Update (3/28): A commenter drops a link about a Roman Catholic enclave in development.
——————————————————-
Have you ever wanted to retreat from the world? Just go someplace where there are no stupid or mean people, where everyone is selfless and thoughtful?
I daydream about living in a gated community town of nice, thoughtful, kind, and smart Bible-believing Christians. We have our own grocery and office supply stores. Christians run and work in the utility companies and gas stations and the DMV. School administrators and teachers are all Christians. The movie theaters, owned and operated by Christians, show Christian-friendly movies. The few people in town who own televisions watch Christian-friendly shows and documentaries that don’t distort the history of Christianity or feature so-called Christian scholars hostile to Christian doctrine and the Bible.
And no unbeliever would be able to enter through the gate.
You see what I’m getting at? I know Christians have their faults. We’re still sinners, after all. But I think about how much better life would be if everyone I met, everyone I heard, everyone I worked with, every writer I read…was a Christian.
When I shared this gated-community-of-Christians fantasy with my sister, she said something like, “You’re not talking about a gated community, Shawn. You’re talking about heaven.”
Indeed! That’s what I want…
Addendum: Loyal readers! I’m not “back” two hours, and people already are intentionally misreading a post. Gee whiz. I know such a place doesn’t exist on earth, and it’s not meant to exist on earth. The Bible teaches that my place as a believer is in the world, allowing God to work through me to reach the lost. I’m simply sharing a fantasy, for crying out loud. I have this longing for heaven, and every cell in my body cries out, “Come, Lord Jesus!” And he said he would.
Then again, I suppose I invite contrary-just-for-the-sake-of-being-contrary comments whenever I open a post, so there you go. I guess that means…I’m back!
{ 1 trackback }
{ 112 comments }
“Ask, and ye shall receive.”
And, welcome back.
Honestly, some of the worst people I’ve met have been the ones who were born-again Christians, so they said.
Thank you, CJ
You took the words right out of my mouth. Religion has always been an attempt to suppress the worst(?) aspects of human nature. Similarly, groups of a particular bent have always sought to separate themselves from “the rest of us”. It never works because within the groups, there are individuals who have differing ideas. But, that’s what makes the world fun. People who challenge your beliefs. Books and movies that show you a different take on life.
When people express this notion, they should say what they really want (even if they don’t realize it!) They want to live among duplicates of themselves preprogrammed with all the “correct beliefs”.
I’m not knocking it. It’s just an imperfect fantasy because the conceit is flawed.
C.S. Lewis wrote one time that we would have longings that just couldn’t be fulfilled on this Earth. Rather than submit to the temptation of trying to fill that hole with something else (booze, drugs, sex, etc.), we should recognize that it’s probably something waiting for us in Heaven.
This fallen universe isn’t our natural environment. We’re flopping around just as badly as those African catfish who can breath air. Yes, we can survive here, maybe even “thrive”, but just like the catfish we long for our natural environment, our Water from the River of Life.
That sounds awful! It would be Stepford Town. What makes the world unique and exciting is encountering people of different beliefs and lifestyles. Otherwise we’d all act just alike and probably wind up going insane.
It may sound good on paper, but it wouldn’t work.
La Shawn,
Welcome back. I missed you
Kentucky Packrat
Beautiful words. Thank you for helping me start my day right.
I’m seeing mega churches trying to establish Christian only communities all the time.
Of course if Christians in this life physically separate themselves totally from all non-Christians, it’s pretty hard to reach out and spread the Gospel.
In scripture like 1 Corinthians 6:3 we are told that we will judge angels at some point in our future. Which means we will still have to deal with something that is out of hand.
Christians, always working to make things better
.
You might be surprised when you get to Heaven LaShawn, the way some of your flock are behaving regarding immigration: http://www.fromthepen.com/issue49.html
Buck
And if we had Christian only communities we’d choose up teams and fight amongst ourselves. You know those important doctrinal matters, like predestination- Are you a Four or Five Point Calvinist? Oh really? Bang, you’re dead.
I’ve seen it happen. We humans have an innate tendency towards and us vs. them mentality. I supose it’s some sort of survival tool.
There are days I long for the same thing, but utopianism just doesn’t work. We were called to be the salt and light…in the world but not of the world. Keep plugging along LaShawn…we need your voice in our world.
Always beware of creating Heaven on earth. Too much blood has been spilled over the centuries at such an attempt.
La Shawn
Comcast bought Road Runner so I have a new address.
I live in the equivalent of a “gated community” – there is a guard at the entrance.
I have many nice neighbors, mostly Republicans, and Christians, and at least one Buddhist.
But I consider one of the luckiest people alive to live here – it’s not heaven, but close.
My children are grown, I have a wonderful wife, and I have extra money to spend on things like this computer and a great surround sound system and down payments for houses for two of my adult children. Yes, they are “self supporting” – almost.
God has been good to me. I owe Him.
Welcome Back La Shawn…
The only way your scenario will play out is when we get to heaven, there’ll never be that kind of peace on earth, not earth like it is right now…
Sounds good, but rigid dogma will destroy a place like this.
LaShawn,
I don’t think anyone is misreading your post. Just giving their own take on it. The sentiment is nice, but the history of actual attempts at isolation….yeech.
I’m agnostic so I don’t have a dog in any religious fight. But, I do believe in the power of faith to tame demons of the personal variety.
I think you can be moral without submitting yourself to a system proscribed and rendered imperfect by man’s involvement.
I think what I call listening to my intuition about a given situation could be someone else’s message from God. I think we live in a universe where everything is possible. I don’t think this is contrary to anything, but rather complimentary to my own personal and professional success.
The Amish are probably the most well-known example of the community you describe. It’s a beautiful culture in many respects. But one of their greatest flaws, ironically, may be their isolation because they do not share the gospel with others (Hat tip to IndependentConservative). On the other hand, their actions are often a powerful Christian testimony. Remember how quickly the Amish extended forgiveness to the shooter and his family after the murders at the West Nickel Mines School?
LaShawn asked, “Have you ever wanted to retreat from the world? Just go someplace where there are no stupid or mean people, where everyone is selfless and thoughtful?”
Doesn’t anybody want to live in a place like that? I’d think so. Yet, when it’s suggested that this may be a Christian place, then people seem to think that would include some of the worst people on earth , a suppressive place, a stepford town, to quote a few of you.
Quite frankly, I’m stunned.
Oh, LaShawn! You post your dream world ideas and simultaneously open the door to the utopians without portfolio.
Obviously, to the utopians, your dream is steeped in a knuckle-dragging tradition of hateful religion.
A real utopia is a world just exactly the way the utopian wants it. And the utopian will smite anyone who disagrees with him.
Welcome back and God bless you for standing firm in your beliefs.
Clearly, we see people who are self-selecting themselves out of the community, who stand at the gate and wail.
Funny that. If all the noisy atheists in my life wanted to join a gated commune so they didn’t have to put up with my nonesense, I think I’d encourage them: more peace and quiet for both of us!
But I wouldn’t be accusing them of Stepfordization or other such nonsense.
