dumb ar you?

You have two choices in America. Vote Democrat or Republican. Figure out which message is better and vote. 

What we do here is banter around ideas and solutions but instead you act like the typical liberal and bash/accuse/mischaracterize conservatives due to YOUR lack of understanding is about our message.

Again..

Darkstar wrote, &quot;Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some &lt;strong&gt;basic&lt;/strong&gt; information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.&quot;

Basic information? That&#039;s your opinion. NAACP membership numbers is not basic information and they are IRRELEVANT. And now so is your opinion. Because you have shown the lack of ability to learn from the answers I gave to YOUR questions. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar wrote, &#8220;Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some basic information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>You challenged a conservative to answer. See if I ever answer your IRRELEVANT meaningless questions again. They don&#8217;t matter. Nobody ever asked questions like you do. I answered them anyway to give you the clue that 2 things:<br />
1) NAACP is irrelevant<br />
2) Main stream media is not on Black america&#8217;s side and reporting things that you want them to</p>
<p>Yet you RAIL against conservatives.</p>
<p>How dumb ar you?</p>
<p>You have two choices in America. Vote Democrat or Republican. Figure out which message is better and vote. </p>
<p>What we do here is banter around ideas and solutions but instead you act like the typical liberal and bash/accuse/mischaracterize conservatives due to YOUR lack of understanding is about our message.</p>
<p>Again..</p>
<p>Darkstar wrote, &#8220;Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some <strong>basic</strong> information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Basic information? That&#8217;s your opinion. NAACP membership numbers is not basic information and they are IRRELEVANT. And now so is your opinion. Because you have shown the lack of ability to learn from the answers I gave to YOUR questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54401</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54401</guid>
		<description>DS wrote, &quot;nothing about the membership levels of the NAACP&quot;. That&#039;s right. They are irrelevant. They MADE THEMSELVES irrelevant.

Darkstar changed his story finally by writing, &quot;I never wrote the Southern Stategy existed today.&quot; Go back and look at your posts where you insisted it was going on up to the year 2000. Repeatedly. Thanks for setting the record straight finally. Now you are admitting that you are talking about some limited policy that existed with a few Republicans decades ago and that&#039;s what I was saying all along. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS wrote, &#8220;nothing about the membership levels of the NAACP&#8221;. That&#8217;s right. They are irrelevant. They MADE THEMSELVES irrelevant.</p>
<p>Darkstar changed his story finally by writing, &#8220;I never wrote the Southern Stategy existed today.&#8221; Go back and look at your posts where you insisted it was going on up to the year 2000. Repeatedly. Thanks for setting the record straight finally. Now you are admitting that you are talking about some limited policy that existed with a few Republicans decades ago and that&#8217;s what I was saying all along. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54400</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54400</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You want to act like Tony was addressing it as if it existed today&lt;/em&gt;

This is why communicating with you is hard. It&#039;s because you intentionlly distort the things people have written that you disagree with.

I never wrote the Southern Stategy existed today. I&#039;ve always written that Blacks lack of support, today, is partially based on the Southern Stategy that existed.

There&#039;s a difference.

And that&#039;s not the first time I&#039;ve told you so.

You keep spreading your misinformation about what I have written.  

This is at least the 3rd time I&#039;ve pointed this out to you in detail.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You want to act like Tony was addressing it as if it existed today</em></p>
<p>This is why communicating with you is hard. It&#8217;s because you intentionlly distort the things people have written that you disagree with.</p>
<p>I never wrote the Southern Stategy existed today. I&#8217;ve always written that Blacks lack of support, today, is partially based on the Southern Stategy that existed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not the first time I&#8217;ve told you so.</p>
<p>You keep spreading your misinformation about what I have written.  </p>
<p>This is at least the 3rd time I&#8217;ve pointed this out to you in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54398</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54398</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Republicans have to do exactlly as you want them to do?&lt;/em&gt;

So, can you show me the post where I state such or thing, or are you going to continue to throw strawmen?

&lt;em&gt;Listen to the message.&lt;/em&gt;

What makes you assume I don&#039;t?
Here&#039;s some information for you so that you will stop addressing your ideas of me vs. what I have written.

I wrote this a few days ago: http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004222.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Republicans have to do exactlly as you want them to do?</em></p>
<p>So, can you show me the post where I state such or thing, or are you going to continue to throw strawmen?</p>
<p><em>Listen to the message.</em></p>
<p>What makes you assume I don&#8217;t?<br />
Here&#8217;s some information for you so that you will stop addressing your ideas of me vs. what I have written.</p>
<p>I wrote this a few days ago: <a href="http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004222.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.visioncircle.org/archive/004222.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54396</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54396</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Donâ€™t attack me for answering your questions&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s not an attack, it&#039;s a serious question. You are lambasting me for things I think and saying it&#039;s not based on facts. You are admitting that you knew nothing about the membership levels of the NAACP, but conservatives in general paint the picture as if the NAACP controls most Blacks minds.

