<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Racialist Double Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-3/#comment-72674</link>
		<dc:creator>Kman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72674</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is something about using the term â€˜white interestsâ€™ that gets everyone thinking â€˜racistâ€™ no matter how innocuous that conversation might be.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s because &quot;white interests&quot; -- when it actually gets defined -- tends to have, as an element, the subjugation or discrimination of other races.

In other words, &quot;white interest&quot; is just a euphamism for &quot;white supremacy&quot;.

Can you define an &lt;i&gt;innocuous&lt;/i&gt; &quot;white interest&quot;?  That is, an interest that is exclusive to whites and DOESN&#039;T involve the &quot;putting down&quot; or subjugation of other races?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is something about using the term â€˜white interestsâ€™ that gets everyone thinking â€˜racistâ€™ no matter how innocuous that conversation might be.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because &#8220;white interests&#8221; &#8212; when it actually gets defined &#8212; tends to have, as an element, the subjugation or discrimination of other races.</p>
<p>In other words, &#8220;white interest&#8221; is just a euphamism for &#8220;white supremacy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can you define an <i>innocuous</i> &#8220;white interest&#8221;?  That is, an interest that is exclusive to whites and DOESN&#8217;T involve the &#8220;putting down&#8221; or subjugation of other races?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72670</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72670</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem is â€” and I think many here may be turning a blind eye to this fact â€”&quot;

--that any &#039;white-only&#039; organization that pops up is instantly vilified. Because of this white-only organizations have devolved to the clandestine state, populated by people for whom membership in the organization is of greater reward than any demonization. Or, very likely, the demonization is used to foment group loyalty.

There is something about using the term &#039;white interests&#039; that gets everyone thinking &#039;racist&#039; no matter how innocuous that conversation might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem is â€” and I think many here may be turning a blind eye to this fact â€”&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;that any &#8216;white-only&#8217; organization that pops up is instantly vilified. Because of this white-only organizations have devolved to the clandestine state, populated by people for whom membership in the organization is of greater reward than any demonization. Or, very likely, the demonization is used to foment group loyalty.</p>
<p>There is something about using the term &#8216;white interests&#8217; that gets everyone thinking &#8216;racist&#8217; no matter how innocuous that conversation might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kman</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72639</link>
		<dc:creator>Kman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72639</guid>
		<description>There are male-only organizations, women-only organizations, and black-only organizations.

So on one level, it stands to reason that there should be white-only organizations.  

The problem is -- and I think many here may be turning a blind eye to this fact -- that white-only organizations do NOT celebrate &quot;white culture&quot; so much as engage in attempts to suppress other cultures and races.  

Prussian Blue, for example, does not celebrate white culture -- the girls celebrate white &lt;i&gt;supremacy&lt;/i&gt;.  Anyone who confuses the two does so at their own peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are male-only organizations, women-only organizations, and black-only organizations.</p>
<p>So on one level, it stands to reason that there should be white-only organizations.  </p>
<p>The problem is &#8212; and I think many here may be turning a blind eye to this fact &#8212; that white-only organizations do NOT celebrate &#8220;white culture&#8221; so much as engage in attempts to suppress other cultures and races.  </p>
<p>Prussian Blue, for example, does not celebrate white culture &#8212; the girls celebrate white <i>supremacy</i>.  Anyone who confuses the two does so at their own peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacky</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72638</guid>
		<description>Dear Andrei

My father while assisting the demise of Rommel in North Africa ended up a guest of your Nazi friends. He saw first hand the inventiveness of the third reich (small initials intended). He was also taken for long walk near the end of the war without picnic provisions in the hopes that he wouldnâ€™t be able to tell the tale. He escaped and lived to tell the tale but for some reason couldnâ€™t talk about what he saw for years. Something about his being unable to believe the horrors and that nobody would believe that people could act like that. Holocaust denial and Europeans who think that they bought civilisation to the world are one of the few things that I find embarrassing about being of European desent.

I have mentioned previous posts that I will not hang my head in shame for things that happened before I was born nor will I bury my head in the sand in denial.

