<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whites Now A Minority In Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58230</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58230</guid>
		<description>Inevitably these discussions are reduced to personal, insipid attacks where grown men behave like 5-year-old boys. Go play on someone else&#039;s blog.

Why don&#039;t you boys behave yourselves and visit some the blogs in this post:

http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/12/blogospheric/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inevitably these discussions are reduced to personal, insipid attacks where grown men behave like 5-year-old boys. Go play on someone else&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you boys behave yourselves and visit some the blogs in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/12/blogospheric/" rel="nofollow">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/12/blogospheric/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58228</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58228</guid>
		<description>Balava writes: Zorro writes incorrectly â€œEuropeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found.&quot;

Thatâ€™s why there is 76% more forest in the U.S. than in 1776.

This is why you liberals will continue to LOSE elections. Because you arenâ€™t interested in the facts - only interested in your self-centered emotion based arguments.&quot;

Are you an upset 12-year old??!!  Your forest comment is flayt wrong...a lie, actually...but has no relevance to the topic. Your second sentence is simply the ranting and wailing [DELETED]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balava writes: Zorro writes incorrectly â€œEuropeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s why there is 76% more forest in the U.S. than in 1776.</p>
<p>This is why you liberals will continue to LOSE elections. Because you arenâ€™t interested in the facts &#8211; only interested in your self-centered emotion based arguments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you an upset 12-year old??!!  Your forest comment is flayt wrong&#8230;a lie, actually&#8230;but has no relevance to the topic. Your second sentence is simply the ranting and wailing [DELETED]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58225</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58225</guid>
		<description>Oh my gosh, ilegals voting!  Now that really IS un-American!

Look, no one would say that NO illegals have ever voted.  But lets be serious - illegal immigrants are not very interested in voting in US elections.  By and large, they just want to work and send some money home to their families.  And you can&#039;t say that Mr Villaraigosa won because of illegal immigrants voting!  Please - he won handily and with broad support.  I am sorry if having an Hispanic mayor somehow turns your stomach, but he won fair and square, with the votes he got from legal US citizens.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my gosh, ilegals voting!  Now that really IS un-American!</p>
<p>Look, no one would say that NO illegals have ever voted.  But lets be serious &#8211; illegal immigrants are not very interested in voting in US elections.  By and large, they just want to work and send some money home to their families.  And you can&#8217;t say that Mr Villaraigosa won because of illegal immigrants voting!  Please &#8211; he won handily and with broad support.  I am sorry if having an Hispanic mayor somehow turns your stomach, but he won fair and square, with the votes he got from legal US citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58223</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58223</guid>
		<description>Zorro writes incorrectly &quot;&lt;em&gt;Europeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found. &lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s why there is 76% more forest in the U.S. than in 1776.

This is why you liberals will continue to LOSE elections. Because you aren&#039;t interested in the facts - only interested in your self-centered emotion based arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zorro writes incorrectly &#8220;<em>Europeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found. </em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why there is 76% more forest in the U.S. than in 1776.</p>
<p>This is why you liberals will continue to LOSE elections. Because you aren&#8217;t interested in the facts &#8211; only interested in your self-centered emotion based arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58224</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58224</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, where did I say anything about, &quot;...the danger of specifically â€œnon-whiteâ€ immigrants...&quot; Now some folks might have expressed that opinion, but it certainly wasn&#039;t me.  Re-read my comments on this thread, please.

I mistook you for a liberal with the &quot;pro-businees&quot; comment.  Sorry, for the mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, where did I say anything about, &#8220;&#8230;the danger of specifically â€œnon-whiteâ€ immigrants&#8230;&#8221; Now some folks might have expressed that opinion, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t me.  Re-read my comments on this thread, please.</p>
<p>I mistook you for a liberal with the &#8220;pro-businees&#8221; comment.  Sorry, for the mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58222</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58222</guid>
		<description>US history in a nutshell:

Europeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found. The French and then the british follow, continuing the holocaust.

The Europeans divvy up the new land: Spanish to the south, everybody else to the north. Now the Spanish move north.

