One thing that bothers me is the apparent disregard for the majority of Americans views on this issue.

Californians voted a while ago to do something about the Illegal invasion and it was a landslide result, I think it was Prop 187 or something, anyway the Losing side took it to a liberal judge who ruled it unconstitutional.

If I remember right it passed with like a 70% vote tally. so when does the Minority rule?
oh in a victim mentality state (Liberal)

Until the politicians and Judges are forced to feel the issues result first hand, they will continue to put the burden on US.

Angel agrees to disagree, which means when the majority wins in the next election involving ILLEGAL Immigration, he will be a partner in the ACLU’s litigation.

I would suggest the ACLU buy some land on the border with Mexico and try to keep the murderers and rapists off their land, as well as the damage to a minimum.

At some point these folks that are “OK” with the invasion are going to be a victim of one of these Illegals and then their tune might change… to bad it will take that.

Angel did say something fairly accurate, Tancredo would have been a “No Chance” candidate.

Now, he has my vote, unless someone with that kind of border view comes up between now and 2008

THIS is reason ENOUGH for me to want ALL illegal immigration brought to a screeching halt IMMEDIATELY!

And, yes, even you “Hug a Tree, You and Me, and let’s let everyone roam FREE” elitists, smugly hiding in your ivory towers, behind your high walled gated communities up on the hilltop will not be immune to the effects of this “immigrant” that you so happily allowed access to, just so you could feel good about how compassionate you are.

I wonder just how your compassion for the poor illegal will hold up when you come to the realization that what he brought with him has just wiped out your entire family.

Fox

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=737771

Don’t get me wrong I am not calling illegals “flies” but let us look at the PRINCIPLE here

1) we employ them with no real consequences for employers who do it.
2) we allow them to purchase homes.
3) Illegals can get food stamps.
4) Free medical care.
5) Some are on Medicaid.
6) Now American banks are extending them credit without any prior credit history.
The above is HONEY!

So, why not:
1)do not extend any benefits to them what so ever
2)Fine employers who employ illegals. I mean great big fines, possible jail time, make them pay taxes on each one they employed and were not paying taxes on.
See vinegar!

It may not solve the problem but it wouldn’t be as attractive to come to the USA.

That is assuming these negative behaviors actually exist, right?

I was being somewhat tongue in cheek, but I do think it would be fair to say that there is a growing trend towards pathologizing negative behaviors.

In my home, I “let in” guests and other people I need to help me maintain my home (people providing me a service). Someone who enters without invitation or permission from me is guilty of something akin to “breaking and entering”.

The reason I think the moratorium is key is that the culture of the country needs a chance to absorb people into it’s fabric. Problems occur with legal as well as illegal immigration. Look at France. The Muslims they are having a serious problem with immigrated legally to fix a labor shortage in the 1960s and 1970s. But, they didn’t take a time out. That is not the sole cause of France’s conflict with radical Islam, but it didn’t help either.

Americans are crying out…not because of racism or nativism or all the isms of the left. They are outraged by

NUMBERISM!!!!!!!