From the monthly archives:

June 2006

Collin Finnerty*** Scroll down for updates ***

The bond for Collin Finnerty, dangerous “rapist,” has been reduced from $400,000 to $100,000, according to The News & Observer.

In other news, Durham County Commissioner Lewis Cheek, another Democrat, has obtained enough signatures to challenge DA Mike Nifong on the November ballot.

Reade Seligmann’s attorney, Kirk Osborn, filled two motions last week:

1) Second Motion For Specific Discovery (PDF): The defense requests access to the accuser’s computer, Durham Access Center records, Duke University Hospital records, and other information. See this op-ed for background.

2) Motion For Bill Of Particulars (PDF): Reade Seligmann offers a “complete alibi” to the charges. According to the motion, the defense carefully reviewed Nifong’s discovery and claims it consists “mainly of extraneous, irrelevant material.” (Hence, the term “document dump.”) According to the discovery, no crime occurred, claims defense.

[click to continue…]

{ 76 comments }

confederate flagThursday, July 13: This post is old news. Read the latest.

Tuesday, July 5: A belated “Happy Independence Day” to all the left-leaning (and sometimes vulgar) bloggers linking to this wonderfully controversial post! From the bottom of my heart, I thank you for all the links, which have caused this blog to rise in the TTLB Ecosystem (#22 out of 50,000+ registered blogs ain’t bad!).

And the traffic meter is looking good, too. I’m touched. Really. If this post has your knickers in a wad, you should read some of my earlier stuff (est. November 2003). Grab a feed, sign up for e-mail updates, and keep checking LBC because controversy is my life. ;)

Update II (7/4): A sharp and well-meaning commenter wants to make sure I’m not sued for libel, so here’s a correction: I wrote that the NAACP gave out awards to pedophiles, plural. That’s not true. The dinosaur nominated a pedophile, singular, for an Image Award, but the pedophile didn’t win the award. Sorry for the confusion.

Update: You should see the kind of trolls trying to get through the spam filter. It is unfitting for a black person to write about such things, they imply (with the usual name-calling)…which only encourages me. When racial double standards are dismantled (as well as archaic ideas about what blacks should or shouldn’t write) I’ll change the subject. (Tip: If you can refrain from ad hominem, I’ll approve your comments.)

What do you think is motivating black liberals’ animosity toward me? Could it have something to do with “racial pride?” Do they consider me a “race traitor” because I seem to lack racial pride? I say that blacks can succeed without skin color preferences; they say otherwise. But I am the traitor, the one who lacks pride in my race? If that’s how their mental processes work, perhaps they’re right and I’m wrong. :?
—————————————————————————————————————-

Stop the presses! Jewish World Review columnist Julia Gorin defends white racialists, tongue-in-cheek, in her latest column, Razablanca.

And I agree with her wholeheartedly.

[click to continue…]

{ 101 comments }

Harry Potter: Who Will Die in Book 7?

by La Shawn on June 28, 2006

in Pop Culture

JKR meeting Queen Elizabeth II J.K. Rowling (in blue on the right), author of the popular Harry Potter series (+ Book 6), revealed on a British talk show that at least two characters will die in Book 7.

We already know more characters will die, but the question is, which ones?

Diehard fans know Rowling mapped out the seven-book series and wrote the final chapter of Book 7 before she sold the first book. But something changed while she was writing the final book, and she had to alter the final chapter (which is locked away somewhere) slightly. Rowling said, “One character got a reprieve, but I have to say two die that I didn’t intend to die,” she said.

If you want to talk about your who-dies theories, click over to my other blog, Fantasy Fiction for Christians. You’ll find links to MP3s of Rowling’s interview and other good stuff.

Voting for American Interests

by La Shawn on June 27, 2006

in General

voting rightsUpdate (6:08 p.m.): I just realized this post is very similar to the second half of Roger Clegg’s article, which I read only 10 minutes ago. I admit to reading only the first half before I published this post, so the similarities are coincidental, in a way. Since conservatives tend to see through special interest props and racial group entitlements like Section 203, we tend to hold the same opinions about them and express those opinions in a similar way.

Update II (7/1): I can’t wait to read this series. :?
————————————————————————-

I have a feeling the average person doesn’t really care about maintaining a cohesive nation. By that I mean borders, language, and culture, a refrain uttered often by Michael Savage, one of my favorite radio talk show hosts. (I was on his show a couple of years ago.)

