July 2006

bloggingThursday, August 3: Read the second post in this series: Don’t Plagiarize!
——————————————————————

This is the first post in a series called “How to Avoid a Blogosphere Scandal.”

The advice can apply to anyone at anytime, but the primary audience is bloggers.

In my short blogging career, I’ve discovered that the more critical and on-point you are about what’s going on in the world, the more detractors will try to dig up dirt on you, “out” you, or hunt for shortcomings, secrets, contradictions, and hypocrisy. People who don’t like you or what you have to say will always look for ways to trip you up. Don’t give them the satisfaction.

Disclosure

Most professions have rules or guidelines about disclosing conflicts or potential conflicts of interest. For example, the preamble to the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics states:

The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.

While we may question mainstream media’s truth-seeking ability or whether they truly strive to provide a “fair” account of events, I believe that in general, most journalists recognize that with a free press comes responsibility. The press serves as a check on government. Part of its duty is to make sure we the people know what’s going on. While I trust the media in theory to tell me the truth, I know that no human is truly objective. As long as I know the source of information is left-leaning, for example, I can make judgments about the fairness (or unfairness) of the coverage, even though events may be factual.

According to SPJ, “Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know.” That means reporters should disclose potential conflicts that interfere with the “right to know.” Whether or not bloggers consider themselves journalists, we should be under a similar obligation. Bloggers pride themselves on being transparent. That doesn’t mean we’re obligated to tell all our business. It means that we’re obligated to let readers know if we’re being paid to blog about a certain topic or person.

[click to continue…]

Mike NifongFriday, August 4: This post is closed. Resume the discussion at Semen in the House.

Update (8/1): See KC Johnson’s latest Duke post, The Brodhead Files.
———————————————————————

Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong didn’t utter those exact words, but that’s the gist of his confession at a press conference last week. See WRAL.com for a video of the 30-minute conference.

The prosecutor said he “underestimated” the media’s interest in his weak yet titillating man-bites-dog case and “misjudged” the effect his many words — like labeling some of the lacrosse players “hooligans” — would have on the case. (For more of Nifong’s “misjudgments,” see Scottsboro, NYT, and Hauntings.)

In my lay opinion, he’s lying. While Nifong may be sorry now for not keeping his mouth shut then, I don’t believe for one second that he “underestimated” or “misjudged” anything. He manipulated left-leaning and jaded journalists to great effect. Bored with the usual crime stories, they soaked up every word.

I haven’t been following the Duke case for the last couple of weeks, but check out The Johnsville News and John in Carolina for updates. Also visit CourtTV.com’s Duke forum.

KC Johnson found Nifong’s campaign web site and dissects the heck out of it.

Meanwhile, the Charlotte Observer calls for a special prosecutor to handle the case.

Nifong should recuse himself from the case based on reckless comments made about the targets of his investigation while still gathering evidence and proceeding with this case based on what appears to be weak evidence. Can he make a case for forcible rape? Doubtful.

With no DNA connecting any of the three indicted players to the stripper-accuser (it was her “boyfriend’s” DNA!), conflicting tales woven by the stripper-accuser (see That Motion!), no physical evidence of forcible rape by the three indicted men (read the motions linked in this post), and serious timeframe issues, we’re left to believe that Nifong either has something huge but unrevealed or he’s a man so deep in #$%& that he can’t climb out.

It might be “mean-spirited” to say this, but I don’t like him. :x

Addendum: Forgot to mention that Duke U. president Richard Brodhead responded to alumni criticism of his effete handling of the matter thus far.

Also, a reader wants to know if there’s a defense fund for the lacrosse players.

Later…There is indeed: click over to Friends of Duke University for info on contributing to the defense fund.

Photo source: WRAL

Why Not ‘Choose AMERICA’?

by La Shawn on 07.28.06

in Illegal Aliens

Ted Hayes - LA Times I write about race a lot because I feel I have something important and different to say than what’s currently coming from the airwaves, print and online media, black church pulpits, college campuses, and all the rest.

I have spoken out publicly against “black” groups, especially when people involved in such groups would scream bloody murder if “white” groups (which already exist on the fringes) went mainstream.

Now we have Choose Black America, a group of black Americans (Republicans and conservatives) opposed to illegal “immigration.”

I LOVE the idea of black Americans getting involved in the “immigration” debate and would encourage more to do so. But if the organization’s function and purpose is to lobby lawmakers and influence public policy, it ought to be race-neutral or its racial aim should be more subtle. It’s the exclusive title I don’t like.

Race-focused groups are not the problem; calling yourselves the “black” this or the “white” that, is the problem.

I know members of Choose Black America, and I support what they’re trying to do. But if we conservatives continue forming “black” groups, how can we rail against liberals who do? Illegal “immigration” hurts all of us (see How Unskilled Immigrants Hurt Our Economy), even the vain elites who support it. Why not call yourselves “Choose America”?

I think I know what white readers have to say about this. Let’s hear it. And what do you black conservative readers think? Do you share my view on this?

[click to continue…]

John McWhorterIf I had my laptop with me, I’d live-blog this event. See Moral Reconstruction post below. But I’m on the Treo. Blogging this is difficult. One cool thing so far: John M. called my name before I approached him. He remembered meeting me two years ago and knows my work. :?

Update (6:20 p.m.): Great event. I’ll update with a summary and photos (I’ll also post photos here) tomorrow and open the post for commenting.

