<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Rape Case: Nifong Wrong&#8230;Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76371</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76371</guid>
		<description>Oops! Didn&#039;t know this post was still open. I usually close comments on posts once they&#039;re off the front page (spam issues). I&#039;ll update with a new Duke post soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Didn&#8217;t know this post was still open. I usually close comments on posts once they&#8217;re off the front page (spam issues). I&#8217;ll update with a new Duke post soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76368</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76368</guid>
		<description>Kemp,
I think that&#039;s a fair way to describe it.

Greg

P.S.  Did you see that KC Johnson picked up on my point from #28 above.  I might not have been the first to connect those two dots but I hadn&#039;t seen it published anywhere until today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kemp,<br />
I think that&#8217;s a fair way to describe it.</p>
<p>Greg</p>
<p>P.S.  Did you see that KC Johnson picked up on my point from #28 above.  I might not have been the first to connect those two dots but I hadn&#8217;t seen it published anywhere until today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNK</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76239</link>
		<dc:creator>UNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76239</guid>
		<description>Itâ€™s a â€œcollective action fallacyâ€ that people who believe in group behavior (race, class, crime groups) often make.

The fallacy is believing that people will sacrifice their own self interest (go to jail, work) for the interests of their group.

Also applies to economics, but look in Wikipedia for a more detailed explanation. 

Also the odds of getting the truth from one person, such a drunk whore, is hit or miss.  The odds of not getting any one of 20, 30, 40 people to talk is the same as going to Vegas and winning 20 times in a row.  Only an idiot could not get one, if not five to talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itâ€™s a â€œcollective action fallacyâ€ that people who believe in group behavior (race, class, crime groups) often make.</p>
<p>The fallacy is believing that people will sacrifice their own self interest (go to jail, work) for the interests of their group.</p>
<p>Also applies to economics, but look in Wikipedia for a more detailed explanation. </p>
<p>Also the odds of getting the truth from one person, such a drunk whore, is hit or miss.  The odds of not getting any one of 20, 30, 40 people to talk is the same as going to Vegas and winning 20 times in a row.  Only an idiot could not get one, if not five to talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kempermanx</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76226</link>
		<dc:creator>kempermanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76226</guid>
		<description>Greg,

When I read the post, I was over served and really did not make much effort at it, but I still think the post, to be polite, was oblique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>When I read the post, I was over served and really did not make much effort at it, but I still think the post, to be polite, was oblique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76209</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76209</guid>
		<description>Kemp,
I know ... I had difficutly trying to explain it myself, and I thought I understood it.  Maybe the best way to describe it is that there&#039;s a sort of negative presumption.  The absence of something expected would tend to argue against that which lead you to expect it.  Like &quot;If A, then almost certainly B; no B, therefore almost certainly not A.&quot;  It probably takes someone who&#039;s a better wordsmith than me to explain clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kemp,<br />
I know &#8230; I had difficutly trying to explain it myself, and I thought I understood it.  Maybe the best way to describe it is that there&#8217;s a sort of negative presumption.  The absence of something expected would tend to argue against that which lead you to expect it.  Like &#8220;If A, then almost certainly B; no B, therefore almost certainly not A.&#8221;  It probably takes someone who&#8217;s a better wordsmith than me to explain clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kempermanx</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76198</link>
		<dc:creator>kempermanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76198</guid>
		<description>Greg and Blugold,

I found the post confusing, sorry I misread it.

I see where Sgt. Gottlieb enjoys harrassing Dukies.  Here is his email address, if anyone wants &quot;Write&quot; him.  Have fun!!  I am sure he will enjoy hearing from his new friends!!
mark.gottlieb@durhamnc.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg and Blugold,</p>
<p>I found the post confusing, sorry I misread it.</p>
<p>I see where Sgt. Gottlieb enjoys harrassing Dukies.  Here is his email address, if anyone wants &#8220;Write&#8221; him.  Have fun!!  I am sure he will enjoy hearing from his new friends!!<br />
<a href="mailto:mark.gottlieb@durhamnc.gov">mark.gottlieb@durhamnc.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blugold</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76194</link>
		<dc:creator>blugold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76194</guid>
		<description>#29.  Thanks Greg...that was my point.  I was simply trying to add some strong evidence that no cover up of any type occurred by these boys and that a rape or anything related did NOT take place.  

Would a parent of a falsely accused player, knowing another teammate was guilty, let his/her son take the fall??  Would the innocent player&#039;s parent(s)--knowing who was involved--sit by quietly while all this unfolds, just hoping the trial for their innocent son turns out OK?  