Come election time, the average American will vote for the party that closely matches his beliefs and interests. The rest of the time he couldn’t care less that his country is becoming a balkanized, socialistic, and indebted mess, or that his fundamental rights as an American citizen are rapidly diminishing, as long as his TiVo is working.

He probably doesn’t care that some liberal columnist misrepresents the intent of the Voting Rights Act and compares its nonrenewal — because of a bilingual ballots provision— to southern Democrats making up requirements to keep blacks from voting.

It seems like only yesterday when I was agreeing with Earl Ofari Hutchinson, left-leaning journalist. His column about blacks holding themselves to higher standards reminded me of the old-school “working twice as hard” axiom that blacks in my generation and older heard growing up. Now he’s back on the usual liberal warpath, accusing Republicans of pandering to white voters by delaying a vote to renew the Voter Rights Act of 1965.

[click to continue…]

{ 42 comments }

Rob at Gut Rumbles…

by La Shawn on June 26, 2006

in Bloggers

…has died.

Rob Smith, aka Acidman, was a plainspoken and prolific blogger out in the ’sphere since 2002 (with close to three million visitors). Rob was a recovering alcoholic who had some health problems recently.

Gut Rumbles was a blog I read through Bloglines, and Rob made me laugh most of the time. One thing was apparent from his posts: he loved to blog.

Thanks for the contribution, Rob.

Other blogging “old heads” (in blog time) remember Rob: Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler, Baldilocks, Hog on Ice, The Other Side of Kim, Smoke on the Water, John of Argghhh!

{ 12 comments }

Buy me, suckers!Update (1:41 p.m.): Rod Nichols, an information officer for the Oregon Department of Forestry, responded to the e-mail I sent Jim Walker. He said the story I linked to is inaccurate. The main points:

1) There is no Spanish language requirement for private firefighting crews or supervisors. The department relies heavily on private contractors, who make their own decisions about how to meet the department’s requirements. Nichols said the deparment has “found it necessary to require that all crewmembers speak English. The requirement that leadership positions – crew boss and squad boss – speak English is sufficient.”

2) No Oregon Department of Forestry employees have been fired or demoted because they can’t speak Spanish. The person who made the claim in the article, Jaime Pickering, isn’t and has never been a department employee, and isn’t a certified fire crew boss, according to the department’s records.

However, this doesn’t preclude Pickering’s employment with a private contractor.

3) I asked if the department checks employees’ immigration status. Nichols said the contractors have the “primary responsibility” to check status of its employees, and the department believes “most” of the crew are in the United States legally. In adherence to federal law, the department records and files I-9 info on everyone hired, including temporary employees for emergencies.

[click to continue…]

{ 29 comments }

Patsy Ramsey, 1957-2006

by La Shawn on June 24, 2006

in General

John and Patsy RamseyWednesday, August 16: Welcome, searchers. There’s been an arrest in this case. Read and discuss the latest.
—————————————————-

Ten years after the death of her slain daughter, Patsy Ramsey is dead of cancer. She leaves behind husband John Bennett Ramsey and son Burke Ramsey (who’s probably in college by now).

When I first heard about the death of six-year-old JonBenet, found dead in her home on December 26, 1996, I suspected the parents knew more than they were letting on.

I theorized that Patsy must have hit the child too hard, killing her accidentally on Christmas night. At this point, two possibilities emerge in my theory: 1) Patsy panicked and tried to make the death look like a murder by taking JonBenet’s body, on her own, to the basement and staging a sexual assault; 2) Patsy panicked, woke her husband, and told him what happened. They both went into action to stage a murder scene.

My theory is based on opinions of detectives who worked the case, handwriting experts, known evidence, and other factors, including, once again, my gut.

One of the strongest pieces of evidence against Patsy is the so-called ransom note. She said that on the morning of December 26, 1996, she found the note on the back stairs leading to the kitchen. The placement of the note was suspicious, and the note itself was obviously phony. Some experts contend, and I agree, that a woman wrote the note, and the most likely woman was Patsy.

(I remember reading somewhere that Patsy sometimes used the phrase “good, Southern common sense,” also found in the note. Steve Thomas, a detective who worked on the case, said whoever wrote the three-page ransom note practiced writing it. The person also used a pen from a pencil cup that was in the kitchen, and returned the pen to the same place after writing the note.)