Of course, all of this misses the point that La Shawn stated pretty clearly: a perfect environment isn’t perfect here, but how is it that we all (including the grumpy Stepford paranoiacs) can imagine an ideal, perfect community that we all know is impossible in this life?
Why is that picture in our head? Why can’t we execute that picture on our own accord, when there are so many pictures we can execute (i.e. a painter’s best paintings match or exceed the picture he had in his heart, a novelist’s greatest work hits its target, the ‘57 Chevy was a marvel of imagination, etc.)?
These are important questions. Some people’s responses to them are so confused that they are “not even wrong.”
Thanks for bringing ‘em up, Miss Barber. I think you rattled Hell’s cage.
Dianne,
I’m not stunned. It could be full of secular humanist and I still wouldn’t like it because the stated desire is to live in a isolated community with people just like you in their understanding of whatever your beliefs are. That would be boring!
This is not anti-Christian, just pro-freedom. Religious freedom, physical freedom, intellectual freedom, spiritual freedom. After all, this is just an intellectual exercise isn’t it? Besides, could you listen to or watch that dreck that passes for Christian entertainment day after day? Imagine…no more “Law and Order”.
I think people’s feeling are too easily hurt when someone doesn’t agree with their view of paradise. The reason is all too often, that person’s view of paradise is ego-driven. By that I mean, derived from that person’s religion and/or beliefs. So, it feels like a personal rejection.
It’s not. It’s just that humans aren’t built that way. Faith may be the way for a lot of people. But, we have to suppress our true nature to embrace it.
Helio,
Thanks for making my point for me!
Angel,
How is a community, freely joined and freely selected, somehow “anti-freedom?”
This baffles me. You, a non-Christian, are free to reside outside the walls of this theoretical community: why then do you choose to judge its inhabitants? What are they to you?
It sounds like you are “pro freedom” for what you like, but “anti freedom” if you think what other people like are stupid, small minded, or in addicted to, in your words “dreck.”
What if life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for one man means living inside the walls of a community, and for another, it means living outside those walls.
Can you accept that level of freedom? Can you live with that without passing judgment? If you are free to live where you like, why then infringe on the happiness of others so that you can critique their art and their community, their dreams and their goals?
“Humans aren’t built that way” is an anti-freedom statement if I ever heard it. Does this mean that the Amish are violating their design? Are they not exercising their liberty to live as they choose?
Is there only one right way to exercise freedom?
There is an analogy I first heard from Ravi Zacharias, that we Christians in our own communities are like salt in a shaker. We enjoy the company and fellowship of our Brothers and Sisters, and the gifts God has given to each one. It is safe in the shaker, and we are comfortable.
But salt is not meant to be in its shaker, and so from time-to-time, God picks it up and shakes some of us out. Those left in the shaker miss those who are gone, and those who are gone end up dissolved in someone’s food. The thing is, though the grains of salt are dissolved by the food, the food will never taste the same again.
I long for the harmony of fellowship with believers who share His Name as you do, La Shawn. I long to be secure and comforted in the presence of God with our brothers and sisters. That’s not what we are promised while on this Earth, but that is the earnest desire for Home.
For those who would think it would be terrible to live in a “community of conformity” such as it is thought to be in Heaven, perhaps you are unaware of the great diversity visible in the world-wide Church? You can find diversity that does not require a departure from Orthodoxy. The Gospel proclaims freedom, and freedom is what we claim to experience. Conversely, some may laud the variety of religions in the World without any concern for their implications. Is it truly laudable if someone’s beliefs contribute to their down-fall? I think that kind of tolerance is more concerned for the culture than for the people in it. If you know something which will save a person’s life, shouldn’t you share it with them even if it involves contradicting some of what they previously believed in ignorance? I think there are many professors these days who evidently agree, as they boldly but untactfully proclaim their intention to knock the Christianity out of their students.
“Faith may be the way for a lot of people. But, we have to suppress our true nature to embrace it.”
Angel, I think you unintentionally hit the nail on the head (of a different discussion). Our true nature is a sinful nature in great need of suppression. Christians share that understanding and the attendant struggle. Is it any wonder one would fantasize about living that struggle with like-minded people?
Hmmm.
@ La Shawn
You just feel that way because Christianity is always under attack in America. That you cannot simply revel in your faith without having twits coming along and tsk-tsk’ing you for actually believing in God.
Basically you want to stop having to defend your faith from every idiot that has an opinion but won’t keep it to himself/herself.
One more thing about freedom: when good people lay down their lives for others, when they struggle and fight and die for liberty, are they free? Or are they restricted by the bonds of want and lack and death?
What is the word I’m alluding to? Choice.
I’m amazed at the swift and noisy response to a single, free woman expressing a desire for herself.
She doesn’t force Angel, Shawn, CJ or anyone else to join, to conform, to repress or to become enslaved to an ideology. Yet they recoil as if she did.
This is an interesting phenomenon.
Dan,
I’m not stopping anyone from doing anything. You, however, seem intent on ripping freedom of speech away from me. You also make my point about hurt feelings. So, if I don’t like “Touched By An Angel” I’m anti-freedom? Your post is very revealing. So, criticism of any of the things you like is infringing on your right to enjoy them. I have to say the logic escapes me.
EW,
I’m well aware of what Christian belief is regarding sin and the nature of man. That’s why I raised the point. After all, Angel is not a pseudonym.
I live among people who struggle who their nature already. Being cooped up with them is not appealing whatsoever. Sorry.
Hi my name is Greg and I’m a La Shawn Barber addict…
It is a nice thought and an original view of heaven alright. I’m kind of suprised by the reaction you got about a simple daydream. But when a movie like 300 starts political debate I guess that it was bound to happen. You’re also speaking in absolutes in your post (i.e. only believers get in) and that will always ruffle feathers.
And welcome back La Shawn!
Memomachine,
You can have all the faith you want. But, when you decide that public policy should be predicated on your PERSONAL faith, we have a problem. Consider me a “twit”. Of course, that is separate from what is being discussed now.
Dan,
I’m not recoiling from anything. Do what you want. Are you that fragile emotionally that you want to seal yourself off from people like me? Okay, but I promise you’ll miss me after a week!
It sounds to me like Angel is saying that a little evil is a good thing.
I have to think about that.
I do think that without bad there is no good and vice versa, and therefore the problem might be that in your Christian enclave, people may start looking for evil, or manufacture it so that they can be the “good” ones. Sort of like “the poor you will always have with you”…unless everyone has exactly the same needs and the same possessions, someone will always have more – or less – than someone else, making one person poorer than another. By definition.
Although I also think that Angel thinks that a little evil is fun, and that a good Christian life is boring. But then, if sin wasn’t attractive, there wouldn’t be sin…n’est pas?
LaShawn,
I liked the post. I think this is a fantasy that many if not all Christians have at times.
