<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Righteous Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sonya</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-67066</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-67066</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this posting.  It really hit home - especially considering how often I call myself &#039;getting mad at God&#039; for not getting what I want.  Every now and then it actually occurs to me how big a sinner I have been (am) and I feel truly grateful to God and bless His Name for where He has me right now.  But, more often than not, I&#039;m always considering not what I have, but I feel I ought to have.  Sad, sad and more sad, but true.  Thanks for getting my head back in focus....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this posting.  It really hit home &#8211; especially considering how often I call myself &#8216;getting mad at God&#8217; for not getting what I want.  Every now and then it actually occurs to me how big a sinner I have been (am) and I feel truly grateful to God and bless His Name for where He has me right now.  But, more often than not, I&#8217;m always considering not what I have, but I feel I ought to have.  Sad, sad and more sad, but true.  Thanks for getting my head back in focus&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymusrex</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-67030</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymusrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-67030</guid>
		<description>&quot;What were Cainâ€™s motives for offering a lesser sacrifice? Greed, perhaps. He wanted to keep the best for himself.&quot;

Perhaps greed was not the motive Cain had in mind when he presented his offering to God. I suspect only God and Cain know ultimately why his offering was rejected. I often wondered why Cain&#039;s sacrifice was less favorable- certainly it was not because he had so many mouths to feed. If indeed it was the quality of the offering that God needed (and did not receive), I suppose Cain should have given Him the best.  Judaic and Islamic interpretations of this story differ from the simplified explanations that I grew up hearing in sunday school. Personally, I&#039;m still unconvinced about the motives for God&#039;s rejection of Cain&#039;s offer, and why it was necessary for Cain to slay his brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What were Cainâ€™s motives for offering a lesser sacrifice? Greed, perhaps. He wanted to keep the best for himself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps greed was not the motive Cain had in mind when he presented his offering to God. I suspect only God and Cain know ultimately why his offering was rejected. I often wondered why Cain&#8217;s sacrifice was less favorable- certainly it was not because he had so many mouths to feed. If indeed it was the quality of the offering that God needed (and did not receive), I suppose Cain should have given Him the best.  Judaic and Islamic interpretations of this story differ from the simplified explanations that I grew up hearing in sunday school. Personally, I&#8217;m still unconvinced about the motives for God&#8217;s rejection of Cain&#8217;s offer, and why it was necessary for Cain to slay his brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-67005</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-67005</guid>
		<description>A Rabbi Lerner was at my university the other day, talking about faith and politics.  He actually mentions this passage in some of his writings.

It&#039;s what you would expect of uber-liberal Christianity:  psychiatric, spiritually empty, vague and watered down.  But what struck me is that when looking at this verse, he sees the source of mankinds suffering as being God&#039;s sin.  You see, we are all misunderstood children, just trying to do our best before God.  Cain was no different, and yet that mean ol&#039; God rejected Cain&#039;s sacrifice, which was a sin for God.  So Cain goes and kills his brother . . . what could you expect of him?  He was hurting inside, trying to deal with the loneliness and rejection, blah blah blah.

It&#039;s the worst kind of justifying I have ever seen.  Making our sins God&#039;s fault.  If I hadn&#039;t read it, I wouldn&#039;t have believed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Rabbi Lerner was at my university the other day, talking about faith and politics.  He actually mentions this passage in some of his writings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s what you would expect of uber-liberal Christianity:  psychiatric, spiritually empty, vague and watered down.  But what struck me is that when looking at this verse, he sees the source of mankinds suffering as being God&#8217;s sin.  You see, we are all misunderstood children, just trying to do our best before God.  Cain was no different, and yet that mean ol&#8217; God rejected Cain&#8217;s sacrifice, which was a sin for God.  So Cain goes and kills his brother . . . what could you expect of him?  He was hurting inside, trying to deal with the loneliness and rejection, blah blah blah.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the worst kind of justifying I have ever seen.  Making our sins God&#8217;s fault.  If I hadn&#8217;t read it, I wouldn&#8217;t have believed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Moore</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66898</guid>
		<description>Giving starts with tithing.  Those who practice tithing know they cannot afford not to tithe.  Those who do not cannot understand how anyone could be so foolish with their money.  Do not know how to bridge that understanding (or lack of it).  Suggest that giving starts after tithing has already been met.  

Tried Calvinist Gadfly.  Read about justification.  Feel those who believe we are saved by works are both right and wrong.  Those who believe we are saved by faith are both right and wrong.

