From the monthly archives:

April 2007

Last year I blogged about Muslims in Baltimore County, Maryland, demanding that Muslim holidays be added to the government school calendar.

Last week, school board members refused the request. From the article:

Baltimore County public school officials have said that adding Muslim holidays to the school calendars is unlawful and “irresponsible,” marking another setback in attempts across the region to add the holidays…School officials, however, stood firm by a state law that disallows public schools from endorsing any religion, saying the school calendar can include scheduled closures only for holidays that cause low attendance rates countywide.

The anti-discrimination committee has pushed its request for the past several years, calling it an issue of equality because schools recognize Jewish and Christian holidays.

So it isn’t a matter of discriminating against Muslims. If followers of Allah become a large enough majority that schools are half-empty during Muslim holidays, the state may choose to close schools. Is it all about…economics?

Being the very opinionated person I am, my view (that the religion of Islam is incompatible with the West) is on the record . What’s yours?

Related posts:

{ 47 comments }

Hardcore Harry Potter

by La Shawn on April 27, 2007

in Pop Culture

Tom RiddleNeed a break from the political back and forth? Click over to this site

…but only if you’re a hardcore Harry Potter fan.

(I know what you’re thinking. Get your mind out of the gutter!)

Update (4/30): Want to learn how to unlock Harry Potter, understand what J.K. Rowling is trying to accomplish, and figure out what must happen in Deathly Hallows? Follow the link.

Hate E-mail and Hate Crimes

by La Shawn on April 27, 2007

in Cultural Decline, Faith, Lunacy

Monday, April 30: Homosexuals, Hate, and the Gospel

By the way, there is no epidemic or rash of “hate” crimes being committed against homosexuals or sexually confused people or blacks (by whites). However, there is an epidemic that deserves more attention, as noted by an e-mailer:

“The single biggest reason that hate-crime legislation leaves me cold? I live just outside Philadelphia, Pa. So far, there’ve been 137 murders, a 20% increase so far over last year’s total of 406. The vast majority have been black on black, mostly male on male. Who hates whom?”

And let’s not forget hispanic-on-black “hate” out in CA.

ahole

Producer-Hate

Earlier this month, a producer at a cable news network sent me an innocuous “Aren’t you going to comment on Don Imus?” e-mail, which I’d intended to ignore. Later that day, I got an e-mail from someone from a Yahoo! account with the same name. It was in CAPS, including the subject line.

He called me an a**hole and a self-hater because I criticized Deval Patrick, governor of Massachusetts, for promising to repeal a 1913 law that prohibits out-of-state couples from marrying in Massachusetts if the marriage would be illegal in their home state, so that homosexuals could “marry” in his state. Then-governor Mitt Romney refused to repeal the law because he knew it was practically the only thing preventing Massachusetts from becoming the “Las Vegas for same-sex marriage.”

I e-mailed the dude at his work (twice) and Yahoo! accounts, trying to figure out what was going on. I received no reply from either account.

[click to continue…]

{ 102 comments }

Newspapers Agonize Over Allowing Comments

by La Shawn on April 26, 2007

in Media Bias

*** Scroll down for updates ***

I never thought I’d see the day when newspapers would be agonizing over whether to allow readers to comment on stories. An excerpt:

Faced with declining circulation, many U.S. newspapers are trying to engage readers by allowing them to respond to news stories online. But the anonymity of the Internet lets readers post obscenities and racist hate speech that would never be allowed in the printed paper.

First, how does allowing comments on stories posted online help with print circulation? With a few exceptions, newspaper web sites allow free access to all stories (though they may require free registration). I don’t see the connection. Regarding online ad revenue, I don’t think allowing comments on stories necessarily increases online newspaper readership. Some of the highest trafficked bloggers I know don’t allow comments. It’s the perceived value of the information, in my opinion, not what readers have to say about it, that brings the eyes.

Second, I’m not too quick to trust a leftist journalist’s judgment about what is or isn’t “racist hate speech.” Sometimes, telling the truth about a person or situation is construed as hateful. Expressing an opinion that may offend liberal sensibilities or challenge his worldview might be called racist.

