<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalist Says Lacrosse Women &#8216;Ignorant&#8217; for Supporting Accused Lacrosse Players</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70398</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70398</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Duke Case Update&lt;/strong&gt;

La Shawn is still blogging this one closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Duke Case Update</strong></p>
<p>La Shawn is still blogging this one closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa M.</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70318</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70318</guid>
		<description>The interview with the driver that delivered to the accuser to the party
 http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/443932.html

really points out how helpful to the defense those cell phone records might be:if the accuser&#039;s employer called her more than once to tell her that the booking would be cancelled if she didn&#039;t get over there right away, it seems reasonable to assume that a) she was late for the engagement (and surely by now the defense has had the stripper&#039;s employer disclose the time she was supposed to arrive?) b)the records will help pinpoint the earliest time she could have been at the house, since her employer would not be calling her to tell her to hurry if she had already arrived.  

Sad that the defense is having to beg for these records....sadder still that all of the evidence they were given does not include the 
very items that would give the accuser some credibility - a toxicology that showed a date rape drug (did she refuse one because she knew it was more likely to reveal things she  willingly took that night?); a COMPLETE rape exam that included something more substantial than the universally logged &quot;consistent with rape&quot; (what else are they going to put on ANY rape exam? Read the instructions...medical staff are SUPPOSED to assume 100% credibility if you walk in and say rape - they are not the jury, just the medics); cell phone records- if they showed a substantially earlier arrival time than has been publicized.  The fact that these critical things are missing or incomplete in the discovery materials strongly suggests that the prosecutor could not include them because they prove that he has no case.  The question is how soon did he realize this and to what lengths did he go to to ensure that he could keep this case in the limelight?  Having no evidence to convince, and each day turning up more that points to the players&#039; innocence,  did he simply hope to suspend our disbelief via innuendo and righteous insistence while he carefully crafted a discovery file that seems tailor-made for the grand jury proceeding rather than a detailed investigative report of the events and processes?  Maybe the Durham police do not mind the fact that the discovery materials make them look like they are sloppy and unprofessional when it comes to investigation and documentation.  Either they are in his pocket, or Nifong doesn&#039;t mind making his own police department look incompetent if it furthers his agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interview with the driver that delivered to the accuser to the party<br />
 <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/443932.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/443932.html</a></p>
<p>really points out how helpful to the defense those cell phone records might be:if the accuser&#8217;s employer called her more than once to tell her that the booking would be cancelled if she didn&#8217;t get over there right away, it seems reasonable to assume that a) she was late for the engagement (and surely by now the defense has had the stripper&#8217;s employer disclose the time she was supposed to arrive?) b)the records will help pinpoint the earliest time she could have been at the house, since her employer would not be calling her to tell her to hurry if she had already arrived.  </p>
<p>Sad that the defense is having to beg for these records&#8230;.sadder still that all of the evidence they were given does not include the<br />
very items that would give the accuser some credibility &#8211; a toxicology that showed a date rape drug (did she refuse one because she knew it was more likely to reveal things she  willingly took that night?); a COMPLETE rape exam that included something more substantial than the universally logged &#8220;consistent with rape&#8221; (what else are they going to put on ANY rape exam? Read the instructions&#8230;medical staff are SUPPOSED to assume 100% credibility if you walk in and say rape &#8211; they are not the jury, just the medics); cell phone records- if they showed a substantially earlier arrival time than has been publicized.  The fact that these critical things are missing or incomplete in the discovery materials strongly suggests that the prosecutor could not include them because they prove that he has no case.  The question is how soon did he realize this and to what lengths did he go to to ensure that he could keep this case in the limelight?  Having no evidence to convince, and each day turning up more that points to the players&#8217; innocence,  did he simply hope to suspend our disbelief via innuendo and righteous insistence while he carefully crafted a discovery file that seems tailor-made for the grand jury proceeding rather than a detailed investigative report of the events and processes?  Maybe the Durham police do not mind the fact that the discovery materials make them look like they are sloppy and unprofessional when it comes to investigation and documentation.  Either they are in his pocket, or Nifong doesn&#8217;t mind making his own police department look incompetent if it furthers his agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNK</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70316</link>
		<dc:creator>UNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70316</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was reading today that the police were going to have her involuntarily committed. It was upon learning this that she gave the rape story.

Donâ€™t know if this is true or not, I just read it.&quot;

Bill, there is a link from one of the local newspapers to PDF files of the police report that says this.  I think one of the above links in this post or the previous post has the information.  Otherwise there is Google News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was reading today that the police were going to have her involuntarily committed. It was upon learning this that she gave the rape story.</p>
<p>Donâ€™t know if this is true or not, I just read it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill, there is a link from one of the local newspapers to PDF files of the police report that says this.  I think one of the above links in this post or the previous post has the information.  Otherwise there is Google News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNK</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70315</link>
		<dc:creator>UNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70315</guid>
		<description>Ricland writes:

&quot;All Iâ€™m trying to do is get at the real reason black folk support people they know are guilty or not guilty.

