Comments on: Condi vs. Hillary?

By: dianne

dianne — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:26:56 +0000

Zogby is apparently thinking that Condi has a shot at it. I just filled out a poll and there were several would you vote for Condi questions..Condi vs. Hillary, etc.

By: DarkStar

DarkStar — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:48:16 +0000

I think it’s Dick Morris still finding ways to milk money from the Clinton haters.

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:39:31 +0000

She is not very “Pro-Choice” at all when you consider her actual stated position on the issue. She is for “States Rights”. See my first post above.

By: Paul Totten

Paul Totten — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:37:59 +0000

I was very enthusiastic about Dr. Rice until her pro-choice views on abortion became known. Her pro-Palestinian posture and support for the Israeli Gaza pullout more strikes against her, in my view.

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:54:55 +0000

Mr. Hamilton, I’ve been waiting for the scenario you mentioned to unfold and I hope it does. If she becomes VP during Bush’s term I could better advocate her running for President.

Mr. Slater, one President handing the flag to another is as old as our Republic. George Washington fully endorsed his VP John Adams and it has continued since. Bill Clinton and Al Gore were not the best of friends, so it did not occur in that case, but it is a normal occurrence and nothing that borders on monarchy.

By: Mark Slater

Mark Slater — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:06:15 +0000

Mr. Hamilton: I do not want anyone, and particularly President Bush in particular, to “hand the flag” off to anyone; as in, it is not up to him to hand-select a successor. To imply such comes very close to a monarchy, and the next to last thing I want is a dynasty of squishy new-right “conservatives” like the one we have been subject to for the last 5 3/4 years.

By: Dan Hamilton

Dan Hamilton — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:39:32 +0000

After the midterm elections Cheney will have more heart trouble and anounce that he has to resign. The Dems will be overjoyed. The MSM will exalt. The moonbat left will *&%$# themselves with joy.

The Bush will anounce that the will apoint Condi as VP with a heavy hand over at State. And a hush will fall over the Dems, the MSM, and the Moonbats will rejoice because they KNOW that Bush has just alienated his base and most of the Republicans.

Condi will then enter 08 as the sitting VP and be FIRMLY backed by Bush. The rest all back in the “now who are they again” pack will try and break out but I don’t think they will make it.

Who else could take the Flag from Bush and continue the fight?? Who amoung the “now who are they again” pack could come close. Bush will want someone HE TRUSTS to succeed him. You really think he will leave it upto the “now who are they again” pack?

By: Frank Zavisca

Frank Zavisca — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:19:06 +0000

Dick Morris is quite cute about Condi, but his selling books and TV interviews is no doubt more important to him than who is President.

But Hillary’s “pro military” stance is amusing – as I have heard she used US Marines to serve snacks to digintaries at the White House.

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:36:36 +0000

Condoleezza Rice’s position on Affirmative Action. Conservatives need not worry.

Some Conservatives feel that “if” Condoleezza Rice ran for President, her views on Affirmative Action might be an issue. Allow me to explain why you have no need to worry about her values on this issue.

By: Kaz-Man

Kaz-Man — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:21:01 +0000

I would vote for Condi, but I don’t think she is going to run. She still has a lot of work to do to straighten out Foggy Bottom. Plus, she has never done the political campaign before.
Hillary is a disaster. She is not going to survive her own primary. She’s too right-wing (which is hysterical) for her party.
The ticket that will win is Allen/Rice. This way she keeps it up being Sec. of State for a while, offsetting Senator Allen’s inexperience on the world stage.

By: Becker

Becker — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:39:30 +0000

I would vote for Condi in a heartbeat. I would also vote for a Guillani/Condi ticket. Personally, I see that one as 16 more years of an R White House.

FWIW, hell will freeze over and crack significantly before I vote for McCain.

With respect to the commenter who noted that Condi, being a minority (and a black one at that) and a woman, would shatter exactly zero preconceptions. The R’s will still be party that hates blacks and minorities and wants women “in their place”. It won’t take five minutes until the NYT outs her as a non-black, non-woman.

By: Smithy

Smithy — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:09:08 +0000

Cobra :“Can you name me the candidate who had the second highest vote total in the history of this country?”

Ummm …..you loony left moonbats are very welcome to get the second highest votes in any elections, dude.

That is perfectly OK by me.

We the Republicans, will continue to take the highest number of votes and the highest number of delegates, and the White House with it as well.

Your preference for finishing second might explain why the RATS Party has only won the presidency just 3 times in the past 40 years, and the RATS are on track to lose yet again come 2008, thanks to “Screaming Lord” Dean, Hanoi John Kerry and the total surrender of the RATS leadership to the bottom feeders from DU/Kos/moveon.

By: Cobra

Cobra — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:25:52 +0000

Smithy writes:

>>>”Listen, the left wing moonbats voted against President Bush too, and he still won with more votes than any president in the history of this country.”

Can you name me the candidate who had the second highest vote total in the history of this country?

–Cobra

By: Smithy

Smithy — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:44:06 +0000

# 25,cobra :“I wouldnâ€™t vote for her, or any other neo-con who ever runs for office again.”

But I am sure you would eagerly vote for the stark ,raving, loony left crazies represented by Howard “I hate Republicans” Dean, and Hanoi John “American troops in Iraq are terrorists” Kerry, no?

Listen, the left wing moonbats voted against President Bush too, and he still won with more votes than any president in the history of this country.

I am quite sure Condi can easily win without the votes of the mad men from Kos/DU/moveon.

By: Smithy

Smithy — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:35:27 +0000

# 19, Jewels :” think the bigger concern is this: would republicans vote for a pro-choice, pro-affirmative action person?

The answer is â€œNo.â€

Nonsense.

You are asking the wrong question.
The right question is, will Republicans vote for best, most qualified candidate, who is best positioned to effectively govern this country at a time when its under attack from Islamofacist scum, and deal ruthlessly with the terrorist abomination that is sworn to destroy this country?
The answer is a resounding YES!!

For proof, go the Thanksgiving poll conducted by Hugh Hewitt, which was given wide publicity on most of the top conservative blogs.
Condi totally destroyed the field of potential Republican candidates for 2008, when her name was included in the list.

I am not quite sure where you got your “Republicans won’t vote for Condi” from.
Umm….do you have any polls to support that ridiculous contention at all?

As for your “pro-affirmative action” charge, it simply doesn’t hold any water.
I am yet to see Condi come out in support of ANY pro-affirmative action fight since she joined the Bush administration.

If you have such a proof, please be good enough to show it to us, will ya?