<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nasty E-mailers and Trolls, Beware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jase Alston</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jase Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58303</guid>
		<description>You say Denzel is a Republican but is he a conservative? What&#039;s the difference?? Just kidding, you know I love you. Just haven&#039;t posted in a long time and I thought a few friendly words were long overdue. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say Denzel is a Republican but is he a conservative? What&#8217;s the difference?? Just kidding, you know I love you. Just haven&#8217;t posted in a long time and I thought a few friendly words were long overdue. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58295</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58295</guid>
		<description>I followed your link to Michelle Malkinâ€™s blog to read the email she got from the guy who she got canned. Now, Iâ€™ll be honest. Michelle is definitely hot enough to be a pin-up girl. I just canâ€™t help but notice such things. However, without regard to Mrs. Malkinâ€™s striking good looks, how off color can someone be?! I mean, good lord. To actually send such a well accomplished and thoroughly wholesome lady such a vicious, sexually profane and racist email, from work no less, one would have to be completely off their rocker and out of their mind.  However, given the present state of the American left, such over the top insanity is to be expected.

 

Furthermore, what did this guy think he was going to prove? Did he not realize just exactly who Michelle Malkin is and how much power she wields? It seems like the jerk completely underestimated the vast and overwhelming influence of the new media and one of its biggest starts. Looks like this nut job decided to trifle with the blogosphere and got burned. Way to go Michelle!!! Itâ€™s nice to see pretty women on the internet that you can be proud of! Score another one for our side.

 

As for your policy of warning trolls, La Shawn, you are obviously a more tolerant person than I. A while back, I received a number of nasty comments on Holstein Grove from the readers of Blame Bush. They had the nerve to compare me to the Nazis and suggested that I am a Klansman. They also spread their out of touch rage all across my site, leaving their hate filled, ever predictable nonsense attached to such harmless, non-political posts as a picture of a rooster and a caricature of Beyonce. I deleted every last one of their disgusting messages as soon as they posted them and firmly chastised them on my site and theirs. I still receive a number of referrals from Blame Bush, as I am listed as one of the blogs they are banned from. My sister refers to Blame Bush as the blog with â€œresident trollsâ€. She says that Blame Bush is a blog of, by and for trolls, where normal people are the unwelcome ones. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed your link to Michelle Malkinâ€™s blog to read the email she got from the guy who she got canned. Now, Iâ€™ll be honest. Michelle is definitely hot enough to be a pin-up girl. I just canâ€™t help but notice such things. However, without regard to Mrs. Malkinâ€™s striking good looks, how off color can someone be?! I mean, good lord. To actually send such a well accomplished and thoroughly wholesome lady such a vicious, sexually profane and racist email, from work no less, one would have to be completely off their rocker and out of their mind.  However, given the present state of the American left, such over the top insanity is to be expected.</p>
<p>Furthermore, what did this guy think he was going to prove? Did he not realize just exactly who Michelle Malkin is and how much power she wields? It seems like the jerk completely underestimated the vast and overwhelming influence of the new media and one of its biggest starts. Looks like this nut job decided to trifle with the blogosphere and got burned. Way to go Michelle!!! Itâ€™s nice to see pretty women on the internet that you can be proud of! Score another one for our side.</p>
<p>As for your policy of warning trolls, La Shawn, you are obviously a more tolerant person than I. A while back, I received a number of nasty comments on Holstein Grove from the readers of Blame Bush. They had the nerve to compare me to the Nazis and suggested that I am a Klansman. They also spread their out of touch rage all across my site, leaving their hate filled, ever predictable nonsense attached to such harmless, non-political posts as a picture of a rooster and a caricature of Beyonce. I deleted every last one of their disgusting messages as soon as they posted them and firmly chastised them on my site and theirs. I still receive a number of referrals from Blame Bush, as I am listed as one of the blogs they are banned from. My sister refers to Blame Bush as the blog with â€œresident trollsâ€. She says that Blame Bush is a blog of, by and for trolls, where normal people are the unwelcome ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58294</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58294</guid>
		<description>not to worry. if eric thinks he has a solution to aid the trolls harrass you he&#039;s obviously not an IT person. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to worry. if eric thinks he has a solution to aid the trolls harrass you he&#8217;s obviously not an IT person. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58291</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58291</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you think you can hide on the internet you are a fool. Even if you think getting behind a proxy server will hide you, you are wrong. It just depends on to what degree someone wants to hunt you down.&quot;

