Wednesday, January 17: Post closed to commenting. Go fill up this one!
Saturday, January 13 (5:08 p.m.): Nifong is off the Duke case. Now others will have to clean up his mess…
Later on the radio…Oops. Don’t say “ejaculate” on the radio! 
Friday, January 12 @ 5:35 p.m.: Mike Nifong tries to slither away.
How many days will pass before all charges are dropped? Catch me on Tammy Bruce’s show tomorrow night around 6:15 9:15 p.m. EST.
Update II (1/12): DNA expert Brian Meehan, one of Mike Nifong’s co-conspirators, will appear on “60 Minutes” this Sunday at 8:00 p.m.
Later…I’m appearing on Tammy Bruce’s show tomorrow night around 6:15 p.m. EST to talk about this case.
Stunning Update (1/11 @ 1:43 p.m.): Whaaaa?? The stripper-accuser now claims Reade Seligmann “did not commit any sex acts on her” but he watched. Oh, honey, get on your knees…and ask God to forgive you for this web of lies. And for being a stripper…
As I wrote in an earlier post, unless they’d knocked me out cold, there’d be plenty of DNA evidence if three men tried to rape me, especially regarding a…certain “forced” act. The man’s blood…and tissue…would be all over me, all over the floor. The crime scene would look like something out a horror movie.
Yet, there was no DNA evidence linking Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, or David Evans to the “victim.” Didn’t she try to fight back?
A commenter in the ABC 11 TV forum says, “Also, have you visited La Shawn Barber’s blog? You remind me of her in your post. I like La Shawn but cannot stand the religious aspect and some of the right wing ideology.”
Well, it’s one big package. I’m glad you like the Duke posts, but the religious and “right wing” stuff are a part of this blog, too.
———————————————————————————————–
CHECK. THIS. OUT. From today’s News & Observer (emphasis added):
“In her latest statement to investigators [from December 21], the accuser in the Duke lacrosse rape case changed her account again about when the alleged gang rape occurred, who attacked her and how…Defense attorneys filed the statement in court today, arguing that it was more evidence that the woman is an unreliable witness.
“The woman adjusted the timing of the assault to earlier in the evening, a time point preceding the well-documented alibi of one accused player, Reade Seligmann. The defense, however, introduced yet more alibi evidence for Seligmann: he was on the cell phone with his girlfriend during the height of the attack as the accuser now times it.”
Doh!
Get your gang-rape fantasy story straight, woman! Someone’s gonna think you’re lying about the whole thing. (Hat tip: Wizbang)
More thoughts later. Paying bills…
More Duke blogging: The Johnsville News, LieStoppers, Crystal Mess, Durham-in-Wonderland, John in Carolina…For more info, see the Duke Rape Case archives, 37 posts deep.
ABC links to latest defense motions.