As a “juror” in the court of public opinion, I think JonBenet Ramsey’s death was accidental and that Patsy Ramsey killed her. JonBenet’s death is still unsolved, and unless John knows something and talks, it will probably remained unsolved. In 2004, John ran for office in Michigan. I blogged about the news and laid out my theory of the case in more detail.

Reams have been written about the case, so I won’t reinvent the microchip. Check out the sources below.

Sources:

{ 28 comments }

Scottsboro, NYT, and Hauntings

by La Shawn on June 23, 2006

in Duke Rape Case

Scottsboro BoysUpdate (1:44 p.m.): Durham Investigator Linwood Wilson criticized the defense for asserting that the accuser’s story was inconsistent, and he asked for proof. In response, Joseph Cheshire, Dave Evans’s attorney, sent Wilson a letter (PDF) with the proof attached.

Now that Nifong has muzzled himself, he’d be wise to muzzle his people, too. :?

I don’t have time today to look for others blogging about the case, so if you are, let me know. See Robert KC Johnson’s latest post, Turning on Nifong.

Independent Conservative: “536 Pages. 5 Rapists. 4 Dancers. No Toxicology Report. No Payoff From Defense and No Plea Deal Requested.”

Commenter Beth Taylor writes:

LaShawn – You probably need to be careful! You’re going to end up getting called as an expert witness in this case for one side or the other…

“Ms. Barber, On March 26th did Attorney Nifong say that this is an act of rape made with racial epithets?”

“No. He did not. He said that on March 27th.”

Thanks for the Friday afternoon laugh, Beth. :)

Rest easy, everybody. See you Monday.
———————————————————————————————————

Scottsboro Boys

Click over to Townhall.com and read my column, Scottsboro Revisited, which discusses a few similarities between the “Scottsboro Boys” case from 1931 and the Duke case. A wonderful site called Famous Trials was one of the sources.

Lessons from the New York Times

[Update @ 10:22 a.m.: The misspelled name has been corrected, but this section contains good advice for writers and would-be writers, including my enemies. I wouldn't wish a published typo on anyone. ;) ... And the term "radioed ahead" is anachronistic, but hey, whatever.]

As one whose name is often misspelled, I should know better. But, alas, things happen. For the record, the researcher’s name is Douglas O. Linder, not David, as I wrote in the column. (Sorry, Douglas!) A correction is pending. Knowing how tense I get about typos, you’d think I’d have learned to be extremely careful about proofreading. But I can be as careless as the next person. Strangely enough, though, whoever edited the piece didn’t catch that but removed several commas. If you notice places where there should be a comma, there probably was one in my version.

The reason I’m so hard on myself is that it’s good practice to be hard on myself. I anticipate bigger things in my career, and the vultures will be circling, waiting for a fall. A small typo is a small typo, but one day, if I’m not careful, I’ll commit an egregious error…perhaps even a career-ending one.

Dramatic, yes, but who wants to be like the New York Times, with its typically long Corrections page? Fortunately, Townhall is online, so corrections can be made fairly quickly, or sometime today. Blogging is different, of course. You have the tools to correct typos in seconds.

Advice: Always, without exception, proofread your work very carefully. Triple-check facts. Do this even if you’re submitting an article to a publication with the world’s best fact-checkers and copy editors. Assume that you are the final editor. Your nerves will thank you.

ghost Hauntings

If you followed the Duke case early on, you may remember some of Mike Nifong’s pre-media moratorium statements. LBC reader Nancy Kidder fact-checked his recent e-mail (PDF) to Newsweek and compiled and sent a list of contradictory statements. First, the relevant portion of the e-mail. Nifong wrote:

[click to continue…]

{ 154 comments }

New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin’s police force can’t police, so he called in state troopers and the National Guard. The spate of crime in the Big Easy has been in majority-black communities. Nagin waxed sentimentally about bringing back a “chocolate” New Orleans earlier this year. I doubt this is what he had in mind, though. Let the good times roll…

Today we learn that the police in Jackson, Mississippi, can’t police, either. Mayor Frank Melton declared a state of emergency and seeks to impose earlier curfews on minors. Jackson, by the way, is an overwhelmingly black city, so don’t cramp your brains trying to figure out who’s committing crimes.

To hear some people tell it, enslaved forefathers, Jim Crow (that their great-grandparents lived through), “institutional racism,” dirty looks from bigots, and too few federal dollars for government schools are the reasons why black youth are out of control, along with the out-of-wedlock birth rate.