Unfortunately, this is part of your comment that has got me hot and sweaty, that has appealed to me and which we have in common. I cannot stand white liberals. The thought of a place without the self-righteousness and sanctimoniousness of white liberals! Oh my god it would be heaven. No Sean Penn, No Noam Chomsky, No (oh my God the delight) No Susan Sarandon. The temptation! Quick somebody slap me Iâ€™m turning to the dark side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrei</p>
<p>My father while assisting the demise of Rommel in North Africa ended up a guest of your Nazi friends. He saw first hand the inventiveness of the third reich (small initials intended). He was also taken for long walk near the end of the war without picnic provisions in the hopes that he wouldnâ€™t be able to tell the tale. He escaped and lived to tell the tale but for some reason couldnâ€™t talk about what he saw for years. Something about his being unable to believe the horrors and that nobody would believe that people could act like that. Holocaust denial and Europeans who think that they bought civilisation to the world are one of the few things that I find embarrassing about being of European desent.</p>
<p>I have mentioned previous posts that I will not hang my head in shame for things that happened before I was born nor will I bury my head in the sand in denial.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this is part of your comment that has got me hot and sweaty, that has appealed to me and which we have in common. I cannot stand white liberals. The thought of a place without the self-righteousness and sanctimoniousness of white liberals! Oh my god it would be heaven. No Sean Penn, No Noam Chomsky, No (oh my God the delight) No Susan Sarandon. The temptation! Quick somebody slap me Iâ€™m turning to the dark side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72608</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72608</guid>
		<description>Keith, I&#039;m not sure that anyone could have missed La Shawn&#039;s point any more completely than you have.  

I suggest slowly re-reading her original post while keeping your knee-jerking to a minimum.  That always helps comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, I&#8217;m not sure that anyone could have missed La Shawn&#8217;s point any more completely than you have.  </p>
<p>I suggest slowly re-reading her original post while keeping your knee-jerking to a minimum.  That always helps comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin T. Keith</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin T. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72575</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;What do you think is motivating black liberalsâ€™ animosity toward me? Could it have something to do with â€œracial pride?â€&lt;/em&gt;

Could it have something to do with the Confederate flag on your blog?

Could it have something to do with the fact that you see no difference between Nazis and the NAACP? (Hint: What would the country be like if either of them got their way? Which would be worse?)

Could it have something to do with the idea that you think that being treated as &quot;conquered and heathen&quot; is an improvement in your life as long as it includes toll roads or something like that - and whether or not it was imposed on pain of death?

&lt;em&gt;Do they consider me a â€œrace traitorâ€ . . .?&lt;/em&gt;

Maybe they just consider you the sort of person who can live through end of the 20th Century and ask, with a straight face, &quot;So why are white racialists vilified?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What do you think is motivating black liberalsâ€™ animosity toward me? Could it have something to do with â€œracial pride?â€</em></p>
<p>Could it have something to do with the Confederate flag on your blog?</p>
<p>Could it have something to do with the fact that you see no difference between Nazis and the NAACP? (Hint: What would the country be like if either of them got their way? Which would be worse?)</p>
<p>Could it have something to do with the idea that you think that being treated as &#8220;conquered and heathen&#8221; is an improvement in your life as long as it includes toll roads or something like that &#8211; and whether or not it was imposed on pain of death?</p>
<p><em>Do they consider me a â€œrace traitorâ€ . . .?</em></p>
<p>Maybe they just consider you the sort of person who can live through end of the 20th Century and ask, with a straight face, &#8220;So why are white racialists vilified?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72571</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72571</guid>
		<description>La Raza, in reference to the loose confederation of leftist America-hating Aztlan reconquista types, means something quite a bit more sinister than &quot;the people.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Raza, in reference to the loose confederation of leftist America-hating Aztlan reconquista types, means something quite a bit more sinister than &#8220;the people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72556</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72556</guid>
		<description>Just to let you know, in Mexican Spanish &quot;la raza&quot; translates to &quot;the people&quot;. It doesn&#039;t really have racial connotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know, in Mexican Spanish &#8220;la raza&#8221; translates to &#8220;the people&#8221;. It doesn&#8217;t really have racial connotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukeNC</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72555</link>
		<dc:creator>lukeNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72555</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll wait until I see LaRaza and NAACP talking about killing folks before I go as far calling them terrorists. 

Its funny, terrorism against black-skinned people was allowed, even perpetrated in this country, for over 200 years. Groups like the NAACP were created to combat this. Fortunately, they arent needed now, they are no longer relevant today. 

