Tuesday, January 16: Yesterday when I said that the “right” kind of people didn’t read the blog, I meant the kind of people who could help me professionally (as a writer) and/or help this blogger reach the stratosphere of the blogosphere. I was feeling sorry for myself, comparing myself to others, and I try not to make that a habit.
From the beginning, I’ve always been amazed that people read my blog. Even three years after I started, I’m surprised each morning when people return, even if some return only to harass me. 
I value your readership, and I don’t ever want to give you the impression that I don’t. The “right†people don’t matter, really, when it comes to what I want to accomplish at LBC. I want to challenge people’s assumptions, make them think about problems and solutions in ways they hadn’t thought about before. I want to share my faith and my opinions and encourage others to be bold in everything they do. These goals have little to do with high ranking or heavy traffic or whether the “right†people are linking and reading.
I realize that my outspoken faith turns off some people. In fact, I’ve heard and read that quite a few hate the religious aspect of this blog but love the political. Well, a woman can’t live on political ranting and raving alone. Since my faith guides everything I do, everything I am, it’s impossible for me to ignore it and/or put it away to appease or appeal to certain readers.
God has blessed me beyond anything I could have imagined. But being the fallen human I am, I sometimes think I “deserve†more. I know I want more, but that’s up to God. If I’m doing what I believe he wants me to do, I can’t go wrong. It may appear wrong in other people’s eyes, but he’s the one I want to please and must obey.
I am thankful for what God has given me, and that includes thoughtful, sincere readers. Thank you so much for commenting on this post. I’m humbled by the 50+ responses. There are rich nuggets worth contemplating in each of your comments, and I will read them again, pray on them, and think of how to incorporate the advice and sentiments into my blogging.
***
When I don’t get the recognition I think I deserve for what I’m doing or what I’ve done, I consider several reasons. The first one that comes to mind is — and I’d rather eat a boiled rat than say it out loud — my skin color. My work on so-and-so has gone unnoticed because I’m black. Because I’m black.
That’s too easy, no matter how true it might be.
Or maybe it’s because I’m a woman. For various reasons, the world is still run by men. That includes the microcosm of the blogosphere. I haven’t done a formal study or anything, but a quick assessment of the kind of bloggers who’re recognized for what they do yields a high number of men, relative to women. Perhaps the people who matter, how ever these people are defined, simply pay more attention to men. And more of the people who matter probably are men. So, the vicious cycle continues.
Or maybe — and this is something I’ve put a lot of thought into lately — I’m not as good as I think I am. Sure, people tell me I’m a great writer/blogger. But am I really? Perhaps a truly objective person out there could tell me the truth: am I a mediocre writer? I know I’ve been called overrated. That’s a possibility.
I read a quote from some important person that went something like this: If we constantly compare ourselves to those greater than ourselves, we could end up with an inferiority complex. If we constantly compare ourselves to those lesser than ourselves, we could end up with inflated egos. I know I can do some things better than others, but are those things what people care about?
I may not be doing enough of what really counts. That’s probably why I’m not being recognized for my work by the “right” people. That’s why I’m not being quoted or linked to on certain topics, although I’ve put in much more time and energy on those topics. Or maybe my blog isn’t read by the “right” people…because I’m black. Or a woman. Or mediocre. Or all three.
This post is cryptic, I know. Don’t mind me. I’m just taking it easy (or trying) on this MLK holiday and thinking about…stuff. I thank God I rarely fall into sullenness.
It’s very unattractive. 
Update (6:33 p.m.): I allow myself one sulky, feeling-sorry-for-myself, nonsensical post a year, and this is it for 2007. Thanks, readers. 
Oh, I know exactly how you feel! I often question if I am passed over for so much because of my disability — the wheelchair gets in the way. I very rarely have those kind of pity parties but they do come now and then. Thank God I don’t live there!
Comment by Karen of Scottsdale — 01.15.07 @ 5:33 pm
I don’t know about the recognition factor, but I know that I respect you, read what you have posted, and give it thought. Even when there is less than total agreement, you always make sense. Not sure how much weight that carries, but there are probably a lot out there like me, except quieter.
Grace and peace.
tn
Comment by tnmartin — 01.15.07 @ 5:34 pm
You write clearly and concisely, which is by itself a rare skill. I’ll admit I also like the added zing of humor that someone like Steve H. of Hog on Ice, or Ann Coulter, puts into the writing. But I’ve come to see you as one of the big names in the blogosphere, myself. I could only hope to be like you when I grew up.
Comment by Barb the Evil Genius — 01.15.07 @ 5:43 pm
Dang, La Shawn …. what brought this malaise on?
A moment of self introspection leading to paralysis by analysis? It’s not you.
You lead with your thoughts. Your drive. Your passion. And your compassion. I don’t give a boiled rat’s patootie where you rank in the views of the “blogosphere varsity” — you’ve struck a chord with a number of folks just like you, folks with intelligence and good common sense.
Keep it up. And if you’re down this way, let us know. There’s eastern NC BBQ to be sampled!!!
TaterCon
Comment by TaterCon — 01.15.07 @ 5:45 pm
I saw you on television on C-SPAN over a year ago. I heard you speak and I was impressed so I googled LaShawn Barber and found this blog and have been here ever since.
You’re a great writer, LaShawn, but your blog is rather selective in that it deals primarily with issues of race and Christianity. That’s fine with me. That’s why I’m here. But, it also may be why some people don’t recognize you, link to you, etc. Many of the “big bloggers” are heavily involved in day to day politics..Iraq..elections, etc. as are the media and so they get recognition because of their topics, not so much their writing skills although many are good writers as well. To illustrate what I’m talking about, I believe you got quite a bit of mention by others regarding the Duke case because it’s a big news item and your approach was quite unique and comprehensive. On the contrary, there’s not much in the news about some of the other items you blog about.
This blog is about you, your interests and passions, and it’s a great blog. I’m quite happy here but I point out the above just to give you a different perspective.
Blessings.
Comment by dianne — 01.15.07 @ 5:49 pm
I like reading your blog. I tell everyone to check out your analyses on the Nifong goofiness. But…I’m probably not the “right” person to read your stuff.
Just thought you would want to know.
Comment by cherylb — 01.15.07 @ 5:55 pm
Without question, your skills as a language artist have soared in the time I have had the pleasure of reading your work. You are in the top tier of writers in your ability to express your thoughts with clarity, force and rhythm. Your research is remarkable and your logic is direct and well supported. (I don’t know if you shoot trolls on sight, but the few who wander in are true fools in their effort to knock your post off the tracks.)
The “black” and “woman” thing is an issue that I would file under “non-issue.” Pure talent is a commodity that is too valuable to go unnoticed and unrewarded.