No fathers at home to head families physically and spiritually, instill discipline, teach children to be honorable men and women, and to convey the importance of decent living has nothing to do with it, I suppose. :?

Update (6/23): Read about the biological importance of biological fathers. It seems that God knew what he was doing after all when he decreed the marital union and units of biologically related people.

million million

Friday, June 23: I’m closing this post because I think it’s veering off into bawdiness. Ideally, commenters focus on the facts at hand and civilly discuss differences of opinion. I don’t like negative remarks about people’s physical appearance, and I’m beginning to wonder if there’s any value in talking about the stripping and “escort” professions in general. As long as commenters aren’t calling me or each other names, I usually stay out of it. But now I must ask commenters to refrain from general discussions about stripping and what turns on drunk college men. Click over to the newest post, and keep it clean.

Some commenters are lawyers; many others are not. But try to discuss the legal and social aspects of the case without being gratuitous.
——————————————————————————————————

I didn’t get a chance to watch or listen to today’s hearing. District Attorney Mike Nifong was supposed to turn over more evidence, and Phillip Seligmann, father of indicted player Reade Seligmann, asked for a bond reduction from $400,000 to $40,000. I’ll find out the details and report later.

Note: I spoke too soon. The judge reduced Reade Seligmann’s bond to $100,000. It’ll probably take a few days before the defense releases the contents of the new discovery documents.

In the meantime, you’ll never guess what’s happened. I’m now worthy of mention in black liberal media as a “black conservative.” Thank goodness Cash Michaels didn’t use the term “black Republican.” Check it out:

[click to continue…]

{ 91 comments }

Dead Amnesty-For-Illegal-Aliens Bill?

by La Shawn on June 22, 2006

in Illegal Aliens

billUpdate (6/23): Firefighters fired because they don’t speak Spanish
————————————————————————————–

Thanks to Dennis Hastert’s hardball maneuver, it looks like President Bush’s amnesty-for-illegal-aliens bill is floating on the surface of the political pond like a putrid dead fish. Shame on all Republicans who voted for it.

Keep border and interior enforcement provisions and dump all provisions leading to citizenship for lawbreakers.

By the way, my first Examiner column is up. Check it out. This morning I walked to the corner news stand and grabbed a few hard copies. It looks so much better in print. The smell of the paper, the ink on my fingers…it was nostalgic! (Also see page 19 of the PDF)

I jumped off Bush’s “nation of laws, nation of immigrants” bandwagon and ran. In theory, we’re a nation of laws, but in practice — Read Part I and Part II of my column on the Herndon, Virginia, day labor center and other topics.

Related posts:

(Image courtesy of Schoolhouse Rock)

Addendum: Ed Morrissey, fellow Blog Board of Contributors member, writes:

Americans have no real ethnic ties to bind them as a nation. This nation bound itself from the beginning on an ideal, one that we have frequently failed but always aspired to achieve: equal treatment under the law. At the time, the notion that a functioning state could survive without a monarch as at least a symbol of national unity seemed ludicrous, but the real challenge as we grew was the notion that disparate cultures could come together, cast off their allegiances to ethnicity and religion to be Americans first and foremost. The one binding cultural touchstone was the ideal of equal treatment under the law, and the laws that implemented it.

It therefore rankles and enrages when we have new immigrants come to this country, and in their very first steps on American soil disdain the laws that bind us as a culture.

(Emphasis added)

{ 17 comments }

family mealMy attributing the decline of the culture to the loss of “family meal” time (see post category below) may be a stretch for some, but such losses accumulate and correlate with other problems. Nothing happens in a vacuum.

Eating dinner together as a family isn’t just an isolated event. No matter how tense it may be, sitting down with your family at meal times gives everyone a chance to talk and/or spend time together in an overscheduled world. Parents’ job is to teach and civilize their kids. Using a knife and fork properly, making conversation with and listening to others, and compromising (Can’t you hear your mothers now? “You’ll eat what I cook!”) — these are just a few important lessons kids learn when they share meals with the family.

We don’t need a study to understand that values are passed down and reinforced through this ritual. But, alas, there is a study. From TIME:

The most probing study of family eating patterns was published last year by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University and reflects nearly a decade’s worth of data gathering.