IndependentConservative,
I attend a megachurch, at least by Wikipedia’s definition. I believe you may have a distorted view of us mega church members. You do know that there’s no limit on the size of a church congregation, right? Now there is a standard minimum size of two or three that are encouraged to come together. The blessings and benefits of coming together to praise and petition God is well noted in the Bible. The heart of most mega churches like ours is in the small groups of people who gather outside the massive weekend services. We are actually many, thousands of small groups of people lifting each other up and helping each other day-by-day to deal with the filth that we all must face in this world. A mega church can be one of the loneliest places on the planet if you do not engage in a small group. The total number of us just makes for a larger pool to built a special interest small group who come together regularly to fellowship and encourage each other to become fully devoted followers of Jesus Christ. And Yes, being fully devoted followers of Christ does include sharing the gospel and feeding the poor just to name a couple of things that small groups do.
And by the way…on the Laptops for the Wounded thread…there was no comment open, so…
do a google on Valour IT. This group has been raising money for laptops for soldiers for about 4 years now…it’s a branch of “Soldier’s Angels”. I know they ran a contest(between military blogs by branch) last year on the Milblogs and raised about $160K. Very good job. The laptops they specifically are supplying are designed for soldiers who have major permanent disabilities, although I think they started out with just normal laptops.
La Shawn, I totally got it.
The older I get, the more weary I get with this world system. There’s so much evil and ugliness in this world, I yearn for a place of goodness, innocence and light. And your sister’s right…that’s heaven.
Suek,
I don’t think evil will have to be manufactured by the gated Christians. The nature of man will take care of that. Sin and I go way back. Sin can be fun. Yes, but does listening to only one point of view or belief make me less sinful?
I’m not quarreling with the nature of LaShawn’s daydream. I’d love to spring from the ground and fly above the clouds. My best ideas come from daydreams. But, just for a moment….consider life a movie. Now, take all the conflict out of the script. You may as well watch a blank screen.
The mistake Dan makes is rushing to protect LaShawn from something that poses no danger. If she is of strong faith, nothing I post here will change that. Maybe you’re the one that needs protecting.
“To live above with those we love,
Ah, that will be glory.
To live below with those we know,
Now that’s a different story!”
>>The nature of man will take care of that….does listening to only one point of view or belief make me less sinful?>>
These two statements seem contradictory. If listening to only one point of view made you less sinful, I’d think it was a good thing. As you point out though, the nature of man tends toward sin, and while the points of view one is exposed to may reduce temptation, it definitely will not eliminate it. The seven deadly sins come from within us, not from without.
LaShawn,
The older I get, the more I also want to retreat. Yet at the same time, I see the need for Christians/those with traditional values to stand and be heard amongst those who don’t agree with us.
>>Yet at the same time, I see the need for Christians/those with traditional values to stand and be heard amongst those who don’t agree with us.>>
As in “Do not hide your light under a bushel basket”, maybe?
I doubt LaShawn would disagree – I think she just feels the need for a respite…
I can see it. More than likely similar to when Jesus and the disciples walked the earth. When any of them did something insane, Jesus gave perspective.
In The Book of Revelation, it speaks of a time when Jesus will reign. I’m certain it won’t be boring.
Again Angel, what is my freedom to you? You certainly have the “freedom” to critique non-Christian pablum such as “Touched by An Angel,” as do I, but I fail to see the point in that.
Neither you nor I watch “Touched By an Angel” because we are free not too. If, as we exercise that freedom to not watch, we still feel the need to skewer those who exercise the freedom to watch it, are either of us really free?
Perhaps I’ll go into this theoretical community for a thousand reasons: to encourage others, to work on a project together, to live in community, to provide stable outreach to the world, yet the only motive you can possibly conceive for doing this is “emotional” fragility?
That tells me far more about your view of others than it does about the inhabitants of this alleged community.
I’m running to protect no one. I just find it fascinating how visceral some folks’ responses have been to a thought experiment that involves a voluntary community!
You’ve taken every opportunity to critique this mythical society, so we must have different definitions for the word “recoil.” You clearly abhor this community, for reasons that, so far, seem based on taste.
I can understand using one’s freedom to critique something of relevance to one’s own experience. For example, if you invited me to a mythical tea party and served very weak Earl Gray when I’d hoped for chai, it would make some sense for me to complain about the refreshments afterward. It would be boorish and small of me, but it at least connects to a disappointment I experienced.
If, on the other hand, I declined the invitation, and STILL complained about your choice of beverage, that is a ridiculous waste of breath (and still rude!) What is it to me what tea you may have served others! I declined! I did not drink! And STILL I complain?
Angel, all are invited, by faith (which is a choice, not an inherited trait) to join this mythical thought experiment community. You have quite clearly declined. Yet you still critique the community?
It can’t just be that it isn’t your cup of tea, can it?
“…I see the need for Christians/those with traditional values to stand and be heard amongst those who don’t agree with us.”
But, to what end? I’m 40 and I’ve heard the pitch already. Maybe one day it will take. But only if there’s ice cream. Lots and lots of ice cream.
We have lots of communities like that in Israel among the Orthodox, seriously. We have our inside squabbles, to be sure, but in religious communities people strive, for the most part, to be good to each other and do good in the world. We have our own stores and schools and such, though if people outside the community want to stop buy and shop or visit, then that’s fine (usually — depends on the exclusivity of the community as to how friendly they are to outsiders). My community is very Modern Orthodox so it is totally inclusive and friendly, but still maintains a certain flavor. If you lived in a community like that, it would give you a respite and renewed strength each day to go back out into the world. Most of your dealings would be with like-minded people. Several nights a week, we have opportunities for Torah study at someone’s home or at the synogogue, etc. There is always something going on in the way of uplifting education or a social event. I wouldn’t say it is utopia exactly, but it is very, very nice. When I leave that protected place and go out into the world, I’m reminded of the differences real fast.
You know, the minute LaShawn said “gated community” I kept thinking of all those sterile, generic Orange County, CA subdivisions…that have the highest home property values in all of the USA.
Clearly, this is what a majority of people want, hence the demand has raised prices.
Jesus, when he was man, didn’t isolate himself. (I don’t think) He walked amongst all kinds of people.
Now that He’s Divine…he’s probably still walking with us I think, and not isolating himself up where ever He is.
So, on the one hand, the isolations seems to go against Christ….and yet the Bible has many passages about protecting one’s self.
And a lot of those gated-communities offer a greater degree of protection.
Christians are of no use if they continually put themselves in the line-of-fire. Sometimes it is nice to go behind gates to recharge, and you come back and have more to give.
Oh, there’s ice cream, all right, and plenty of it. But I seriously doubt that there is enough to entice you to the truth, over and above what you would rather believe. Jesus filled the bellies of thousands when he shared the contents of a little kids’ lunch. What they wanted was more food, not an encounter with a just, generous and living God.
Perhaps what you believe is the truth, but how do you know? Where is your evidence?
Wow, Dan….”Touched by An Angel” is too hardcore for you? Boorish and rude. You and I have different definitions of freedom for sure. Mine can be found in the dictionary. Yours is in some faraway land where people like everything you like, watch everything you watch and believe what you believe.
The gated community that you’re envisioning better secede from the United States because the Constitution expresses the idea (another crazy word) that freedom of speech is guaranteed. Not just when you like it, but always. Boorish and rude. That’s freedom, baby!