Third, while I get a kick out of reading feedback on some stories, I don’t think newspapers should waste time worrying about whether to allow it. Like this guy:

[click to continue…]

{ 76 comments }

US Supreme CourtI’m pleased to announce the kickoff of the “Super Tuesday of Equality” campaign.

Ward Connerly, Chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute, is the man behind the anti-race preferences in government momentum. Campaigns kicked off this week in Colorado, Missouri, and Arizona.

The campaigns are a push to place initiatives on the November 4, 2008, ballot against skin color preferences. Connerly and company have already encouraged three states to pay more than lip service to equality and ban government-mandated race and sex preferences in government hiring and admissions.

Californians passed Proposition 209 by 54 percent in 1996, and the state of Washington passed I-200 with 58.3 percent of the vote in 1998. The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, which appeared on the November 7, 2006, ballot as Proposal 2 after facing challenges by several groups, passed with 58 percent of the vote. (Also see An Affirmative Action Lesson for Mary Sue Coleman)

Michigan voters have spoken, but groups continue to challenge the will of the people and fight for skin color preferences for a certain race.

[click to continue…]

Speak No Truth

by La Shawn on April 24, 2007

in Conservatives

The thing I like best about being a conservative is that I don’t have to lie.

So begins a straight-forward commentary “The Big White Lie,” by a novelist named Andrew Klavan. A conservative born in New York and currently living in California, Klavan discusses truth, the idea of calling a thing by its name, and liberalism’s aversion to it.

Over the years, truth telling has become something “polite” people don’t do in public. By way of example, Klavan begins:

The thing I like best about being a conservative is that I don’t have to lie. I don’t have to pretend that men and women are the same. I don’t have to declare that failed or oppressive cultures are as good as mine. I don’t have to say that everyone’s special or that the rich cause poverty or that all religions are a path to God. I don’t have to claim that a bad writer like Alice Walker is a good one or that a good writer like Toni Morrison is a great one. I don’t have to pretend that Islam means peace.

First, I’m glad Klavan recognized Toni Morrison as a superior writer to Alice “The Color Purple” Walker. I’ve always thought so, though Walker is probably more well known. As the author of one of my favorite books of all time, Song of Solomon, Morrison studied, understands, and appreciates the works of good writers, regardless of race. Her style has been compared to William Faulkner’s, one of America’s great southern writers.

With a decreasing emphasis on studying the Western canon, too many people have lost the ability to understand what is good and what is crap. With politically correct pabulum flowing through the streets like raw sewage, we’re knee-deep in crap, and people from the highest office to the lowest rung are afraid to call it crap.

speech.jpgBut I digress. As Klavan acknowledges, it is politically incorrect to tell the truth. To call abortion murder is to be an extremist who wants to send women back to the Victorian era. Personal responsibility, accountability, and a desire to speak out for and protect the unborn limit a woman’s “rights,” I guess. For anyone to say that out-of-control black crime and illegitimacy rates are destroying the black community and that the responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of those committing the crimes and having babies by different men is to be self-hating if you’re black and a racist if you’re white.

[click to continue…]

{ 101 comments }

‘Intact’ Infanticide

by La Shawn on April 23, 2007

in Child Killing, Columns

In 1996, registered nurse Brenda Pratt Shafer told the House Subcommittee on the Constitution about a partial birth abortion she’d witnessed.

A woman was six months pregnant with a baby diagnosed with Down Syndrome. She chose death for the child. Shafer testified that she saw the baby’s beating heart on the ultrasound monitor. The so-called doctor pulled the baby into the birth canal with forceps, partially delivering his body while leaving the head inside.

“The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks that he might fall …The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp. I was really completely unprepared for what I was seeing. I almost threw up as I watched the doctor do these things.”

Continue reading “Supreme Court Says No to ‘Intact’ Infanticide.”

Previous post: Supreme Court Upholds Ban On Partial Birth Abortion

How Many Books Do You Own?

by La Shawn on April 21, 2007

in General

Song of SolomonThrough the years, I’ve accumulated over 500 books (not counting Bibles), presently squeezed onto two five-shelf bookcases, one three-shelf bookcase, four small tables, and a desk.