[T]here is something about a shared meal–not some holiday blowout, not once in a while but regularly, reliably–that anchors a family even on nights when the food is fast and the talk cheap and everyone has someplace else they’d rather be. And on those evenings when the mood is right and the family lingers, caught up in an idea or an argument explored in a shared safe place where no one is stupid or shy or ashamed, you get a glimpse of the power of this habit and why social scientists say such communion acts as a kind of vaccine, protecting kids from all manner of harm.

The rest of the article summarizes CASA’s and other studies’ findings. For instance, family meals have a positive effect on kids. Eating together doesn’t cause kids to drink less, do better in school, etc., but it is certainly correlated with those things.

I’ve noticed a trend in the social sciences arena. Everything old is new again. When it comes to raising children, researchers are yielding all kind of common sense results. After decades of permissiveness and the “do what feels good” mantra, people finally realize that “traditional values” are good for children. One may even say they are ideal. Once you’re an adult, you can do what feels good. But that’s not how most people I know raise their children. “Do as I say, not as I do/have done,” is the usual theme. For instance, most fathers I know who’re raising young daughters are nervous about their daughters’ future dating adventures. Why? I’ll let readers who are fathers of daughters answer that question.

Anyone who’s raised or spent time around children know the little creatures don’t need to be taught selfishness and rudeness. They’ve got those down pat! They must be taught how to be kind and to share. Thoughtfulness must be cultivated and encouraged. Teaching kids “good values” is more difficult when children don’t spend time with the family or when they grow up in broken families.

bird building nest It is almost cliché to say, “Families are important,” but family creation is becoming a lost art. These days, in certain communities, childbearing is disconnected from family creation. Back in the day, people made a nest, if you will, to lay their eggs. It’s crucial to a child’s development that he have a nurturing and safe place to stumble as he grows and learns how to cope with life. For a primer on the importance of nest-building, consult our tiny-brained friends, the birds.

Human females should spend time observing what female birds do instinctively.

(As an aside, I was pleased as punch that someone quoted in TIME, an anthropologist from Rutgers, no doubt, used the term “American Indians” in reference to American Indians, instead of Native American, which describes anyone born in America.)

Update: An excerpt from an article by Joseph C. Phillips on “soul food”:

Soul food has been unfairly labeled as unsophisticated and unhealthy fare — peasant food cooked in pork fat. That, however, misses the true essence of the food. Not only has the cuisine evolved, incorporating dishes from Haiti, Jamaica and the West Indies, it has also adapted to America’s more health-conscience habits. Chefs and home cooks are finding ways to prepare traditional dishes without the addition of meats, lighter oils like canola are now used instead of lard and turkey has replaced pork.

The story begins in the plantation kitchen. English recipes, influenced by French techniques, with Native American ingredients, all prepared with an African sensibility by African hands. These same hands took the leftovers from those kitchens, along with inferior cuts of meat, vegetables grown in small gardens, and fresh fish, possum, rabbit and squirrel — the only quarry available to hunters during the evening after a long days work — and created magic.

{ 17 comments }

Individuality

by La Shawn on June 21, 2006

in BC Wisdom, Race Preferences

I found an “old” essay written by Shelby Steele, author of recently released White Guilt. The main topic is individuality. I thought you might enjoy it. An excerpt:

Not long ago C-SPAN carried a Harvard debate on affirmative action between conservative reformer Ward Connerly and liberal law professor Christopher Edley. During the Q and A a black undergraduate rose from a snickering clump of black students to challenge Mr. Connerly, who had argued that the time for racial preferences was past. Once standing, this young man smiled unctuously, as if victory were so assured that he must already offer consolation. But his own pose seemed to distract him, and soon he was sinking into incoherence. There was impatience in the room, but it was suppressed. Black students play a role in campus debates like this and they are indulged.

Here is a brief litany of obvious truths that have been resisted in the public discourse of black America over the last thirty years: a group is no stronger than its individuals; when individuals transform themselves they transform the group; the freer the individual, the stronger the group; social responsibility begins in individual responsibility. Add to this an indisputable fact that has also been unmentionable: that American greatness has a lot to do with a culturally ingrained individualism, with the respect and freedom historically granted individuals to pursue their happiness–this despite many egregious lapses and an outright commitment to the oppression of black individuals for centuries. And there is one last obvious but unassimilated fact: ethnic groups that have asked a lot from their individuals have done exceptionally well in America even while enduring discrimination.

