I find political blogs to be oh so boring, but I don’t go around telling them that. I just don’t go there. And if you don’t know about Manolo the Shoe Blogger that’s ok. He’s hysterical, an original smart voice, and has been written up in Forbes, etc, for making in the 6 figures by blogging. He’d be the last person to promote himself, and yet he is quite famous. Don’t they call that backwards thinking?

Bloggers tend to tell it like it is, Donna. Other bloggers called the panel weak and worse. Part of why people read this blog is because I give honest assessments. Thanks for visiting! – Admin

You are confusing what journalists do with what they are supposed to do – unbiased reporting, and some discussion also unbiased.

Blogging is too new and diffuse to even have a real definition.

Warren Olney of To the Point http://www.moretothepoint.com/
comes close to this.

Locals on NPR say they just don’t know what side he takes – which is the way it is supposed to know.

This is from MS Bookshelf 2000: #3 approaches the ideal. Blogging was not in the dictionary.

jour·nal·ism

jour·nal·ism (jûr?n?-liz´?m) noun

1. The collecting, writing, editing, and presentation of news or news articles in newspapers and magazines and in radio and television broadcasts.
2. Material written for publication in a newspaper or magazine or for broadcast.
3. The style of writing characteristic of material in newspapers and magazines, consisting of direct presentation of facts or occurrences with little attempt at analysis or interpretation.
4. Newspapers and magazines.
5. An academic course training students in journalism.
6. Written material of current interest or wide popular appeal.

I’ve been pretty underwater for the last few months and I didn’t even hear about the big ‘Open Source Media’ launch that happened in my city yesterday until just the day before. I called the organizer on the day of…

TK

It’s official: Pajamas Media, now wisely under the name Open Source Media (TMV doesn’t even OWN pajamas) has been launched.

In case you’ve been on Mars, this is a new infoventure that seeks to take a group of bloggers and offer some of the…

I arrived late to yesterday’s Open Source Media launch, so I missed Jeff Goldstein’s keynote address (although Roger L. Simon filled me in). But I had a wonderful time yesterday. I have no idea what to expect from Open Source…

One thing the Bush Administration clearly has been very good at is focusing the attention of the press (and by extension the American people) on issues that they want to highlight. This has had the effect of advancing the Bush agenda, but has had the added effect of deflecting focus away from things that the Administration does not want to highlight. One of those issues is clearly the rampant, runaway spending of your tax dollars by Bush and the Republican majority congress. At this point there can be no doubt that, as they try to focus your attention on issues like stem cells and Supreme Court nominations, Bush and the Republican Congress are spending us all into a hole from which it will take us, our children and our grandchildren years to recover.

You don’t need to take my word for this, nor the words of any democrat or Bush-hater. You need only to read what conservatives like George Will are saying, or the people at conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute. The Cato Institute recently completed a report on the spending habits of all US presidents during the last 40 years. If you’re interested in reading the report I’ve included a link at the end of this post.

If you want to continue to believe that Bush and Congressional Republicans are “on your side” or if you care only about saving stem cells and banning gay marriage perhaps you should read no further. But if you’re interested in the truth and are concerned about your financial well-being and that of your children, perhaps you should read on. Here’s some of what the Cato Institute report had to say about presidential spending over the last 40 years:

All presidents presided over net increases in spending. As it turns out George W. Bush is one of the biggest spenders of them all. In fact he is an even bigger spender than Lyndon B. Johnson in terms of discretionary spending.

The increase in discretionary spending in Bush’s first term was 48.5% in nominal terms. That’s more than twice as large as the increase in discretionary spending during Clinton’s entire 2 terms (21.6%) and higher than Lyndon B. Johnson’s entire discretionary spending spree (48.3%).

Adjusting the budget trends for inflation Bush looks even worse; his spending rate is much higher then Lyndon Johnson’s. In other words, Bush expanded federal non-entitlement programs in his first term almost twice as fast each year as Lyndon Johnson did during his entire presidency.

George W. Bush is the biggest spending president of the last 40 years in both the defense and discretionary spending categories by a long shot. He beats Johnson by almost 4% in defense spending growth and more than 3% in domestic discretionary spending growth.

And conservative columnist George Will points out that in his column today that federal spending has grown twice as fast under President Bush and congressional Republicans as under President Clinton. And with respect to the argument that this profligacy is related to 9/11 and homeland security, Will and the conservative think tanks have noted that over 65 percent of the spending increase is unrelated to national security.
Will further reports that Congressional Republicans (who achieved their majority by promising fiscal discipline) have presided over an orgy of pork spending with your tax dollars the likes of which have never been seen before. In 1991, the 546 pork projects in the 13 appropriation bills cost $3.1 billion. In 2005, the 13,997 pork projects cost $27.3 billion.

You may support Bush and the congressional Republicans because of some vague promise of “progress” on social issues with which you and the Republicans agree. In that case perhaps you are entitled to refer to yourself as a “social conservative.” But nobody who calls themselves a fiscal conservative could support Bush and the Republican Congress who are spending your tax dollars in an orgy of profligacy the likes of which has not been experienced in our lifetimes. You can continue to deny yourself this truth, but be assured that true conservatives know the truth. Bush and the Republican Congress are asking you to mortgage their futures and the futures of their children and grandchildren in exchange for soft “promises” on social issues. You are justifying the fiscal rape of your children and grandchildren perpetrated by your “moral” leaders in exchange for a vague promise of gains on social issues. Do yourself and your kids a favor; look them in the eye and explain to them why you have chosen to saddle them with these financial burdens, explain to them your reasoning. Then look in the mirror and explain to yourself how you can continue to support the people who you know in your heart are screwing you and to your kids. Is that morality? Is that conservatism?

Read the whole Cato article here:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0510-26.pdf

Read the Will column here:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/will/cst-edt-geo17.html

The thing bloggers most like to blog about is blogging itself, especially the hypothesis that blogging will one day transform the global media—if it already hasn’t. Thus, it’s not surprising that yesterday’s launch of Open So…

It’s hard to miss everyone talking about “Open Source Media”. LaShawn Barber is near-live blogging the event. Then Jeff over at The Shape of Days posted an objection to OSM, Buzzword foul with extra penalties for vapidness. I was going to keep quiet…

Some buzz on the PJ Media launch. (They can call it whatever they want; it will always be PJ Media to me.) Pamela has more breathless reportage and more pix. James Wolcott continues to fantasize bitterly about Pamela.The Rainbow Room…

This series is dedicated to the proposition that Blogging is a prime example of the saying Variety is the Spice of Life. Let’s get to the good stuff! I know I said the next edition was gonna be on Turkey