By the way, I’m not critiquing the mythical society. I’m critiquing you! You are the epitome of anti-freedom. Here’s the way a free mind works:
Oh, here comes an idea! Hmmm…do I like this idea or not? Is there powdered sugar on it? No. Blecch! I hate this idea. I should express that opinion. Reset brain and way for a new idea to come my way for evaluation.
I’m sorry for the admittedly personal attack. But I draw the line at being called boorish and rude. Especially, by someone who doesn’t recognize when they are the very definition of the word(s).
Hmmm.
@ Angel
1. You can have all the faith you want. But, when you decide that public policy should be predicated on your PERSONAL faith, we have a problem. Consider me a “twitâ€. Of course, that is separate from what is being discussed now.
What on earth are you talking about? How is this utter nonsense in any way, shape or form an actual response to what I wrote? How is the concept of an isolated community of fellow-believers at all an infringement on YOU? And what does any of that have to do with “public policy”???
Here’s a clue for you, who seems sadly lacking in any, the concept of such a community doesn’t necessarily include you. Perhaps that’s what really offends you that people can conceive of an existence that doesn’t have to include you, but there you are.
2. I’m not a Christian…I however have many friends who are Christians and I can see quite easily for myself how much Christianity is under attack.
IMHO I wouldn’t be surprised if Christians became irritated by this sort of idiotic nonsense enough to start pushing back. It’s started already, though in a low-scale sort of way. But I think the age of resurgent, and far more muscular, Christianity isn’t too far off.
3. Again, this isn’t about you.
[Deleted]
No name-calling!!! – Admin
Hmmm.
No name-calling!!! – Admin
Sorry but really now, how pompous can someone get?
If a gated community consisting solely of elderly residents is legal, then how is a gated community consisting solely of Christians somehow an affront to nature and an attack on the Constitution?
Especially since there are actually gated Christian communities in existence?
My views tend to bring out the irrational in some people, but in order to keep some kind of order around here, I don’t call commenters names or allow commenters to call each other (or me) names. Believe me, I’ve been on the receiving end of a lot of people’s frustrations, ignorance, and misunderstandings, and if I can refrain from calling them names, so can you. – Admin
I think La Shawn is describing the Hope that is found in the Bible — a “verily, verily” that hasn’t become reality yet — but surely will. Jesus died to deliver us from the penalty of sin, and rose from the grave to deliver us from the power of sin. Next major event – deliverance from the presence of sin. No gates required to keep others out because only those who are seeking to be there will be there. It’s taking a long time to find enough souls to fill God’s kingdom who want to worship God for an eternity. Thank God we were born while the free offer was still on the table. In the meantime, we just have to worship God the best we can where we are. That’s almost heaven.
The fantasy community sounds nice, but if I were to live there, I think I’d always feel like something was missing. Like the commenter who wrote about the salt in the shaker (great analogy!), I’d want to be shaken out so I could witness to my friends who are unbelievers. I’d rather be shut off from all other Christians, and thus be a light to all my non-Christian friends, than live in a perfect community where everyone was Christian.
But then again, that’s largely because, despite my beliefs, which are conservative Christian, I don’t feel “at home” around conservatives or Christians. There’s a certain Evangelical culture that, try as I might, I just don’t fit in with…and it doesn’t have anything to do with beliefs, just personality, I guess. I suppose I’m just waiting on Heaven too. I have a feeling that I’ll feel at home there.
Welcome back, La Shawn.
P.S. Thanks for putting a link to Randy Thomas’ blog on your 3/14/07 post. I didn’t know he had started blogging again!
Hmmm.
@ Bill
Sorry but leading sentence of the second paragraph “I daydream about living in a gated community town” kinda does that in.
*shrug* A number of my Christian friends have expressed the same ideal.
To create a separate community where you can walk around with a bible without having to deal with someone who absolutely must contend against your faith. To have a school set up not just to teach the regular classes but to also incorporate religious teaching and to offer time for mediation and prayer. Where being devout is the norm, not the unusual.
The downside of course is that any refuge is just an illusion and if Christians en masse withdraw from American life it will leave us all much poorer for it.
Welcome back, LB!
Hope you enjoyed your break!!!
Dan,
I’m walking away slowly. I’m not going to debate my beliefs with you. That was never the point of my objection. The point was that too much of anything would be boring and unstimulating to ME. If other people want that, fine. They are welcome to it. I make one exception to my objection to the gated community. If everyone and everybody were made of chocolate chip cookies, I would gladly live there. But, after a week, the streets would be deserted, I would be 350 lbs or more. On top of it all, all the chocolate chip orphans would break my heart. You have to draw the line somewhere. I just couldn’t eat the kids.
Memo,
In case you forgot, this is what you posted.
“You just feel that way because Christianity is always under attack in America. That you cannot simply revel in your faith without having twits coming along and tsk-tsk’ing you for actually believing in God.
Basically you want to stop having to defend your faith from every idiot that has an opinion but won’t keep it to himself/herself.”
Christianity is not under attack. When it enters the public sphere and is discussed as an idea in the marketplace, it is fair game like any other idea. Revel in your faith all you want. I’m not stopping you. But I’ll stop myself from having an opinion about it when you stop sending missionaries to the Third World. Or worse, knocking on my door to talk to me about it.
So Angel,
I understand YOU not wanting people knocking on your door. I don’t like that either unless my door is three blocks down the street due to a tornado.
Are you saying:
You don’t think we should send medical teams from our church to third-world countries anymore?
You don’t want one of our church’s small groups volunteering to bring a hot meal to the homeless shelter?
How does this affect you?
It’s really disappointing that people have taken what should be a light discussion and turned it into such a nasty, low-down and dirty brawl.
LaShawn,
I really would like to know what Memo called me. That shows the depth of his (her?) intelligence. We’re “discussing” an abstract that will never happen. At least, not on this plane of existence, and I get called names. Fantastic. Better yet, I’m the troublemaker! Wow.
Hank,
I’m saying exactly what I posted, I will stop having an opinion on Christianity as is practiced by some when they stop. So, to spell it out, I will never stop having an opinion. And, you will never stop trying to convert people. We have a standoff.
“The downside of course is that any refuge is just an illusion and if Christians en masse withdraw from American life it will leave us all much poorer for it.”
Also proving my point.
La Shawn wrote: “Then again, I suppose I invite contrary-just-for-the-sake-of-being-contrary comments whenever I open a post, so there you go. I guess that means…I’m back!”
And then I read the posts. Heh heh. I see what you mean, La Shawn. But you know you love us all.
Angel,
I am not trying to convert anyone. My primary mission is not to convert people. My primary mission is to please God.
Many Christians do not go out into the streets or third-world countries because they enjoy it. Many don’t even like to do some of the things they do. Many, myself included, do not perform services for the needy with a megaphone shouting out scripture and handing out Bibles. We just quietly serve others. If asked why I do such dirty jobs for no pay, then certainly I will share my reason. My reason is that I do it in honor of my Father who has commanded me to put others before myself. If asked more I will give it.
You may very well do some of the same dirty jobs in service of others. You just have a different reason.