&lt;em&gt;Maybe this should be a clue to you as I tried to make it that the main stream media is not on your side and not reporting things that YOU care about.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, maybe you missed the many times that I&#039;ve stated such.

&lt;em&gt;Is that clear now Darkstar. Now learn from the answersâ€¦.instead of obsessing.&lt;/em&gt;

Umm...
Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some basic information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.

Thanks for playing...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Donâ€™t attack me for answering your questions</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not an attack, it&#8217;s a serious question. You are lambasting me for things I think and saying it&#8217;s not based on facts. You are admitting that you knew nothing about the membership levels of the NAACP, but conservatives in general paint the picture as if the NAACP controls most Blacks minds.</p>
<p><em>Maybe this should be a clue to you as I tried to make it that the main stream media is not on your side and not reporting things that YOU care about.</em></p>
<p>Well, maybe you missed the many times that I&#8217;ve stated such.</p>
<p><em>Is that clear now Darkstar. Now learn from the answersâ€¦.instead of obsessing.</em></p>
<p>Umm&#8230;<br />
Your answers are showing that you are ignorant of some basic information, but are making conclusions based on your lack of knowledge.</p>
<p>Thanks for playing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54395</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54395</guid>
		<description>Darkstar #162, Man you are a control freak. Republicans have to do exactlly as you want them to do?

Shoot. They won&#039;t even do all what I want them to do . Where do I get my compensation. 

Listen to the message. If you don&#039;t like it as much as you like the Democrat message then dont&#039; vote for them. You can try to shape the Republican or Democrat message by informing the politicians or writing about what you think but you in your post # 162 exhibit so much controlling views. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar #162, Man you are a control freak. Republicans have to do exactlly as you want them to do?</p>
<p>Shoot. They won&#8217;t even do all what I want them to do . Where do I get my compensation. </p>
<p>Listen to the message. If you don&#8217;t like it as much as you like the Democrat message then dont&#8217; vote for them. You can try to shape the Republican or Democrat message by informing the politicians or writing about what you think but you in your post # 162 exhibit so much controlling views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54393</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54393</guid>
		<description>Darkstar wrote, &quot;Why are you relying on the MSM when you know they donâ€™t report accurately?&quot;

Boy you have things backwards. I don&#039;t. And neither should you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar wrote, &#8220;Why are you relying on the MSM when you know they donâ€™t report accurately?&#8221;</p>
<p>Boy you have things backwards. I don&#8217;t. And neither should you. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54392</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54392</guid>
		<description>Darkstar wrote, &quot;Why is your ignorance the problem of Blacks? To be more precise, why are you making comments based on your lack of research when it is stated that conservatives are â€œthinkersâ€?&quot;

Don&#039;t attack me for answering your questions. Learn from the answers. I don&#039;t have to research the membership of the NAACP to be a conservative or be a thinker or have done research on other areas like economics and the environment. Maybe this should be a clue to you as I tried to make it that the main stream media is not on your side and not reporting things that YOU care about. And still I don&#039;t care about the NAACP. 

&lt;strong&gt;The NAACP is irrelevant.&lt;/strong&gt;

Is that clear now Darkstar. Now learn from the answers....instead of obsessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar wrote, &#8220;Why is your ignorance the problem of Blacks? To be more precise, why are you making comments based on your lack of research when it is stated that conservatives are â€œthinkersâ€?&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t attack me for answering your questions. Learn from the answers. I don&#8217;t have to research the membership of the NAACP to be a conservative or be a thinker or have done research on other areas like economics and the environment. Maybe this should be a clue to you as I tried to make it that the main stream media is not on your side and not reporting things that YOU care about. And still I don&#8217;t care about the NAACP. </p>
<p><strong>The NAACP is irrelevant.</strong></p>
<p>Is that clear now Darkstar. Now learn from the answers&#8230;.instead of obsessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/comment-page-4/#comment-54389</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/07/06/thoughts/#comment-54389</guid>
		<description>Darkstar wrote, &quot;Once again, wonâ€™t address that I quoted conservative Republicans. Who is convicted?&quot;

You. You&#039;re obsessed with some strategy that I never knew about until you came along that existed decades ago that Tony Snow was addressing as existing decades ago with a few politicians.

You want to act like Tony was addressing it as if it existed today because your perspective is WHACK (because you&#039;re obsessed). :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkstar wrote, &#8220;Once again, wonâ€™t address that I quoted conservative Republicans. Who is convicted?&#8221;</p>
<p>You. You&#8217;re obsessed with some strategy that I never knew about until you came along that existed decades ago that Tony Snow was addressing as existing decades ago with a few politicians.</p>
<p>You want to act like Tony was addressing it as if it existed today because your perspective is WHACK (because you&#8217;re obsessed). <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