The occupation will be soft and bloodless. Everyone will play soccer on Sunday, have beautiful gardens, care more for family than foreign imperialistic adventures, and there will be elotes-carts on every street corner. 

Â¡VIVA TEJAS!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US history in a nutshell:</p>
<p>Europeans (mostly Spanish) settle North, South and Central America, destroying the civilizations they found. The French and then the british follow, continuing the holocaust.</p>
<p>The Europeans divvy up the new land: Spanish to the south, everybody else to the north. Now the Spanish move north.</p>
<p>The occupation will be soft and bloodless. Everyone will play soccer on Sunday, have beautiful gardens, care more for family than foreign imperialistic adventures, and there will be elotes-carts on every street corner. </p>
<p>Â¡VIVA TEJAS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58219</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58219</guid>
		<description>Aaron wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;city under Spain and Mexico a heck of a lot longer than it has been under the US flag&lt;/em&gt;

You sound like you belong to La Raza (translation-&quot;The Race&quot;). What you wrote is irrelevant because it is a city in America now. America has the right to make sure that everyone who is here came here legally for all of the reasons I posted above. To resort to name calling doesn&#039;t further your debate. To not recognize the facts of the impact doesn&#039;t further your debate. To post the sentence you posted above really damages your debate and will do more to convert newbie political types to conservativism than liberalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron wrote, &#8220;<em>city under Spain and Mexico a heck of a lot longer than it has been under the US flag</em></p>
<p>You sound like you belong to La Raza (translation-&#8221;The Race&#8221;). What you wrote is irrelevant because it is a city in America now. America has the right to make sure that everyone who is here came here legally for all of the reasons I posted above. To resort to name calling doesn&#8217;t further your debate. To not recognize the facts of the impact doesn&#8217;t further your debate. To post the sentence you posted above really damages your debate and will do more to convert newbie political types to conservativism than liberalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58218</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58218</guid>
		<description>#124.  Non-sequitur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#124.  Non-sequitur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58217</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58217</guid>
		<description>Raymond - 
And about LA - my point was that LA has been a city under Spain and Mexico a heck of a lot longer than it has been under the US flag - I dispute your attempts to claim it as purely American.  There is no valid reason why an Hispanic shouldn&#039;t be mayor of a city that has this kind of diverse history.  And it doesn&#039;t mean that &quot;their brand of culture&quot; (as you call it) is taking over just because a Latino was elected mayor.   

btw, I am well aware of the differences between the terms Mexican, Hispanic, and Latino.  Instead of distracting us with your knowledge of racial/ethnic terms, why don&#039;t you get back to debating the issue at hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond &#8211;<br />
And about LA &#8211; my point was that LA has been a city under Spain and Mexico a heck of a lot longer than it has been under the US flag &#8211; I dispute your attempts to claim it as purely American.  There is no valid reason why an Hispanic shouldn&#8217;t be mayor of a city that has this kind of diverse history.  And it doesn&#8217;t mean that &#8220;their brand of culture&#8221; (as you call it) is taking over just because a Latino was elected mayor.   </p>
<p>btw, I am well aware of the differences between the terms Mexican, Hispanic, and Latino.  Instead of distracting us with your knowledge of racial/ethnic terms, why don&#8217;t you get back to debating the issue at hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58215</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58215</guid>
		<description>#121.  Sounds like and is are not equal.  did you go to a public school by any chance?  And these reason I told you I had melanin in my skin is to reign in your own myopic view of the world of races.

You implied I was white and I checked you.  Seeing your attitude, you are going to get checked a lot in this house podna. 