Again my point:  The actions of the players and players&#039; families provide some very compelling evidence nothing happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#29.  Thanks Greg&#8230;that was my point.  I was simply trying to add some strong evidence that no cover up of any type occurred by these boys and that a rape or anything related did NOT take place.  </p>
<p>Would a parent of a falsely accused player, knowing another teammate was guilty, let his/her son take the fall??  Would the innocent player&#8217;s parent(s)&#8211;knowing who was involved&#8211;sit by quietly while all this unfolds, just hoping the trial for their innocent son turns out OK?  </p>
<p>Again my point:  The actions of the players and players&#8217; families provide some very compelling evidence nothing happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76188</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76188</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m too lazy to go grab links but go to Liestoppers and you&#039;ll also find discussion about a News &amp; Observer story on Chief Detective Gottlieb.  Seems Gottlieb has had a penchant for arresting Duke kids and throwing them in the can.  

During the period May &#039;05 to Feb &#039;06, there were 4 supervisors working the area that includes Duke.  Gottlieb made 28 arrests during that time.  20 of them were Duke students and 15 were taken to jail.  

During that same period, the other 3 supervisors combined to make 64 arrests and only 2 of them were Duke students.  The N&amp;O story also says that most of those Duke arrests were for the kinds of things for which most people just get issued citations and sent on their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too lazy to go grab links but go to Liestoppers and you&#8217;ll also find discussion about a News &amp; Observer story on Chief Detective Gottlieb.  Seems Gottlieb has had a penchant for arresting Duke kids and throwing them in the can.  </p>
<p>During the period May &#8217;05 to Feb &#8217;06, there were 4 supervisors working the area that includes Duke.  Gottlieb made 28 arrests during that time.  20 of them were Duke students and 15 were taken to jail.  </p>
<p>During that same period, the other 3 supervisors combined to make 64 arrests and only 2 of them were Duke students.  The N&amp;O story also says that most of those Duke arrests were for the kinds of things for which most people just get issued citations and sent on their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76187</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76187</guid>
		<description>Kemp,
I think you misread Blugold&#039;s post.  He&#039;s expressing doubt that an innocent guy (Seligman) would take a fall for a guilty teammate, which, given Seligman&#039;s alibi evidence, you&#039;d have to assume he&#039;s doing IF &quot;something happened&quot; in that bathroom.  But, since&#039;s it&#039;s extremely unlikely that an innocent guy would just take a fall for a guilty teammate in this kind of situation, it&#039;s all the more reason to doubt the allegations.  

In other words, he&#039;s got an alibi, and rather than take the fall himself, he&#039;d have turned on his guilty teammate IF there&#039;d really been a crime.  The fact he hasn&#039;t (and no one else has stepped in to keep Seligman from taking the fall) would tend to show that there wasn&#039;t a crime to cover up.  I think that&#039;s what Blugold is trying to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kemp,<br />
I think you misread Blugold&#8217;s post.  He&#8217;s expressing doubt that an innocent guy (Seligman) would take a fall for a guilty teammate, which, given Seligman&#8217;s alibi evidence, you&#8217;d have to assume he&#8217;s doing IF &#8220;something happened&#8221; in that bathroom.  But, since&#8217;s it&#8217;s extremely unlikely that an innocent guy would just take a fall for a guilty teammate in this kind of situation, it&#8217;s all the more reason to doubt the allegations.  </p>
<p>In other words, he&#8217;s got an alibi, and rather than take the fall himself, he&#8217;d have turned on his guilty teammate IF there&#8217;d really been a crime.  The fact he hasn&#8217;t (and no one else has stepped in to keep Seligman from taking the fall) would tend to show that there wasn&#8217;t a crime to cover up.  I think that&#8217;s what Blugold is trying to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76185</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76185</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something I&#039;ve wondered and haven&#039;t seen anyone else comment on anywhere else.  What does the esteemed group here think?  Most folks I&#039;ve seen have cast Nifong as a political opportunist who did this to get elected to a position to which he&#039;d been appointed.  Actually, I think it was something more desparate than that.

Nifong had spent his whole legal career as a prosecutor in the Durham DA&#039;s office.  Twenty-something odd years, to be inexact.  Election, schmelection.  I always kind of figured if he lost, he&#039;d just go right back to doing what he&#039;d always done, which didn&#039;t seem like enough to motivate someone to do what he&#039;s done with this case.

I recently read, though, when he was appointed DA, he had fired Freda (?) Black, his primary rival, whom he beat by something less than 1000 votes in the democratic primary.  I suppose about the time he became aware that she announced her candidacy for his seat, he knew that he needed to beat her in the election or he probably would meet the same fate she met at his hands (payback is an angry female dog).  

