I know, I know. People think she’s been too harsh. Meanwhile, she has been asked to commit suicide and called just about every name there is to call someone.

Ciao

No, I do not distill it, I do not like any of the qualities, roughly equally.

As for examples, any supporters do not like to believe that their heroes lie. I don’t get enough coconuts by banging my head against that tree

I note you didn’t defend the hypocrisy she exhibited by attacking another woman’s physique, while claiming that only a ‘liberal’ would do that. Does that make Ann (by her own definition) a, what? A liberal or a liar? Answer me that Heliotrope? Or shall I remain as confused as you claim to be?

Oooh, look what I typed,’liberal’ & ‘liar!’

Quick, meme-alert, alliteration bonus,

print me SOME MONEY!

Hint:

Google: Coulter, lies.
Google: Liberal, lies.
Google: Right-wing, lies.

Waste of time.

I hope that clears the point, and please accept my apologies for poor writing skills.

“just what your beef with Ann Coulter is after you call her an exploiter, fabricator, a whorer, gutterscum, a slanderer, a Chauvinist and a hypocrite.”

Yes, I have a beef with those ‘qualities’.

The promulgation of a fallacy that there are two types of people in the world:

Type A (me) = wholly good
Type B (them) = wholly bad)

That is the most dangerous and disgraceful lie to be spread amongst people of the world.

Only the very worst among us would embrace such nonsense and then spread the same for cash. I cannot admire that. No matter how much money it makes.

Consider this statement:

‘the only group of people who make broad generalizations are the (insert broad political affiliation)’

I’ve seen it so often in the so-called blogosphere, yet it is nothing more than a PERECT demonstration of the ’self-destroying argument’.

No matter how much people defend Coulter, Moore et al…I can see how the defense is desperate, a refusal to face the reality or a glee to revel in the lies. They are cheap hacks getting rich by carefully manipulating and harvesting the basest human emotions to the most profitable effect.

Clever – yes – in the way someone realises that a coconut falls from a tree if they repeatedly bang their head against it.

I will ask though just what your beef with Ann Coulter is after you call her an exploiter, fabricator, a whorer, gutterscum, a slanderer, a Chauvinist and a hypocrite. Surely it can not be her use of language.

You distill it all down to her being a liar, which you detest intensely, yet you demonstrate no lie told. I remain confused.

Pure class. You win.

I suppose that certain combinations of vitriol seem powerful, but careless usage of corrosives, even words, can backfire.

Your invective is perhaps intended to be an approximation of your assessment of Coulter’s writing style, but it does not seem to be intuitive enough to be equal to her plain. Just an observation.

Assuming you didn’t read comment 97, or didn’t get where I was coming from, simply put: I detest liars intensely.

People who lie, slander, feed a propaganda machine and slander for profit make me want to literally throw up.

Add some nationalistic propaganda and generalized bigotry, and you might see how I wouldn’t want to line their pockets or spend all my time fact-checking someone who whores out lies, hypocrisy and partisan propaganda. Who’s worse? The hooker or the client?

A (small) demonstration of the hypocritical iniquity of someone like Coulter:

Coulter: “Only conservative women have their looks held up to ridicule because only liberals would be so malevolent.” (From the book ‘Slander’)

So, yeah, I’m with Coulter, she’s in the face of those mean liberals! Only THEY would pick on a woman because of her physique. Only conservatibe women get ridiculed for their looks!!! Thank the Good Lord that Coulter is a loving Christian and would never stoop so low.

But what’s this:

Coulter: “The only sort of authority Cindy Sheehan has is the uncanny ability to demonstrate, by example, what body types should avoid wearing shorts in public.” Godless, Page 128.

Ooops. Do as she says, not as she does?

Where have we heard that before? Yes, liberals!!

Keep on putting pennies in those hats folks..the End Of The World Is Nigh. No really.

The same amount of time it took me to read Fahrenheit 9/11.

Zip. Nada. Nothing. They don’t get my money. They don’t even get the shine off my shinola.

Gutterscum making cash from suffering.

Ann Coulter’s new book Godless: The Church of Liberalism is about how Liberalism has literally become a state enforced form of faith. Coulter says this herself in her own review of her book. (She did her own review because she knew Liberal le…

ann coulter, marketing genius…”

Ann Coulter has made her fortune whoring 9/11. End of story.

Surely she’s as much a genius as anyone standing on a street corner and shouting:

“Fags are gay”

“Conservatives are Evil”

“Liberals are Godless”

If you think you hate homosexuals, you’ll put a penny in the hat when he confirms how evil they really are. If you hate Conservatives…you’ll put a penny in his hat when he exposes how bad they really are…
Thing is, she is (fiscally) smart enough and mean enough to generalize, exploit, fabricate and strengthen the fear and hatred that gripped America on that day.

Albert Einstein was a genius.

Coulter is just paid to tell lies, half lies, and jingle some jingo.

It’s funny that people hate her so much when she is so transparent, anyone with half a heart or a quarter of a brain could see through her, or Michael Moore. Unless…

Matt Drudge’s Sunday evening broadcast is recorded in real time and presented in beautiful low-fidelity mp3 format — perfect for those of us who cannot stay up until 1 AM on a school night.
LISTEN TO THE ARCHIVES:
» 9:30 segment (on WABC only) …

if those 9/11 widows were backing Bush on this Iraq war and made pro-conservatve republican statements, would Ann coulter have said written this book? Nah…

ann coulter, marketing genius…

a hypocrite, but a marketing genius.

But how about the protest over McCain’s commencement address at New School as another example? Or Condi’s speech to Boston College?