[DELETED]

&lt;em&gt;I&#039;m inclined to delete comments with information to help creeps harass me anonymously. - Admin&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you think you can hide on the internet you are a fool. Even if you think getting behind a proxy server will hide you, you are wrong. It just depends on to what degree someone wants to hunt you down.&#8221;</p>
<p>[DELETED]</p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m inclined to delete comments with information to help creeps harass me anonymously. &#8211; Admin</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58288</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58288</guid>
		<description>quote: Talk about idiots. If I was going to flame somebody it would be from a free email account and then I would switch my IP. Sheesh.endquote.

Anyone who thinks they can hide behind a free email service like Yahoo, Hotmail, Gmail, etc. is the one who is an idiot. If you think you can hide on the internet you are a fool. Even if you think getting behind a proxy server will hide you, you are wrong. It just depends on to what degree someone wants to hunt you down.

I commend your response to the flaming troll.

To you potential trolls and flamers, take heed. You CAN be caught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote: Talk about idiots. If I was going to flame somebody it would be from a free email account and then I would switch my IP. Sheesh.endquote.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks they can hide behind a free email service like Yahoo, Hotmail, Gmail, etc. is the one who is an idiot. If you think you can hide on the internet you are a fool. Even if you think getting behind a proxy server will hide you, you are wrong. It just depends on to what degree someone wants to hunt you down.</p>
<p>I commend your response to the flaming troll.</p>
<p>To you potential trolls and flamers, take heed. You CAN be caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Kjono</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Kjono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58261</guid>
		<description>I have to say that what I really liked about Ms. Malkin&#039;s approach was the public shaming aspect.  The internet has for so long been thought to be that place where no one can see you and you can assume some other persona that will never be seen by the people you know in real life that people don&#039;t really think that something they say in e-mail will be posted publicly and read by their employers, family and friends.  They do&#039;t think their actions will ever have consequences.

And I appreciate your reasons for wanting to give warnings.  Compassion is a good thing to have - whether those on the receiving end deserve it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that what I really liked about Ms. Malkin&#8217;s approach was the public shaming aspect.  The internet has for so long been thought to be that place where no one can see you and you can assume some other persona that will never be seen by the people you know in real life that people don&#8217;t really think that something they say in e-mail will be posted publicly and read by their employers, family and friends.  They do&#8217;t think their actions will ever have consequences.</p>
<p>And I appreciate your reasons for wanting to give warnings.  Compassion is a good thing to have &#8211; whether those on the receiving end deserve it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal Carne</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal Carne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58249</guid>
		<description>Regarding comments at LGF - you can comment, but Charles only opens up the registry for new commenters on occasion. I don&#039;t know if he gets swamped every time he does it, or if it&#039;s a software issue, or what. Just an FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding comments at LGF &#8211; you can comment, but Charles only opens up the registry for new commenters on occasion. I don&#8217;t know if he gets swamped every time he does it, or if it&#8217;s a software issue, or what. Just an FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idgit</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58244</link>
		<dc:creator>idgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58244</guid>
		<description>Oops...that was supposed to end like this...

I&#039;d NEVER bait a liberal. (That&#039;s a lie.)

See I really AM self-deprecating!

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;that was supposed to end like this&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d NEVER bait a liberal. (That&#8217;s a lie.)</p>
<p>See I really AM self-deprecating!</p>
<p> <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idgit</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58243</link>
		<dc:creator>idgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58243</guid>
		<description>So, Jeff-O,

&quot;Youâ€™re all gonna hate each other into the biggest mess and I wish it would stop.&quot;

Are you saying the *current* mess of liberal vs conservative, blue vs red, cats vs dogs isn&#039;t big enough? I&#039;d say we&#039;ve ALREADY gotten ourselves into the mess, big time!