We are told that we must have works.  Works are actions that show what we really believe.  A real question is if we can truly have faith if we have not works.  We are not saved by those works, for we are only saved by faith in Christ. But the way it is posed tells us that we have not faith if we have not works.  We are told to put our money where our mouth is.  Professing faith is easy, the Lord expects more than that.  As usual he gives us the benefit of the doubt.

I am only aware of three places in scripture that mention where Christ cleaned the temple.  These seem to indicate two different occasions, one near the beginning of his teaching and the other near the very end.  In John 2:13 to 16 at the start of his mission to teach us the good news we read that &quot;when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple,&quot;.  If he was in the midst of anger would he have stopped to braid together a &quot;scourge&quot;?  He comes across to me as a very careful individual who carefully thought out the ramifications of what he was saying and doing.

When presented with a woman taken in the very act, he stooped down and wrote in the dust.  I believe he carefully considered his actions at length before answering those who were trying to trap him.

An instance also sometimes claimed as an act of anger is that of the fig tree that he caused to wither.  A close reading does not show any anger then either.  He set us an example, and anger does not seem to be a part of that example.

As usual I both enjoyed the presentation of an idea by La Shawn and the comments brought out by those who have commented on it.

Bless you all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving starts with tithing.  Those who practice tithing know they cannot afford not to tithe.  Those who do not cannot understand how anyone could be so foolish with their money.  Do not know how to bridge that understanding (or lack of it).  Suggest that giving starts after tithing has already been met.  </p>
<p>Tried Calvinist Gadfly.  Read about justification.  Feel those who believe we are saved by works are both right and wrong.  Those who believe we are saved by faith are both right and wrong.</p>
<p>We are told that we must have works.  Works are actions that show what we really believe.  A real question is if we can truly have faith if we have not works.  We are not saved by those works, for we are only saved by faith in Christ. But the way it is posed tells us that we have not faith if we have not works.  We are told to put our money where our mouth is.  Professing faith is easy, the Lord expects more than that.  As usual he gives us the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>I am only aware of three places in scripture that mention where Christ cleaned the temple.  These seem to indicate two different occasions, one near the beginning of his teaching and the other near the very end.  In John 2:13 to 16 at the start of his mission to teach us the good news we read that &#8220;when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple,&#8221;.  If he was in the midst of anger would he have stopped to braid together a &#8220;scourge&#8221;?  He comes across to me as a very careful individual who carefully thought out the ramifications of what he was saying and doing.</p>
<p>When presented with a woman taken in the very act, he stooped down and wrote in the dust.  I believe he carefully considered his actions at length before answering those who were trying to trap him.</p>
<p>An instance also sometimes claimed as an act of anger is that of the fig tree that he caused to wither.  A close reading does not show any anger then either.  He set us an example, and anger does not seem to be a part of that example.</p>
<p>As usual I both enjoyed the presentation of an idea by La Shawn and the comments brought out by those who have commented on it.</p>
<p>Bless you all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66893</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66893</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Why? Because giving to God what you think you canâ€™t afford demonstrates faith that he will provide.&gt;&gt;

Maybe...but I think it also goes to &quot;thou shalt not have strange gods before Me&quot;.  We always think of &quot;strange gods&quot; as being Baal and the Golden Calf, but really, it&#039;s _anything_ we make more important than God.  If you have a spouse/sweetheart who &quot;can&#039;t&quot; come to a special dinner because s/he has to work late, don&#039;t you wonder who comes first?  Sometimes it&#039;s just life that gets in the way, but if something else _always_ gets in the way, you have to wonder.  Talk is cheap, actions speak louder than words.  Cain valued something more than God...Able didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Why? Because giving to God what you think you canâ€™t afford demonstrates faith that he will provide.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Maybe&#8230;but I think it also goes to &#8220;thou shalt not have strange gods before Me&#8221;.  We always think of &#8220;strange gods&#8221; as being Baal and the Golden Calf, but really, it&#8217;s _anything_ we make more important than God.  If you have a spouse/sweetheart who &#8220;can&#8217;t&#8221; come to a special dinner because s/he has to work late, don&#8217;t you wonder who comes first?  Sometimes it&#8217;s just life that gets in the way, but if something else _always_ gets in the way, you have to wonder.  Talk is cheap, actions speak louder than words.  Cain valued something more than God&#8230;Able didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted  Wegener</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66892</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted  Wegener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66892</guid>
		<description>James 1:20 

&quot;for the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God&quot;

With all due respect Lashawn, Anger is almost always a sin. 

There is such a thing as righteous indignation but it is rare. Very rare. 