The subject of this post WAS about a dream of heaven. It is not a dream of creating an earthbound country club where non-members have to watch from the outside. There are some parallels between this dream in relation to things to come if you believe God. You don’t believe God and that is okay. That simply means you aren’t going to miss a thing.
Just keep in mind that not all Christians are concerned with shoving Jesus in your face even though you appear fairly concerned with making sure that no Christian use their freedoms of speech and religion to talk about Jesus and pray to God.
ANGEL – Why do you come to this obviously Christian blog?
Hmmm.
@ Angel
1. Learn how to read.
2. Learn how to comprehend what you read.
3. Read again where I write that I’m not a Christian.
4. Christianity is not under attack.
In NYC the Muslim Crescent and the Jewish Menora are considered secular symbols and are thus allowed anywhere and everywhere during Christmas. However the Christian Cross is considered to be a *religious* symbol so Christians are restricted to the *Christmas Tree* as their symbol for Christmas.
All of this under the Establishment Clause.
5. When it enters the public sphere and is discussed as an idea in the marketplace, it is fair game like any other idea.
La Shawn wasn’t writing about anything entering the “public sphere”. She was talking about retreating from the world to plunge deeper into her faith.
Your problem is that you simply have absolutely no understanding for what you’re discussing. What you’re trying to argue is simply irrelevant. Your other problem, being that you’re a rabidly secularist liberal, is that you think the argument you’re having is the same one that everyone else is participating in.
It’s not. In reality you’re the odd person out mumbling into a wall and thinking you’re the personification of Socrates.
6. Revel in your faith all you want.
Not my faith, I’m not Christian.
7. I’m not stopping you. But I’ll stop myself from having an opinion about it when you stop sending missionaries to the Third World.
Yes and all those billions of dollars for good deeds done in the third world such as education, clean water and housing.
8. Or worse, knocking on my door to talk to me about it.
Considering that this is La Shawn’s blog, frankly the irony is like a vast inky blanket that smells of mothballs.
Hmmm.
@ Angel
I wrote:
“The downside of course is that any refuge is just an illusion and if Christians en masse withdraw from American life it will leave us all much poorer for it.â€
You wrote:
Also proving my point.
And I reply:
What on earth are you talking about? Where in God’s name do you see anything I wrote as proving your point? My statement about a refuge being an illusion is that ultimately faith must reside in the world.
It has nothing to do with whatever you wrote.
Angel,
You are already debating your beliefs with me, so don’t pretend as if I’m the volatile one from whom a saner person should “back away slowly.” Your belief is that some forms of entertainment, both Christian and non-Christian, are not only not worth watching, but probably harmful in some vague way.
Your belief is that this mythical place is harmful to healthy community and attractive only to emotional cripples.
Your belief is that freedom is somehow threatened by a community of individuals self-selecting (i.e. opting out) of your affairs.
These are beliefs you have very clearly laid out. I respect them as your beliefs. However, this is, in no way, a brawl. It is a very lively discussion in which not all parties agree.
As far as a “conversion” standoff goes, I’m afraid I have to disagree with you on that part. Millions more people convert to Christianity every year than those Christians who die or lose faith (and guess what: the “Third World” Christians are sending missionaries West, because our need is greater!). In other words, there is no standoff, but a shockingly decisive net gain of Christians worldwide.
So, by the math, you are simply an isolated holdout!
We’re coming to get you, Barbara…*
*Of course, I don’t really believe that a religion or philosophy is necessarily true based solely on its growth.
But I do invite you to get on board the train before it leaves the station. There’s quite a party going on board, and we’d love to have you.
Hank,
You really should go back and read my previous posts. There is an interesting thread occurring among all the people who disagree with my take on the daydream of being surrounded by like minded people of any stripe. Somehow expressing a different opinion is making me a bad person or something. And worse yet, I want to stop Christianity in its’ tracks apparently.
What I have said is that the way some folks practice their religion makes it a nonstarter for me. That doesn’t mean I’m not open to the idea of religion. But, as I have also posted several times, this is not what this is about. This is about the freedom to do what you want. Religious freedom also encompasses people like me who choose to be unaffliated with any sect.
I think if you are secure in your beliefs, you don’t pull out the knives when the topic comes up even in such a light way. This was about a daydream, remember.
I realize I’m outnumbered here. But, I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind about his/her faith. That is a line I never cross. I should receive the same respect.
Hmmm.
In case anyone is wondering I base my knowledge and respect of Christianity on friends, priests and ministers I’ve known. And the fact that I survived my early childhood living with my rice-farming maternal grandparents in South Korea due to the generosity of the Pearl S. Buck foundation.
While Angel may deride the influence of Christians on the third world I have first hand knowledge of how incredibly valuable it can be. Without the generosity of the Pearl S. Buck foundation it would have been much much harder than it was, which was hard enough.
Though I was adopted into a wonderful American couple’s home I’ve never forgotten that I’m alive today because of that spirit of generosity.
Angel disapproves of missionaries. But while missionaries seek to bring the glory of faith to others, they also bring life.
This is the problem with what’s wrong with Christians today, yet when you read about Jesus, who he hung out with, ate with, talked with, they weren’t the “Holier than Thou” Pharisees, they were the sinners a la Matthew, Mary Magadlene, ect…..
Lately, going to church, I’ve been questioning why Christians go to church. I’ve had so many experiences with Christians in the past few months which shocked me.
These christians didn’t care much about living a Christian life, but on Sunday, you would see them shouting and screaming and jumping. yet, when I ran into them during the week, they worried more about presenting the Christian Style, than living the Christian Substance.
They would be the first to point out the sins of other. One person couldn’t believe I was joking around with someone who wasn’t “saved”. We were joking around about a movie we had seen and she gave me this look of how I could associate myself with a person like that. That person I was “associating” myself with is, is an addict of gangsta music.
I tried to explain her that I didn’t judge the behavior, that person was my friend regardless of how he lived his life. And through my testimony and my life, I would serve as an example for him to change his ways.
I realized at church, how Christians are so excited, shouting and screaming. Yet, they don’t live it.
Has Christianity become a social club. A feel good club, where it’s some sort of fraternity and you have to meet certain requirement to be in that social club.
That’s what I’m finding more and more. Christians get so worked up about the usual issues of abortion, gay marriages ect…. instead of getting so worked up about the mission Jesus gave us to save souls.
The christian friends I hang around with, are so worried about presenting their image, than actually trying to improve their christian lives.
It makes us feel good, to shout, scream, hear these songs, dance, hear that preacher disect the bible, but when it comes time to practice what we preach, we spend our energy telling others why they can’t join our “2 hours feel good sunday social club”.
God doesn’t need help to fight his own battle, let him worry about the abortionists and the so called immoral people.
My prayer is to be a better christian and to be a better ambassador of Christ every day. Christianity is becoming too political. I was a PK all my life and I remember how repressive it was growing up as a christian. I couldn’t do this, couldn’t do that, couldn’t watch this or that. I felt trapped. I rebelled and now I’m finding my way back to Christ.
My dad and I had a discussion sunday about Preacher’s Kids going astray and the reason is because when Christians become Christians, they forget to be humans.