Except me, of course, I&#039;d NEVER bait a liberal </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Jeff-O,</p>
<p>&#8220;Youâ€™re all gonna hate each other into the biggest mess and I wish it would stop.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you saying the *current* mess of liberal vs conservative, blue vs red, cats vs dogs isn&#8217;t big enough? I&#8217;d say we&#8217;ve ALREADY gotten ourselves into the mess, big time!</p>
<p>Except me, of course, I&#8217;d NEVER bait a liberal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff O</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58241</guid>
		<description>â€œSheesh! Why hate when you can just disagree.â€ T-Steel â€œYouâ€™ve got to love those â€˜tolerantâ€™ liberals though.â€ Jack

I&#039;m sorry but it&#039;s just amazing to me to see the generalization here - that this is something all liberals would do.  

How intellectually dishonest can you get?  How self righteous can you get?  

Check this site - www.famousidiot.com - and then come talk to me about why I shouldn&#039;t make the same generalization about the right wing. 

&quot;Rightwingers meanwhile are much more accepting of peopleâ€™s rights to express themselves. Leftwingers donâ€™t. Leftwingers seem to believe that they are entitled â€“even obligedâ€“ to take action to silence their opponents,&quot;

I&#039;m sorry but this is just self serving drivel.    Why can&#039;t I post a comment at Freep or LGF?  Regardless, both sides do this!  It&#039;s a childish ad hominem fest full of false generalizations and poor rhetoric on ALL SIDES.  

You&#039;re all gonna hate each other into the biggest mess and I wish it would stop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œSheesh! Why hate when you can just disagree.â€ T-Steel â€œYouâ€™ve got to love those â€˜tolerantâ€™ liberals though.â€ Jack</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but it&#8217;s just amazing to me to see the generalization here &#8211; that this is something all liberals would do.  </p>
<p>How intellectually dishonest can you get?  How self righteous can you get?  </p>
<p>Check this site &#8211; <a href="http://www.famousidiot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.famousidiot.com</a> &#8211; and then come talk to me about why I shouldn&#8217;t make the same generalization about the right wing. </p>
<p>&#8220;Rightwingers meanwhile are much more accepting of peopleâ€™s rights to express themselves. Leftwingers donâ€™t. Leftwingers seem to believe that they are entitled â€“even obligedâ€“ to take action to silence their opponents,&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but this is just self serving drivel.    Why can&#8217;t I post a comment at Freep or LGF?  Regardless, both sides do this!  It&#8217;s a childish ad hominem fest full of false generalizations and poor rhetoric on ALL SIDES.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re all gonna hate each other into the biggest mess and I wish it would stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis B</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58234</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58234</guid>
		<description>First a comment to Glamchild,

I think you have Dowdified that quote from the email. 

&quot;Such remarks are clearly inappropriate in any context and an e-mail such as this certainly should not have been sent during working time using our firm&#039;s equipment.&quot; 

Leaving off the first part makes it sound like they would be OK with the remark if sent from home when clearly they state it was inappropriate. The phrasing may reflect the fact that if posted from a home account, they may have no cause to fire the person.

Onward.

I think the other comments are correct. Why bother with a warning. That is up to the employer to decide.