A few of my favorites:

  • Song of Solomon, by Toni Morrison
  • Harry Potter series (Books 1-6), by J.K. Rowling
  • The Complete Works of Shakespeare, edited by Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor
  • Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950, by Charles Murray
  • The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, by Francis S. Collins
  • A Meaningful World: How the Arts and Sciences Reveal the Genius of Nature, by Benjamin Wiker and Jonathan Witt
  • The Renegade Writer: The Totally Unconventional Guide to Freelance Writing Success, by Linda Formichelli and Diana Burrell

How many books do you own?

{ 79 comments }

Urban: The Race Preference Loophole

by La Shawn on April 20, 2007

in Race Preferences

Some schools are taking pre-emptive action against Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations and private citizen lawsuits by removing blatantly illegal, racially exclusive language from scholarships and replacing it with the new descriptor, “urban.”

Urban, of course, is code for “black.” Northeastern University has opened its Ujima Scholars program to all students, but with a catch. The program will target students from an “urban background.” (Source)

Questions like, “If Northeastern is already predominately a White university, why should the Ujima programs be used for White students?” uttered by Lula Petty-Edwards, director of the school’s African American Institute, are totally irrelevant to the illegality of racially exclusive scholarships.

Northeastern, a private research university, receives federal (taxpayer-funded) grants. That brings it within the purview of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (”No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”) In that regard, the school also may want to remove racially exclusive language from other scholarships and fellowships.

[click to continue…]

The Black Republican

by La Shawn on April 19, 2007

in Conservatives

br_mag.jpg

The National Black Republican Association reprinted two of my op-eds in the current issue of its magazine, The Black Republican. Click on the image to download a PDF copy.

Read the whole thing. If you want to cut to the chase, check out pages 33 (37 in the PDF) and 49 (53 in the PDF) for my pieces. Notice that I included “self-described independent conservative” in the tagline. I wanted readers to know that I am not a Republican nor a member of any political party. With the exception of belonging to a church, I break out in hives at the thought of joining groups.

Must be some unresolved childhood issue. :?

Unrelated Update (4/20): A stripper quoted me in an op-ed she wrote for an alternative newspaper in Colorado. The topic? The Duke case.

murdermurder

Radical feminists and other blood-thirsty infanticide supporters must be crying in their collective beer right about now. Here’s a PDF copy of the opinion. Read more here.

(If you’re neither a radical feminist nor blood-thirsty, you shouldn’t be offended by the characterization.)

For the ignorant, a so-called partial birth abortion is a procedure in which a woman allows a “doctor” to pull her baby down the birth canal, delivering him partially to avoid murder charges (he’s considered a person in utero only if he’s “wanted,” you see), and inserting a probe or scissors into his skull, killing him. You’ve come a long way, baby!

More from me on this later…

Update: See “Intact” Infanticide.

Other bloggers: SCOTUS blog, Wizbang, Prolife Blogs (gruesome photo warning), California Conservative, Global Review, Blue Crab Boulevard, Captain Ed, “Okie” On The Lam

Related posts:

{ 80 comments }

Physical and Intellectual Disarmament

by La Shawn on April 18, 2007

in Education, Lunacy

glock_2.jpgThe post on the Virginia Tech rampage drew thousands of visitors from Canada and the UK and a few from Australia yesterday, thanks to Google listing my blog among two others for searches on “Virginia Tech.”

Some of those visitors expressed condolences, while others used the tragedy as an opportunity to rant about gun ownership and possession in the U.S. and how banning guns would solve the problem of violent crime. Not only is that untrue, but it sounds downright un-American to me, no offense to the foreigners.

I just don’t understand that kind of thinking. Like locks on doors, gun control works for honest, law-abiding people. Just ask D.C. residents. But the nature of a criminal is to commit crimes, that is, break laws, and laws against possessing and owning guns will prevent honest and law-abiding people from possessing and owning guns, not criminals. The logic is so simple a child can follow it. What’s wrong with so-called adults?