The line that got me the most in Lashawn’s post is
“And no unbeliever would be able to enter through the gate.” by Lashawn.
What would Jesus say? Weren’t we unbelievers once.
Lashawn,
At first, I read your post and thought about my own ideal community, a community that is not Christian base. Then I read the post that talked about the Amish people and thought “oh yeah” I would want them in my “ideal” community as well.
Then it just started getting unproductive and silly because I focusing on what it is that divides me from other people. I remembered that what I loved about the Amish was how they handled grief, an emotion that we all face at some time.
I can always see what divides me from others. That’s easy. But to try and focus on what truly unites me across the board with everybody else is difficult;however, I believe that it’s more rewarding and easier on the heart and the mind.
A trip to any museum of art that spans centuries of human existence is a good start.
Memo,
You couldn’t be more wrong. One of the beautiful features of the comments section is that you can scroll back and put posts in context and that’s I would advise you to do.
Dan,
Sorry, man. Appreciate the invite. I have to respectfully decline. I don’t need you to believe what I believe. It doesn’t make it any less “true” to me as I’m sure you would agree applies for you as well.
Memo,
I have to say you are an artist with your words.
You just helped me visualize a door-to-door vacuum sales person knocking on the door while I was listening to a good friend tell of an awesome dream they had last night. They know all about vacuums and want me to know how much they know about vacuums. In my little vision, what the sales person does not understand is that I also sell vacuums and have just as much to say about vacuums as they do and will talk about vacuums all day of given the chance.
Vacuums…everybody’s got one and they all suck.
Oh what a beautiful dream my friend was describing.
Although I do not share your religious views (I am an Atheist), I think I do understand how you may feel. Many times I wish that I could live in a world that was full of logical, rational and free-thinking people who believed in plain common-sense. I do love reading your blogs and you hit the nail right on, but where I defer is I believe my fight with what’s wrong with this country is here and now. I know you will continue to fight as well, but for me, this life is all that I’ve got, so I’d better make it count.
– The unbeliever
Welcome back La Shawn!
Your post reminds me of the good ole days when I was a young girl living in a community full of kind Christian people who were thoughtful and nice. Where you could play in the park and walk to the neighborhood 7-Eleven without fear of being molested or kidnapped. The way the world is today, I can certainly identify with your dream of living in an environment devoid of hostility and aggression. When my time comes, I’ll rejoice as I pass through the gates of Heaven where hostile non-believers aren’t allowed…
Welcome Back. Your latest is a nice post; one to think about and contemplate.
Unfortunately, on this earth, that will never happen. Even during the Millennium, when Christ rules here on earth for 1,000 years, people will be dissatisfied and will revolt against the most perfect earth that has been seen (except the Garden of Eden.)
Yes, it is correct, that what you define is Heaven, but I doubt when we get to heaven we will be watching television, seeing movies and having barbecues. Instead, as you well know, we will be worshipping the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords.
That is something to look forward to, and our feebile attempts to describe heaven here on earth will in no way compare to what is waiting for the true Christian.
As I have heard several times, for the Unsaved, this is the most of heaven they will ever see; for the Saved, this is the most of hell we will ever see. Gives me much to look forward too.
Wow! La Shawn, you came back with a bang! (Although apparently unintentionally.) Kudos to you for maintaining a comment section that is the most thoughtful and with the fewest ad hominem attacks of any I’ve read.
Earlier commenters noted our human tendency to sin. It saddens me to believe that we could have heaven on earth right now – or if not heaven, much closer than we are – if could just stop indulging our greed, pride and anger. Hunger, disease, pollution, all gone. But we are not willing to make the choices that would allow it to be. (And I know I’m included among those who sometimes fail to do so.) It is a nice dream, though, and a wonderful hope for those who believe.
P.S. Angel, you seemed surprised at some of the reactions to your comments (your post #55), but you did kind of come out swinging:
Angel #3:
When people express this notion, they should say what they really want (even if they don’t realize it!) They want to live among duplicates of themselves preprogrammed with all the “correct beliefsâ€.
I’m not knocking it. It’s just an imperfect fantasy because the conceit is flawed.
I read this to say that even though La Shawn didn’t realize it, *you* knew what she “really” wanted, ‘to live among duplicates of [herself] preprogrammed with all the “correct beliefsâ€.’
Along with the statement about “the conceit is flawed, it sounded like a knock to me.
Well… ::: scratching head ::: I can be pretty stupid …
… and have been rumored to be a meanie on occasion …
Can I come in the gates for social events?
Angel,
“It doesn’t make it any less “true†to me as I’m sure you would agree applies for you as well.”
I’m afraid you’ve made an assumption here that I can’t agree to. Just because something is “true” to me doesn’t make it really true. For example, if I believe in the Great Sky Fairy, and believe that the Great Sky Fairy will shield me from all harm, does my belief then create the Great Sky Fairy to stop the bus when I step out in front of it?
No, I can only believe in those things that I know to be true. You have more faith than I do, as you declare that your belief does not hinge on facts or absolute truth.
In short, by your claims, your only criterion for truth is that you have to believe it. It doesn’t have to be true for me.
I don’t live under those same rules. I only believe in things I know to be true, and these truths apply to all people, including yourself, whether they acknowledge them or not.
Back to the Sky Fairy: say the Sky Fairy stops the bus and saves my life. All the riders on the bus see the great, unearthly creature descend to earth and shield me from disaster. The police confirm the eyewitness accounts and any damage to the bus. News crews record the thing.
But some fellow in a nearby coffee shop knows that the Sky Fairy can’t possibly exist, and therefore doesn’t believe in it.
If he says, “Well, this Sky Fairy business is true to you, but really matters is my point of view. My point of view determines what is and isn’t true.”
So, we’ve determined that you don’t believe in the Sky Fairy. But how do you explain the bus, the witnesses, tne news footage? Or do you bother explaining it away, knowing that your belief is so strong that it can overwhelm the real experience of fifty people and millions of viewers?
Let me put it this way: If you believe something contrary to what I believe, I’m apt to check the facts again and consider the source.
On this issue, we can’t both be right.
I guess the question is then, given that we each only have, at best, a 50/50 shot at being right (either you or me) which one of has more to lose if we are wrong?
To answer LaShawn’s question: Yes, I too dream of retreating from this world to a place my Lord & Savior promised me – a place where there will be perfect harmony.
One last thing to brothers and sisters who may have misread this post in addition to the non-believers: Jesus himself instructed his disciples do shake the dust off their feet at people who would not receive Him. God does separate the wheat from the chaff, to the benefit of the wheat. This should make the wheat humble, not proud of position.
Indeed, Christ was “soft on sin” in that he died for all sinners, but that in no way excludes the real fact of a real heaven where only his believers are welcomed. Jesus departed from crowds as well: he refreshed in the midst of his own community – he excluded Gentiles from his ministry, speaking almost exclusively to Jews for the majority of his ministry (and famously tossing a “scrap” to a “Gentile” who persisted through his resistance.)
LaShawn speaks of a place of balm for the weary, and instantly accusations fly.
No wonder we need the balm in the first place!