By not reporting it right away you let these folks move from one target to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First a comment to Glamchild,</p>
<p>I think you have Dowdified that quote from the email. </p>
<p>&#8220;Such remarks are clearly inappropriate in any context and an e-mail such as this certainly should not have been sent during working time using our firm&#8217;s equipment.&#8221; </p>
<p>Leaving off the first part makes it sound like they would be OK with the remark if sent from home when clearly they state it was inappropriate. The phrasing may reflect the fact that if posted from a home account, they may have no cause to fire the person.</p>
<p>Onward.</p>
<p>I think the other comments are correct. Why bother with a warning. That is up to the employer to decide.</p>
<p>By not reporting it right away you let these folks move from one target to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaybird</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58233</link>
		<dc:creator>jaybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58233</guid>
		<description>I say warning the people is the right thing to do, depending, of course, upon the trespass.  If it&#039;s egregious, no warning.  But if it&#039;s just your standard flame, then I warn them first.  Remember folks, it&#039;s mainly leftwingers that do whatever they can to silence other people with whom they disagree and people with whom they get into political arguments.  They think it&#039;s a real coup to discover where a conservative works, or with whom they have a contractual relationship, then bludgeon their employer into getting rid of them, by foisting a boycott off on them, or by whatever other means they can. And it&#039;s not just bloggers.  Remember Dr. Laura&#039;s TV show that the gays hounded off the air?  Remember Rush Limbaugh and the Florida orange juice contract?

Rightwingers meanwhile are much more accepting of people&#039;s rights to express themselves.  Leftwingers don&#039;t.  Leftwingers seem to believe that they are entitled  --even obliged-- to take
action to silence their opponents, by whatever means they can, and to do whatever personal harm they can to them along the way.  

I choose to not stoop to their level.  So I say warn &#039;em once, and then, if they persist, lower the boom on &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say warning the people is the right thing to do, depending, of course, upon the trespass.  If it&#8217;s egregious, no warning.  But if it&#8217;s just your standard flame, then I warn them first.  Remember folks, it&#8217;s mainly leftwingers that do whatever they can to silence other people with whom they disagree and people with whom they get into political arguments.  They think it&#8217;s a real coup to discover where a conservative works, or with whom they have a contractual relationship, then bludgeon their employer into getting rid of them, by foisting a boycott off on them, or by whatever other means they can. And it&#8217;s not just bloggers.  Remember Dr. Laura&#8217;s TV show that the gays hounded off the air?  Remember Rush Limbaugh and the Florida orange juice contract?</p>
<p>Rightwingers meanwhile are much more accepting of people&#8217;s rights to express themselves.  Leftwingers don&#8217;t.  Leftwingers seem to believe that they are entitled  &#8211;even obliged&#8211; to take<br />
action to silence their opponents, by whatever means they can, and to do whatever personal harm they can to them along the way.  </p>
<p>I choose to not stoop to their level.  So I say warn &#8216;em once, and then, if they persist, lower the boom on &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58232</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58232</guid>
		<description>What does hate accomplish for these people?  What does hate accomplish for anybody?  What has it ever accomplished?  

I don&#039;t get it.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does hate accomplish for these people?  What does hate accomplish for anybody?  What has it ever accomplished?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58201</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58201</guid>
		<description>Evon - You said it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evon &#8211; You said it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evon Bachaus</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty/comment-page-1/#comment-58187</link>
		<dc:creator>Evon Bachaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/nasty-e-mailers-and-trolls-beware/#comment-58187</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sheesh! Why hate when you can just disagree.&quot; T-Steel &quot;Youâ€™ve got to love those â€˜tolerantâ€™ liberals though.&quot; Jack 
 
Ann Coulter has insight here.  Once on Fox, she said something to the effect that Liberals are so used to their ideas being taken for granted in academia, TV, the movies, the MSM and elsewhere, that they are unaccustomed to being challenged.  This is why most  high-school conservatives could debate a liberal college professor. Liberals are so poor at debating in the realm of ideas, they automatically fall back on name-calling. And they&#039;ve redefined tolerance as being dogmatically politically correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sheesh! Why hate when you can just disagree.&#8221; T-Steel &#8220;Youâ€™ve got to love those â€˜tolerantâ€™ liberals though.&#8221; Jack </p>
<p>Ann Coulter has insight here.  Once on Fox, she said something to the effect that Liberals are so used to their ideas being taken for granted in academia, TV, the movies, the MSM and elsewhere, that they are unaccustomed to being challenged.  This is why most  high-school conservatives could debate a liberal college professor. Liberals are so poor at debating in the realm of ideas, they automatically fall back on name-calling. And they&#8217;ve redefined tolerance as being dogmatically politically correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