Update II (7/27 @ the crack of dawn): Moral Reconstruction: A Model for Urban Transformation was a refreshing diversion from typical discussions about race, culture, inner cities, poverty, etc. Although participants shared the view that many problems in inner cities are exacerbated by immoral and destructive behavior, each had slighly different ideas about solutions.

Spiritual Solutions

Reverend Jesse L. Peterson, founder of Brotherhood Organization for A New Destiny (BOND), which counsels boys and men and helps them build good moral character, is not popular among black liberals for obvious reasons. Last year he got to the heart of the Katrina problem and blamed the people for not helping themselves. Either “Moral poverty cost blacks in New Orleans” (see his column archives) or one of his other Katrina columns was widely disseminated and discussed. A white Congressman made news and was branded a racist after he e-mailed the piece to various people.

Peterson is the author of SCAM: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America (reviewed here and here).

Ward Connerly and Grant StormReverend Grant Storm (pictured left with Ward Connerly) is a minister and activist in New Orleans who believes, like all Bible-believing Christians, that man is dead in his sins and needs spiritual cleansing. Without addressing spiritual poverty, there’s little point talking about “morality.” Without God, what is morality? Whose morality is it? Storm, Peterson, and I believe that people are responsible for their own behavior but agree that government dependency makes it easier for people to give in to their sin nature.

[click to continue…]

Michael J. Maxwell

July 25, 2006

Give me your maniacs, your moochers, your huddled terrorist cells yearning to kill and destroy… Have you ever heard of Michael J. Maxwell? Chances are you haven’t. Maxwell is the former director of the Office of Security and Investigations, part of Citizenship and Immigration Services. In April, he testified before a House subcommittee about fraud [...]

Read the full article →

Moral Reconstruction

July 24, 2006

If you’re in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday swing by the Heritage Foundation for a discussion about what people really need to focus on: morality. I’ve blogged time and again that immorality, not racism or any other “ism,” is the most pressing problem in “inner cities” and urban areas. Drug and excessive alcohol use, criminality, illegitimacy, [...]

Read the full article →

Big Blue Balls and Other Stuff

July 19, 2006

Monday, July 24: The interview was for an article (about blogging) and a tentative podcast for the Baltimore Sun. The article will be published in late August. I’ll keep you posted. One reason I think the interview went very well is because the story won’t be political. And the journalist isn’t the typical left-leaning type [...]

Read the full article →

What In the Fallen World…?

July 18, 2006

Wednesday, July 19: A commenter provided a link to an article on black slaveowners. Memo to anyone who takes the NAACP seriously. The national NAACP is a social club of limousine liberal Negroes who care nothing about “poor” blacks or “social justice.” The organization’s usefulness is over, part of ancient history. ————————————————————————————————————— I know you [...]

Read the full article →

Salaciousness Sells

July 17, 2006

Wednesday, July 19: Robert KC Johnson blogs about a letter from Duke alumni to the university’s administration condemning their failure to protect the students. Check it out. A commenter provided a link to an article in Duke’s student newspaper. Read Living A Nightmare: LAX Players Speak Out. Tuesday, July 18: An interesting yet predictable trend [...]

Read the full article →

D.C. Follies: Chief Declares “State of Emergency”

July 13, 2006

In the wake of the murder of Alan Senitt, a British national, Metropolitan Police Department Chief Charles Ramsey has declared a “state of emergency” in the nation’s capital. I blogged about Senitt’s murder earlier this week in Media and Dog-Bites-Man Crimes. The impetus for the chief’s unprecedented move is the embarrassment of underclass thugs venturing [...]

Read the full article →

The Perversity of ‘Diversity’

July 13, 2006

Monday, July 17: John at Discriminations blogs about a law school dean’s idea of diversity, which he doubts goes deeper than melanin. I concur. ——————————————————————- No matter how much hate e-mail I get or how many nasty blog posts my opinions generate, I will keep talking and writing about the hypocrisy of racialist double standards, [...]

Read the full article →

Duke Rape Case: Accuser Used Phone During ‘Rape’ Timeframe

July 12, 2006

Monday, July 17: Post closed to commenting. Please continue discussing the Duke case at Salaciousness Sells. ———————————————————————— Have you noticed that each bit of information that leaks out about the Duke “rape” case is favorable to the defense? There are many possible explanations. For example, if the defense is leaking info, they’ll leak only that [...]

Read the full article →

I Am; Therefore, I Blog

July 11, 2006

Friday, July 14: Chris Muir’s Day By Day online comic strip, which has been syndicated to newspapers, will now be available via cell phone through SmashPhone.com, a comic strip network. Viewers can access strips through Verizon, Cingular, Sprint, T-Mobile, and other carriers. ————————————————————————————- Hat tip to Sister Toldjah for the post idea and the advice! [...]

Read the full article →

Social Security Administration Won’t Report Illegal Aliens

July 10, 2006

Update: State governments are getting the message. The federal government is a too-powerful, pork-laden bureaucracy with little accountability. It certainly doesn’t help matters that the White House is sending mixed signals with a strong “war on terror” mantra and weak border and interior enforcement efforts. Talk, as they say, is cheap. ——————————————————————————— Big government is [...]

Read the full article →

Media and Dog-Bites-Man Crimes

July 10, 2006

***Scroll down for updates!*** Close your eyes and imagine reading a news story about two white men breaking into a black man’s house in the Georgetown area of Washington, D.C., slashing his throat and killing him, and attempting to rape his girlfriend, also black. Picture a white woman waiting in the getaway car. Now envision [...]

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Read the full article →