Ed’s point, (that Margaret Cho is grossly fat) is certainly a more intelligent and ‘Republican’ attack upon the opposition than those other stupid fat liberals who call Ann Coulter ‘anorexic’ or Rush Limbaugh ‘fat’.

In other news this week, Conservative bloggers didn’t mention how fat Ted Kennedy is at:

http://fatboy.cc/

Etc.

BTW being a skank in a swimsuit isn’t the same thing as being a photoshopped pseudo skank in a swimsuit.

She’s probably attractive enough that someone went to the trouble to photoshop her pic. I’d take it as a compliment. I wouldn’t try to get the guy fired. His attempt to harm her backfired. I say move on.

If you are going to pretend to be Charlotte Church, you might want to make sure you get the name right. It’s ‘Church’ not ‘Chase’.

Might be worth putting your brain into gear before you take your mouth on the road. But, credit due, you made me laugh.

which party doctors photos or fakes documents in order to silence/shame/intimidate critics? and in how many instances has this been done? well, let’s see: if memory serves, malkin’s fake-bikini shot makes 4 done by the dems-liberals-islamofacsists recently (the others being the ‘lieberman blackface’ shot; the ‘thick smoke over beirut’ shot; and the ‘fake-but-accurate’ nat’l guard docs that dan rather thought so much of). versus none by conservatives. gee, that’s odd: you’d think, all other things being equal, that nasty little tricks like this would be more or less equal too.

instances like this are out there – why not just add them up? numbers don’t lie, do they? how many fact-based liberal bloggers are there out there? compare that with the number of fact-based conservative bloggers. i’ll bet big bucks there’s a lot more of the latter than the former. why should that be? there must be a reason, no? now compare the number of hysterical, untalented liberal propagandists masquerading as entertainers (and here’s where the left’s beloved maggy cho finally gets her due). you know, the ones whose act consists largely of “they’re so stupid!” screeds. i can think of 4 or 5 of those (often grossly fat) bozos right off the top of my head…but no conservative ones.

things like that. the total lines of hysterically partisan hatred spewed by liberal bloggers/commenters versus the total lines of conservative hate. which parties’ congressmen resign when caught raiding the cookie/nookie jar compared to staying in office, clinging desperately to power. the number of times tolerant liberals have “jokingly” called for the death of the president, versus the number of times tolerant conservatives called for bubba’s death.

add ‘em up. in the end, real numbers (“accurate; non-falsified”) don’t lie. and in the end, it’s the totalitarian left and their islamofascist buddies who do the bulk of these contemptible little stunts. hmmm….might a lesson be learned from that?

You failed to mention that all of this started becuase Michelle smeared me in her column and I would sue, but being a public figure, I cannot.

Since when is it alright to smear me because I do not believe George Bush is doing his job? I pay taxes in both the UK and the US so I am entitled to my opinion on my show, by the way.

I would appreciate Michelle Malkin keeping the focus on other things besides me. I am not interested in playing her punching bag or being fodder for her penning.

I don’t think anyone tricked him. I think he made a mistake, corrected it, and has kept it up at the request of the subject of the mistake. How this is reckless or shows disregard, I don’t know. Its not like he’s posting personal contact information for people and those people are getting harassed.

You have convinced me. Muller is the paragon of virtue and his fair and balanced site is the source for the fount of wisdom.

It is a shame that some gremlin led him to engage in promoting a photoshopped picture of Michelle Malkin, his long standing nemesis on the subject of FDR’s internment of the American Japanese citizens.

Do you suppose that Malkin might have tricked him into making this innocent mistake?

reckless? I don’t think so. Fraud? I dont see that. Conspiracy? To what? tortious interference? With what? Intentional infliction. Do yo know what that requires?

Also, he dindn’t “post” the picture.

I am cogent of degrees of racism within political forums, what interests me more, is how (if ever) it is different on the ‘left’, and different on the ‘right’.

I suggest we get serious about these generalizations, in the interest of constructive discussion and comparison:

To Chris Ford:

Do you think that the ‘left’s comments to Malkin are notably different than the ‘rights’ comments to Margaret Cho?

Is the ‘far-left’s’ ‘antisemitism’ notably different to the far-right’s anti-semitism?

Here are some examples of recent right-wing comments to an American of Asian descent:

http://margaretcho.com/attacks_from_the_right.htm

Here are some examples of recent far-right wing anti-semitism:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=328650&page=2

To compare, Chris, would you please read both of my links, and then post up the links to the forums and comments of both Michelle Malkin (where she gets it ‘the worst’) and the far-left boards responsible for the ‘worst ant-semitism’ this side of Cairo.

This wil enable and honest comparison. Then we could discuss any appreciable and specific differences without the need to generalize..

Thanks,

JohnD

It isn’t just hypocrisy, it shows there own demands that others hew to PC code to avoid “hurting people” are not based in actual belief – but insincere to the core.

Others have noted the Far Left boards are saturated not just with honest, political criticism of Israel and Jews – but the vilest anti-Semitism this side of Cairo. And we have seen the Left attack Sullivan when he was on a conservative tear as a “bareback faggot”, Matt Drudge, a Jew and homosexual, as a conservative money-grubbing Bush sodomite..Steele gets oreos tossed at him by “down with racism!” leftists who fail to note the irony of whites, jews of privilege on the Left condemning a black guy for failing to “think as we order blacks to think.”

But Malkin seems to get it the worst. Calling her many variants of “Asian whore”. With the vilest dehumanizing language and images imaginable of this married housewife/journalist/author. An interesting thing happened at Berkeley as Asians arriving to protest a Malkin speaking engagement (mainly on her defense of Internment) – met the protestors of the Far Left carrying signs of “yellow slut” “Me sooo love ping-pong balls” and other dreck – and the Asians made no bones of their vehement disagreement with the Far Left’s racist, anti-woman slurs. It caused quite a follow-up controversy at Berkeley and a healthy debate if the “politics of confrontation and street protest theater” have gone full circle into becoming the very Brownshirts they supposedly abhor. Predictably, Berkeley said “Naaaaah!”, but I have no doubt you will see many future Asian conservatives date their conversion to the attacks on Malkin.

- Muller is a law professor
- His blog cites the school as his employer and position to bolster his credibility
- May have used/be using University property/ computers/ server space
- He is obligated to conduct himself ethically, to avoid bringing discredit upon the School
- He appears to have recklessly posted the photo as if it were Malkin’s
- He said it was of her
- Looks like he did so without making an effort to determine it was legitimate
- He may have done this to hurt her credibility, to inflict economic harm upon her
- He may have acted in concert with others
- As a lawyer, he should have known better
- Potentially: Fraud, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with professional and employment relationships
- Enjoy.