You are pioneering in the blogosphere. I have yet to understand where the market is in the medium. But, the blogosphere is certainly a terrific way to make yourself and your talents known. As Gabriel said: “Toot thou thine own horn; for also shall it not otherwise be tooted.”
Comment by Heliotrope — 01.15.07 @ 5:55 pm
Thanks, Karen, tnmartin, Barb, Tatercon, dianne, cherylb, and Helio.
I felt a bit silly writing this post, but I published it nonetheless. I just wanted “the world” to know that I, too, throw a pity party every now and then. I’m turning 40 this year, and I guess I’m feeling introspective, making mid-life assessments.
Although I wasn’t fishing for compliments, I thank you for them.
The sun will come out tomorrow…
Comment by La Shawn — 01.15.07 @ 5:59 pm
La Shawn,
We wouldn’t be hitting your blog if you weren’t worthwhile.
For comparisons, well, IMHO the only comparisons any of us ought to be making are to Jesus and to our own best.
If you come out well on those two and somebody doesn’t appreciate you, well, that’s their loss.
Chuck
Comment by Chuck — 01.15.07 @ 6:02 pm
La Shawn,
I believe there is some truth to the statements you made in regards to race and being a woman. That, sadly, is still the state of affairs of the society in which we live. MLK brought us some distance but we still have a long ways to go.
Comment by Ron — 01.15.07 @ 6:04 pm
LaShawn, I only wish that I could put thoughts to keyboard as well as you do. I used to be a recreational writer (way before PCs existed!) but as I have gotten older, I find that I am not as articulate anymore. I admire your writing.
As to your question - I have a possible answer. And please, this is only based on my own experience. I think it is because you are black. Not just because you are black per se, but it is because you are black that you are able to put words to things that many white people (including myself) dare not whisper. We live in a society which is so restricted that we cannot put voice to those things which we feel are wrong when it comes to a ‘minority’ race. We would be called racist and worse. I grew up in the 60s and as a child I was a witness to the turmoil of the civil rights era. But I can never know nor understand the pain and injustice except as an observer. I don’t believe I have ever been a racist, but when I see the state of so many in the black community, I get frustrated by the constant blame. My family history in this country only goes back about 60 years. I do not feel the ‘guilt’ of slavery, but I do feel empathy for the suffering it caused. But I cannot help but wonder why after so many years it is still being used to excuse poor results and bad choices among the descendants of slaves.
What I am trying to say is that I love to read your thoughts because I agree with so much of what you write. But do I ever recommend your blog to anyone else? No. Because I am afraid that I have no right to admit I agree with you. I am not black, therefore if I recommend you to someone else it is because I am racist. I’m not. But that is the way it would appear.
I am a woman. I can complain about feminists all I want. I am a former ‘liberal’, therefore I can complain about the harm they are doing to our country all I want. But I have never been black and cannot say “Dayum, LaShawn hit the nail on the head with that one!” even though I do agree with you on so many issues. We live in a society where there is a perception that unless you’ve ‘been there’, you have no authority to take a position on certain issues.
Perhaps because the blogosphere is made up of a majority of white males, they are hesitant to link to you for the same reason?
This is all just my opinion, of course. It could be that they are all just stoopid.
And I wouldn’t want you to change anything. As a non-practicing Catholic who still prays and speaks to God on a daily basis, I am also in awe of your faith. Do not change that either.
Terri
Comment by Terri — 01.15.07 @ 6:12 pm
Ms Barber,
I’m a 40 yr old white male and your blog is one of the 1st things I read every morning. I wish I had your talent to put my thoughts into words as you do. Keep up the great work .
Sam in Houston
Comment by Sam — 01.15.07 @ 6:13 pm
I like your writing style, follow your page, and I don’t subscribe to your theory that the Blogosphere is dominated by men. I’m a 38 year old white man from Wisconsin who’s favorites list on his browser consist of Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingram, Jessica McBride (out of Milwaukee), and you. Hardly a male dominated list. I don’t seek out conservative women, I seek out a person’s message and character, I don’t care about color or sex. And that’s true of most people I know (who are conservative that is). I didn’t really realize that the pages I had bookmarked were all women until I read your posting from today and did a little inventory. Keep up the good work! Your posts offer a unique perspective.
Comment by Jamie J — 01.15.07 @ 6:17 pm
Despite the fact that I disagree with 99 percent of what you have to say, I still come back to read your blog. That must say something about you as a writer.
I’m a quote gal, so I thought that I would share this one.
“Most successes are unhappy. That’s why they are successes - they have to reassure themselves about themselves by achieving something that the world will notice.†—-Agatha Christie
Comment by kathy — 01.15.07 @ 6:18 pm
Feeling ignored, misunderstood or not taken seriously by the “right” people is a nearly universal emotion, regardless of race or gender. Heck, even some Presidents have had this feeling (LBJ and Nixon in relation to Ivy League people, for example, and GW Bush right now in relation to all the “smart” people who go out of their way to assert that he isn’t one of them). In my 2006 Christmas letter to long ago friends, I admitted, “There’s a fine line between healthy introspection and reprehensible self-absorption, and I probably cross it.” That’s probably true of anyone with ambitions which have been thwarted–in other words, most of humanity. So your blue funk today is okay, LaShawn, as long as it is temporary. MLK Day is a pretty good time for a black woman whose opinions are at odds with most other black people to sulk a bit. The whole theme of the day, if you listen to the appointed speakers, seems to be “Victimization never ends,” and it’s enough to make you feel victimized by those who feel victimized. (Hope that makes sense.) You’re in good company: people like Shelby Steele, Michael Steele, John McWhorter, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams and Star Parker are also probably wondering this day if anyone will ever understand them.
All I can tell you is (1) God understands, and it’s His opinion/ultimate wisdom that matters most. (2) I’ll bet your number of “hits” is thousands per day ahead of that of the average blogger.
If you were mediocre, your blog wouldn’t be one of the very few I visit every day. I’m in awe not only of your abilities, but of your courage. So there. Tomorrow is a new day, yet another opportunity, yet another gift from God.
Comment by Dave — 01.15.07 @ 6:24 pm
I believe it is the limited amount of topics you choose to address. Your sex and race might limit those. This is a matter of self selection. because that is what interests you. The self-selection with your background might limit your “quotability”.
I say this with a marketing mindset. For example, people may not look to you for insightful quotes on educational issues, although you have addressed them or look to you on addiction issues, although you have addressed them.
Just think about all successes you have had. Think about all the people you have met and what fun it has been.
Keep it up.
Comment by Tim — 01.15.07 @ 6:32 pm
Hi, LaShawn. Just thought I’d let you know that you are a bright spot in my little corner of the internet…you are on my short list of sites I visit daily, along with Michelle Malkin & Hot Air, Drudge, and Fox News. It seems like I am always talking to people about info I read on your site, so I encourage you to keep it up.
