Check out BoreAmerica, a blog dedicated to exposing Air America’s follies.
This Air America stuff is hysterical, although sort of sad. Liberal bloggers are calling the scandal “made up,” although Air America allegedly diverted almost half a million dollars from poor black kids in New York. (They borrowed money from a non-profit?)
The Karl-Rove-blows-CIA-agent’s-cover was a manufactured “scandal” that proved to be a whole lot of hot air (and untrue), but the media covered it incessantly. Where is MSM now that the liberal radio network has been accused of stealing money from poor black kids in New York? Don’t these liberal journalists have anything to report even in defense of their comrades?
See Michelle Malkin for lots of links.
Related posts:
- Air America Issues Statement About Money Allegedly Stolen From Poor Black Kids in New York
- Air America Allegedly Stole Money From Poor Black Kids in New York
Is MSM finally covering the alleged theft?
{ 3 trackbacks }
{ 15 comments }
Has anyone seen Gore TV yet? While I think Al Gore is a world class jerk, I think it is pretty cool when any person is able to start their own medium. Especialy TV or cable.
I actually tuned in to listen to Air America a few days ago and it was so boring that after about 15 minutes I had to shut it off….borrrrrinnnnnngggggg
The whole scanario is really confusing…The initial press release seems to imply that the non-profit is mismanaging the funds..What the sam hill is going on?
La Shawn:
Tax money should not be extracted from working Americans to provide recreation for “Poor Black Kids” any more than for “Air America”. This money belongs to taxpayers, not these two.
In a rare support of religion Air America justified taking money from poor black kids by quoting the words of Jesus. “the poor will always be with you”.
“Even though I’m a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors.” That’s from a speech on by Bush Senior, April 26, 1999.
The Rove scandal is not “fabicated”. Leaking CLASSIFIED information (whether or not Rove said her name violates Executive Order 12958. Read on:
The Novak column, however, appears to be only one of multiple leaks of Ms. Wilson’s identity. As this fact sheet documents, there appear to be at least 11 separate instances in which Administration officials disclosed information about Ms. Wilson’s identity and association with the CIA.
Under Executive Order 12958, the White House is required to investigate any reports of security breaches and take “prompt corrective action,” such as suspending the security clearances of those involved. Unlike prosecutions for criminal violations, which require “knowing” and “intentional” disclosures, the executive order covers a wider range of unauthorized breaches, including the “negligent” release of classified information. There is no evidence that the White House has complied with its obligation to investigate any of the 11 reported instances of security breaches relating to Ms. Wilson or to apply administrative sanctions to those involved.
The Disclosures of Valerie Wilson’s Identity
1. The Disclosure by Karl Rove to Columnist Robert Novak
In a column dated July 14, 2003, Robert Novak first reported that Valerie Plame Wilson was “an agency operative on weapons of mass destruction.” [1] Mr. Novak cited “two senior administration officials” as his sources. [2] According to multiple news reports, one of these two sources was Karl Rove, the Deputy White House Chief of Staff and the President’s top political advisor. [3] During a phone call on July 8, 2003, Mr. Rove confirmed for Mr. Novak that Ms. Wilson worked at the CIA. During this conversation, Mr. Novak referred to Ms. Wilson “by her maiden name, Valerie Plame,” and said he had heard she was involved in “the circumstances in which her husband … traveled to Africa.” [4] Mr. Rove responded, “I heard that, too.” [5] Mr. Novak’s name also appeared “on a White House call log as having telephoned Mr. Rove in the week before the publication of the July 2003 column.” [6]
2. The Disclosure by a “Senior Administration Official” to Columnist Robert Novak
In addition to his communications with Mr. Rove, Mr. Novak learned about Ms. Wilson’s identity through communications with a second “senior administration official.” [7] Mr. Novak’s second source has not yet been publicly identified. Mr. Novak has stated, however, that the source provided him with Ms. Wilson’s identity. As he stated: “I didn’t dig it out, it was given to me.” [8] He added: “They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it.” [9]
3. The Disclosure by Karl Rove to TIME Reporter Matt Cooper
During a phone call on July 11, 2003, Mr. Rove revealed to TIME reporter Matt Cooper that Ms. Wilson worked at the CIA on weapons of mass destruction. [10] Mr. Cooper reported that this “was the first time I had heard anything about Wilson’s wife.” [11] Mr. Rove provided this information on “deep background,” said that “things would be declassified soon,” and stated, “I’ve already said too much.” [12]
4. The Disclosure by Scooter Libby to TIME Reporter Matt Cooper
During a phone call on July 12, 2003, TIME reporter Matt Cooper asked the Vice President’s chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby “if he had heard anything about Wilson’s wife sending her husband to Niger.” [13] Mr. Libby replied, “Yeah, I’ve heard that too,” or words to that effect. [14] Mr. Libby provided this information “on background.” [15]
5. The Disclosure by an “Administration Official” to Washington Post Reporter Walter Pincus