Usually when I tell Christians that, they respond by saying Christ got angry when he threw the money changers out of the temple. But if you look at the  Scripture closely it doesnt say he was angry. Only that he threw the money changers out of the temple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James 1:20 </p>
<p>&#8220;for the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God&#8221;</p>
<p>With all due respect Lashawn, Anger is almost always a sin. </p>
<p>There is such a thing as righteous indignation but it is rare. Very rare. </p>
<p>Usually when I tell Christians that, they respond by saying Christ got angry when he threw the money changers out of the temple. But if you look at the  Scripture closely it doesnt say he was angry. Only that he threw the money changers out of the temple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie Calhoun</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66879</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Calhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 06:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66879</guid>
		<description>That was a great and refreshing post La Shawn. And I, too am eternally grateful that God doesn&#039;t give us what we really deserve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a great and refreshing post La Shawn. And I, too am eternally grateful that God doesn&#8217;t give us what we really deserve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond B</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66878</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66878</guid>
		<description>Am I my brothers keeper is one of the biggest slapback statements I have ever heard quoted from the bible. The passage itself brings up a wide range of discussion.
Ryamond B
www.voteswagon.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I my brothers keeper is one of the biggest slapback statements I have ever heard quoted from the bible. The passage itself brings up a wide range of discussion.<br />
Ryamond B<br />
<a href="http://www.voteswagon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voteswagon.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66877</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66877</guid>
		<description>Nice work; I&#039;ve never really thought of giving in the light of Cain and Abel, but you&#039;re right on.  Thanks for the wake-up call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work; I&#8217;ve never really thought of giving in the light of Cain and Abel, but you&#8217;re right on.  Thanks for the wake-up call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66876</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66876</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to BibleGateway.com.  Great resource that I had not been aware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to BibleGateway.com.  Great resource that I had not been aware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66875</link>
		<dc:creator>TM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66875</guid>
		<description>Are you telling me that the first murderer was a Vegan, and the first murder victim was a meat eater?  My goodness, this changes quite a lot.  I had always thought that the Vegan / Liberals were the peaceful types and the meat eaters / Conservatives were the violent ones.  I guess I am certainly going to have to watch my back when ever I am around those vegetarians.
&lt;b&gt;
That is it!  I have got a new dating rule.  When ever I am dating a woman, and she suggests going to a vegetarian restaurant, I will reply with &quot;WHY, ARE YOU PLANNING ON MURDERING ME!!!!&quot;  Hmmmm, actually, I have one planned for tonight.  It will be interesting to see how it goes with my new and improved dating rules.
&lt;/b&gt;
Please don&#039;t think that I am making fun of your post.  I enjoyed it quite a bit and found it to be very inspirational.  It was only after I finished reading and appreciating it, that the above bit of harmless whimsy sprang to mind.

Very respectfully,

TM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you telling me that the first murderer was a Vegan, and the first murder victim was a meat eater?  My goodness, this changes quite a lot.  I had always thought that the Vegan / Liberals were the peaceful types and the meat eaters / Conservatives were the violent ones.  I guess I am certainly going to have to watch my back when ever I am around those vegetarians.<br />
<b><br />
That is it!  I have got a new dating rule.  When ever I am dating a woman, and she suggests going to a vegetarian restaurant, I will reply with &#8220;WHY, ARE YOU PLANNING ON MURDERING ME!!!!&#8221;  Hmmmm, actually, I have one planned for tonight.  It will be interesting to see how it goes with my new and improved dating rules.<br />
</b><br />
Please don&#8217;t think that I am making fun of your post.  I enjoyed it quite a bit and found it to be very inspirational.  It was only after I finished reading and appreciating it, that the above bit of harmless whimsy sprang to mind.</p>
<p>Very respectfully,</p>
<p>TM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewels</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66874</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. I also like the fact that God didn&#039;t &quot;smite&quot; the dude into oblivian after he killed his brother. Although his actions did have consequences, God was merciful and marked him so that no one would kill him.

Cool beans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. I also like the fact that God didn&#8217;t &#8220;smite&#8221; the dude into oblivian after he killed his brother. Although his actions did have consequences, God was merciful and marked him so that no one would kill him.</p>
<p>Cool beans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Zavisca</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/03/05/1861/comment-page-1/#comment-66873</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Zavisca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1861#comment-66873</guid>
		<description>La Shawn:



Thanks for the comments on Cain and Abel.

This reminds me somewhat of a recurrent theme in life - some of the worst atrocities are committed by those close to people - often their own family - because people trust them, and are therefore vulnerable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn:</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments on Cain and Abel.</p>
<p>This reminds me somewhat of a recurrent theme in life &#8211; some of the worst atrocities are committed by those close to people &#8211; often their own family &#8211; because people trust them, and are therefore vulnerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