&quot;...imply that Hispanics lower educational standards, and are drug dealers, criminals, and welfare bums who are somehow taking over the US because they elected an Hispanic mayor...&quot;

I wasn&#039;t implying.  I was stating cold, hard fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#121.  Sounds like and is are not equal.  did you go to a public school by any chance?  And these reason I told you I had melanin in my skin is to reign in your own myopic view of the world of races.</p>
<p>You implied I was white and I checked you.  Seeing your attitude, you are going to get checked a lot in this house podna. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;imply that Hispanics lower educational standards, and are drug dealers, criminals, and welfare bums who are somehow taking over the US because they elected an Hispanic mayor&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t implying.  I was stating cold, hard fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58214</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58214</guid>
		<description>Independent, let&#039;s not get too side-tracked here.  My statement about pro-business GOP was meant to indicate that the GOP is prone to rank business interests higher than the public interest.  Yes, I know, they are often the same thing, but as in this case, not always.  However, I do agree that the dems are washed-up, but not because they are anti-business.  Just for the record, I&#039;m definitely not anti-business, either.

I also agree with you that neither party will do anything.  I take it for granted that the democrats won&#039;t do anything.  They&#039;re afraid that taking any action against illegal immigration will get them labeled as racists.  Certainly, statements like yours about the danger of specifically &quot;non-white&quot; immigrants helps create the appearance that opposition to immigration is tantamount to racism.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary or correct to focus on skin color here, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any difference between how these immigrants act as compared to prior waves of white immigrants.

You&#039;re right about the Latino vote.  Both parties want to court them, although the GOP is new to that game.  Unfortunately, this will only snowball as more illegal Latinos make it here.  However, as successive generations assimilate and view themselves as American, I would expect more of them to take similar positions on illegal immigration.  I&#039;ll admit this is just a guess and a hope, but I think it&#039;s quite reasonable.  After all, that&#039;s what happened to the Irish and Italians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent, let&#8217;s not get too side-tracked here.  My statement about pro-business GOP was meant to indicate that the GOP is prone to rank business interests higher than the public interest.  Yes, I know, they are often the same thing, but as in this case, not always.  However, I do agree that the dems are washed-up, but not because they are anti-business.  Just for the record, I&#8217;m definitely not anti-business, either.</p>
<p>I also agree with you that neither party will do anything.  I take it for granted that the democrats won&#8217;t do anything.  They&#8217;re afraid that taking any action against illegal immigration will get them labeled as racists.  Certainly, statements like yours about the danger of specifically &#8220;non-white&#8221; immigrants helps create the appearance that opposition to immigration is tantamount to racism.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessary or correct to focus on skin color here, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any difference between how these immigrants act as compared to prior waves of white immigrants.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the Latino vote.  Both parties want to court them, although the GOP is new to that game.  Unfortunately, this will only snowball as more illegal Latinos make it here.  However, as successive generations assimilate and view themselves as American, I would expect more of them to take similar positions on illegal immigration.  I&#8217;ll admit this is just a guess and a hope, but I think it&#8217;s quite reasonable.  After all, that&#8217;s what happened to the Irish and Italians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58213</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58213</guid>
		<description>Aaron wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;No, no one should ever resort to unwarranted, knee-jerk accusations of racism. But then again, no one should ever shy away from calling it like it is.&lt;/em&gt;

So you&#039;re saying you know what&#039;s in our minds and that we&#039;re racists. We&#039;re saying that we know what&#039;s in our minds and we&#039;re not. So you continue the unproductive debate tactic because you think you know what&#039;s in our minds. Cool. You lost.

Aaron wrote to Raymond, &quot;&lt;em&gt;Illegals canâ€™t even vote, you nimrod. &lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Looking beyond the name calling of racist and nimrod, you show your incorrectness again by asserting your knowledge that illegal aliens can&#039;t vote. Almost every government service office in CA (which doesn&#039;t only give services to citizens) has Voter forms and you only need an address (no proof of citizenship) and some other information. When you go to the polls in CA you are not asked for an ID. There are areas in LA that get more votes than # of citizens living in the area. How is that possible. It&#039;s hard when you are challenged Aaron. I know. I used to be a liberal also. Everything you are hearing is contrary to what you are used to hearing on the mainstream press...