I also appreciate your support of homeschooling. It means a lot to know that someone who’s opinion I respect so much truly believes in what I am doing.
And remember, f-f-f-f-40 is just a number!
Your sister in Christ,
Kym
Comment by Kym — 01.15.07 @ 6:36 pm
As a blogger much, much lower on the “food chain” than you, I think you’re doing well! You are attending conferences as a panelist, your blog is linked to by those above you as well as those below and on the same level, you are working for yourself and seem to be having some success with it…
Take this moment of introspection and think about where you want to be. Whose attention do you want? Fox News? CNN? More local recognition? More regional? National? Then think about what you need to do to get there. Network with other black conservatives, like Dr. Williams or Mr. Cain? And from there, gain access to the likes of Neil Boortz or Rush Limbaugh?
Or go the “chick” route: Michelle Malkin, Mary Katherine Ham, Laura Ingram, Baldilocks?
And what are you prepared to sacrifice to get there? There are trade-offs in life–I decided early in my career that I wouldn’t trade my family life for my job. The downside is I’m not making what I could be. The upside is I’m still married to the same man and all my children are speaking to me.
Comment by March Hare — 01.15.07 @ 6:37 pm
La Shawn, I am glad you got this out early in the year. lol
Now, that you have it out of your system, we can all go back and enjoy the thought provoking and stimulating posts that you put up on this blog.
You do have that rare ability to write well, and I do enjoy your comments. Keep up the good work.
Comment by David — 01.15.07 @ 6:51 pm
Hey LaShawn, maybe if you were a black, and a lesbian conservative writer you’d get noticed more. That gay thing is in ya know.
Comment by Stacy L. Harp — 01.15.07 @ 7:15 pm
I just learned about your work when you spoke on the Tammy Bruce program last Saturday. And in response to your post “Black.Woman.Mediocre,” I would not know that you are a ‘black’ person based on what I’ve read of your thoughts, and on that basis would rate you among the top political and social commentators I’ve encountered on the blogosphere. I like clear, incisive writing style. I hope you will always retain your high principles. Thank you.
Comment by O. — 01.15.07 @ 7:17 pm
La Shawn, I couldn’t leave your site today without commenting — my first!
I’m not going to heap praise on you to make you feel better. The fact that I visit your site daily and have turned many of my family members and friends onto your blog should speak for itself.
Your perspective as a black, female, conservative Christian writer is what makes you so different — and special! I don’t read your blog just so I can find something I can agree with you on, I read because it makes me examine my thoughts more thoroughly.
Please don’t compare yourself to anyone in the mainstream media or even MM (I don’t even visit her site daily). Continue being who God made you and allow Him to guide your path.
Your brother in Christ,
Lee
James 4:10
Comment by Lee — 01.15.07 @ 7:21 pm
Gee LaShawn what brought this on? Did you accidentally see my post about this?
http://ahshoot.townhall.com/g/d119802d-9c57-4f7a-bf8c-ff4f4cb2eabd
Heck, even with a link such as this:
http://www.townhall.com/youropinion/
I can’t get read or linked by anyone important either.
Bleh, blogging’s for fun anyway. Profit is just extra.
But your talent is there, I second the motion to stick with Hot Air and go that route. You’re already on TV so you’ve got it made. Keep going.
Comment by ScottG — 01.15.07 @ 7:23 pm
imo, it’s because you are a black conservative.
Comment by christy — 01.15.07 @ 7:23 pm
Dear La Shawn: I believe that God has a sacred ministry for every believer. Your ministry here has been a wonderful blessing for me. But whether this blog is big or small doesn’t really matter if Christ is in control. Satan attacks all who witness for Christ. Sometimes our gender, race or economic status is used by Satan to drive away our focus on Christ. God made you Black for His Holy purposes. And he made you a woman for His Holy purposes. Don’t allow anyone or any circumstance to steal your joy in Christ. Sing some joyfull hymms and praise the lord and you’ll be surprised how the clouds depart. “If God is for you, who can be against you?” Your ministry concerning race and gender is difficult and yet is very much needed if we are to love one another as Christ commanded. I’LL keep you and your Ministry in my prayers. May the lord bless you as your ministry has blessed me.
Comment by DeaconP — 01.15.07 @ 7:24 pm
Hey LaShawn, you inspired me to write about you.
Comment by Stacy L. Harp — 01.15.07 @ 7:32 pm
Hm. Well, I don’t comment regularly, and I rarely agree with your views, so you might not particularly care what I think. I do read regularly, though. I think that you write clearly and concisely, and I am rarely offended by anything you say — you are civil, whereas many people who write about politics are not. I mean, occasionally I will agree with what you say; most often I will not. But either way, I don’t feel angry or anything.
You do present some conservative arguments I’m not used to hearing, and I enjoy hearing them. They make me think, and more often than not I end up being more inclined to believe what I believed before I read the article, but in my opinion anything that makes a person question their accepted ‘truths’ is a good thing. It’s why I come here!
I would not say that you are mediocre; rather, I would say that this is a time when there are a lot of mediocre writers blogging, and a lot of them are blogging about politics. It’s very difficult for a civil person to get noticed in a room full of 100,000 people who are all screaming insults at each other! I mean, if you were to go around all Ann Coulter or Amanda Marcotte or something, I’m sure your page-hit count would be higher, but you would be more mediocre despite all the extra traffic. Does that make sense?
Your blog is like the local coffee shop. It may not make as much money as Starbucks, but that doesn’t mean that it is mediocre or sub-par — in fact, it is above average. But people driving through, when faced with a Starbucks and a local coffee shop, will hit the Starbucks because they know it already; its familiar sign announces its presence before they ever glance at the local shop.
And anyway, you’re doing quite well for yourself. You go to conferences, etc. It’s like, my boyfriend initially moved to Manhattan to be an actor. He has since become a teacher, but he was talking with the a childhood friend who also moved to the city to pursue a career in acting. They complained together for a while, bemoaning the lack of work and the impossibility of getting “noticed,” and then his friend mentioned that she had just won a prestigious award for her work in an off-Broadway play. That is HUGE in the acting world! Perspective is everything — the successes you have achieved with your blog are very impressive, even if they don’t always feel that way.
Comment by Alexandra — 01.15.07 @ 8:07 pm
La Shawn,
this particular post of yours is a great example of one of the reasons that I admire you so much. You’re not the kind of person that fishes for compliments, so I will only shower you with honesty.
Along with being an eloquent, articulate writer and a well-read, knowledgeable individual, you are also one of the most courageous people I have ever had the pleasure of communicating with. It is tough to disclose our moments of weakness to others. I believe that only a truly secure person such as yourself can do this and bounce back to normal almost immediately.
