Well LaShawn:
I am glad that you have touched on this issue, and I did too. Stacy and Suzie started a blogburst for open trackbacks and posting on this topic. They have a list of links to the sites, AND how you can contact Blogger, Congress and other agencies to stop this madness. What many of these moonbat sickos fail to see is that harming children is NOT nor will ever be a Constitutionally protected right. Here is a link to Suzie’s article; she and Stacy coordinated this. This is an evil and vile topic but necessary to expose these sickos. Thanks for doing so as well.

I kid you not….

Hateful condemnation is a poor basis for Scripture interpretation. Don’t let it cause you to read into the words what isn’t there.

If Google continues to do nothing, will people that run ads with Google accept working with a company involved in this? I mean on both the advertiser and publisher side.

Will other people using Google’s blog service continue to feel comfortable using it?

Will all of us who go “Googling” continue to feel comfortable using their services?

When are we going to put our foot down? I mean if we really don’t like this and we take no action other than to give complaints while feeding Google’s bottom line when we have a choice, what does this all amount to?

It means we ARE doing a good job and it gives us a source to track em down with…

I LOVE that part…

I agree with you but again, the laws are setup to accept this sooner or later…

I was using one of Stacy’s answers to Dayside… which was “because a majority of people are against it” … her words not mine

Christ said it’s better to tie a millstone around someone’s neck and throw him into the sea, than to allow him to hurt a child.

That is quite different from condemning him to hellfire for eternity. Even the Old West preachers told the men about to be hanged, “May God have mercy on your soul.” They understood it was the Christian’s duty to preach and participate in salvation, not condemnation.

When you send someone else to hell, you are taking your own eyes off of Heaven. Thus you endanger your own salvation.

Once saved, always saved, so my salvation is secure. I have no power to “send” anyone to hell or heaven, but I get your point. – Admin

This has nothing to do with opinion, with moral subjectivity, or with some sort of unjust societal taboo. It has to do with the open advocacy of the molestation of children – an act that is both a Federal and state crime throughout the US.

ISPs routinely shut down sites that advocate for the murder of innocents via Islamic terrorism, and Google is more than willing to self-censor when it comes to expanding its reach into the Chinese economy. There’s no injustice in holding them to account for their hypocrisy in this matter.

If our only argument is because “most people” think or believe a certain way, this too will be a battle America will lose. The reason this battle is already on a down turn…look at its cousin, the law that allows young girls to get abortions without parental notification. A young girl can have sex with an older man, an adult, get pregnant and the law will protect this illegal relationship. The law is already accepting homosexual relationships (not as far as marriage but they may as well). The precedence (sp?) is being set with our own laws and Constitution. If a young girl can “choose” what to do with her body… why can’t a young boy?? (No I don’t agree with this the point is our laws have opened the door for this and its only a matter of time. It doesn’t matter that the young boy or girl is coerced or taken advantage of, they can make their own choices without parental involvement).