Aaron wrote incorrectly again, &quot;&lt;em&gt;2) the NET economic impact of illegal immigration - when you weigh all of the costs and benefits - is negligible. &lt;/em&gt;

Illegal Immigration has the following impacts:
1) National Security - Top priority
2) Financial - you claim is negligible but you fail to see the informatio on the web sites that La Shawn gave you - 10 billion is spent just in CA giving services to people who shouldn&#039;t even be here (not here legally)
3) Environmental - I&#039;m appealing to your liberal views by challenging you to look at the environmental impact of some of the subpar communities (areas the size of many acres) where the environment is not kept up. Not to mention the impact to the border area where trash, backpacks, excrement, erosion and what not is going on.
4) Health - There are many doctors who&#039;ve written about the concerns regarding the spread of tuberculosis and how it&#039;s coming in from illegal immigrants and it was a disease that was once whooped here in America. It would seem that anyone would be concerned not just about Tuberculosis but any viruses coming in from people that aren&#039;t coming legally (therefore we can&#039;t track them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron wrote, &#8220;<em>No, no one should ever resort to unwarranted, knee-jerk accusations of racism. But then again, no one should ever shy away from calling it like it is.</em></p>
<p>So you&#8217;re saying you know what&#8217;s in our minds and that we&#8217;re racists. We&#8217;re saying that we know what&#8217;s in our minds and we&#8217;re not. So you continue the unproductive debate tactic because you think you know what&#8217;s in our minds. Cool. You lost.</p>
<p>Aaron wrote to Raymond, &#8220;<em>Illegals canâ€™t even vote, you nimrod. </em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Looking beyond the name calling of racist and nimrod, you show your incorrectness again by asserting your knowledge that illegal aliens can&#8217;t vote. Almost every government service office in CA (which doesn&#8217;t only give services to citizens) has Voter forms and you only need an address (no proof of citizenship) and some other information. When you go to the polls in CA you are not asked for an ID. There are areas in LA that get more votes than # of citizens living in the area. How is that possible. It&#8217;s hard when you are challenged Aaron. I know. I used to be a liberal also. Everything you are hearing is contrary to what you are used to hearing on the mainstream press&#8230;</p>
<p>Aaron wrote incorrectly again, &#8220;<em>2) the NET economic impact of illegal immigration &#8211; when you weigh all of the costs and benefits &#8211; is negligible. </em></p>
<p>Illegal Immigration has the following impacts:<br />
1) National Security &#8211; Top priority<br />
2) Financial &#8211; you claim is negligible but you fail to see the informatio on the web sites that La Shawn gave you &#8211; 10 billion is spent just in CA giving services to people who shouldn&#8217;t even be here (not here legally)<br />
3) Environmental &#8211; I&#8217;m appealing to your liberal views by challenging you to look at the environmental impact of some of the subpar communities (areas the size of many acres) where the environment is not kept up. Not to mention the impact to the border area where trash, backpacks, excrement, erosion and what not is going on.<br />
4) Health &#8211; There are many doctors who&#8217;ve written about the concerns regarding the spread of tuberculosis and how it&#8217;s coming in from illegal immigrants and it was a disease that was once whooped here in America. It would seem that anyone would be concerned not just about Tuberculosis but any viruses coming in from people that aren&#8217;t coming legally (therefore we can&#8217;t track them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58211</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58211</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on being black, Raymond.  Does that somehow make you immune from having racist attitudes towards Latinos?

I find it hilarious that you get uptight about being called a &quot;nimrod&quot;, but find it perfectly acceptable to imply that Hispanics lower educational standards, and are drug dealers, criminals, and welfare bums who are somehow taking over the US because they elected an Hispanic mayor.  You know, that sounds awfully like the kind of things racist whites said about blacks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on being black, Raymond.  Does that somehow make you immune from having racist attitudes towards Latinos?</p>
<p>I find it hilarious that you get uptight about being called a &#8220;nimrod&#8221;, but find it perfectly acceptable to imply that Hispanics lower educational standards, and are drug dealers, criminals, and welfare bums who are somehow taking over the US because they elected an Hispanic mayor.  You know, that sounds awfully like the kind of things racist whites said about blacks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58209</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58209</guid>
		<description>First of all Aaron, I am not a &quot;nimrod&quot; and if you wish to keep posting here you will conduct yourself accordingly (sorry LaShawn, I just could not resist.  LOL!!)