We knew OJ was guilty as hell.

We know the Lacrosse stripper is lying through her teeth.

So why do we support these people? &quot;

While anyone can make a typo, why are black people &quot;they&quot; then &quot;we&quot; and if you are not black, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to say &quot;we&quot; support OJ and the Stripper even when &quot;we&quot; know they are guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricland writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;All Iâ€™m trying to do is get at the real reason black folk support people they know are guilty or not guilty.</p>
<p>We knew OJ was guilty as hell.</p>
<p>We know the Lacrosse stripper is lying through her teeth.</p>
<p>So why do we support these people? &#8221;</p>
<p>While anyone can make a typo, why are black people &#8220;they&#8221; then &#8220;we&#8221; and if you are not black, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to say &#8220;we&#8221; support OJ and the Stripper even when &#8220;we&#8221; know they are guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNK</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70314</link>
		<dc:creator>UNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70314</guid>
		<description>Ricland,

You should read the sites that you recommend before recommending them.

Even a biased site admits that most people like you formed their opinions the sensational  headlines and not the facts:

&quot;You ain&#039;t chicken, are yuh, Bo?&quot; another youth taunted him.

Bobo had to fire or fall back. He entered the store, alone, stopped at the candy case. Carolyn was behind the counter; Bobo in front. He asked for two cents&#039; worth of bubble gum. She handed it to him. He squeezed her hand and said: &quot;How about a date, baby?&quot;

She jerked away and started for Juanita Milam. At the break between counters, Bobo jumped in front of her, perhaps caught her at the waist, and said: &quot;You needn&#039;t be afraid o&#039; me, Baby. I been with white girls before.&quot;

At this point, a cousin ran in, grabbed Bobo and began pulling him out of the store. Carolyn now ran, not for Juanita, but out the front, and got the pistol from the Milam car.

Outside, with Bobo being ushered off by his cousins, and with Carolyn getting the gun, Bobo executed the &quot;wolf whistle&quot; which gave the case its name:

THE WOLF-WHISTLE MURDER: A NEGRO &quot;CHILD&quot; OR &quot;BOY&quot; WHISTLED AT HER AND THEY KILLED HIM.

That was the sum of the facts on which most newspaper readers based an opinion

The Negroes drove away; and Carolyn, shaken, told Juanita. The two women determined to keep the incident from their &quot;Men-folks.&quot; They didn&#039;t tell J. W. Milam when he came to escort them home.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/sfeature/sf_look_confession.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricland,</p>
<p>You should read the sites that you recommend before recommending them.</p>
<p>Even a biased site admits that most people like you formed their opinions the sensational  headlines and not the facts:</p>
<p>&#8220;You ain&#8217;t chicken, are yuh, Bo?&#8221; another youth taunted him.</p>
<p>Bobo had to fire or fall back. He entered the store, alone, stopped at the candy case. Carolyn was behind the counter; Bobo in front. He asked for two cents&#8217; worth of bubble gum. She handed it to him. He squeezed her hand and said: &#8220;How about a date, baby?&#8221;</p>
<p>She jerked away and started for Juanita Milam. At the break between counters, Bobo jumped in front of her, perhaps caught her at the waist, and said: &#8220;You needn&#8217;t be afraid o&#8217; me, Baby. I been with white girls before.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this point, a cousin ran in, grabbed Bobo and began pulling him out of the store. Carolyn now ran, not for Juanita, but out the front, and got the pistol from the Milam car.</p>
<p>Outside, with Bobo being ushered off by his cousins, and with Carolyn getting the gun, Bobo executed the &#8220;wolf whistle&#8221; which gave the case its name:</p>
<p>THE WOLF-WHISTLE MURDER: A NEGRO &#8220;CHILD&#8221; OR &#8220;BOY&#8221; WHISTLED AT HER AND THEY KILLED HIM.</p>
<p>That was the sum of the facts on which most newspaper readers based an opinion</p>
<p>The Negroes drove away; and Carolyn, shaken, told Juanita. The two women determined to keep the incident from their &#8220;Men-folks.&#8221; They didn&#8217;t tell J. W. Milam when he came to escort them home.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/sfeature/sf_look_confession.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/sfeature/sf_look_confession.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaterCon</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70312</link>
		<dc:creator>TaterCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70312</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tatercon,
Had que at Watfords in bishopsville,sc today on the way back from beach,.....&quot; Kemp

South Carolina &#039;cue?  Was it the mustardy stuff?
Or is it just Maurice (now there&#039;s a restauranteur with a race baitin&#039; history from the old white school ...) that serves up the mustardy stuff around Columbia?

