Update (1:44 p.m.): Durham Investigator Linwood Wilson criticized the defense for asserting that the accuser’s story was inconsistent, and he asked for proof. In response, Joseph Cheshire, Dave Evans’s attorney, sent Wilson a letter (PDF) with the proof attached.
Now that Nifong has muzzled himself, he’d be wise to muzzle his people, too.
I don’t have time today to look for others blogging about the case, so if you are, let me know. See Robert KC Johnson’s latest post, Turning on Nifong.
Independent Conservative: “536 Pages. 5 Rapists. 4 Dancers. No Toxicology Report. No Payoff From Defense and No Plea Deal Requested.”
Commenter Beth Taylor writes:
LaShawn - You probably need to be careful! You’re going to end up getting called as an expert witness in this case for one side or the other…
“Ms. Barber, On March 26th did Attorney Nifong say that this is an act of rape made with racial epithets?â€
“No. He did not. He said that on March 27th.â€
Thanks for the Friday afternoon laugh, Beth.
Rest easy, everybody. See you Monday.
———————————————————————————————————
Scottsboro Boys
Click over to Townhall.com and read my column, Scottsboro Revisited, which discusses a few similarities between the “Scottsboro Boys” case from 1931 and the Duke case. A wonderful site called Famous Trials was one of the sources.
Lessons from the New York Times
[Update @ 10:22 a.m.: The misspelled name has been corrected, but this section contains good advice for writers and would-be writers, including my enemies. I wouldn't wish a published typo on anyone.
... And the term "radioed ahead" is anachronistic, but hey, whatever.]
As one whose name is often misspelled, I should know better. But, alas, things happen. For the record, the researcher’s name is Douglas O. Linder, not David, as I wrote in the column. (Sorry, Douglas!) A correction is pending. Knowing how tense I get about typos, you’d think I’d have learned to be extremely careful about proofreading. But I can be as careless as the next person. Strangely enough, though, whoever edited the piece didn’t catch that but removed several commas. If you notice places where there should be a comma, there probably was one in my version.
The reason I’m so hard on myself is that it’s good practice to be hard on myself. I anticipate bigger things in my career, and the vultures will be circling, waiting for a fall. A small typo is a small typo, but one day, if I’m not careful, I’ll commit an egregious error…perhaps even a career-ending one.
Dramatic, yes, but who wants to be like the New York Times, with its typically long Corrections page? Fortunately, Townhall is online, so corrections can be made fairly quickly, or sometime today. Blogging is different, of course. You have the tools to correct typos in seconds.
Advice: Always, without exception, proofread your work very carefully. Triple-check facts. Do this even if you’re submitting an article to a publication with the world’s best fact-checkers and copy editors. Assume that you are the final editor. Your nerves will thank you.
Hauntings
If you followed the Duke case early on, you may remember some of Mike Nifong’s pre-media moratorium statements. LBC reader Nancy Kidder fact-checked his recent e-mail (PDF) to Newsweek and compiled and sent a list of contradictory statements. First, the relevant portion of the e-mail. Nifong wrote:
[click to continue…]