Now, what Spain and the Spanish have to do with the Mexican Indian class invading this nation, I don&#039;t know.  What they have to do with this topic is also unclear.  Hispanic DOES NOT equal Latino DOES NOT equal Mexican.

by the way Aaron.  I am BLACK!

As for Mexican illegals not being able to vote in LA?  I&#039;d like to order up one super-sized reality check for Aaron.  I guess you also missed Villarigosa&#039;s quote where he said &quot;Mexican national policy will have a roll in my government and decison making process.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all Aaron, I am not a &#8220;nimrod&#8221; and if you wish to keep posting here you will conduct yourself accordingly (sorry LaShawn, I just could not resist.  LOL!!)</p>
<p>Now, what Spain and the Spanish have to do with the Mexican Indian class invading this nation, I don&#8217;t know.  What they have to do with this topic is also unclear.  Hispanic DOES NOT equal Latino DOES NOT equal Mexican.</p>
<p>by the way Aaron.  I am BLACK!</p>
<p>As for Mexican illegals not being able to vote in LA?  I&#8217;d like to order up one super-sized reality check for Aaron.  I guess you also missed Villarigosa&#8217;s quote where he said &#8220;Mexican national policy will have a roll in my government and decison making process.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/comment-page-3/#comment-58207</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/08/11/whites/#comment-58207</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, while I&#039;ll agree that fining businesses or even imprisoning business owners that hire illegals is one very important step in getting the situation under control, there are many other steps that could be taken.  Several people upthread have already mentioned my thoughts.  

You said, &quot;But try to do this and watch the pro-business GOP show a very immigration-friendly side.&quot;  First of all, if Rebublicans are the &quot;pro-business camp, does that make Democrats the anti-business camp?  Just asking?  If that is the case, then Democrats are in worse trouble than I thought.  Americans like money, Hmmm.  Democrats can&#039;t argue that illegals are coming here for that all encompassing American dream and then turn around a spit on those that have the initiative and tenacity to fufill that dream.  If Democrats are anti-business, then they are anti-American and their days are numbered.  Any party with a philosophy that boils down to, &quot;we&#039;ll support you when your weak and dependent, but villify you when you become productive and succesful&quot; will not be allowed into power in America.  Frankly, I don&#039;t think the Republicans or the Democrats will activly do anything about the immigration problem because of that all important latino vote.  That is where both parties fail miserably.  Leaders should not court demographics, but should stand and fight for those policies that make the whole of America stronger.  Republicans have done a better job of making people feel like they are looking out for the good of the nation, but it&#039;s a slim margin of differnece in my opinion. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, while I&#8217;ll agree that fining businesses or even imprisoning business owners that hire illegals is one very important step in getting the situation under control, there are many other steps that could be taken.  Several people upthread have already mentioned my thoughts.  </p>
<p>You said, &#8220;But try to do this and watch the pro-business GOP show a very immigration-friendly side.&#8221;  First of all, if Rebublicans are the &#8220;pro-business camp, does that make Democrats the anti-business camp?  Just asking?  If that is the case, then Democrats are in worse trouble than I thought.  Americans like money, Hmmm.  Democrats can&#8217;t argue that illegals are coming here for that all encompassing American dream and then turn around a spit on those that have the initiative and tenacity to fufill that dream.  If Democrats are anti-business, then they are anti-American and their days are numbered.  Any party with a philosophy that boils down to, &#8220;we&#8217;ll support you when your weak and dependent, but villify you when you become productive and succesful&#8221; will not be allowed into power in America.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t think the Republicans or the Democrats will activly do anything about the immigration problem because of that all important latino vote.  That is where both parties fail miserably.  Leaders should not court demographics, but should stand and fight for those policies that make the whole of America stronger.  Republicans have done a better job of making people feel like they are looking out for the good of the nation, but it&#8217;s a slim margin of differnece in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