I don’t need fancy studies and statistics to tell me that gun-toting thugs would think twice about mugging or attacking someone if they believe the person might be armed. In a state with concealed carry laws, the chances probably are greater that a random person might be packing.

[click to continue…]

{ 158 comments }

Virginia Tech Rampage

by La Shawn on April 17, 2007

in General

students reactWhat causes people to go on murderous rampages? Sexual jealousy, revenge, a lust for terrorizing, psychosis — God only knows the depth of depravity in the human soul.

The murders of 30+ innocents at Virginia Tech (more here) yesterday put the Duke case in perspective, didn’t it? The families of the formerly indicted three still have their sons with them. They are alive, free to get on with their lives, to create and do some good in the world. Neither the families of the murdered people at Virginia Tech nor the victims themselves have that luxury.

I can’t imagine what it’s like to watch the news and wonder if my loved one is among the casualties. My family when through that twice since I moved to D.C. Back in 1998, during my first week of working on Capitol Hill (Senate), a crazed fool named Russell Weston killed two Capitol Hill police officers in the Capitol, closer to the House side than the Senate building I worked in. The news reported that an unidentified woman had also been shot. My poor mother didn’t remember that I was on the Senate side or realize the Senate and House sides are some miles apart.

Then on September 11, 2001, she heard that the Pentagon had been attacked and the rumor that various government buildings were targets. (I was working for the feds.) She couldn’t get through to me because of jammed phone lines, and I couldn’t get through to her. She didn’t have an e-mail account, and I didn’t think to try to e-mail someone she may have known with an account.

shootings at VA Tech

I’m stunned about what happened at Virginia Tech. I want to say something profound or moving or helpful, but I just don’t have the words. If you have a first-hand account of what happened or just want to comment on it all, feel free.

[click to continue…]

{ 179 comments }

Every One His Due

by La Shawn on April 16, 2007

in Columns, Duke Rape Case, Justice

The Duke case is over for me, in a sense. I’ll update you on Mike Nifong’s legal woes now and then. But for the most part, the case turned out the way I wanted it to.

Did you catch the former players and the NC attorney general on “60 Minutes” yesterday? I was hoping the formerly indicted men wouldn’t be bitter and would continue to behave like gentlemen, and they didn’t disappoint. They talked about how emotionally draining it was to live under indictment for heinous crimes, facing prison and knowing they hadn’t done anything to that woman.

As for her, sister needs serious help. If she doesn’t care enough to get it for herself, perhaps she’ll do it for her three children. I’ll keep them in my prayers.

There are blogs out there dedicated to the case, so check them frequently if you want to follow developments. The Johnsville News rounds up most Duke case-related articles and blog posts. LieStoppers is a group effort (with at least one attorney), with news links and commentary. Crystal Mess is run by an attorney, and John in Carolina frequently covers the media’s role in this mess.

KC Johnson, a Brooklyn College professor, started blogging the case because of the unbelievably inappropriate behavior of pampered Duke professors, screeching about the white male patriarchy and signing on to a “listening” statement filled with anonymous and third-hand quotes from black students. He’s gone on to write articles and consult for ABC, and he’s working on a book. He’s attended several hearings in person, live-blogging the proceedings. His Durham-in-Wonderland is the top go-to blog on the Duke case. Bookmark or subscribe to all the Duke blogs if you need a daily fix.

Read my latest Duke case column at Townhall, “Every One His Due,” where I castigate the castigators. An excerpt:

It was like an episode of “Law & Order.”

Three, drunken, rowdy, privileged, elitist, indulged, slur-slinging lacrosse-playing white men accused of beating, strangling, raping (vaginally and orally), and sodomizing a poor, oppressed black woman forced to take off her clothes for strange men in order to feed her children, while the lacrosse team erected a “blue wall of silence,” barricading themselves within the old-boy protection of the moneyed white male patriarchy – no writer could have penned a more gripping drama.

Also see Star Parker’s “Getting perspective on Imus and Duke.”