You are very tough and you hold everyone to the highest standard. But, you also hold yourself to the exact same standard. You don’t accept anything less than the best from yourself; when you don’t feel like you’re the best, you can be pretty unjustly hard on yourself, IMO.
As far as your recognition, it may have more to do with the fact that many people are still just uncomfortable with topics dealing with race. I think commenter Terri hit the nail on the head when she said that you put to words things that the people who makeup the largest percentage of the blogosphere are not “allowed” to say or acknowledge.
You are far from mediocre, La Shawn, and I hope that you come to see yourself the way the rest of us do. Before I go to bed tonight, I will pray the same prayer for you that I have been praying for myself lately…that the Lord will constantly consume you with the power of the Holy Spirit and that your your mind and heart will be protected always.
Love ya!!
Comment by Tami Gill — 01.15.07 @ 8:10 pm
I came across your blog because the guru of blogs linked to you (Glen Reynolds). I’ve seen you linked at numerous other well-respected blogs and I’ve seen those bloggers comment here. Your ideas are well-respected by your readers even if they may not be getting the credit they deserve from the hoity toity journalism types. You serve an awesome God and you will see the fruits of your labors in His time. Remember what his word promises if you seek His kingdom and righteousness first.
All His servants spend some time being refined in the desert, so this is preparing you for great things.
Keep the faith LaShawn!
Comment by Elizabeth — 01.15.07 @ 8:13 pm
LaShawn,
So unlike you….your blog is a must read in my book. Keep at it and you’ll be gain the recognition you deserve.
Now, pick your ass off the ground and write!
Best, from a middle-aged white guy,
Lenny
Comment by Lenny — 01.15.07 @ 8:21 pm
LaShawn,
Mediocre you certainly are not!! Black and female has nothing to with how you are perceived.I visit every day and appreciate your insight into so many issues and agree with you almost all of the time. I am a white male almost 60 and you are awesome!!!!!
Comment by elgerdobo — 01.15.07 @ 8:25 pm
I actually rarely agree with what you say Lashawn, but I love this site because different opinions challenge my thinking. Reading your posts just challenge my thinking. At times I find myself in the shower having full debate with myself about what I read on your site saying things like “How can she says that” or “she has a point BUT why does she have to say it like that etc…”
As long as people are reacting positively or negatively by the work, that means they’re into the work otherwise they wouldn’t be reacting.
By the way, i do change my name from time to time, because I tend to remain anonymous but I’m guessing you have an idea who it is, since I’m the one with fake email with repeating alphabet letters.
Comment by bob — 01.15.07 @ 8:31 pm
I’m 57, white and male. I find your blog interesting and agree with most of it.
A while back you said you where going to stop writing about illegal immigration for some reason that sounded like giving up.
DON’T give up.
Comment by Rick — 01.15.07 @ 8:35 pm
>>imo, it’s because you are a black conservative.>>
I second that. And add “and an outspoken Christian”. Your positions are not popular, or at least are not politically correct. If you were already “Somebody” (ala Bill Cosby), you might cause an uproar. As it is, your voice is still small. Within the next 10 years, I’m guessing, you may well become recognized as one of the leaders of a blossoming movement, but at the moment you’re in the position of “a prophet receives no honor in his own village”.
Comment by suek — 01.15.07 @ 8:38 pm
La Shawn, it could be worse. You could be Paris Hilton. Listen La Shawn, you have all these people who come to this site to read what you have to say!!!! You are able to say it well and spread the word of God, too. What a gift! We may not be the “right” people, but we are “your” readers! I consider you to be one of the top bloggers. I try to read you everyday.
Comment by Belle — 01.15.07 @ 9:01 pm
La Shawn, You’ve often said that you blog for yourself. Keep it up.
Comment by RepJ — 01.15.07 @ 9:49 pm
Now that I am in my mid 50s, I can tell you that turning 40 is not so bad. I did not pay any attention to blogs until I started reading yours. I am attempting this blog thing. My sister laughs at me and can’t understand why anyone would want to respond to anything I blog about, or what anyone else blogs about. I am now trying to understand WordPress so I can continue blogging with a new domain name; and another thing, La Shawn you are definitely not mediocre.
Comment by Bev — 01.15.07 @ 10:02 pm
First LaShawn, let me say that you are a wonderfully clear TRUTH TELLER.
Not that I think everything you say is exactly right (though I think most of it is), but I’ve become clear (I’m a fairly newcomer) that you only say what you think is factually true, and are FEARLESS in doing so. As opposed to saying what you think will advance an agenda (albeit a just, right and true one people generally believe).
Having said that, I think this is just wrong:
Or maybe it’s because I’m a woman. For various reasons, the world is still run by men. That includes the microcosm of the blogosphere. I haven’t done a formal study or anything, but a quick assessment of the kind of bloggers who’re recognized for what they do yields a high number of men, relative to women. Perhaps the people who matter, how ever these people are defined, simply pay more attention to men. And more of the people who matter probably are men. So, the vicious cycle continues.
Yes of course you’re right that the blogosphere is dominated by men. Not entirely by any means, but predominantly.
However there has hardly EVER been a human competitive (somewhat, mostly co-operative) endeavor with lower barriers to entry that have less to do with existing power structure. Bloggers get cred depending upon how popular they are among readers and other bloggers, who link them. Computers and internet connections are available to the whole American middle class (at least).
Why do men prevail in the blogosphere?
i) men got there first. Men almost always are the first to do new things that are possible for both genders to do. Men tend to be bigger risk takers, and to be more adventurous. (No not all men more than all women, but somewhat, on average.) Part of the reason that men are bigger risk takers is that men tend to be “regarded†by biology, and as well quite literally by society, as more expendable. It’s part of why we (and everybody else, including despite misconceptions the Israelis) are much more ok with men being front line combat infantry than women.
2) Men tend to work harder/longer/more single mindedly at work endeavors than women over the long term, at least by their 30’s and beyond. There are three main reasons for this I think. a) sexual attractiveness considerations; b) children; c) availability of socially esteemed other options.
Re sexual attractiveness, it’s clearly an unalloyed mate attracting advantage for men to prove themselves smart and workplace industrious and in a power position. Yeah a certain amount of physical attractiveness may be more important for some women but these things help not hurt, and the more of these things the better, without limit. For women in contrast, too much is a bad thing for most men in the mate attraction game. It’s more like it’s a good thing for women to attain a certain status, but not go TOO far, for attracting men. Nothing like that generally applies in reverse. I think this is built in biology. And I think so based on lots of sociobiology and evolutionary psychology studies, not just conjecture.
Children. Women nearly always WANT (and insist) on being the primary caregivers to children. Yeah they often want lots of help, and often more than they manage to get. But they usually DEMAND to be the primary one the child relies upon and looks to. Just consider custody hearings. And many other things. The way of the world is that wanting to be primary they are often more so than they’d ideally like. Of course men’s want’s here are reciprocal. Men rarely (no never, rarely) want to be the primary care giver.