Dan, What is truly interesting about the Gentiles is that they were the ones who had real faith. The Centurian and the lady with the sick child all had real faith and did not constantly ask for miracles like the Jews did. The Centurian had enough faith to know that Jesus didn’t even have to be present to do His thing.
I will comment even though I am one of many. Amen, and Maranatha Lord!
Dan,
You know what? You’re right. We can’t both be right. You win. Even though that tells me exactly what I was able to determine about you from your first response: You are guilty of what you accuse others of doing in that you have zero respect for the faith or non-faith of others. So, I hope you’re happy. You’re a winner.
And, I’m a loser even though I acknowledged the power that faith has in helping people conquer personal demons. Even though I respect people of faith (just because I wouldn’t want to be surrounded by them constantly doesn’t mean I don’t respect their rights) and continue to say they can believe what they want as long as they don’t try to impose it on me. Okay, Dan. You win.
Yippee!
B-squared,
You busted me. I’ve been lying in wait for LaShawn to return so I can “knock” her over a daydream. I guess I should be banned. Is that what you would like?
LaShawn: Glad you’re back. To live is Christ and to die is gain.
Sorry to be selfish, but your being here is our gain–big time!
I’m with you in longing for heaven, though.
Atheists and agnostics are a hoot! So many of them feel compelled to tell believers how unhinged they (the believers) are.
As a believer, I present a challenge to the non-believer: lure me into your reality. What treasure can you unfold? Is skepticism sufficient to sustain me? Is a life of license so grand that my name may spent in hedonism without dishonor to my relatives now or in the future?
By what code shall I live? What is its genesis and what is its authority?
I read that harmony among those who truly believe is “boring.” But what is boring? Chump work? Drugs that no longer lift, but pain? Doing the same ole, same ole?
Not all Christians act like “true” Christians. Right! No doubt about it. But nobody gets to home plate without starting out to get to first base. Why take the trip at all? Why try? Why not just sit in the stands and drink beer and fiddle with your cellphone?
If only the athiests and agnostics were clever enough to read Cervante’s Don Quixote and understand what “tilting at windmills” really means. But, no, they would far rather skip the hard work and just be critics.
General “Vinegar Joe” Stilwell (of WWII fame) had a motto: Illegitimi Non Carborundum. It is fantasy latin, but a great motto. Google it, if you do not know what it means.
To every Christian (and we are all sinners) on this site, I offer Stilwell’s advice: Illegitimi Non Carborundum!
Helio,
Below is my original post. I’m so unhinged.
“You took the words right out of my mouth. Religion has always been an attempt to suppress the worst(?) aspects of human nature. Similarly, groups of a particular bent have always sought to separate themselves from “the rest of usâ€. It never works because within the groups, there are individuals who have differing ideas. But, that’s what makes the world fun. People who challenge your beliefs. Books and movies that show you a different take on life.
When people express this notion, they should say what they really want (even if they don’t realize it!) They want to live among duplicates of themselves preprogrammed with all the “correct beliefsâ€.
I’m not knocking it. It’s just an imperfect fantasy because the conceit is flawed”
Hank,
“Memo,
I have to say you are an artist with your words”
Deleted]
“No name-calling!!! – Admin
Comment by memomachine — 03.27.07 @ 2:19 pm
Hmmm.
No name-calling!!! – Admin”
The artistry that flows from Memo’s keyboard. But, I guess he gets a pass from the commenters because he’s not a heathen like me.
Also from one of my original posts…
“I’m agnostic so I don’t have a dog in any religious fight. But, I do believe in the power of faith to tame demons of the personal variety.
I think you can be moral without submitting yourself to a system proscribed and rendered imperfect by man’s involvement. ”
What is so horrible about that statement?
Helio,
I think people should use what works for them. It’s that simple. For you, being a Christian has given you a treasure; for others, it just doesn’t work for them. I think it’s a waste of time to try and lure a person in either direction.
Once, I told a fellow Christian that asking me to believe in a Christian god is like asking you to believe in Zeus. That religion was real to the people of that time. I think the saying goes: Today’s religion is tomorrow’s mythology.
Either way, it’s our attempt to find meaning and purpose in life.
What a thread! I’m out of breath just reading all this.
Seems like some folks not only don’t believe, but don’t want others to believe either. Fear of belief? Fear of submitting to a supreme being? I don’t know, but it seems odd, to say the least.
I’m pretty much of a heathen, but I would be ecstatic to discover that Christians have been right all along. Where’s the down side? Why hope that there’s nothing greater than ourselves? I don’t understand the adamant denials.
Hey EW, I saw your post about the Amish. Seems some other folks have too.
There is a very dirty dark secret in Amish country. There is a big problem with rape in the Amish communities. Law enforcement allows the Amish to handle much of their own law enforcement and their “love” form of justice results in more repeat offenders and more female victims than one can shake a stick at.
The bottom line, places without any accountability are not such a great idea. The great thing about Heaven, is that when things got out of hand, the good had the support of all mighty God to help them toss the bad out. And for now we have to work our way beyond those demons through Jesus Christ.
Of course if Christians in this life physically separate themselves totally from all non-Christians, it’s pretty hard to reach out and spread the Gospel.
Co-sign.
LaShawn speaks of a place of balm for the weary, and instantly accusations fly.
A “walled community” and evangelism aren’t mutually exclusive, but the post reads that way.
#87 Paige says: “I think people should use what works for them. It’s that simple.”
I was once set upon a course to be a missionary; a fisher of men. Luckily, I met a much wiser soul who informed me that I would be fighting with my inner demons. I am a hard task-master and not much inclined toward the forgiveness of human foibles.
That said, I ask you (with all due respect): how many divergent paths are there for people to follow in “what works for them”?
For whatever reasons, I brought together a group of single mothers in Santiago, Chile who live in abject squalor. With the help of some cranky nuns, we have taught them to sew and to create expressive tokens of the sunshine in their lives. They assemble daily and share in the raising of their children as they work wonderful crafts. This is a “mothers only” society. (My rules.) However, two years ago, Ishmael, a man unknown to any of the women or nuns, attached himself to the project. He is the “daddy” in residence. We so appreciate his kindness and effort.
Ishmael will not come into the church, let alone become a communicant. But the power of his love and soul is transcendant. What should we make of him? Is he just doing his thing, or is he truly blessed?
When the fisher of men casts his nets, there is no guarantee of what he will drag aboard into his fragile boat. It is with abiding faith that the fisherman believes that he will not be swamped or devoured by an unintended serpent of evil. Call that naivite, if your will; we Christians call it faith.
But if you have no faith in your fellow, what is there? And, if your faith in your fellow is dependent entirely upon your own cleverness, does that not mean you consider yourself the smartess person around?
Angel #81
You busted me. I’ve been lying in wait for LaShawn to return so I can “knock†her over a daydream. I guess I should be banned. Is that what you would like?
Angel – no, not at all! I didn’t mean it that way.
From your comments in #55 (”…people have taken what should be a light discussion and turned it into such a…brawl”) and #64 (”Somehow expressing a different opinion is making me a bad person or something.”) I got the impression that you felt some were over-reacting to your comments. I was just pointing out that in post #3 you may not have intended it, but your comments could have been interpreted as somewhat critical and judgmental and started the exchange down a more – confrontational? – path.