In other words, if she won, he probably would NOT be able to go back to prosecuting traffic offenses.  And where else is a guy like him going to find employment?  That&#039;s right.  This was all-or-nothing for Mad Mike, which explains the kind of limb he finds himself out on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve wondered and haven&#8217;t seen anyone else comment on anywhere else.  What does the esteemed group here think?  Most folks I&#8217;ve seen have cast Nifong as a political opportunist who did this to get elected to a position to which he&#8217;d been appointed.  Actually, I think it was something more desparate than that.</p>
<p>Nifong had spent his whole legal career as a prosecutor in the Durham DA&#8217;s office.  Twenty-something odd years, to be inexact.  Election, schmelection.  I always kind of figured if he lost, he&#8217;d just go right back to doing what he&#8217;d always done, which didn&#8217;t seem like enough to motivate someone to do what he&#8217;s done with this case.</p>
<p>I recently read, though, when he was appointed DA, he had fired Freda (?) Black, his primary rival, whom he beat by something less than 1000 votes in the democratic primary.  I suppose about the time he became aware that she announced her candidacy for his seat, he knew that he needed to beat her in the election or he probably would meet the same fate she met at his hands (payback is an angry female dog).  </p>
<p>In other words, if she won, he probably would NOT be able to go back to prosecuting traffic offenses.  And where else is a guy like him going to find employment?  That&#8217;s right.  This was all-or-nothing for Mad Mike, which explains the kind of limb he finds himself out on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Koza</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76177</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Koza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76177</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else notice that Andy Roddick looked like he was wearing a Duke lacrosse &quot;innocent&quot; wristband when he played at the US Open yesterday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else notice that Andy Roddick looked like he was wearing a Duke lacrosse &#8220;innocent&#8221; wristband when he played at the US Open yesterday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seahawk</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-76175</link>
		<dc:creator>Seahawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-76175</guid>
		<description>A great deal more now emerges about officer Gottlieb and his abuse of Duke students--

http://media.www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2006/09/11/News/Students.Criticize.Lax.Cops.Behavior-2265465.shtml?sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com&amp;MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com

(excerpted example)  :

&lt;i&gt;At 3 a.m. on the morning after the concert, Gottlieb and nine other police officers raided the students&#039; home and arrested Tomovich and his six housemates for noise ordinance and open container violations.

&quot;I was still half asleep, and he put me in handcuffs,&quot; Tomovich said.

Tomovich and others said the police dragged his sleeping housemate Justin Bieber, Pratt &#039;06, off of his bed, causing him to fall on the floor, before dragging him down the stairs.

Gottlieb and the other officers led the housemates outside.

&quot;[Gottlieb] said, &#039;You&#039;re going to be in the biggest trouble of your life,&#039;&quot; Tomovich said.

After they were taken to the station, Tomovich--a U.S. citizen of Serbian heritage--said that Gottlieb threatened to deport him for breaking the law.

&quot;He took me to a back room and said, &#039;Do you need to speak to your consulate? We can deport you.&#039; I said, &#039;Why would I need to speak to my consulate?&#039;.... I&#039;m a U.S. citizen. I have a different last name, but I&#039;m a U.S. citizen,&quot; Tomovich recalled.

All seven housemates were arrested and taken into custody. &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great deal more now emerges about officer Gottlieb and his abuse of Duke students&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://media.www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2006/09/11/News/Students.Criticize.Lax.Cops.Behavior-2265465.shtml?sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com&#038;MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2006/09/11/News/Students.Criticize.Lax.Cops.Behavior-2265465.shtml?sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com&#038;MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com</a></p>
<p>(excerpted example)  :</p>
<p><i>At 3 a.m. on the morning after the concert, Gottlieb and nine other police officers raided the students&#8217; home and arrested Tomovich and his six housemates for noise ordinance and open container violations.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was still half asleep, and he put me in handcuffs,&#8221; Tomovich said.</p>
<p>Tomovich and others said the police dragged his sleeping housemate Justin Bieber, Pratt &#8217;06, off of his bed, causing him to fall on the floor, before dragging him down the stairs.</p>
<p>Gottlieb and the other officers led the housemates outside.</p>
<p>&#8220;[Gottlieb] said, &#8216;You&#8217;re going to be in the biggest trouble of your life,&#8217;&#8221; Tomovich said.</p>
<p>After they were taken to the station, Tomovich&#8211;a U.S. citizen of Serbian heritage&#8211;said that Gottlieb threatened to deport him for breaking the law.</p>
<p>&#8220;He took me to a back room and said, &#8216;Do you need to speak to your consulate? We can deport you.&#8217; I said, &#8216;Why would I need to speak to my consulate?&#8217;&#8230;. I&#8217;m a U.S. citizen. I have a different last name, but I&#8217;m a U.S. citizen,&#8221; Tomovich recalled.</p>
<p>All seven housemates were arrested and taken into custody. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kempermanx</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-75998</link>
		<dc:creator>kempermanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-75998</guid>
		<description>Blugold,
What the hell are you talking about? 
No team member has ever been linked to any rape, so how can they be hiding something?  Don&#039;t smoke that stuff and try to post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blugold,<br />
What the hell are you talking about?<br />
No team member has ever been linked to any rape, so how can they be hiding something?  Don&#8217;t smoke that stuff and try to post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seahawk</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-75947</link>
		<dc:creator>Seahawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-75947</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What happened to Crystalâ€™s girlfriend that was willing to talk about Crystal for +/- $10K (which isnâ€™t a crime) but instead was arrested. Is she still in jail?&lt;/i&gt;