As for socially esteemed other options, there are very few in our society (or virtually any other) that evaluates a man other than in the first instance for his work related achievements and endeavors. Note these need not always be paid and are certainly not necessarily measured by amounts of pay. Women may get the highest regard for extraordinary things in this realm as well, but they get a great deal for other things as well or instead, such as being great mothers to extraordinary offspring, or important community cement. Certainly at the level of middle level status, women don’t necessarily depend upon their work. Men always do. Again, I think this is biologically rooted, rather than being merely a ‘social construct’ – although it’s flavor and intensity, etc., are socially mediated.
Comment by dougjnn — 01.15.07 @ 10:18 pm
I’m a 52-year-old nobody, a mom of six and a Christian. I followed a link to your site one day, and I’ve visited it regularly ever since. I’ve appreciated your coverage of the Duke case, thoughts on education and discussions on fantasy, but even more I value your honesty about your walk with the Lord. I have come to many of the same conclusions as you have about life and politics, despite coming from a fervently lefty family(they’d say it with pride). You express those ideas so well; be thankful for that gift.
One thing I’ve been telling my kids for the last few years is not to wish for fame. Not only does it often ruin character, but frequently it seems to diminish talent, as well. Rather, I exhort them to seek to glorify the Lord, and He will lead them as He desires. I believe God will do whatever is best for you.
Your blog means a lot to me.
Comment by Jessica — 01.15.07 @ 10:20 pm
In my opinion, it’s very likely the “Christianity” aspect of your blog that’s the most off-putting (not to me; I’m a deeply serious follower of Jesus Christ, myself). People are afraid to touch it; they tiptoe around it and pretend it’s not there. For the most part, musicians who are “too Christian” don’t get signed by “secular” labels. We’re the stone that makes men stumble, hon.
Blessed are you, when men persecute you for My sake…
Fight on, my dear friend.
Comment by GradualDazzle — 01.15.07 @ 10:39 pm
Actually, I think that you are a black women who writes well helped get you noticed initially. Now, however, you say the uncomfortable thing, write the inconvenient truth, so it is back to the slush pile for you.
It is becoming clear that you need certain “credentials” to take the “next step”, which is what I think you are wondering about — why can’t you seem to take the next step. In street verbiage, you need cred, something to make the powers that be take notice.
Maybe you should go on Oprah…
Keep on, keeping on LaShawn; keep on, keeping on.
Comment by William Meisheid — 01.15.07 @ 10:40 pm
Keep your head up.
I am a white, male and I may not be one of “the people that matter, how ever these people are defined” but I do read your blog and talk you up at work. I can’t link you to anything as I do not have the ability or courage to do what you do, but please, please keep it up. You have a great message.
Rome was not built in a day, or, as I told my wife the other day as we struggled with an issue here at home, “nothing that is good comes easy”.
Comment by Patrick Hunter — 01.15.07 @ 10:40 pm
I felt the same way when I scored 1587 on my sat and when I finished 2nd in the NY marathon.
Comment by Randy — 01.15.07 @ 10:52 pm
La Shawn,
I am a middle aged white guy, and I read your post everyday. I find it informative, and most often you challenge my thought process. I agree with your opinions most of the time. In my humble and non-professional opinion you are a great writer!….For what it’s worth…
Sparky
Comment by Sparky — 01.15.07 @ 11:11 pm
With everything you have to put up with-being a black female conservative-I don’t blame you from having a bad day or two. Keep up the good work.
Comment by George — 01.15.07 @ 11:21 pm
Hey, LaShawn, I’m another middle age white guy that reads your blog with regularity. I read a lot of blogs regularly. I suppose that when it comes to heavy-duty political/national security/war type stuff, I mostly read male bloggers. But I have found over the last few years that a lot of the blogs that really move me are written by females. Namely, Cassandra at Villainous Company, Dr. Sanity, Neo-Neocon and yourself. Go ahead and sulk and feel sorry for yourself for a day or two, but please don’t let it last long.
Comment by Glenn — 01.15.07 @ 11:55 pm
is recognition more important than the mark left on someone’s life? many believers have heard of d.l. moody but do they know who introduced him to the gospel? what about spurgeon or billy graham? remove those people from the equation and you’ll have maaaanny who wouldn’t have heard the gospel but for d.l., charles, and billy.
on a secular level, a teacher/professor may never earn a ‘teacher of the year’ award, or they may never have any of their work published. but think about how many students they were able to influence during the time they stood at the head of the class. you of all people should know that in this life we only see part of the story, if that. now…quit yer whinin!=)
Comment by thomas — 01.16.07 @ 12:11 am
La Shawn, I found your blog through Stacy Harp, after I began reviewing books for her. And, I’m happy to have found you. There is so much you blog about that I agree with. I came here every day to check out the Lacrosse posts, because I valued your opinion.
From reading this, I believe you place too much emphasis on ‘the right people aren’t paying attention because you are a woman, or you are black.’ Gosh! There are so many men I have begun to read, and then I lose interest because they may have had a post or two that interested me, and then they became ’stale’. Woman/Man, White/Black - doesn’t matter, if you are good. And, you are!
You have always come across as a very good writer, one who believed in what she wrote. When I find a blog that holds my interest, I put them on my browser to keep up with. You got on my blogroll from about the first time I read your blog. I’ve also listed you on a Thursday Thirteen post in December as a blog I read. Other people then read that article, and come check you out.
Like someone else said, you need only please God and yourself. Stay true to God and you’ll never go wrong.
Comment by Barb — 01.16.07 @ 12:13 am
LaShawn, I feel drawn to your blog for several reasons…I echo Kym in appreciating your support for homeschoolers. I love your uncompromising pro-life stance. I agree with you politically, obviously. You write clearly and concisely and–most importantly–courageously. The world needs more like you! I have always loved straight talkers, and that is why I love your blog.
Most of all, though, I feel drawn to you as a sister in Christ. I honestly never even think about race (except in purely theoretical terms when you comment on news stories) because in Christ there are no dividing lines like black/white, male/female, etc. I know not everyone thinks that way, but I can’t see it being an obstacle to linkage.
BTW, I just turned 40 myself.
So, I feel a kinship with you there, too. (I found it helped to think of myself as “practically 40″ for the last couple of years. Not such a shock to the system that way.)
God bless you, LaShawn, and keep up the great blogging!
Comment by Susannah — 01.16.07 @ 12:13 am
Well, I luv ya. And you’re by no means mediocre! Your blog is the first thing I read when I get up in the morning and the last thing I read before I go to bed. If I didn’t get my La Shawn Barber fix I’d be lost.
Hang in there. It will happen. Appreciation and syndication is just around the corner…
God bless.