Give me my eastern NC style any day....

Tat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tatercon,<br />
Had que at Watfords in bishopsville,sc today on the way back from beach,&#8230;..&#8221; Kemp</p>
<p>South Carolina &#8216;cue?  Was it the mustardy stuff?<br />
Or is it just Maurice (now there&#8217;s a restauranteur with a race baitin&#8217; history from the old white school &#8230;) that serves up the mustardy stuff around Columbia?</p>
<p>Give me my eastern NC style any day&#8230;.</p>
<p>Tat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70310</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70310</guid>
		<description>If this accuser files a civil suit (do I even need to say &#039;if&#039;?), are there any legal grounds for the defendants filing charges against her for blackmail?

Why not, counter-sue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this accuser files a civil suit (do I even need to say &#8216;if&#8217;?), are there any legal grounds for the defendants filing charges against her for blackmail?</p>
<p>Why not, counter-sue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70309</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70309</guid>
		<description>I am just curious, what would happen if a young man from the party now came forward claiming the the accuser had, in fact, attacked, beaten and brutally raped him? (yes, women can rape men)

Would she be arrested on 400k bail?  No evidence you say?  Who needs evidence?  Change your story 10 times?  Who cares?  Criminal past with history of substance abuse?  That&#039;s cool.  Arrest her now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just curious, what would happen if a young man from the party now came forward claiming the the accuser had, in fact, attacked, beaten and brutally raped him? (yes, women can rape men)</p>
<p>Would she be arrested on 400k bail?  No evidence you say?  Who needs evidence?  Change your story 10 times?  Who cares?  Criminal past with history of substance abuse?  That&#8217;s cool.  Arrest her now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70308</guid>
		<description>Considering the accuser could 

1. NOT describe any of her attackers without looking at Lacrosse team pictures, 
2. and then when she did look at them she didn&#039;t identify Evans, 
3. then 3 weeks later said she was 90% sure if he had a mustache, which he has never had, 
4. and that only &#039;inconclusive&#039; DNA evidence existed on one of her fingernails (which Evans himself picked up and handed to the cops), 

it is truly remarkable to me that Evans was indicted (on 400k bail no less) when another rapist who resisted arrest and fought with police was given only $150k bail.

So basically, this young man has been indicted with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER!

Just really beyond belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the accuser could </p>
<p>1. NOT describe any of her attackers without looking at Lacrosse team pictures,<br />
2. and then when she did look at them she didn&#8217;t identify Evans,<br />
3. then 3 weeks later said she was 90% sure if he had a mustache, which he has never had,<br />
4. and that only &#8216;inconclusive&#8217; DNA evidence existed on one of her fingernails (which Evans himself picked up and handed to the cops), </p>
<p>it is truly remarkable to me that Evans was indicted (on 400k bail no less) when another rapist who resisted arrest and fought with police was given only $150k bail.</p>
<p>So basically, this young man has been indicted with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER!</p>
<p>Just really beyond belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70307</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70307</guid>
		<description>So, Delwyn, you haven&#039;t read any of the 11 or so posts I&#039;ve written about this case since April and haven&#039;t followed any of the news stories I took the time to link to in the posts? You haven&#039;t followed the case at all? Don&#039;t know about the stripper&#039;s previous record from 2002 stemming from a drunken car chase and trying to run over a cop? I and many others believe she made up the rape story to deflect attention from being drunk that night and other criminal-related reasons. Possible parole violation? Who knows. I and others believe she has serious problems and/or fantasies about gang rape because 10 years ago she made gang-rape accusations against...you guessed it. Three men.

I REALLY like when people comment on my blog, but it&#039;s very irritating when they don&#039;t follow the threads or the story, then ask me to answer questions I&#039;ve answered before. There is no &quot;us&quot; to give information to because regular readers read the posts and follow the links and know exactly why I write what I do.

I created a Duke Rape Case category to make it easier for new or infrequent readers to keep up. If you read each post, you&#039;ll learn more than you ever wanted to know about this case and my opinion of it:

http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/category/duke-rape-case/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Delwyn, you haven&#8217;t read any of the 11 or so posts I&#8217;ve written about this case since April and haven&#8217;t followed any of the news stories I took the time to link to in the posts? You haven&#8217;t followed the case at all? Don&#8217;t know about the stripper&#8217;s previous record from 2002 stemming from a drunken car chase and trying to run over a cop? I and many others believe she made up the rape story to deflect attention from being drunk that night and other criminal-related reasons. Possible parole violation? Who knows. I and others believe she has serious problems and/or fantasies about gang rape because 10 years ago she made gang-rape accusations against&#8230;you guessed it. Three men.</p>
<p>I REALLY like when people comment on my blog, but it&#8217;s very irritating when they don&#8217;t follow the threads or the story, then ask me to answer questions I&#8217;ve answered before. There is no &#8220;us&#8221; to give information to because regular readers read the posts and follow the links and know exactly why I write what I do.</p>
<p>I created a Duke Rape Case category to make it easier for new or infrequent readers to keep up. If you read each post, you&#8217;ll learn more than you ever wanted to know about this case and my opinion of it:</p>
<p><a href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/category/duke-rape-case/" rel="nofollow">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/category/duke-rape-case/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70306</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70306</guid>
		<description>I was reading today that the police were going to have her involuntarily committed.  It was upon learning this that she gave the rape story.