The worst part is, conservative christians for the most part, refused to help and combat these problems, probably the greatest sin of this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll wait until I see LaRaza and NAACP talking about killing folks before I go as far calling them terrorists. </p>
<p>Its funny, terrorism against black-skinned people was allowed, even perpetrated in this country, for over 200 years. Groups like the NAACP were created to combat this. Fortunately, they arent needed now, they are no longer relevant today. </p>
<p>The worst part is, conservative christians for the most part, refused to help and combat these problems, probably the greatest sin of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72551</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72551</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;Shutter the NAACP, which has become nothing more than a clique of partying elitists who give out awards to pedophiles...&quot;

Tell me.  How many awards has the NAACP given to pedophiles?  I know that R. Kelly was nominated for an Image award a while ago, but he didn&#039;t win that award.  Have I missed something?  Or have you made an unjust charge against the NAACP?

If you can substantiate the charge you made please do so. But, if not, please have the decency to retract it.

&lt;em&gt;Oh yeah, I forgot! The NAACP nominated the criminal, but he didn&#039;t win. Duly noted. - Admin&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;Shutter the NAACP, which has become nothing more than a clique of partying elitists who give out awards to pedophiles&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Tell me.  How many awards has the NAACP given to pedophiles?  I know that R. Kelly was nominated for an Image award a while ago, but he didn&#8217;t win that award.  Have I missed something?  Or have you made an unjust charge against the NAACP?</p>
<p>If you can substantiate the charge you made please do so. But, if not, please have the decency to retract it.</p>
<p><em>Oh yeah, I forgot! The NAACP nominated the criminal, but he didn&#8217;t win. Duly noted. &#8211; Admin</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gershwin</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72544</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gershwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72544</guid>
		<description>Correction:  the last clause of the first paragraph should have read:  &quot; though they do combat bigotry other than anti-black bigotry as well.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:  the last clause of the first paragraph should have read:  &#8221; though they do combat bigotry other than anti-black bigotry as well.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gershwin</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72543</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gershwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72543</guid>
		<description>The NAACP is an association comprised primarily, though not entirely, of black people which exists to combat racism against black people and otherwise promote the interests of black people, though they do combat anti-black bigotry as well.

Prussian Blue promotes Nazism.   

To equate the two boggles the mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NAACP is an association comprised primarily, though not entirely, of black people which exists to combat racism against black people and otherwise promote the interests of black people, though they do combat anti-black bigotry as well.</p>
<p>Prussian Blue promotes Nazism.   </p>
<p>To equate the two boggles the mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrence</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72542</link>
		<dc:creator>terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72542</guid>
		<description>I heard just as much about that little black girl as I did about Prussian Blue. The girl even made the cover of the NY Post.

As for why Prussian Blue may have garnered more attention, it&#039;s not because they are racists, it&#039;s because they are straight up Nazis. A Nazi pop duo is far more interesting than a little black girl spouting racist poetry --- especially since the little white girls are old enough to know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard just as much about that little black girl as I did about Prussian Blue. The girl even made the cover of the NY Post.</p>
<p>As for why Prussian Blue may have garnered more attention, it&#8217;s not because they are racists, it&#8217;s because they are straight up Nazis. A Nazi pop duo is far more interesting than a little black girl spouting racist poetry &#8212; especially since the little white girls are old enough to know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBeard</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72526</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72526</guid>
		<description>Andrei, there are only two possibilities here.  Either you have crafted a very clever satire above, or you are a hateful raving lunatic.  I&#039;m voting for the latter.

And like JohnD, I have a personal reason to despise your agenda.  It&#039;s represented by a cross, with the family surname on it, in the American Cemetery at Normandy.  The man under that cross was more of a man than every member of your pathetic hate club added together.  

Disgusting.  But La Shawn, please leave the insane ramblings of our little ... up on the board, so everyone can see how racial &quot;pride&quot; can be perverted into racial hatred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrei, there are only two possibilities here.  Either you have crafted a very clever satire above, or you are a hateful raving lunatic.  I&#8217;m voting for the latter.</p>
<p>And like JohnD, I have a personal reason to despise your agenda.  It&#8217;s represented by a cross, with the family surname on it, in the American Cemetery at Normandy.  The man under that cross was more of a man than every member of your pathetic hate club added together.  </p>
<p>Disgusting.  But La Shawn, please leave the insane ramblings of our little &#8230; up on the board, so everyone can see how racial &#8220;pride&#8221; can be perverted into racial hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnD</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/06/29/racialist-double-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-72506</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2031#comment-72506</guid>
		<description>&quot;all White nationalists can see are enemies, all around.&quot;

I&#039;m caucasian, so I guess my perspective is different, because the only real enemies I see are people like you.  And no I don&#039;t mean &#039;white&#039; people.