Comment by Tate — 01.16.07 @ 12:25 am
La Shawn: Snap out of it! Your blog is highly readable, very worthwhile, and in fact groundbreaking. Keep doing what you do and being who you are. You don’t know what awaits you around destiny’s corner (fame, fortune, true love?) In the meantime, I advise focus, work and enjoy the ride.
Comment by Heroic Dreamer — 01.16.07 @ 12:29 am
Don’t compare yourself to those more or less successful than yourself. Measure yourself against who you are and who you want to become. Remember that when you fall flat on your face you’re still moving forward.
Don’t worry about doing the things other people care about. “To thine own self be true. And it follows as night does the day that thou canst not be false to any other”.
Focus on what YOU feel is important, give it your best shot. When we stand before the throne of God we’ll be standing there alone, no one else’s opinion will matter.
God bless you.
Comment by Subvet — 01.16.07 @ 12:33 am
Hello La Shawn,
Allow me to be straightforward.
I have read lots and lots of books, and as to the quality of your writing, I don’t think it’s on par with a G.K. Chesterton or a Graham Greene or a C.S. Lewis, but this not the same as saying your work doesn’t have value.
I’ve been reading your blog for a little over four months now, and I think I’ve a general feel for your style of writing and the way you analyze topics. I think, for the most part, people read your blog and your articles because they are insightful into the world we live in, and because you raise compelling questions.
Your writing itself I rate as high average. Not mediocre, but not wildly fantastic either. But style ain’t everything. Personally, I’d rather read insightful essays and articles than beautifully rendered histories of the screwdriver. I’m being facetious here but my point is that topics count for a whole helluva lot.
Now, I don’t divine to know the reason your writing isn’t getting the acclamation you think it deserves, but I doubt VERY much that it’s because you’re black, or because you’re a woman, or because you’re mediocre.
For what it’s worth, I go through the same sort of mood from time to time. I’m not quite the writer I imagine myself (the reality of ourselves usually fall far shorter than the projections of our egos, eh?), but I do read your blog every day and I find your topics much more engaging than most. I also think you have one of the most successful blogs out there just be sheer volume of foot-traffic.
That is a pretty sizable achievement in of itself.
Other commentors said you shouldn’t compare yourself with other people. Yes, I believe, that’s exactly right. There is but one Audience that matters, La Shawn. On your writing consulting blog, you said you are in love with words, right? We joy truly is the serious business of Heaven.
God bless, La Shawn, and I hope you come up out of your sullenness. Who knows what tomorrow will bring?
Comment by Thomas Nguyen — 01.16.07 @ 1:40 am
Enjoy reading your blog… would you be concerned if people read your blog BECAUSE you are black or BECAUSE you are a woman? You are probably in the top .0001 % of the blogs… not a bad place to be…
Courage!
Comment by Alan — 01.16.07 @ 1:47 am
So you don’t get noticed by the Important People. Us ordinary types sure do like you and there are a lot more of us than them.
Comment by Peter — 01.16.07 @ 3:50 am
God doesn’t look at skin color, only man does that. What God told Samuel many years go still works; where man looks at the outward appearance, God looks at the heart.
Wish all could learn that simple fact.
Comment by David — 01.16.07 @ 5:27 am
Upside Down World
She fails because her message is not what people want to hear. It is as simple as that. If we lived in a better society, with better people that truly understood the relationship between individual liberty and responsibility and the importance of famil…
Trackback by League of the Scarlet Pimpernel — 01.16.07 @ 5:56 am
#57- With all due respect, La Shawn does not in any way fail. I am not sure exactly who the “right” people are, but maybe La Shawn should look at it this way: Maybe those people are not reading the RIGHT BLOG. I’ve said it before and I will say it again, I believe much of what La Shawn says hits a little too close to home for some people. When they read La Shawn, it makes them look at themselves and that can make some people uncomfortable. Plenty of us check out her blog several times a day. La Shawn, your blog is still growing and will continue to attract readers.
Comment by Belle — 01.16.07 @ 7:22 am
La Shawn, I’m white, male, and mediocre. The first two things don’t matter one way or another, just as “black” and “woman” don’t matter in your case. The mediocre part is the only issue of concern, and is what holds me back.
As for your doubts, your concern about being mediocre, you’re simply wrong about yourself. Usually you’re right about what you post, but here you’ve blown it. I know mediocre intimately, and you’re not it.
One comfort for you might be the knowledge that truly gifted people often tend to have self-doubt. Nothing wrong with that. Seems to stir the creative juices somehow, if not allowed to get out of hand. Just don’t go and pull a Van Gogh on us.
Comment by redbeard — 01.16.07 @ 7:47 am
Belle, if you read the complete post from the trackback you would see that you and I agree and my use of the word “fail” does not mean what you took it for.
Comment by El Cid — 01.16.07 @ 9:27 am
As someone who gets, on average, 15 hits a day I find it amazing that someone whose blog is as esteemed as yours has momentary struggles with the same things I do.
That being said, I used to read all the ‘big names’ of the ’sphere because I thought I would somehow be missing something if I didn’t. Yours is the ONLY one I still read, and on a daily basis at that. And I read for the very reasons you’ve attributed to not doing well. Because you’re a woman. Because your perspective is grossly needed. And because your writing connects on a level the “Big Boys” just don’t have, in my opinion. And moreover, your strong Christian faith and boldness inspires me not just in my writing (where I really don’t take up topics that need it)… but more importantly in my daily walk and life.
I think the more crucial component of what you do is not that you are/are not competing with big names, but that you are affecting people on a deeper level and changing lives. There’s no position anywhere as valuable as that.
Comment by Janet — 01.16.07 @ 9:50 am
May God continue to Bless you and lead you, La Shawn.
Comment by Doug — 01.16.07 @ 10:37 am
Though we OFTEN bump heads, I would say that the people who won’t read you because you are black or a woman, aren’t people you wish as readers anyway.
Be of good courage!
Comment by Tiffany in Houston — 01.16.07 @ 10:43 am
You certainly seem to be doing the right thing.
You write well and your blog is very professionally set up…and although you have a niche (Christian views and values and racial issues) it’s a very big niche given the current climate in the country.
Life isn’t fair at all - we’re all born with different levels of skills, ambitions, drive and determination, etc and there are always going to be people who “got there first,” or had “the right backing,” or other innate advantages, but you’ve done well in only three years!
In that regard you’re proof that hard work pays off….and it’s always OK (even a good thing) to want for more - it’s motivation.
Comment by JMK — 01.16.07 @ 11:02 am
La Shawn, your feeling sorry for yourself actually paves the way for many of us. You are quite inspirational and give bloggers like me hope and a reason to keep writing. I’m a nobody, black, Christian and a woman, with probably an average of one hit a day on my newly formed blog. But all bloggers have a beginning and must keep writing.