Just an observation; not intended as an attack.
Redbeard,
Just to clarify. Not once have I advocated my non-belief. I’m not a cheerleades for it. If some want to see it as some flaw, so be it. It’s not based on fear. It’s based on the facts that I have and as I understand them.
I recognize the power of faith. I understand the value of charity. I wake up every day with hope.
I’m not sitting here telling anyone what to believe. But, a few people have told me what I should believe. One commenter even asked why I visit this blog (”Why do you come to this obviously Christian blog?”)
Is that what is required for admission? Is that why the concept of a Christians-only world is appealing to people? Just complete agreement and harmony? That is not reality. Neither is an agnostics-only world. Either would be torture to me. I like debate. Sometimes, I even like a good fight. That is what appeals to me.
I’m writing a script right now about a family that is trying to stay together in the face of overwhelming odds. What would be a better story? One in which that family faces no problems, no conflict, no struggle. Or, one in which they face their problems, struggle and overcome them?
I don’t appreciate your going on hiatus.
I need you here at least every few days posting thought provoking blogs. Next time please clear your calendar w/me!
Glad to read you’re back. You make blogs worth reading. And you missed a Duke LAX lawyers passing.
B-squared,
It doesn’t really matter. The blood was in the water from the first keystroke. You cannot say anything the least bit critical about Christianity as it is practiced by some today.
Almost all of the “haters” express a persecution complex. One even presented a scenario of being accosted for walking down the street with a Bible!
Where has that happened in this country? I don’t recall the news item.
The fact is the majority of the people in this country practice a religion of some kind. A minority does not. Religion, like politics, is interesting, but holds no sway in my life one way or the other.
Welcome Back as I have missed you. My Daily reads just weren’t complete without you. What a great world awaits us when we leave this world.
I have had the same longing for a Christian existence where we are free to act ourselves with the fear of haters attacking us.
But, nothing really makes us obey or fear the haters around us. We don’t have to obey them. We could just speak and act as we choose no matter how angry they get and we could defend one another from attackers no matter what. There are a lot of “us” and few of “them” if we all were committed to just acting and speaking as Christians and supporting and defending one another.
Great to have you back. Keep dreaming. Keep writing. Keep being yourself.
#96-”Religion, like politics, is interesting, but holds no sway in my life one way or the other.”
I guess that a person on fire falling from a building does not have the same perspective as those observing elsewhere, but don’t let your name go to your head.
#94-”Not once have I advocated my non-belief.”
That is really funny. Really!
RaLph,
I guess the “L” is for Laughriot. You’re killing me!
But, I guess stating your agnosticism is advocating it. I’m beginning to think no one reads anyone of my posts. I think folks scan for “hot words”, then reacts. If some of those who have chosen to attack me would really read what I’ve posted…what am I saying? That’s never going to happen. just the fact that I’m agnostic is enough to rip me to shreds.
LaShawn,
I enjoyed your article and agree 100% and knowing it was just fantasy is fine. People get so sensitive but being a Christian myself and learning that this is the way life will be and knowing that just as such words leave my mouth there will be those who look for reasons to shatter and smash God’s word and direction. People will accept evil fantasy but the thought of someone wanting to write Christian fantasy well, you’d think someone just committed the ultimate sin, which is basically the way the world is in the present time. Nice job LaShawn!
Randy
I am just picking on you. Sorry. I do think that most of our comments are funny once pondered for a while.
By the time that I saw La Shawn’s blog on this topic there were already 58 comments. I started reading the comments and refreshed my browser and the count was jumping faster than I can read, comprehend and analyze.
RaLph (Ra is for Rachel, L is for Laura, ph is for Joseph)
Regarding the gated community topic, my house is my gated community. If I need to be unplugged from the world, I unplug the phone, tv and computer.
In most cases people who live in gated communities are living with their own kind. The more expensive the neighborhood, the more that I find unity within the community and a higher quality of life that is not based on things/stuff/objects.
La Shawn,
Your post reminded me that my home is supposed to be the “gated community” where the Lord Jesus reigns. I recently discussed (okay, preached) Galatians 5:13 with my children, and exhorted them to “by love serve one another.” When “outsiders” enter our gates, I want them to see how lovely it can be within the gates. And when I daily leave the gates to go out into the community, I want to bring some of that same love, joy, peace, etc. with me.
Thanks, and God bless you.
Welcome back, La Shawn! Maybe we’ll grab a cup of coffee in the Kingdom and laugh about the old blogging days. I’m very much looking forward to Heaven also.
Missed ya much, LaShawn. Glad to see you’re back! Had me worried yesterday when your blog “couldn’t be found.” Whew, that was a close one!
Actually, it is happening. Go to http://www.avemaria.com. Tom Monaghan, founder of Domino’s Pizza is building it down in Florida.
Here’s an article link in Newsweek that covers the controversy.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11434439/site/newsweek/
Also look him up on Wikipedia to see a life of wealth and privilege devoted to religion.
Lashawn,
Your fantasy is awesome! That would be wonderful if this world really knew the Lord for who he is. What a wonderful place it would be!
But like your sister said– heaven is exactly like your fantasy. Everyone is on one accord with worshipping the King of kings and Lord of lords!
I wouldn’t want a lock on the gate, and I couldn’t imagine living in a place without any Jews, not to mention Buddhists, or the Hundus that I buy groceries from – but living among respectful people who are humble before God, that would be Heaven.
Thank you Mark, for your comment. The part in LaShawn’s fantasy about there being no admittance for non believers had me imagining “No Jews Allowed” signs. Ugh. But I’m not sure what she meant — unbelievers in Jesus or unbelievers in G-d? Big difference there, for some of us anyway.
I liked 10KM’s comment too. “Unbelievers” might just be good people who don’t believe yet.
I am posting before I read all the comments because I dont want my immediate reaction waterdowned.
Yes, LaShawn, I agree with you and welcome back. There are times whent the evil of this world gets me down, when I get tired of trying to live a good Christian life when I spend the entire day rubbing elbows with those who either are totally clueless, or worse are doing the devil’s work of baiting so they can then point to my human flaws and weakness and tell me I am a hypocrit because I sin.
Every now and then I would love to just curl up in the love of God and not worry about those around me. There are times when I look at the world, a news story, or just the way some people behave and think that doing the work of the Lord is just overwhelming.
But the awesomeness of my Lord overcomes me and I realize that with God’s help, and only with God’s help I can put that one foot in front of the other and once again work on whatever my mission or purpose is.
Now I have read the posts, and I am so comforted by the comments from so many wonderful Christians while at the same time having the exact premise of LaShawns post re-enforced.
Praise God that there are those here who are so willing and able to do the Lord’s work.
“If only the athiests and agnostics were clever enough to read Cervante’s Don Quixote and understand what “tilting at windmills†really means. But, no, they would far rather skip the hard work and just be critics.”
Painting so, with the very broadest brush, is surely an art best reserved for those who find more joy in being a critic than in honest appraisal or investigation?
Comments on this entry are closed.