On July 12, 2003, an “administration official” told Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus that “Wilson’s trip to Niger was set up as a boondoggle by his CIA-employed wife.” [16] Mr. Pincus has not publicly identified his source, but has stated that it “was not Libby.” [17]
6. The Disclosure by a “Top White House Official” to an Unidentified Reporter
In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other reporters about Ms. Wilson’s identity. According to the Washington Post, a “senior administration official” confirmed that “before Novak’s column ran on July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at least six Washington journalists and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson’s wife.” [18] According to this official, “Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge.” [19] Press reports suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may be NBC correspondent Andrea Mitchell. [20]
7. The Disclosure by a “Top White House Official” to an Unidentified Reporter
In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other reporters about Ms. Wilson’s identity. According to the Washington Post, a “senior administration official” confirmed that “before Novak’s column ran on July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at least six Washington journalists and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson’s wife.” [21] According to this official, “Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge.” [22] Press reports suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may be NBC Meet the Press host Tim Russert. [23]
8. The Disclosure by a “Top White House Official” to an Unidentified Reporter
In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other reporters about Ms. Wilson’s identity. According to the Washington Post, a “senior administration official” confirmed that “before Novak’s column ran on July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at least six Washington journalists and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson’s wife.” [24] According to this official, “Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge.” [25] Press reports suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may be MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews. [26]
9. The Disclosure by an Unidentified Source to Wall Street Journal Reporter David Cloud
On October 17, 2003, Wall Street Journal reporter David Cloud reported that an internal State Department memo prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel “details a meeting in early 2002 where CIA officer Valerie Plame and other intelligence officials gathered to brainstorm about how to verify reports that Iraq had sought uranium yellowcake from Niger.” [27] This “classified” document had “limited circulation,” according to “two people familiar with the memo.” [28]
10. The Disclosure by an Unidentified Source to James Guckert of Talon News
On October 28, 2003, Talon News posted on its website an interview with Ambassador Joseph Wilson in which the questioner asked: “An internal government memo prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel details a meeting in early 2002 where your wife, a member of the agency or clandestine service working on Iraqi weapons issues, suggested that you could be sent to investigate the reports. Do you dispute that?” [29] Talon News is tied to a group called GOP USA [30] and is operated by Texas Republican Robert Eberle. [31] Its only reporter, James Guckert (also known as Jeff Gannon), resigned when it was revealed that he gained access to the White House using a false name after his press credentials were rejected by House and Senate press galleries. [32] In a March 2004 interview with his own news service, Mr. Guckert stated that the classified document was “easily accessible.” [33] In a February 11, 2005, interview with Wolf Blitzer of CNN, Mr. Guckert said the FBI interviewed him about “how I knew or received a copy of a confidential CIA memo,” but he refused to answer FBI questions because of his status as a “journalist.” [34] A week later, Mr. Guckert changed his account, claiming he “was given no special information by the White House or by anybody else.” [35]
11. The Disclosure by a “Senior Administration Official” to Washington Post Reporters Mike Allen and Dana Milbank
On December 26, 2003, Washington Post reporters Mike Allen and Dana Milbank reported on details about the classified State Department memo, writing that it was authored by “a State Department official who works for its Bureau of Intelligence and Research.” [36] The Post story was attributed to “a senior administration official who has seen” the memo. [37] The Post also reported that the CIA was “angry about the circulation of a still-classified document to conservative news outlets” and that the CIA “believes that people in the administration continue to release classified information to damage the figures at the center of the controversy, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV and his wife, Valerie Plame.” [38]
Notes
[1] Robert Novak, The Mission to Niger, Chicago Sun-Times (July 14, 2003).
[2] Id.
[3] Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on CIA Officer, New York Times (July 15, 2005). See also Rove Confirmed Plame Indirectly, Lawyer Says, Washington Post (July 15, 2005).
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Rove Confirmed Plame Indirectly, Lawyer Says, Washington Post (July 15, 2005).
[7] Robert Novak, The Mission to Niger, Chicago Sun-Times (July 14, 2003).
[8] Columnist Blows CIA Agent’s Cover, Newsday (July 22, 2003).
[9] Id.
[10] Matt Cooper, What I Told the Grand Jury, TIME (July 25, 2005).
[11] Id.
[12] Id.
[13] Id.
[14] Id.