Thank you for your smarts, commitment to Christ, and for being a great example for others. And by the way, you are doing great and I’m not surprised to see your name and links on many other blogs that I visit on a daily basis!
Comment by Carlotta — 01.16.07 @ 11:06 am
Actually, La Shawn, we all experience times when we don’t seem to be accomplishing much. But we know that God works all things for good for those who love him, don’t we? So, keep on keeping on. Your blog has made changes, I am sure, that are eternal. I am sure that there are going to be people in Heaven who come up to you and tell you that your site was one of the reasons they were brought to a saving understanding of the Grace of God. Now if that don’t cheer you up, I don’t know what would.
YIC,
Ben
Comment by benm — 01.16.07 @ 12:11 pm
La Shawn, I rather think of you as the fig seed.
Not glamorous like seasonal flowers, here today, gone tomorrow. You’ve got depth and that counts as reflected by your fruits. I have no doubt that like the good and faithful servant, you are doubling the returns on God’s investment in you and that’s the only thing that counts.
As for the malaise, the prophets of old often endured bouts of introspection, wondering if they were making that impact for God or if they were just overated and/or unappreciated windbags.
In any case, since this post, you’re obviously firing on all cylinders with your latest posting on ‘Christian Illegals’.
Comment by Andy — 01.16.07 @ 12:57 pm
LaShawn,
I agree with you 1/4 of the time. I’ve actually quantified it! Sometimes, as you well know, I have problems with how you approach an issue. My beliefs in respect to race are out of love and concern, first for my daughter, second for my friends and fellow citizens. Your opinions are clear and concise. Sometimes, there’s humor. But, most often, I read anger.
I’m a screenwriter. I love my craft. I’m inspired by many things. Politics, faith (to a lesser degree), and emotion. A lot of what I do is based on love. Love for my daughter. Love for my friends. Love for my country.
I’m sure you are insprired by those same things.
I guess the musical question is, “Where is the love?” That’s the only thing that bothers me.
Maybe I’m not the “right” person to read your blog. But I have for quite some time. I admire the intensity and depth of feeling you bring to it.
Every artist goes through a “dark night of the soul.” A crisis of faith. Will I ever be appreciated? It’s hard to not be hurt when you feel your creation is not as widely accepted by the world. But, every artist overcomes this and continues to create. Just create, LaShawn.
With regards,
Angel
Comment by Angel — 01.16.07 @ 1:11 pm
BTW, if you’re looking for further writing inspiration, the WSJ is running an editorial series, today and over the next few days. Author Charles Murray discusses the failure of education and that elephant in the room which is IQ, g and of course “The Bell Curve”. Bound to be fireworks from the ivory-tower crowd.
Comment by Andy — 01.16.07 @ 2:41 pm
Indeed! I read Murray’s piece this morning. I may blog about it this week. Here’s a new spin on an old saying:
“If you post it, the hate mail will come…”
Comment by La Shawn — 01.16.07 @ 2:49 pm
I think you’re pretty cool, Ms. Le-B. And I think very highly of myself–so you should feel flattered!
Comment by Lucinius Antonninus — 01.16.07 @ 4:55 pm
BTW, if you’re looking for further writing inspiration, the WSJ is running an editorial series, today and over the next few days. Author Charles Murray discusses the failure of education and that elephant in the room which is IQ, g and of course “The Bell Curveâ€. Bound to be fireworks from the ivory-tower crowd.
But KIPP still keeps producing results…
Comment by DarkStar — 01.16.07 @ 11:24 pm
You crack me up, LaShawn.
I’m sure we are worlds apart on a lot of things - but you call ‘em like you see ‘em and for that - my hats off to you!
Comment by unique — 01.17.07 @ 9:38 am
DS, if you’re referring to “Knowledge Is Power Program”, it can only do so much if the fact still remains that 1/2 of all kids are of below average intelligence. Simply put, knowledge is not the end all without wisdom, or at least the cognitive power, g, to make use of that knowledge.
Put it this way, would you rather have someone with an IQ of 104 treat you as your doctor, or be your plumber?
Right now, if 45% of HS students are going on to college, odds are real good that at least half of them have no business enrolling in a 4-yr degree. Their innately lower capacity dilutes the college infrastructure to the point of dumbing down the course material and disproportionately saps the available resources. Those students would be better off in a vocational school learning a certifiable trade.
But no, society has inflated the value of higher ed to the point that we act as if college is the right of all comers. To wit, the Dems intention to lower the interest rate for student loans.
Obviously these jokers lack the cognitive ability to see that this does nothing to lower the real cost of education. Instead, administrators will be scrambling to inflate tuition in order to snare a larger share of the subsidy. But it sure makes for a good soundbite to proclaim victory in the war on affordable education.
That’s all I’ll say for now until Le Shawn blogs about it.
Comment by Andy — 01.17.07 @ 12:00 pm
Off and on for two months, IÂ’ve been wondering what is the purpose of all this blogging, aside from being fun.
Pingback by The Thomas Chronicles — 01.17.07 @ 8:25 pm
Andy, Murray was on record as saying there is “no proof” that the school lead by Marva Collins has produced any dramatic results. 60 Minutes interviewed her and Collins said Murray never contacted her or the school to determine the results. 60 Minutes then looked at the results of the school and showed that Murray was wrong.
In my opinion, any Black person that is comfortable with the idea that Murray is proposing, is being foolish. An under performing Black student would likely to be assumed to be of “low IQ” and then tracked in a “low IQ” trade instead of trying to find a way to motivate the student.
Any person, regardless of race, who is the parent of a boy, who supports Murray’s idea is also foolish. Boys don’t seem to do as well with the “sit still and learn” approach for which girls are more suited.
My son, almost 2 years old, is learning quickly but is ACTIVE and ALWAYS IN MOTIION. I compare him to my daughter when she was his age and there is a BIG difference in energy level and the ability to stay on one task for a certain amount of time.
Comment by DarkStar — 01.17.07 @ 10:37 pm
DS, I agree that under-performance is not the same as low IQ. Murray also points out that lack of motivation is a big factor in failure.
At the same time, no matter how motivated one is, it won’t compensate for an IQ of 90. The fact that a savant might ‘know’ every word in the Webster dictionary does not make him smart if he can’t construct an abstract concept using a few of those words.
I also think IQ is shaped in large part by environment. Give a babe an interactive & challenging environment and their neurons will spark. Ignore the child and have the boob-tube babysit him and his IQ will be stunted. I think once they get around 5 or 6, their die is set and no amount of intervention or knowledge is going to recover the full cognitive potential they were born with.
I think too many blacks are spooked by the whole issue of IQ and therefore dismiss it as some figment of white supremacy imagination — sort of like plugging fingers in the ears, going, “nah, nah. I can’t hear you”.