Now consider what this Harvard student is called upon by his racial identity to argue in the year 2002. All that is creative and imaginative in him must be rallied to argue the essential weakness of his own people. Only their weakness justifies the racial preferences they receive decades after any trace of anti-black racism in college admissions. The young man must not show faith in the power of his people to overcome against any odds; he must show faith in their inability to overcome without help. As Mr. Connerly points to far less racism and far more freedom and opportunity for blacks, the young man must find a way, against all the mounting facts, to argue that black Americans simply cannot compete without preferences. If his own forebears seized freedom in a long and arduous struggle for civil rights, he must argue that his own generation is unable to compete on paper-and-pencil standardized tests.

Emphases added.

Update: A libertarian on individual rights and the Duke rape case:

The Duke case presents, in a microcosm, a clear picture of life in a future United States in which the Politically Correct world of the college campus becomes the legal standard for everyone. That is a world in which all events are viewed through an extremely abstract prism in which there are only “group” or “collective” rights, and where all individual rights are destroyed. Ultimately, it is the world of the Soviet Union and Josef Stalin’s “Show Trials” of the 1930s, in which we saw this whole thing in full flower.

The Duke case is an outrage on many fronts, but I argue here that the real battleground is abstract, but also very real, and that is where individual rights go against the zeitgeist of “collective rights” that are all the rage among our intellectual and political classes.

Yahoo! E-Mail Issues

by La Shawn on June 21, 2006

in Administrative

Yahoo! e-mail seems to be down at the moment. I haven’t been able to log in all morning. If you’re waiting for a reply from me, please be patient.

Update (5:07 p.m.): In response to this post, commenter and blogger Mark La Roi wrote: “Stories like this one are why I have come to believe that while race isn’t the roadblock many of us make it out to be, it’s almost always a factor in some fashion.”

I asked him to elaborate, and he did so here and here.
———————————————————————————————

Some of you may be tired of reading about race. I sometimes get tired of blogging about it. (Why do I do it? See this post.)

Just when I’m ready to move on, I get pulled back in the muck with news like this:

Nine dunces – at least six are black – at the Marion County Juvenile Detention Center in Indianapolis, Indiana, were charged with raping six teenage inmates. From the Indianapolis Star:

Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi said Monday that authorities know of six teenage detainees — ages 13 to 15 — who had sex with male employees at the facility between 2000 and 2005. The ex-employees — eight guards and one control booth operator — face counts of child molestation, sexual battery or sexual misconduct with a minor, among other charges…Brizzi said the charges came after a five-month investigation. He said the guards wooed the girls with love letters and gifts, including a teddy bear emblazoned with the words “I Love You.”

Those girls were children, for crying out loud! Where’s the outrage? Watch the video.

It gets worse. (Well, not really worse than rape, but you know what I mean.) More than one in four guards at the same facility have criminal convictions. That’s 24 of 88. Stunning. I can’t prove it, but I attribute these and other atrocities to affirmative action hiring.

Let’s put this in perspective. The national media have spent months chasing their tails over unsubstantiated and absurd rape charges in Durham, North Carolina, against three white lacrosse players, writing story after story, op-ed after op-ed, broad social commentary after broad social commentary ad nauseam. But a bunch of brutish thug guards raping teenagers in a detention facility isn’t worthy of their paper and ink?

Reporters found time to write drivel like this, but not one feminist-journalist dared speak out about what happened to those vulnerable teenage girls??? Was this covered on any of the cable news stations? Did it spawn social commentary on negative stereotypes and the patriarchy? Is it just me, or are people’s priorities completely screwed up?

You’d think that guards who’re charged to watch over minors but break the law and breach their custodial duty by raping them is much more heinous than whatever happened at a sleazy party at Duke.

New Black Panthers, where are you when we really need you?

comic strip To make the whole thing even more bizarre, an Indianapolis Star cartoonist lampooned the scandal, but drew a goofy-looking white guy for the strip! The accused men are black!

This is why I write about race so often, readers. What the media won’t touch, I will. If you have more information about this mess, please let me know. I specifically want to know the race of the girls. Ideally, it wouldn’t matter. But as we’ve seen in the Duke case, it does.

I must be having a Twilight Zone moment. As a fan of the old black and whites (no pun intended), I’ve probably seen every single episode. But come on.

I need a vacation. :?

{ 76 comments }