[15] Id.
[16] The When and How of Leak Being Probed, Washington Post (Nov. 26, 2004).
[17] Id.
[18] Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA Agent’s Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post (Sept. 28, 2003).
[19] Id.
[20] Secrets and Leaks, Newsweek (Oct. 13, 2003) (stating that she “heard in the White House that people were touting the Novak column and that that was the real story”).
[21] Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA Agent’s Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post (Sept. 28, 2003).
[22] Id.
[23] Reporter Held in Contempt in CIA Leak Case, Washington Post (Aug. 10, 2004) (describing a July 2003 telephone conversation between Mr. Russert and Mr. Libby).
[24] Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA Agent’s Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post (Sept. 28, 2003).
[25] Id.
[26] Secrets and Leaks, Newsweek (Oct. 13, 2003) (reportedly stating to Mr. Wilson, “I just got off the phone with Karl Rove, who said your wife was fair game”).
[27] Memo May Aid Leak Probe, Wall Street Journal (Oct. 17, 2003).
[28] Id.
[29] Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post (Dec. 26, 2003). See also Senate Intel Report Discredits Wilson’s Claims About Iraq, Niger, Talon News (July 13, 2004) (confirming that Talon reported on the memo in October 2003).
[30] Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post (Dec. 26, 2003).
[31] Democrats Want Investigation of Reporter Using Fake Name, New York Times (Feb. 11, 2005).
[32] Id.
[33] Id.
[34] Rumsfeld Visits Iraq, CNN (Feb. 11, 2005).
[35] Anderson Cooper 360, CNN (Feb. 18, 2005). See also Web Site Owner Says He Knew of Reporter’s 2 Identities, New York Times (Feb. 20, 2005) (claiming that referring to the memo as though he had it was “merely an interview technique”).
[36] Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post (Dec. 26, 2003).
[37] Id.
[38] Id.
Talk about trying to catch the wind,this story is much ado about nothing.The public could care less about those tired Democrat talking points.
Larry, would you mind giving us a link to the “fact sheet”? It would be helpful.
I’m against outing agents, too, so don’t get it twisted. The questions are: was Plame undercover; if so, who outed her?
I wasn’t covering the Rove faux controversy, but I’ll be honest: I trust conservative writers and bloggers more than any liberal journalist on this issue, so I’ll defer to them (and my post stands as is, by the way):
http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2005/07/rove_trumps_wil.html
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/3878_0_2_0_C/
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003017.htm
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002973.htm
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004980.php
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004957.php
That’s all well and good, but what’s the point?! I mean, exposing CBS news for the crooks they are was extremely necessary. But air america? Why bother? in order for people to be lied to, they’d have to be listening in the first place.
Ah, but Dan Rather and Mapes didn’t steal from children and alzheimers patients. That’s one reason we should bother. And the money AA has absconded with, was money that came from our pockets.
The most unseemly part of the Rove deal is how badly the bitter leftists want it to be true, in hopes of damaging the administration and “getting” George Bush.
How very disappointed the lefties will be if they can’t do any damage with this. After all, they have nothing positive to offer the nation, and they live solely for the purpose of hating anyone to the right of Teddy (hic) Kennedy. But I’m sure that if the Rove thing fizzles, they’ll find another stalking horse to use to go after the administration, so they will still have a reason to live.
A quick review is in order. First there were the fake Air National Guard documents about President Bush. Then there was the fake “Bush stole Ohio” story. Next was the fake “Bush is a tight-fisted meanie” story after the tsunami last December. Recently there has been the fake Koran-flushing story, the fake “US has killed 20,000 civilians in Iraq” story, the fake “Karl Rove outed a CIA agent” story, the fake “US military is killing journalists” story, and the fake Gitmo=Gulag story. Are there any other examples of “professional reporting” that I have forgotten?
La Shawn, the reason you don’t see the Air America scandel in the MSM is clear – lack of space. If you want to see a story in the MSM, make sure that it is not true.
Mwalimu,
You might be giving them ideas. Bush is a tight fisted meanie and therefore he didn’t give the federal dollars to Air America.
Perhaps I am wrong but couldn’t we leave out the black in ‘poor black children’. I understand the need to re-enforce the severity of misusing monies intended for those in need but is it necessary to use such qualifiers. We are all Americians with out labels. God bless America, God bless the childern, and God bless those that will care for and protect them from harm.
Can’t leave it out. Sorry. White liberals are always castigating conservatives about their some phantom disregard for “the poor” and preaching about what taxpayers should be doing for blacks and “the poor.”
I want to expose the irony and hypocrisy of the same liberals stealing from blacks and “the poor.”
Comments on this entry are closed.