Her girlfriend was arrested for 2 bad checks; there is no indication of how long ago she wrote these checks. (Considering how the cabbie was treated, it may have been a long time ago.) Linwood Wilson, also active in the lacrosse case, runs the DPD Worthless Check program.
 
Her ex-husband was arrested; his trial has already been postponed once (not sure, but I think until after the election). Not sure if he&#039;s still in jail or not. 

Her (former?) boyfriend Matt Murchison was arrested. He was on probation and had it revoked for driving with a bad licence. His trial has been postponed at least twice. 

Elmostafa the cabbie was arrested, charged, and tried (fortunately a security video tape saved him).

Then there is Kim, who embezzeled $25,000 from a former employer and hasn&#039;t made restitution; who missed appointments with her probation officer, and left the state to go to California without the court&#039;s permission. But she isn&#039;t in jail
and had a favorable bail deal personally arranged by Nifong; 
and Judge Stephens (who used to eat lunch once a week with Nifong, and who signed the initial 
warrants in the lacrosse case, and then wouldn&#039;t quash them even though he found out they were based on falsified information) has postponed her trial until after the election.

So it seems that all these people are being kept hanging (despite an overcrowded Durham court docket, which recently underwent &#039;reforms&#039; designed in part to end endless postponments of trials) until the lacrosse case is settled; and with the disposition of their cases--most of them have extensive previous criminal records--resting in the hands of the DA.

&quot;Jail-house witness&quot;, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What happened to Crystalâ€™s girlfriend that was willing to talk about Crystal for +/- $10K (which isnâ€™t a crime) but instead was arrested. Is she still in jail?</i></p>
<p>Her girlfriend was arrested for 2 bad checks; there is no indication of how long ago she wrote these checks. (Considering how the cabbie was treated, it may have been a long time ago.) Linwood Wilson, also active in the lacrosse case, runs the DPD Worthless Check program.</p>
<p>Her ex-husband was arrested; his trial has already been postponed once (not sure, but I think until after the election). Not sure if he&#8217;s still in jail or not. </p>
<p>Her (former?) boyfriend Matt Murchison was arrested. He was on probation and had it revoked for driving with a bad licence. His trial has been postponed at least twice. </p>
<p>Elmostafa the cabbie was arrested, charged, and tried (fortunately a security video tape saved him).</p>
<p>Then there is Kim, who embezzeled $25,000 from a former employer and hasn&#8217;t made restitution; who missed appointments with her probation officer, and left the state to go to California without the court&#8217;s permission. But she isn&#8217;t in jail<br />
and had a favorable bail deal personally arranged by Nifong;<br />
and Judge Stephens (who used to eat lunch once a week with Nifong, and who signed the initial<br />
warrants in the lacrosse case, and then wouldn&#8217;t quash them even though he found out they were based on falsified information) has postponed her trial until after the election.</p>
<p>So it seems that all these people are being kept hanging (despite an overcrowded Durham court docket, which recently underwent &#8216;reforms&#8217; designed in part to end endless postponments of trials) until the lacrosse case is settled; and with the disposition of their cases&#8211;most of them have extensive previous criminal records&#8211;resting in the hands of the DA.</p>
<p>&#8220;Jail-house witness&#8221;, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mem</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2006/09/05/duke-rape-case-nifong-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-75945</link>
		<dc:creator>mem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/?p=2134#comment-75945</guid>
		<description>What happened to Crystal&#039;s girlfriend that was willing to talk about Crystal for +/- $10K (which isn&#039;t a crime) but instead was arrested.  Is she still in jail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Crystal&#8217;s girlfriend that was willing to talk about Crystal for +/- $10K (which isn&#8217;t a crime) but instead was arrested.  Is she still in jail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