Addendum: Read how DA Mike Nifong set about lying and downplaying the lack of DNA evidence, while forging ahead with the case and pandering to blacks at North Carolina Central University, a black college the accuser attended.

Don Imus, Booker T., and XM Radio

by La Shawn on April 13, 2007

in BC Wisdom, Faith

Update II (4/20): Last Friday, I participated on a panel organized and sponsored by the Booker T. Washington Society. Ron Court and Reggie Jones started the organization last year to commemorate the 150th birthday of Booker T. Washington, former slave, educator, public speaker, and writer.

The Booker T. Washington Society is committed to educating students about Washington and providing high school students with $1000 college scholarships. The Society also treats scholarship recipients to a few days in the Washington D.C., area to see historic sites and attend workshops, where they hear from black entrepreneurs and others. Last year, the panel I participated on focused on economics. This year, the group was smaller and the panel discussion was more intimate.

More importantly, all the panelists — me, Rev. Jesse Peterson, and Reggie Jones — are Christians. Court, who was moderating, is a Christian, too. Rather than beginning the discussion with Hurricane Katrina (the students were from New Orleans), each of us shared our personal testimonies and our ascent from the abyss, so to speak. Two of us currently own businesses, and one used to own a business. Jesse Peterson, who built a janitorial service from nothing, sold it and started an organization called Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND). The motto is “Rebuilding the family by rebuilding the man.”

Peterson operates a home for mostly black boys, where they must work to earn their keep and learn how to be responsible, decent men. Most of the boys, like many black children in this country, are not being raised by their fathers. Often vilified by ignorant blacks who can’t tolerate another black person who doesn’t blame whites for problems, Peterson truly cares about blacks, unlike so-called leaders in the professional civil rights industry.

Back to faith. The focus of the panel discussion was personal stories of faith and how that faith gave us the courage to clean up our lives and reach for our dreams. Afterward, I was pleasantly surprised that so many people thanked me for sharing my testimony. Unless otherwise indicated, I always assume most people in a group are not Christians. My assumption was wrong this time. :)

The group, which included students, a few teachers and parents, wanted suggestions on what to do about rising crime rates in New Orleans and how to reach black boys growing up without fathers. Peterson gave some “tough love” advice about helping boys to confront and forgive their absent fathers, to stop considering themselves victims of white racism, and to take responsibility for their children and for themselves as men. He also said they should stop listening to civil rights charlatans, who are in the business of keeping blacks angry.

Again, last year’s discussion centered around economic issues. This year, it was faith based. Economics won’t save these lost boys. Only Christ can do that, and it was a wonderful experience being surrounded by people who feel exactly the way I do.

Read about the changed life of a man who lived in Peterson’s group home as a teen.
———————————————————————————————————————–
Don Imus

To all the people who keep e-mailing me about Don Imus, STOP. To those who intend to, DON’T.

Here’s my obligatory statement: I’m embarrassed by the way some blacks have reacted to Imus’s remarks and thoroughly disgusted by their white enablers. As a multiracial society, America is rife with double standards. There’s one standard of acceptable behavior for whites, and another, much lower standard of acceptable behavior for blacks (of all socioeconomic classes). It’s shameful. Everybody knows it, but few will publicly admit it.

If black Americans in 2007 are this delicate and overreact to the slightest insults with this much unrighteous indignation, it’s pretty safe to say black people are not made the way they used to be, of stronger stuff, able to withstand truly demeaning and criminal treatment at the hands of true oppressors. It’s sad to know that the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of people who faced actual oppression are so much weaker, much less discerning, and much more undignified.

People like Jason Whitlock and John McWhorter and Michelle Malkin have expressed my own sentiments about the matter very well. I won’t be posting anything else about this subject, and there will be no discussions on this blog about it. If I decide to cover it in an op-ed, I’ll link to it. Moving on…

[Update 2:47 p.m.: This dumb Imus discussion has gone on for what...over a week? I've stayed out of it until this morning, adding my obligatory statement to the fray in the hopes that people will leave me alone about it...and Slate picks up the statement. "Power of the blogs," I guess.]

[click to continue…]