Don&#039;t know if this is true or not, I just read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading today that the police were going to have her involuntarily committed.  It was upon learning this that she gave the rape story.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if this is true or not, I just read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delwyn Campbell</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70305</link>
		<dc:creator>Delwyn Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70305</guid>
		<description>Ms.Barber said that the the accuser made the accusation to cover herself...from what?  That is the question that I have been asking for sometime now; what was her motive for making this accusation? I am hopeful that Ms. Barber can give us that information, since she made the statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms.Barber said that the the accuser made the accusation to cover herself&#8230;from what?  That is the question that I have been asking for sometime now; what was her motive for making this accusation? I am hopeful that Ms. Barber can give us that information, since she made the statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricland</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70304</link>
		<dc:creator>ricland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70304</guid>
		<description>All I&#039;m trying to do is get at the real reason black folk support people they know are guilty or not guilty.

We knew OJ was guilty as hell.

We know the Lacrosse stripper is lying through her teeth.

So why do we support these people? 

Saying only ignorant blacks is no more helpful than saying only ignorant whites were lynchers. 

Look, you can&#039;t enslave a people -- treat them like animals -- for 200 years and then one day say, &quot;Ok, you&#039;re free. Let&#039;s shake hands and make like none of that happened,&quot; and expect folk to shake your hand.

ricland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;m trying to do is get at the real reason black folk support people they know are guilty or not guilty.</p>
<p>We knew OJ was guilty as hell.</p>
<p>We know the Lacrosse stripper is lying through her teeth.</p>
<p>So why do we support these people? </p>
<p>Saying only ignorant blacks is no more helpful than saying only ignorant whites were lynchers. </p>
<p>Look, you can&#8217;t enslave a people &#8212; treat them like animals &#8212; for 200 years and then one day say, &#8220;Ok, you&#8217;re free. Let&#8217;s shake hands and make like none of that happened,&#8221; and expect folk to shake your hand.</p>
<p>ricland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kemperman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70303</link>
		<dc:creator>kemperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70303</guid>
		<description>Tatercon, 
Had que at Watfords in bishopsville,sc today on the way back from beach, no beer there either, but you do get &quot;hash&quot; in sc.  Ricland is diffentantly &quot;Mike&quot;, but he is pretending now to be black, instead of gay.  I think he&#039;ll move the traffic up, so Lashawn don&#039;t ban him yet.  Wait a while and we call it a lynching! Kemp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tatercon,<br />
Had que at Watfords in bishopsville,sc today on the way back from beach, no beer there either, but you do get &#8220;hash&#8221; in sc.  Ricland is diffentantly &#8220;Mike&#8221;, but he is pretending now to be black, instead of gay.  I think he&#8217;ll move the traffic up, so Lashawn don&#8217;t ban him yet.  Wait a while and we call it a lynching! Kemp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seahawk</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/05/29/lacrosse-women-ignorant/comment-page-2/#comment-70302</link>
		<dc:creator>Seahawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=1983#comment-70302</guid>
		<description>&quot;Blacks seek to lynch the Duke Lacrosse players because doing so affirms the notion the our women are just as human as white women.&quot;

No, it affirms the notion that racists--white and black--usually harbor the silly notion that everybody is obsessed with the other color&#039;s womenfolk.

&quot;Sacrificing the Duke Lacrosse players will do this. It will let white America know â€” using white Americaâ€™s own bloody techniques! â€” that weâ€™re just as human as they&quot;

Or, that blacks can turn out to be just as nuts about race as whites. 

We already had the ultimate sacrifice for sin; we don&#039;t need another one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blacks seek to lynch the Duke Lacrosse players because doing so affirms the notion the our women are just as human as white women.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it affirms the notion that racists&#8211;white and black&#8211;usually harbor the silly notion that everybody is obsessed with the other color&#8217;s womenfolk.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sacrificing the Duke Lacrosse players will do this. It will let white America know â€” using white Americaâ€™s own bloody techniques! â€” that weâ€™re just as human as they&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, that blacks can turn out to be just as nuts about race as whites. </p>
<p>We already had the ultimate sacrifice for sin; we don&#8217;t need another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