As a &#039;white&#039; person, you don&#039;t get to speak for me. No matter if you are black, white or green. If your primary motivation is racial or supremacist (religious or otherwise)then your only feasible perspective can be one of alienation.  Alienation of yourself and of anyone around you who doesn&#039;t share your fixations. 

You took your chance to forcibly impose notions of yourselves as a &#039;Super-race&#039;, and proved *nothing* other than that human beings can become murderous monsters, driven by power, fear of the &#039;Other&#039;, distrust, greed.

You ask:

&quot;Identify yourself as someone who is at least not our enemy, and who does not go along with the silly â€œHitler Blood Libel,â€ that the Jews have so successfully smeared on us.&quot;

May you and people who think like you finally develop the intelligence and integrity that will enable you to learn the shame that you bring upon both yourselves and the human race.  I&#039;m &#039;white&#039; and you&#039;ll never speak for me or any child of mine for as long as I live.

Your arrogant opinion that you speak for my &#039;race&#039; is nothing but an insult.  My grandfather&#039;s parachute battalion manually interred many of the the corpses that your Aryan &#039;Race&#039; murdered. And he is &#039;white&#039;. He never recovered from that and other horrors. He doesn&#039;t wear &#039;white shame&#039; for what Nazis did. He wears shrapnel under his skin. And the best you can do is call the jews &#039;silly&#039;.  Shame on you.

At least have the honour to find a name for Nazism other than &#039;white pride&#039;.  You do the rest of us whites a great disservice.  The white &#039;race&#039; and the rest of the world chose *not* to be Nazis. That choice was paid for by the blood of millions. Alongside brothers and sisters of the human race of many nationalities/colours.  Fighting YOUR ideals.  One day you might *get* that.  And I hope that shame would finally set your heart free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;all White nationalists can see are enemies, all around.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m caucasian, so I guess my perspective is different, because the only real enemies I see are people like you.  And no I don&#8217;t mean &#8216;white&#8217; people.</p>
<p>As a &#8216;white&#8217; person, you don&#8217;t get to speak for me. No matter if you are black, white or green. If your primary motivation is racial or supremacist (religious or otherwise)then your only feasible perspective can be one of alienation.  Alienation of yourself and of anyone around you who doesn&#8217;t share your fixations. </p>
<p>You took your chance to forcibly impose notions of yourselves as a &#8216;Super-race&#8217;, and proved *nothing* other than that human beings can become murderous monsters, driven by power, fear of the &#8216;Other&#8217;, distrust, greed.</p>
<p>You ask:</p>
<p>&#8220;Identify yourself as someone who is at least not our enemy, and who does not go along with the silly â€œHitler Blood Libel,â€ that the Jews have so successfully smeared on us.&#8221;</p>
<p>May you and people who think like you finally develop the intelligence and integrity that will enable you to learn the shame that you bring upon both yourselves and the human race.  I&#8217;m &#8216;white&#8217; and you&#8217;ll never speak for me or any child of mine for as long as I live.</p>
<p>Your arrogant opinion that you speak for my &#8216;race&#8217; is nothing but an insult.  My grandfather&#8217;s parachute battalion manually interred many of the the corpses that your Aryan &#8216;Race&#8217; murdered. And he is &#8216;white&#8217;. He never recovered from that and other horrors. He doesn&#8217;t wear &#8216;white shame&#8217; for what Nazis did. He wears shrapnel under his skin. And the best you can do is call the jews &#8216;silly&#8217;.  Shame on you.</p>
<p>At least have the honour to find a name for Nazism other than &#8216;white pride&#8217;.  You do the rest of us whites a great disservice.  The white &#8216;race&#8217; and the rest of the world chose *not* to be Nazis. That choice was paid for by the blood of millions. Alongside brothers and sisters of the human race of many nationalities/colours.  Fighting YOUR ideals.  One day you might *get* that.  And I hope that shame would finally set your heart free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