I would think that even the Bible implies that IQ/g is real, as it makes distinctions between the clever, the foolish, the dullard and the unmotivated among other descriptions of intelligence levels.
Comment by Andy — 01.18.07 @ 5:12 am
La Shawn,
It’s not because your Black or a Woman or mediocre. It’s because you are a Christian and you talk about God. That makes people uncomfortable. Do not change a thing and do not lose heart.
Comment by Michael — 01.18.07 @ 10:43 am
La Shawn, you serve a few customers very well. Isn’t that better than serving many people less well? It’s why I prefer to shop at my local hardware store (whose owner responds to my needs) rather than Home Depot (”…this is what we sell, take it or leave it”). I highly recommend marketing writer Seth Godin’s blog — in fact, I’ll point you straight to this post: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/03/the_coming_blog.html
In another vein, I recently read an article about the self-doubts that haunt even the most successful people. The key is to learn how to use those doubts constructively (and when to put them in a locked box).
Cheers!
Comment by Kim — 01.19.07 @ 11:06 am
Buck up Buckeroo,
I find links to you all over the blogs
I read. Ya got my vote.
I see what you are doing as not taking the
easy path. In this great country you and
I are free to do that. It may not be popular
and it won’t be PC, but what you are doing is
very inspirational. Keep up the good work.
Comment by Rob — 01.19.07 @ 4:05 pm
I’ve read your blog over the past couple of years, but have never taken the time to comment (other commenters are more eloquent than I). But your unique blend of political and Christian commentary is what keeps me coming back. Never compromise.
Comment by Mrs. Who — 01.20.07 @ 3:52 pm
La Shawn,
OK. I understand the pity party. But, please. I don’t read your blog because your black (or white) or because you’re a woman (or a man), and I certainly don’t read it because you’re mediocre. While you should strive to be better than you are, I read your blog because of who you are right now. Keep it up, if it weren’t for blogs like yours I would completely give up on the blogosphere.
Thanks for being you,
Kyle Cooper
Comment by Kyle Cooper — 01.21.07 @ 10:39 am
In truth, your writing has jumped a quantum leap from the beginning and is ascerbic yet witty, challenging but not hostile, brave but not without justification. In short, your writing delights, intrigues, provokes, and is authentic.
Comment by jan — 01.21.07 @ 3:07 pm
Wait a minute: this is your ONE feeling-sorry-for-myself post for all of 2007 ???
We’re only in January……that doesn’t leave you much wiggle room. You mean to tell me during the endless dog-days of Summer….you won’t have a single bad day?
Anyway, I think you should write what you know.
If you know the Bible, and I think you do. Then that’s what you should be writing. Who cares if someone doesn’t like it.
Also, Alcohol. You might have something to say about that. So why not write more about it?
There have been a lot of people who use Alcohol as an excuse, and “Rehab” seems to be a catch-all for any type of bad-behavior or misconduct, these days.
You might have an opinion on that, and I think you should say it.
I don’t think you should ask other people if you are a good writer.
It’s like asking…does-this-make-me-look-fat?
People are only to willing to share their opinions anyway.
Like you said, all that matters is God’s opinion.
Maybe a better question is: If you felt like, in doing this Blog, God wasn’t by your side, and God wasn’t there for you (in terms of the Blog)….would you continue to do it?
Comment by Glamchild — 01.21.07 @ 3:47 pm
Keep on writing!!
Comment by SolShine7 — 01.21.07 @ 9:29 pm
THOU SHALL NOT KILL, PERIOD.
All followers of the three (3) great Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, believe in the Ten (10) Commandments. In our humble opinion, if anyone killed another innocent human being, he is neither a Jew, nor a Christian, nor a Muslim, because he disobeyed one of the most important Commandments of Almighty God: Thou Shall Not Kill ……..
Given below are some of the verses from the Holy Qur’an in support thereof, referring to the number of Surah (Chapter) first followed by the number of Ayah (Verse), later (from an English translation of the Holy Qur’an by Mr. Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall).
Yet ye (Children of Israel) it is who slay each other and drive out a party of your people from their homes, supporting one another against them by sin and transgression, and if they came to you as captives ye would ransom them, whereas their expulsion was itself unlawful for you. Believe ye in part of the Scripture and disbelieve ye in part thereof? (2:85)
Lo! those who disbelieve the revelations of Allah (God Almighty), and slay the Prophets wrongfully, and slay those of mankind who enjoin equity: announce them a painful doom. (3:21)
O ye who believe! eat not up your property among yourselves in vanities: but let there be amongst you traffic and trade by mutual good-will: nor kill (or destroy) yourselves (commit suicide): for verily Allah hath been to you Most Merciful. (4:29)
Never should a believer kill a believer; but (if it so happens) by mistake (compensation is due): if one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave and pay compensation to the deceased’s family, unless they remit it freely. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with you and he was a believer, the freeing of a believing slave (is enough). If he belonged to a people with whom ye have a treaty of mutual alliance, compensation should be paid to his family and a believing slave be freed. For those who find this beyond their means (is prescribed) a fast for two months running: by way of repentance to Allah: for Allah hath all knowledge and all wisdom. (4:92)
If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell to abide therein (for ever): and the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him. (4:93)
For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if be had
killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Our messengers came unto them of old with clear proofs (of Allah’s sovereignty), but afterwards lo! many of them became prodigals in the earth. (5:32)
They are losers who besottedly have slain their children without knowledge, and have forbidden that which Allah bestowed upon them, inventing a lie against Allah. They indeed have gone astray and are not guided. (6:140)
Say: “Come I will rehearse what Allah hath (really) prohibited you from”: join not anything as equal with Him; be good to your parents: kill not your children on a plea of want; We provide sustenance for you and for them; come not nigh to shameful deeds whether open or secret; take not life which Allah hath made sacred except by way of justice and law: thus doth He command you that ye may learn wisdom. (6:151)
O Prophet! when believing women come to thee to take the oath of fealty to thee that they will not associate in worship any other thing whatever with Allah, that they will not steal, that they will not commit adultery (or fornication), that they will not kill their children, that they will not utter slander intentionally forging falsehood, and that they will not disobey thee in any just matter then do thou receive their fealty and pray to Allah for the forgiveness (of their sins): for Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful. (60:12)
Kill not your children for fear of want: We shall provide sustenance for them as well as for you: verily the killing of them is a great sin. (17:31)
And slay not the life which Allah hath forbidden save with right. Whoso is slain wrongfully, We have given power unto his heir, but let him not commit excess in slaying. Lo! he will be helped. (17:33)
And those who cry not unto any other god along with Allah, nor take the life which Allah hath forbidden save in (course of) justice, nor commit adultery and whoso doeth this shall pay the penalty; (25:68)
Comment by Dr. M. A. Qazi — 01.22.07 @ 10:54 pm